It's patently absurd to declare that without robbing the childless to give out free money, that nobody will have kids.
Natalist economics is unsustainable and doesn't work anyway. It's fueled by spite for the childless more than any real goal - I fail to see how anyone who sees the current legal system around marriage and children thinks a man would sign up for a few hundred bucks off his taxes. The losses are limitless.
Okay, so I'm hearing, let them have kids, but you basically oppose any state regulations of it. Do you have equally detailed plans for societal handling of child abuse then?
Are you looking for the world population to decline to zero, or are you looking for reproduction to happen in some way that you approve (and what)?
It's patently absurd to declare that without robbing the childless to give out free money, that nobody will have kids.
Natalist economics is unsustainable and doesn't work anyway. It's fueled by spite for the childless more than any real goal - I fail to see how anyone who sees the current legal system around marriage and children thinks a man would sign up for a few hundred bucks off his taxes. The losses are limitless.
Okay, so I'm hearing, let them have kids, but you basically oppose any state regulations of it. Do you have equally detailed plans for societal handling of child abuse then?
I agree that "Married Filing Jointly" is a scam.