2
Redsky 2 points ago +2 / -0

you're spot on. I agree fully.

0
Redsky 0 points ago +1 / -1

My understanding is that greater Israel is not an economic powerhouse and is NOT independently wealthy. Instead Israel relies upon tribute from the USA, Rothschild's, etc. Through selling natural gas Israel can be an economic powerhouse

1
Redsky 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is interesting but not the reason. The real reason is because of Israeli desires to control gas pipelines throughout the middle east.

So what was this unfolding strategy to undermine Syria and Iran all about? According to retired NATO Secretary General Wesley Clark, a memo from the Office of the US Secretary of Defense just a few weeks after 9/11 revealed plans to "attack and destroy the governments in 7 countries in five years", starting with Iraq and moving on to "Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran." In a subsequent interview, Clark argues that this strategy is fundamentally about control of the region's vast oil and gas resources.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2013/aug/30/syria-chemical-attack-war-intervention-oil-gas-energy-pipelines

Israel found a massive natural gas field of the coast of gaza. The ultimate goal is for Israel to supply natural gas to Europe - thus Israel destroyed the NordStream Pipeline (via the US) and are setting the groundwork to become a major natural gas supplier to the world.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-to-build-new-natural-gas-pipeline-from-its-offshore-rig-direct-to-egypt/

[Edit:] The article below the strategic position Syria holds to build pipelines to Europe. It doesn't reference the (Israeli) pipeline to Europe but you can research that and fill in the blanks.

https://www.news.com.au/world/middle-east/is-the-fight-over-a-gas-pipeline-fuelling-the-worlds-bloodiest-conflict/news-story/74efcba9554c10bd35e280b63a9afb74

2
Redsky 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump names David Sacks (Jewish) as crypto and AI czar

2
Redsky 2 points ago +4 / -2

Thanks; I was going to respond out of good faith; but Jewish Shills / IDF agents do not argue out of good faith.

5
Redsky 5 points ago +6 / -1

This is the only conspiracy that really matters; all other conspiracies are subordinate to the Jewish Question

2
Redsky 2 points ago +3 / -1

I can tell the middle one (Jewish) by the pose - no need to look up who the person is.

0
Redsky 0 points ago +3 / -3

I think you have TDS.

I'm sure there is a plan if Russia goes nuclear - this whole Ukraine/Russia thing makes 0 sense which means we are not seeing it from the perspective of the (Jewish) interests that started this war. Victoria Nuland (Jewish), Anthony Blinken (Jewish), Zelenskky (Jewish), Putin Raised by (Jews).

I'm worried that Ukraine/Russia does not make sense because it is only a single step in a much larger plan - because we don't know the plan it seems illogical to us.

3
Redsky 3 points ago +4 / -1

Perhaps; the alternative is to simply allow the cities to transfer into the hands of third world invaders so... not sure what you're suggesting the best path is.

2
Redsky 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jones mentions Israel when the Jewish Question Arises. Once a guest, or caller, begins labeling the "globalists" or "Illuminati" or "Elites" Jews then Jones becomes very particularly and anti-conspiratorial. He immediately drops his conspiratorial view and critically attacks the idea of globalists being largely Jews. He becomes combative at the notion of that a group of conspirators *may be connected by something other than money and power. *

To me this facade that drops immediately upon a guest calling out the Jewish Question is what identifies Jones as an IDF operative - much like the IDF operatives on this board.

Immediately question if those in power share a Jewish background and their true persona comes to light.

2
Redsky 2 points ago +3 / -1

I view RFK was a force for good within the space he is fighting (anti-pharmaceutical complex and making people healthy).

3
Redsky 3 points ago +4 / -1

Time will tell; however, I see RFK as a force for good. He was one of the few that stood up against the vaccine mandates. I've personally changed my diet and eating habits based upon information he has provided so I'm grateful to him. His attack of Fauci was invaluable - against standing up when many others caved.

I'm not against vaccines either - vaccines could be a valuable tool but not in the way they are administered now and certainly not by the group that is administering them. Conceptually, I would never write off the idea of a vaccine but instead I write them off in the way they are administered/managed.

2
Redsky 2 points ago +4 / -2

The sad reality is that no one is able to make it in American politics without bowing before (Jewish) interests. America has become a colony, or vassal state, of Israel.

If RFK wants to continue his battle against Pharmaceutical interests, and make America healthy - he must bow before the interests that control America. I view this as picking/choosing battles - his battle space is the pharmaceutical complex NOT (Israeli) control of American Politics.

2
Redsky 2 points ago +2 / -0

These are allegations that have not led to civil or criminal prosecution hence "I don't know if he is a pedophile" because these allegations have NOT been proven true in a court of law. I'm clearly aware of the definition of pedophilia - are you aware of the difference between allegations and criminal prosecution?

I DO know his (Jewish) accomplice Joel Greenberg DID go to jail for sex trafficking minors so I KNOW Joel Greenberg is a pedophile. It's odd that the US has two (Jewish) individuals (Epstein, Greenberg) running sex-trafficking rings for US politicians - what are the coincidences? So odd.

Now we do know Israeli was caught installing cellphone towers around the white house / DC. (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/12/israel-planted-spying-devices-near-white-house-says-report) so Israel has a history of spying on US politicians. So you have the Israeli government spying on politicians and (Jews) running sex-tracking for US politicians - suddenly a picture of control/entrapment begins to emerge.

by B1-66ER
2
Redsky 2 points ago +2 / -0

very interesting.

1
Redsky 1 point ago +1 / -0

At this stage in the game, and on this site, I'm quite surprised I need to provide evidence relating to Trump's Jewish connections.

  1. Trump's largest backer was Sheldon Aldson (Jewish). Sheldon was so attached to Israel he flew Israeli Spy Jonathon Pollard Back to Israel on his jet for free
  2. Ivanka Trump married Jared Kushner (Jewish) so Trump has Jewish (Grandchildren)
  3. Eric Trump was married under a Jewish Wedding Ceremony. Kind of odd.
  4. Trump's office is filled with Jews - Larry Fink (Jewish) bailed Trump out of bankruptcy.

I can go on and on but I suspect you're not arguing out of good faith (probably another vpnsurfer) so it's probably not worth continuing this conversation.

I am arguing that many of these high profile sex-trafficking cases involve a disproportionate number of Jews - most likely because the sex trafficking operations are likely MOSSAD run operations to gain control over the non-Jews for blackmail to benefit Israeli interests. At this point can you even argue Epstein (Jewish) did not have Israeli connections? You conveniently leave out Epstein and point to Epstein's client (Prince Andrews) as the pedophile, that may be but who was running the operation?

Pdiddy is interesting; as stated the music industry is under heavy Jewish influence. My argument is that Pdiddy is probably working for someone else.

It's very interesting, and perhaps telling, that you have such an unwillingness to look beyond "rich and powerful" for other connections/coincidences.

by B1-66ER
2
Redsky 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vh0oMAIkVzA

At 5:27 it clearly shows Britney is wearing a Star-of-David necklace. Why is Britney wearing a (Jewish) necklace during her psychotic break? Was she trying to send a message?

5
Redsky 5 points ago +5 / -0

I dont know if Matt Gaetz is a pedophile or not. It's important to note the context of the allegations: Matt Gaetz's friend Joel Greenberg (Jewish) was the connection between Matt and the alleged sex with a minor.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/gaetz-associate-sentenced-11-years-sources-probe-florida/story?id=94225875

Why was this not pursued further? Probably because Greenberg acted as an Epstein-like Mossad operative to honeypot American politicians and once you start getting close to Mossad / sex-trafficking / honeypots the trail abruptly ends.

by B1-66ER
5
Redsky 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's more like: Jews throw a false flag attack (Oct 7th) to justify the extermination of women and children - then get upset when people claim they are nazis.

2
Redsky 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump isn't Jewish? You sure about that? Prince Andrew wasn't Jewish, but his handlers were. Diddy isn't Jewish, but the music industry is heavily Jewish controlled.

Your aversion to the Jewish question is interesting - particularly on a conspiracy board. "They are just rich and powerful. No other connections...just rich and powerful. Globalists, Illuminati, elites...anything but jews"

by B1-66ER
2
Redsky 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm curious where this first originated. I recall hearing this quite awhile ago

3
Redsky 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was Matt Gaetz's friend Joel Greenberg (Jewish) who was sentenced Thursday to 11 years in prison after pleading guilty to sex trafficking.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/gaetz-associate-sentenced-11-years-sources-probe-florida/story?id=94225875

Weren't Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell also (Jewish)? Think this could be connected? Did James Alefantis have connections to (Jewish) intelligence?

3
Redsky 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://sdlegislature.gov/Session/Bill/24760/266416

The Bill Reads:

The term "antisemitism" has the same meaning as the working definition of antisemitism adopted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance on May 26, 2016, including the contemporary examples of antisemitism identified therein.

I find it odd these 'antisemitism' bills:

(1) never define antisemitism in the bill, but instead reference an outside source. Why is this? Is it so that the definition can be changed and the bill still relevant?

(2) I'm not sure what to make of the Orwellian logic "working definition" and "contemporary examples". In my mind a 'working definition' is a dynamic definition that is in flux; however, the bill references the date of "May 26, 2016" so does that mean the "working definition" is the definition as of that date? Then why use the language 'working definition'? Or does it mean to accept the "working definition" that was established on May 26, 2016 and is subject to change?

(3) I assume the reference to an outside source as the definition (and not reiterating the definition within the bill) due to Jewish love of power and control. It seems like very groveling gesture or transfer of power to point the reader to the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance for the definitive definition of antisemitism as opposed to defining it yourself. It's almost a transfer of authority to Jewish Power.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›