She's trying to one up her baby daddy on depop body count.
So you can read the Bible "as is" without subjecting the text to your interpretation?
What you meant to say is this: "You say the Bible says one thing according to the Church that gave us the Bible and I say the Bible says another thing according to my own interpretation."
You bring into the text your preconceived assumptions. The Earth was created before the Sun. That's biblical. Flat Earth is not biblical in any sense. You are the one attaching external meaning to the text.
No. Khazaria initally had khan, not kagan as top leader. It was Khazarian Khanstvo, as many other Middle Asian states. "Khan" and "kagan" are different worlds with different roots from different languages. Jewish "kagan" have nothing to do with "khan". There was numerous "khanstvo"'s around Russia, but only few "Kaganate"'s - Khazarian Kaganate, Uighur Kaganate and Kimak Kaganate.
That modern mixing of "khan" and "kagan" is pure fantasies of all that Jewish "historians" who are rewriting real history already for a long time for their benefit. It is just another Jewish chutzpa, nothing more.
Sure. So all that's false and made up by all historians (not just western):
Khagan or Qaghan (Mongolian:ᠬᠠᠭᠠᠨ; Khaan or Khagan; Old Turkic: 𐰴𐰍𐰣 Kaɣan)[a] is a title of imperial rank in Turkic, Mongolic, and some other languages, equal to the status of emperor and someone who rules a khaganate (empire).[1] The female equivalent is Khatun.
It may also be translated as "Khan of Khans", equivalent to King of Kings. In Bulgarian, the title became known as Khan,[b] while in modern Turkic, the title became Khaan with the g sound becoming almost silent[c] or non-existent; the ğ in modern Turkish Kağan is also silent. Since the division of the Mongol Empire, monarchs of the Yuan dynasty and the Northern Yuan held the title of Khagan. Kağan, Hakan and Kaan, Turkish equivalents of the title are common Turkish names in Turkey.
Never mind there are Byzantine and Chinese references to that word long before the Khazar Khaganate was judaized. Are they all falsified? What's the benefit behind this ingenious move when no one knows it was a jewish title? Can you prove the jewish origin of the title?
There can't be "fake jews". Either they are Jews by blood of maternity line, either they are not Jews at all. You can't just declare yourself as Jew, that does not work even on the West like it work with gender, race or whatever. To be a Jew is absolutely not enough to declare yourself a Jew and/or practicise judaism. The approval and acceptance of other Jews is absolutely necessary.
Jews often declare themselves as belongin to other etnicities, but this does not mean it will work other way.
So you get it - they are no damn jews (in the Biblical sense), that's the whole point. They couldn't be, until they did it back in 9th c. They adopted judaism as a religion without having jewish blood. That's why Revelation calls them false jews. How hard of a concept is this? Do you have another take on Rev 3:9? Can you give me an example of what being a "false jew" and "those who say that are jews but are not" would entail?
The whole chapter is full of metaphorical language. God doesn't literally "sit" upon the Earth or the heavens, are you kidding me? This is the lack of reading comprehension and free-style interpretation that gives ammo to atheists against Christianity.
Nowhere in the Bible does it say the Earth is flat. I haven't heard of any of the Church fathers claiming that too.
So, I urge you all: diligently study God’s word in the Bible, repent of your sins, believe the Gospel, and put your faith in Jesus Christ; for the kingdom of God is at hand.
The only correct interpretation of Scripture is within the Church of Christ. Any "Bible study" divorced from the Orthodox tradition will lead to false interpretation, heretical delusions and prelest (all protestant sects). The Bible is a liturgical text the Church, inspired by the Holy Spirit created and compiled, it's not a gnostic truther or a self-help book (yet it contains all the truth and help one could require).
Using pedowikia as source of historic knowledge is worse than eating fake WEF meat.
Cope and a genetic fallacy. See the link of the post which is not wikipedia.
Or better yet, is Princeton publishing good enough for you? https://archive.org/details/dunlop-d.-m.-the-history-of-the-jewish-khazars/page/n1/mode/2up
Russia as state is traced at least from year 3099 from Creation ( 2409 B.C.) when brother Dukes Sloven and Rus established town of Slovensk (now Novgorod) as capital of Rus. And it is just first documented occurence in ancient written sources, and who knows how far that really goes into the past, especially taking in account fact that people live here since paleolite.
Around 1100 years ago Russia just become empire, and that does not mean that there was no Russian statehood earlier.
Any source on that bizarre claim?
Here's what I found:
https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780191736636.timeline.0001
If you are not aware, it is not allowed for goyim to study judaism. It is one of the first talmudic rule that become core of modern Talmud. There is no way that Khazar etnicities was allowed to do that. Only after replacement with Jews, Khazarian elite began to practicise judaism, because they was already Jews.
Have you heard of messianic jews? Was Bulan and his heirs jewish or did he convert? I know the rule but since we have a historic jewish kingdom that's not made up of jews apparently it was disregarded.
Then they began to build their sinagogues and Khazaria become Kaganate, because state become leaded by top Jewish priest - kagan (cohen, kogan, cogen... - many Jews have that surnames). Only since then Khazaria become Khazarian Kaganate.
Khazaria was established as khaganate initially. All turkic tribes were ruled by khans and they had zero connection to judaism - they were pagans, practicing mostly tangrism. My country was a khaganate before it was Christianized, so no, the word khan has nothing to do with the jewish cohen which means "priest". Here's the meaning:
khan (n.) title of sovereign princes in Tatar counties, c. 1400, from Turkic, literally "lord, prince," contraction of khaqan "ruler, sovereign."
What is this, free dance interpretation class? How do you expect anyone to take you seriously with such bs?
There is no such etnicity as "khazarian". Like there is no etnicity as "american". It is not etnicity, it is citizenship. Khazarian Kaganate was multiethnic state, with Jews as elite and many other local tribes as slaves and serves. In the best case you could speak about "Khazarian Jews", just like you speak about "Americal Jews" or any other Jews. And this means they are Jews ethnically, not some "khazarians" or "americans".
Again, khazarian doesn't refer to ethnicity but to origin and as a way to delineate khazarian false jews from the Biblical jews and their bloodlines.
You could continue to play that disgusting game, but this will not make Jews someone else. Jews was Jews, is Jews and will be Jews, whatever names you will try to push. They will always be the same Jews as in Old Testament.
I'm sorry the truth doesn't sit well with your delusions. I'm not pushing anything and the reason of the post is strictly historic and I'm trying not to let any bias in. I have problems with both Biblical Christ-killing jews as well as false ashkenazi jews but that's not the point of the post.
Just how much prophesies have been fulfilled since the OT with the coming of Jesus. And now we see the prophesies Jesus made coming to past.
But he (Abraham) said to him, ‘If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rise from the dead.’ ”
Luke 16:31
I wouldn't care for the facts if I was not ready for them and didn't care for the truth deeply. It's a moral choice. People should learn to care and love truth before all the folder chasing and documentaries. Then it all falls into place. It's a spiritual problem.
I've tried waking close friends up with facts no sane person could deny but they're still in denial. I've given up on them. Let he, who has ears hear. They need a paradigm shift first.
No. They made raids stealing and enslaving people in that regions, but never had any control over that territories. They never reached Kiev that was capital of Russia at the time, and there was no any Kazakhstan at all at the time.
No. Russia didn't exist at that time. The earliest mention of a Russian khaganate was in 9th c. and at that time Kiev was within Khazar territory (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d8/Early_Rus.png). I know Kazakhstan didn't exist at the time, I was obviously referencing the territories of today. The Khazarian raids went much further than Kiev and at their height they controlled most of modern day Ukraine (and much more).
It is still unknown if locals who was under control of Jewish elite allowed to practicise Jewdaism. Taking in account that Jews does not allow goyims to study Talmud, I think that star of David symbols on khazarian shields was just a signs of their masters, not symbols of faith of shields owners.
Khazarian elite turned into pure Jews within several generations. But their subjects was not Jews. Really, number of Jews in Khazarian Kaganate hardly was significant.
What jewish elite? The ruling dynasty converted to judaism - they were the elite. They studied judaism and adopted jewish culture, names and rituals. Synagogues were built for the purpose so yes, khazarian subjects also practiced judaism to some extent.
Their origin is Babylon-Egypt-Judea Jewish tribes. They track their Jewish bloodlines carefully, by maternity line. So there is zero chance that some locals from Khazaria somehow sneaked into Jewish population. You need Jewish mother who gave you birth to be accepted as Jew. All that thing about ghiyur (many think it is a rithual to become a Jew) is that it only make you Judaic, but for Jews you will never be accounted as a Jew. Just a goyim who was allowed to study Thalmud and practicise Judaism and not be punished for that.
Tell that to the khazarians who had no jewish lineage but converted to judaism. That's why the Bible calls them false jews. They are not jewish in blood obviously.
All that modern European Jews are ancestors of those Old Testament Jews, just Jews track their ancestry by maternity line. That is why they could differ a lot, like Sephards and Ashkenazi, but all of them still keep that Jewish genetic material from Jewish women X chromosome.
Apparently not, because they're khazarians, meaning they are converted jews intermingled with a some real jews. That's why they don't the DNA tests in Israel. Their names are jewish, their traditions are jewish but they are not jews.
I'd say turn to Christ who is the Truth about everything. It's easier said than done because we've been flooded with fake Christianity and most who think of themselves as Christians are heterodox.
Wow, I've never seen that. Based Nixon, I'm impressed. Watergate made all the more sense now.
Actually their kingdom reached past Kiev to the West, they had Crimea, Georgia, parts of Kazakhstan and European Russia.
Some jews immigrated to the kingdom and while they helped judaizing the country and intermingled with the locals. They would be a drop in the bucket compared to the local turkic population and their bloodlines have been lost because of intermarriage with local fake jews. This is how we got the enormous ashkenazi population that swept over Europe once the Khazars were destroyed by the Russians.
It doesn't matter how they spin the origin of modern day jews. Commie jew A. Koestler popularized the Khazar origin story because he thought this will put jews in a good light showing common origin with other European people. But it backfired and he backtracked saying he made it all up. Which of course is bs because it was not his theory to begin with and it's a well supported fact in academic historical circles. The jews have learned this part of their history is bad PR and labeled it a conspiracy theory. If you told a normie about this they will instantly call you an anti-semite conspiracy nut. You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.
In conclusion, it doesn't matter how one interprets or feels about this piece of history, it still is the true origin of 90+% of modern jews, especially in the west and in Israel.
Exactly. The only true faith is in the eternal Church of Christ which is the Christian Orthodox Church. All OT saints and prophets worshipped the trinitarian Christian God. Christ was there (theophanies) and revealed God's will to Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, etc. The God of Abraham is not the jewish or islamic absolute unitarian deity. No, He's the Trinity. Jews and muslims, just like all pagan people, worship some demonic entity or Satan himself. Reject fake and gay ecumenism and the generic unitarian god it pushes and uplift the true faith.
The false jews will eventually worship Him:
Indeed I will make those of the synagogue of Satan, who say they are Jews and are not, but lie—indeed I will make them come and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you.
Rev. 3:9
I've talked with historians researching the subject and this is well documented. The propagandists go as far as to deny the existence of the jewish Khazarian Khaganate established by the Bulan dynasty, calling it an "anti-semitic conspiracy theory".
They were conquered by the russians who established their kingdom there (Kievska Rus) and expelled them (mostly to Poland and Bohemia). That's the reason jews were banned from Tsarist Russia and why the false jews organized and financed the Bolshevik Revolution (remember that 80% of the communist party was jewish).
Russia's invasion is history rhyming with the events 1000 years ago when Prince Sviatoslav I destroyed the Khazarian empire.
What does "began to end" even mean? This is retarded use of language. The world began to end since the day it was created just like you began to die since you were born.
It's a common cope for them, when they get pushed on the problem of mind/consciousness not being physical in nature (as in equal to the brain). It's a fancy way of saying the mind is the resulting product of brain activity. But emergentism presupposes the existence of metaphysics and thus it's not compatible with physicalism/materialism.
All I see there is a truth-hating atheist khazarian jew poisoning the mind of people with false ideas.
Exactly, rejecting truth is a symptom of moral failing, not intellectual.
You can't convince people of the truth with any facts or evidence unless you share a common worldview/paradigm. NPCs operate from another paradigm and assumptions.
Exactly, why would I trust the liars at NASA? The entire thing is faith based.
Where is this info coming from? If it's NASA it surely is fake and gay. Has anyone else observed the storm?
Good call on EU being a part of the NWO. What I can't get is how this guy finds it hard to say "fuck the NWO, of course it's bad, I'm a Christian!", instead he went "well, it's a necessary and inevitable step in the history of humanity". It's like I'm listening to Kissinger or some other cabal goon here. No Christian can ever tolerate the NWO.
A lot of Ukrainians are khazars.
Let alone quote Rev. 3:9
It's darwinian evolution that brought us malthusian eugenics and this madness in the first place. Darwin and his ilk can fuck right off, that demonic scumbag.