1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

What kind of mentally ill faggot reads 5 year old reddit comment threads

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

But I didnt see one comment, out of thousands. If someone mentioned it, it was likely downvoted, buried, collapsed.

It is a bit of a lesser known theory, iirc the only place I’ve come across it was in the doc Revelation of the Pyramids, and even there it was only like 5-10 minutes out of 2 hours. That’s before we even consider how astroturfed and manipulated the feed and comments on deaddit are.

Reminds me a bit of the assassins creeds game. Ive only beat 1 and 2, but werent they about aliens creating humans and advanced technologies and stuff?

Yeah, like you say the early games in that series had some of the most captivating mixtures of reality and fiction to create something that both hadn’t been seen before but simultaneously felt like it really could have explained some of the mysteries of the world (or atleast, a similar story). Basically, the First Civilization arose on Earth, genetically engineered humanity in their image, but lacking their “6th sense”

I never heard asimov was a degenatron....that’s a shame

6
Graphenium 6 points ago +6 / -0

Like the antikythera mechanism, which was an “impossible” feat of engineering for Ancient Greece, demonstrating a mastery of astronomy, math, and precision machining considered “not possible” for thousands of years. So they make an Indiana Jones movie about it, call it the dial of destiny and say it was a time machine.

Wonder how they’ll twist the truth of this one?

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Learned all about this freak in the excellent book Going Clear about L Ron Hubbard and the founding of Scientology - Hubbard was good friends with Parsons and they often engaged in sex/blood rituals based on Crowley’s “works”

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s like any great work, there is the surface, and what lies beneath; the thing, and what it represents; the literal reading, and the esoteric reading. I’m pretty sure this goes back to pre-“history”. Not this specific conflict mind you, which is rather recent, but the larger War in which this battlefield is but a proxy

8
Graphenium 8 points ago +8 / -0

Because the entire conflict has been crafted to produce maximum bloodshed for the blood gods

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +3 / -1

“A single post”

You literally undid a different nuke of this faggot by another one of your moderators either yesterday or the day before.

Lmfao

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +3 / -2

That’s certainly the aura he attempts to present. You’d need quite a more intimate knowledge of what happened there over the last few years to pierce that veil and see it isn’t “free speech” which drives his decisions.

Atleast, that’s the conclusion I’ve come to (along with most of the actual, human users over there with attention spans long enough to care).

There’s a reason 95% of posts made there are made by accounts which don’t post comments, and it ain’t about freeing speech, but controlling it

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +4 / -3

It’s because the head mod of ConPro is a subversive faggot who undermines the moderation decisions of those below him. It’s happened multiple times, most often for a specific proven subversive shill named fagsurgent

Isn’t that right u/elvis_interstellar ?

-1
Graphenium -1 points ago +1 / -2

Shakespeare wasn’t even Shakespeare....

And the real Shakespeare also spearheaded the writing of the King James Bible

Give this a read:

https://sirbacon.org/francis-bacon-and-the-kjv-bible/

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://communities.win/c/Meta/p/17s5fbO9MB/troll-spamming-conspiracy-with-p/c/4Z7T34rGbXG

I would send it in a message but that messes up the formatting - in that comment, there is a line between the two “commands”, it should actually just be 3 dashes

Lemme know if that works

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://communities.win/c/Manna/config/filter

You should be able to copy n paste from there to any of your other communities

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’ve been thinking the same shit basically every year since 2012 or whenever that “the disclosure project” thing started gaining momentum. Sometimes I wonder if it’s almost a trap to keep us docile... “worlds ending any day now, why bother organizing/resisting/etc”

Not saying things are one way or another, just that I find myself oscillating on the topic

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sounds a lot like the Hidden Hand interview / Law of One stuff - it’s pretty freaky how many seemingly distinct sources I’m seeing make these similar claims, especially recently

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good points made with this post, easy to get lost or overlooked in the furor of some new /ourguys/?!?!?!?!?!? agit-prop

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +3 / -1

As I see it, there are (more than) a couple options:

  1. the punctuated evolution theory - as part of the 26,000 year precession cycle, human existence is basically a training ground for souls. We incarnate here over and over until we learn some fundamental lessons about existence. To ensure that this classroom never gets too disordered, the board is intermittently wiped clean (roughly every 26,000 years, according to multiple lines of thought like the Yuga calendar, the work of catastrophists like Carlson, Hancock, etc, various esoteric ideologies like the “Law of One”, and many religious systems). This explains the suffering in the world (it’s a challenge to be overcome). The earth is a classroom, our “teachers” exist outside of this classroom in some manner and our goal is (perhaps) to comprehend that and thus progress to eventually join them “outside the class”. In this framework most all of the world’s religions, mystery cults, etc are in aid of passing this information to us in a form we can comprehend.

  2. the cosmic farm theory - we were “planted” here, in order that one day, after our crop grows nice and ripe, we (or our “mental energy”, “loosh”, “vril”, “vital essence”, “souls”, or even the planet’s gold lol, who knows) may be ”harvested”. This too explains the suffering in the world. This might be the most “Godless” universe to live in. One where aliens are unopposed and total in their domination. Religious belief systems in this framework most likely become “tricks” or “traps” (we’ve all probably seen a post on why we “shouldn’t go towards the light” after death, or the “Saturn soul cube” or whatever)

  3. ancient astronaut theory - a bit of column A and a bit of column B. Punctuated global catastrophes present a technological civilization with two options: dig in, or leave. Whatever the catastrophe is - massive solar flares, pole flip leading to temporarily no magnetosphere, asteroid clogging the skies, nuclear winter, basically anything global in scale. According to soyence, “anatomically modern humans” have existed for a minimum of 300,000 years. I think it’s quite likely that at SOME POINT during this 300,000(plus) span of time, with intermittent global catastrophes occurring many, many times, atleast once have we managed to leave the Earth in order to survive. Most likely landing on the Moon. The Moon, which has so many mathematical oddities and myths, and legends of intelligent beings associated with it to make it a story worth exploring in and of itself. So all that is to say: No John, you are the demons

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’ve come to think much the same in terms of the idea of a “common origin” to the different legends / myths / origin stories of the world.

I suppose the most convenient (though perhaps far from the best) means of asking questions on this topic is, how does “the truth of things” (as best you or I or anyone else understands it) differ from the tale as told by those in power, as a means of controlling our perceptions?

A main factor is perhaps the difference in whether or not these entities are seen as “physical”/“corporeal” or “meta-physical”/“spiritual”? The idea that what we have long called “gods” are perhaps more accurately called “homo superius” or perhaps even “non-human beings”? Our modern religions find it sacrilegious to suggest the notion that angels and gods are “mere” aliens, but the more one studies things the more one understands that our ancestors don’t seem to have delineated the two concepts. Interested in where you come down on this one.

And Where else would you find differences (or similarities) between “the ancient truth” and our modern versions? Does it boil down to Go(o)d versus (D)evil? Or is that an oversimplification of something like order and chaos? Or growth and decay? Or something else entirely? Or do you think all this symbolic interpretation is superfluous, and it’s something far stranger than fiction could ever come up with? I find the idea of this existence being a “training ground” of some sort resonates strongly with my understanding of things...

Anyway cheers man thanks for being a quality commenter, whenever I see your posts I know I’m about to enjoy some serious effort posting

view more: Next ›