No. Khazaria initally had khan, not kagan as top leader. It was Khazarian Khanstvo, as many other Middle Asian states. "Khan" and "kagan" are different worlds with different roots from different languages. Jewish "kagan" have nothing to do with "khan". There was numerous "khanstvo"'s around Russia, but only few "Kaganate"'s - Khazarian Kaganate, Uighur Kaganate and Kimak Kaganate.
That modern mixing of "khan" and "kagan" is pure fantasies of all that Jewish "historians" who are rewriting real history already for a long time for their benefit. It is just another Jewish chutzpa, nothing more.
Sure. So all that's false and made up by all historians (not just western):
Khagan or Qaghan (Mongolian:ᠬᠠᠭᠠᠨ; Khaan or Khagan; Old Turkic: 𐰴𐰍𐰣 Kaɣan)[a] is a title of imperial rank in Turkic, Mongolic, and some other languages, equal to the status of emperor and someone who rules a khaganate (empire).[1] The female equivalent is Khatun.
It may also be translated as "Khan of Khans", equivalent to King of Kings. In Bulgarian, the title became known as Khan,[b] while in modern Turkic, the title became Khaan with the g sound becoming almost silent[c] or non-existent; the ğ in modern Turkish Kağan is also silent. Since the division of the Mongol Empire, monarchs of the Yuan dynasty and the Northern Yuan held the title of Khagan. Kağan, Hakan and Kaan, Turkish equivalents of the title are common Turkish names in Turkey.
Never mind there are Byzantine and Chinese references to that word long before the Khazar Khaganate was judaized. Are they all falsified? What's the benefit behind this ingenious move when no one knows it was a jewish title? Can you prove the jewish origin of the title?
There can't be "fake jews". Either they are Jews by blood of maternity line, either they are not Jews at all. You can't just declare yourself as Jew, that does not work even on the West like it work with gender, race or whatever. To be a Jew is absolutely not enough to declare yourself a Jew and/or practicise judaism. The approval and acceptance of other Jews is absolutely necessary.
Jews often declare themselves as belongin to other etnicities, but this does not mean it will work other way.
So you get it - they are no damn jews (in the Biblical sense), that's the whole point. They couldn't be, until they did it back in 9th c. They adopted judaism as a religion without having jewish blood. That's why Revelation calls them false jews. How hard of a concept is this? Do you have another take on Rev 3:9? Can you give me an example of what being a "false jew" and "those who say that are jews but are not" would entail?
You wrote h a nh a n. Khan of khans. It is two words, not one. Means khan who conquered and rule over other khans.
Khan is written as "хан" in Mongolian or "ᠬᠠᠨ" in old script.
"Kagan" is different from "hanhan". And have completelydifferent meaning. Khazarian Kaganate never conquered other khans, so no one in Khazaria could name itself even "khan of khans".
Also, take a look how many "kagan"'s, "kogan"'s, "cohen"'s and other similar surnames among jews, but you will not find anything similar in Mongolian surnames.
Fuck, you even don't know that old mongolian script just don't have a letter to deliver sound "K" as in "kagan/kogan/cohen" or "kaganate". There is simply no any way in old Mongolian to write "kagan". Only after changing to Cyrillic, Mongols get a letter to write the word "kagan/kogan/cohen".
Funny, how you still pushing that nonsense about some "good jews" and trying to pervert words of New Testament.
Jews in Biblical sense is a nasty tribe of greedy traitors who betrayed God who once helped them and turned pure evil killing Jesus, Son of God. If that biblical Jews hade any option to kill God, they definitely did that. Funny that Jacob from Old Testament, as soon as he meet God's angel, guess what, began to fight him and demand blessing from him. And then he was named Israel, i.e. "one who fight against God". This place from old Testament is often used as example of prophetic events that predicted murder of Jesus by Jews.
Whole history of that Biblical Jews from Bible is an example of what good person should never do. They are not the heroes of that book, they are villains who betray, cheat, seduce, genocide, swindle everybody around since the beginning. God even send his Son in attempt to fix that tribe and bring them to sanity, but everybody know how that ended. Modern Jews just continue all that evil traditions of their ancestors. And unfortunately fingers on your single hand will be enough to count those rare Jews who dare to question that Jewish way.
Sure. So all that's false and made up by all historians (not just western):
Never mind there are Byzantine and Chinese references to that word long before the Khazar Khaganate was judaized. Are they all falsified? What's the benefit behind this ingenious move when no one knows it was a jewish title? Can you prove the jewish origin of the title?
So you get it - they are no damn jews (in the Biblical sense), that's the whole point. They couldn't be, until they did it back in 9th c. They adopted judaism as a religion without having jewish blood. That's why Revelation calls them false jews. How hard of a concept is this? Do you have another take on Rev 3:9? Can you give me an example of what being a "false jew" and "those who say that are jews but are not" would entail?
You wrote h a nh a n. Khan of khans. It is two words, not one. Means khan who conquered and rule over other khans.
Khan is written as "хан" in Mongolian or "ᠬᠠᠨ" in old script.
"Kagan" is different from "hanhan". And have completelydifferent meaning. Khazarian Kaganate never conquered other khans, so no one in Khazaria could name itself even "khan of khans".
Also, take a look how many "kagan"'s, "kogan"'s, "cohen"'s and other similar surnames among jews, but you will not find anything similar in Mongolian surnames.
Fuck, you even don't know that old mongolian script just don't have a letter to deliver sound "K" as in "kagan/kogan/cohen" or "kaganate". There is simply no any way in old Mongolian to write "kagan". Only after changing to Cyrillic, Mongols get a letter to write the word "kagan/kogan/cohen".
Funny, how you still pushing that nonsense about some "good jews" and trying to pervert words of New Testament.
Jews in Biblical sense is a nasty tribe of greedy traitors who betrayed God who once helped them and turned pure evil killing Jesus, Son of God. If that biblical Jews hade any option to kill God, they definitely did that. Funny that Jacob from Old Testament, as soon as he meet God's angel, guess what, began to fight him and demand blessing from him. And then he was named Israel, i.e. "one who fight against God". This place from old Testament is often used as example of prophetic events that predicted murder of Jesus by Jews.
Whole history of that Biblical Jews from Bible is an example of what good person should never do. They are not the heroes of that book, they are villains who betray, cheat, seduce, genocide, swindle everybody around since the beginning. God even send his Son in attempt to fix that tribe and bring them to sanity, but everybody know how that ended. Modern Jews just continue all that evil traditions of their ancestors. And unfortunately fingers on your single hand will be enough to count those rare Jews who dare to question that Jewish way.