Schneerson
Lol
Getting retards to call everything a.i. has to have been the real psy-op all along, it’s worked so ridiculously well.
Regarding this video, the claim seems to be equally schitzo and baseless
It’s funny how you flit between “the science on the rocks under our feet can’t be trusted!” and “let’s spin our wheels on black holes!”
I don’t want to start doing the thing where I have to copy and paste each sentence and respond to it with a one liner, so hopefully at some point in the next couple weeks you just give the actual texts an honest chance, holding back your judgements as much as humanly possible until you’re done reading, and then you’ll surely be inspired to write something from the standpoint of outreach and understanding rather than sterile “debunking”. For example your tact here:
I read the summaries I quoted. The "harvest" theory says clearly if you don't choose then you can stay in your "third density" reincarnating indefinitely.
In no place does the concept of “indefinitely” appear in the actual text.
Looking forward to that life-affirming, non-sterile approach
Thanks for admitting your own bias.
In as much as cognizance of history instills bias, okay, I guess. I mean, it’d be foolish to pretend “Holy Wars”, “martyrdom”, and “Sicarii” are modern inventions.
My point is that I'd rather partake whole meals than extricate what is negligible from a raft of poison that has killed others. See what you think of my initial statement.
Ironic considering the abrahamic faiths have caused literally billions of deaths, many of innocents and particularly of gnostics. Your initial statement strikes me much the same as every other time I’ve shared these links and you respond to what they think they say (filtered through your lifetime of cognitive biases) instead of what they actually say, after you briefly skim the summaries that i tell you to skip.
Invention of "densities" and of billions of years is gnostic: irrational appeal to gnosis that may be true or false.
Bro, you don’t get the call the scientific consensus “irrational” nor an “appeal to gnosis”. Your young earth creationism is far more of an “appeal to secret knowledge”, considering all the holes in the story.
Claims of "trying" to speak in Egypt "with mixed results" also cast doubt, indicating the speaker's professed inabilities.
It’s called “free will of choice” bro, unless you look at Jesus on the cross and think to yourself “golly, that guy sure was inept! He couldn’t even convince those jews to pick his life over the life of a convicted murderer and thief!”
Christianity teaches unity in diversity, not unity free from polarity.
What is the polarity of Light again? Oh…non-polar you say? And all the matter in the universe is made of slowly vibrating light? Wow, you don’t say…
You give a big list of what “Christianity teaches” in an attempt to contrast it with the linked sources - I’d suggest you take a step back and understand those are simply lessons you’ve learned from other people.
Your points clearly indicate you didn’t read the links either. For example you say:
Denial of a day of judgment
Uhhh, buddy, are we reading the same thing? The Capital H “Harvest” is one of the key points of the text. So it explains your little “Day of Judgement” far more wholistically than even you can, yet you frame it as “denial”. Odd…
Based Simpsons reference!
You’re the one setting the table, remember
I will admittedly be approaching this subject with a bias. Anything that expressly comes from channeling or a self-proclaimed world-controller is suspect from the start because it only stands or falls on its accuracy and not on claims of its power due to its allegedly extraordinary source.
Fair enough, that’s practically expected given the sources - I’d be surprised if anyone’s first reaction was something other than “channeling/illuminati? that sounds wetarded!” Or “im supposed to believe an ”evil person” is telling the truth?”. The whole reason I suggest the people here skip the summaries and just read the actual texts is so that they can augment their first reaction with their second, third, fourth, and so-on reactions. You of all people will know how easy it is to take one or two sentences of a work out of context to twist them into anything imaginable, im sure, as a mod of c/Christianity
My bias is likely to conclude that the material is composed essentially of a mix of trivialities and lies. … I'm still not likely to give something self-identifying as "Ra" material a totally equal place at the table yet.
Im just saying, wait until you’ve read as much as you can physically manage before setting that table! lol - something something angels unawares something something
Hah, glad this squeaked past the line at the last minute. Like I said in the nomination thread, the “framework of existence” that these two “writings” (for lack of a better word, lol) present is the most wholistic, coherent, understandable “framework” I’ve ever come across. They deepened my understanding and appreciation of the Bible, but also…everything else. Art. Strife. “Spirituality”. Struggle. Love. Literally existence itself and all that encompasses is enriched, imo, if you really give these links a shot
They’re long reads! I admit it! But they're worth it. The Hidden Hand link offers two shorter “summary” versions, but I recommend skipping them and just reading the thread as it is, warts and all (it was, after all, basically an AMA between an illuminati member and r/Conspiracy lmao). And it looks a lot longer than it really is, since the format of a forum back and forth has a lot of extraneous text. Regarding the Ra Material/Law of One, just read as far as you can manage, I don’t expect anyone to read every word on that website lol, but atleast the first 20 or so “sessions” should start to give you an idea of that “framework” i was talking about.
Im a big believer in the idea that synchronicities are how God/the universal consciousness communicates with us temporally bound critters
These two reads gave me a far deeper appreciation for, and understanding of, the Bible than I had before - while also provoking me to look deeper into it, especially the “hard to understand” parts.
Edit) also, yeah, that was a good idea to make these last longer. Especially in this case, both are relatively long reads, so even people who want to contribute will take a while to, probably.
The worldview expressed in the Law of One/“Ra Material” and the Hidden Hand interview
https://www.wanttoknow.info/secret_societies/hidden_hand_081018
The way I see things, these two sources explain existence, the state of our world, and the meaning of life far more accurately than any other. One is a “channeled” work, and the other is a long series of Questions and Answers between a conspiracy forum (RiP ATS) and a self-proclaimed world-controller. I see them as complimentary, showing a deeper reality by showing two sides of the same coin. One side being that of Service-to-Others, and the other being Service-to-Self
Now I could uncharitably adopt your view that all Jews believe hateful things about Jesus
I didn’t even say that. I said their religion is a rejection of Jesus.
For a significant segment it may be the most consulted book, which is a travesty
Glad we can agree on that. I’d even say that “significant segment” is synonymous with “religious jewry”. I don’t see anyone representing “Judaism” who actually places the Torah above the Talmud. Have you ever? (To turn your rhetorical “get out of jail free card” against yourself.)
The "Oral Torah" is not the Talmud because the Talmud is written
You can’t trick me with pilpul you dirty gypsy. When a jew refers to “oral Torah” hes a fucking ignorant lier, because nothing about it is passed down orally, and that’s been the case since 500ad. It’s all written in their stupid fucking book.
Well, Talmudic Semites uphold every letter of the OT
Don’t make me start calling you a lying kike bro, I don’t enjoy it.
https://communities.win/c/Christianity/p/1ARdRJJMpF/an-orthodox-jew-and-a-messianic-/c/4eZBKaQDGuf
“The Torah (OT) is nothing without the Talmud”
And just to pre-empt you, here it is straight from the rabbis mouth
"the written Torah 1:16 without the oral Torah we cannot do 1:18 anything"
>To the degree that Talmudism rejects the Torah Judaism of Messianics
That “degree” is 100%. Fuck off with that same old diatribe. The monolithic rejection is their holy book saying (in a dozen places and contexts no less) hes an idolatrous sorcerer burning in hell for his sins.
Inb4”itsNOTtheirHolyBook”
Yes it is bitch.
Edit) can’t let this go unreplied to:
> They are still pre-Christian, unlike most other nations being evangelized.
What a load of horse shit. If anything, they’re one of the few “post-Christian” religions/societies on earth. They literally re-formed themselves in opposition to Christianity
That isn’t even what I’m saying. Im saying the people called “jews” today have no spiritual connection to the “jews” of the Bible. Or atleast, a less than or equal to connection compared with the Muslims of today.
The people you call jews are more accurately called Talmudists.
Talmudism was a rejection of true Judaism.
Thus they are rejected by their Father. According to your own logic.
Not at all. "Children of Abraham" always had the dual meaning. If it hadn't, then Ishmaelites and Midianites would be children of Abraham in every sense, but they were not accounted as his children because they didn't have the faith of Abraham. If you don't do what your father does, everyone knew your father dismisses you as a child.
Jesus said the Jews aren’t “children of Abraham” anymore.
You keep saying this, but it's you that are adding to the text and twisting the words.
Hypocrite. If Muslims aren’t children of Abraham today then neither are jews.
Hypernormalization is great. Made by a documentarian named Adam Curtis
I also recommend his
Bitter Lake - about the last 100 or so years of Western meddling in the Middle East and the lies we’ve been told/told ourselves along the way
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1pn2z7zp1V0
All Watched Over By Machines of Loving Grace - about the way computers and technology and our reliance on them has been sold to us as making us more “free”, while in reality it has imprisoned us in many ways
https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDCEA4A968815D711
The Living Dead - about how collective memory is manipulated and conformed to the narratives chosen by the powerful, even things like the facts of a man’s life
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=luI-ecZ0AQM
The Power of Nightmares - about the early days of advertising and all the psychological manipulations and propagandizing which that field entails, focusing on Bernays/Freud and other highly influential people/movements
It looks like this channel has a lot of his stuff, including the power of nightmares:
Look up stellar parallax mushbrain
The stars we see in space are millions of light years away.
That means, unless you’re retarded, the light you’re seeing is millions of years old.
That means the universe is millions of years old.
Period. End of topic. Until you revolutionize particle physics that’s how it’s gunna stay
Lmfao
I don’t think you get to invoke BBT inflation when that’s something which explicitly occurs during the first few microseconds of existence, LONG before any stars form. And if the stretching out occurred after the stars formed, that would be observed as redshift (it isn’t, at least, not the type you describe, of a one-time stretching event)
And you don’t need to tell me about this stuff. I was posting about “fundamental constants” not necessarily being all that constant years ago. You would give those posts shit because you don’t like Rupert Sheldrake lmao. But you writing some sentence of bullshit on the internet doesn’t account for tens of thousands of professionals and experts who operate in these domains every day who would say your views are next to unfounded.
Anyway, my point is not to get into a debate about any given one of these subjects. My point is you need to deal with “the consensus” with a little more respect than the flippancy of the we wuzzers. Take some lessons from sheldrake:
Your world view requires, for all intents and purposes, God to be a Liar. Why would God make it look like stars are clearly many millions of light years away? Why would God make it look like c was invariant? And make the CMB look like it’s 13.4 billion light years away? Why would God make the rock layers look like they got deposited slowly over millions of years of slow geologic processes, infrequently punctuated by catastrophic (and relatively rapid) layering events?
Your ideology reeks far too much of “Satan buried dinosaur bones to test our faith!”-esque cope. Especially so to so flippantly dismiss “the establishment perspective”. Grand claims require grand evidence. You’ve yet to overturn the consensus much less propose a coherent alternative. Imo atleast. To balance out your opinion above.
And “we” also “know” that many sedimentary and metamorphic rock formation processes take fucking eons.
Until you can explain:
The speed of light
Radio-isotope decay
Asteroids/meteors/moon rocks consistently being dated to 4.6 billion years old
Cosmic microwave background radiation
And literally a dozen other dating mechanism
You’re gunna need to do a little better than “theyz lyin! We wuz 6,000 year ol kangz n shieeet!”
Cosmology and astronomy provide strong evidence for an older universe, not to mention geology here on Earth
Apparently “influenza” comes from the Italian “influenza della stelle”
Documentary on how the government actually went about seeding mis- and dis-info into the “ufo community”:
Mirage Men
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=awsv66J31S8
Skip to two minutes in, there’s a weird/annoying intro for some reason
That’s literally what their entire religion of talmudism is
See:
Eruvs - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eruv
Sabbath Ovens - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabbath_mode
Shiksas - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiksa
Shabbat Elevators - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shabbat_elevator
And their absolute favorite, Shabbos Goys - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shabbos_goy
Everyberg. Singlestein. Timeowitz.