Oh. Thats your issue…
How do you figure that you can still observe galaxies that are further away having higher rates of redshift, if expansion stopped at some point in the past? Surely that would be seen in observation of the furthest objects - if expansion stopped in the past, then the accelerating expansion would hold until some distance where it failed to hold. Yet we don’t observe that. We observe an accelerating expansion as far as we can see, a distance which increases as our tech improves.
What's in question is whether it's expanding right now, how much, and whether the expansion is accelerating or decelerating, and that part isn't measured by redshift but by a longer chain of inferences.
I don’t think this is the case at all. I mean, assuming we’re talking about scientific theories and not feelings
It’s still not clear to me why you dont consider “spacetime expansion” as an explanation for the observation of cosmological redshift. Without needing to get into any math, how are you explaining a rate of redshift that increases with distance (as the cosmological constant model predicts, and as we observe)?
I don’t see why you want to drive an uncrossable gulf between “ZPE fields” and “expanding spacetime”, when it seems the obvious (observed) reality is an expanding spacetime with/comprising a ZPE field
We’ve seen the small scale effects (e.g. Casamir) and the large scale effects (e.g. cosmological redshift) and everything in between from Hawking radiation to Tibetan monks that work with this energy field, to whatever other X-files we’ve collected in our personal files.
But putting aside our preferred tangents and sticking to “the Science” as it stands today, where do you see the disconnect between the observations (redshift) and the explanation (cosmological constant)?
dark energy has no function except that it keeps cosmic structures together for as long as materialists say they existed because otherwise we'd have to admit they didn't exist that long.
That’s dark matter you’re thinking of fyi - dark energy has nothing to do with the structures in the universe, but the energy density of “empty” space.
Plato is quoting Solon
Plato says “~9,000 years ago”
Plato was in the year ~500 BC
500 BC was 2,500 years ago
Thus Plato’s Atlantis tale “occurred” 11,500~12,000 years ago
Atlantis had larger structures but they were not traditional pyramidal or else we would have found them by now.
Ocean levels rose 500feet with the end of the younger dryas. Less than 1% of the ocean floor has been mapped.
Dude make a new community for this or something, you’re posting as much spam about him as hes posting about the yids
“His own side” of course being the jews who funded his entire operation and were in the process of withholding that funding unless he started sucking zionist toes again
https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/16aAN6rUMI/is-there-a-better-explanation/c
^Visual of what you’re talking about
"The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop!" is the title of a famous article written by former New York Governor Martin H. Glynn, published in the October 31, 1919, issue of The American Hebrew magazine.
Context of the Article Subject: Glynn wrote the article to lament and raise awareness about the horrific conditions, including starvation and disease, facing an estimated six million Jewish people in war-torn Eastern Europe following World War I.
Purpose: The article served as a plea for humanitarian aid, specifically within a fundraising campaign aimed at American Jews to help their European coreligionists.
Key Phrases: In the article, he referred to the situation as a potential "holocaust" and asserted that "six million Jewish men and women are starving across the seas".
Legacy and Controversy The article is primarily remembered today because it used the figure of "six million" in the context of a potential "holocaust" of Jewish people, decades before the actual Holocaust of World War II. This has led to the article being exploited by Holocaust deniers as part of their efforts to discredit the historical death toll of the WWII genocide.
However, historians, such as Robert N. Proctor, assert that the use of this number is "simply a remarkable coincidence and nothing more," as the 1919 article addressed a different, earlier crisis.
It’s just a cohencidence goy! Simply a remarkable cohencidence (though it’s illegal to remark on but ignore that for now)! Nothing more!
Manson was a government operation to sow chaos
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHAOS:_Charles_Manson,_the_CIA,_and_the_Secret_History_of_the_Sixties
Read a book sometime and quit getting all your world history from Fortnite and CoD, mongoloid
Between the two of us, you’re the only one who suggested i become the mod here, mushbrain
Now that you’ve been exposed you can crawl back in your hole and stop spamming
I think (((their))) plan involves “transhumanism” and “the technological singularity” - which is to say that (I assume) the race of the slave won’t matter much once all the slaves get brain chipped aka “neura-linked” (to the herd that is, and its digital antichrist shepherd)
ImFineWithThat.jpg
Thanks
Apparently the other thing he posted last night (where I also asked for context) is about lolis, so it’s hard to tell with OP where he’s even coming from with his posts lol
- Jesus said to his disciples, "Compare me to something and tell me what I am like."
Simon Peter said to him, "You are like a just messenger."
Matthew said to him, "You are like a wise philosopher."
Thomas said to him, "Teacher, my mouth is utterly unable to say what you are like."
Jesus said, "I am not your teacher. Because you have drunk, you have become intoxicated from the bubbling spring that I have tended."
And he took him, and withdrew, and spoke three sayings to him. When Thomas came back to his friends they asked him, "What did Jesus say to you?"
Thomas said to them, "If I tell you one of the sayings he spoke to me, you will pick up rocks and stone me, and fire will come from the rocks and devour you."
Good post :) it’s nice to see someone talking theology without making it about hitler’s views on the subject lmao
Is that why you were begging me to post more, 4 months ago?
Lmfao just blow it out your ass retard, and keep my name outcho mouf nigga
🚨 Retard alert 🚨
Huh? I exposed your sub-60 iq and the fact that you have to edit the images you post to hide the truth, scroll up retard
Except you keep saying my name after I exposed you in this post…
Great comment and I largely agree - I think these fields where normal people stand no chance of dealing with them hands on (“just build your own particle collider”) are full of navel gazing. I just think it would be better if you discussed more so the observations ( rate of redshift increasing with distance aka “spacetime expansion”) and less the weakness of the label and the system of obsessive labeling. While it’s an important point, I’d also like to hear your scientific mind’s thoughts on the scientific observations (which do appear to “disprove” the notion that the universe as a whole conserves energy - though of course with the acknowledgement that it’s “true” “often enough to be very useful knowledge” e.g. in basically any normal human endeavor)