Ok, since you're much smarter and better debater than me, why don't you tell me how is your argument any different instead of doing meta and ad homs?

Here, I'll interpret my argument for you so you can see it's not a strawman: My critique was that having no contemporary records of something in history doesn't necessarily mean that it didn't happen. Are you aware most historical accounts are written many years after the subject they record? If that were the criteria, most of history's events and figures would be questionable. But people like yourself obviously don't extend that level of skepticism in every case but save it mostly for Jesus Christ. This is a double standard. Your argument is fallacious, sir.

Also, do we have to mention we have roman historians like Josephus and Tacitus who wrote a few decades after Christ and attest to his existence? I'm sure you know about this but since it was 30 years later I guess he couldn't have known a guy like this existed during Pontius Pilate and Herod's rule, that he claimed he was king of the jews and was crucified. Some passages of Paul's epistles like 1 Corinthians 15 are dated to be written in the 30's so within years of Christ's Resurrection. There's a reason why all serious historians (many of which aren't at all Christian btw) accept Jesus' existence.

I'm attacking your argument and if you think it's a strawman you can demonstrate that. What's the point of framing and doing meta commentary?

This is an open forum, isn't it? Why do you ask stupid question?

You are a divine spark

Basic bitch Kabbalah mixed with Eastern mysticism ("we're all One, dude - this world and all distinctions are an illusion") dressed up as new age and you gobbled that up like a good goy.

Isn't it curious how well this belief aligns with the fake and gay NWO - we're all one and need to unite into a one world government with one world religion, no borders or distinctions, sacrifice personhood to collectivism, reality is illusion... Do you now understand why the socialist League of Nations and later UN was pushed by the theosophic (new age) society? Or why Eastern mysticism and new age ideas have seeped in pop culture especially since the 60's social revolution? Do you begin to connect the dots?

I don't need you to tell me you can't read, dude. If you could, you wouldn't be in the position you're in.

Just answer this: Where do you get knowledge of Jesus? What is even Christ for a person who rejects the messianic Hebrew tradition of the OT? Even heretics and new agers appeal to Scripture so don't act as if you have other mystical sources for it.

"If something happened 2000 years ago, how come there are no surviving records to our day but the only records we have date back to 1970 years ago?"

This is the entirety of your argument. Do you find it compelling?

Meanwhile Plato's earliest manuscripts date back to 14c after his death but no sane person would dare say Plato didn't exist.

Lol, "let me tell you the Gospel, the OT prophecies and the subsequent apostolic Church that kept the teachings and spread Christianity all over the Earth as prophesized are made up by my gnostic new age take I red by some random guy, writing about it 20c later while high on shrooms about "Christ consciousness" is totally real."

Not everything is proven the same way. No amount of evidence about the past will bring you to absolute truth in the mathematical (deduction) or even empirical (induction) sense. What you stated isn't correct because it suggests evidence isn't interpreted through a theoretical framework (paradigm) and could prove or disprove claims about the past on its own. There's no evidence outside of a theory (in philosophy of science this is known as theory ladennes).

This guy doesn't know how history works. Do you think you can go back and empirically verify if anything in the past occurred? I'll let you in a little secret - everything you know about the past that you didn't witness yourself, is based on conjecture and interpretation of circumstantial evidence and testimony.

Arabs are Ishmaelites. Jews came from his brother Isaac who was fair skinned.

Also, anti-christians love to say "Jesus was a jew". Then if you point out do modern jews all look like dirty Arabs? They cant rectify the two statements, either way they are disingenuous

Yes, I love to bring that argument up. They are pressed between admitting Jesus was white or that modern day jews aren't of the Biblical tribes but are the 13 tribe.

It' the other way around. There are no gayliens. The entire alien mythos was created by early 20th century occultists like Elena Blavatsky, Alice Baily, L. Ron. Hubbard (scientology cult leader) and Alister Crowley who claimed to have contacted an entity called Lam, which looks suspiciously similar to the so called grays, depicted in pop culture. Sci-fi writers, who were also luciferian but on the materialist side coming from the Royal Society and fabian socialist circles like H.G. Wells were also instrumental.

The government agencies stoked the UFO craze and used it to distract people and as a cover for their military tech projects.

I mean, every Christian knows that the pagan gods are demons. Unless you're Catholic post Vatican II Nostra Aetate that is.

Of course. This was evident for humans for thousands of years, but then humans abandoned God's revelation and tried to reason in their own fallen way. Now we know that grandfather was a snail, my cousin was a potato and we all were pond scum at one time but randomly mutated into organisms that are capable of reasoning about being itself :clown:

This is not predicting much because we're livin' it.

"Oh no - there are no coomies in the Bible and no freedum to be a degenerate? Shucks, I will pass then."

Never mind the iconic "The Truth will set you free" and freedom from passions and the wages of sin is talked about ad nauseum in the Gospel. Why didn't you mention anything about love and truth, you little goblin?

Btw, why ought we value any of those things - freedom, happiness, etc? Do you have an argument beside "it feels good to me and I prefer it"?

PS: Your instinct to oppose Christianity is correct - if the good old times of Christian monarchy come back people like you will end up walking in a long trail of jews faster than the wifi speed in your WEF allotted coompod circa 2030.

Do they have Wall Str. and Bretton Woods in Zimbabwe?

Selling my gold and BTC and stacking sulfur. Sulfurmaxxing.

You can't be insolvent if you print your own money. This is dumb.

They are all gay. The whole gangsta rap scene is a fake and gay psy op. It's WWE stuff.

The biggest blowback in this country was about a black dude supposedly getting suffocated by a white cop. Idk what you're on about. Again, BLM is a state sponsored thing.

Why would they target black dudes? Last time I checked the DS pushed BLM summer of love, CRT in academia and media and DEI in favor of "oppressed minorities". How do you reconcile this or are you just black yourself and biased?

Thanks for the context.

Yes, but they don't want total annihilation and chaos. It's a controlled collapse aka the Great Reset. They need the infrastructure to run their Skynet talmudic technocracy.

It's not all of them and it doesn't have to be. It's sort of like when the Illuminati infiltrated the freemason lodges. I'd say it's the Pareto principle so 20%.

Do you have a link to that goblin?