Fake, to be sure. So fake everybody on r/conspiracy already gets that. So fake the shills don't even bother trying to defend it. It's an act of desperation. The thing is, what comes next?
Evidence has a paper trail, and evidence gets handled in various in various ways by various people. That's what should be observed.
If someone is asking, "If Kash or Dan is smart and a 'good guy', then why aren't they calling out this rank bullshit?", well it may not be that simple. They could be on a mole hunt, watching to see who in the Big Machine fails to raise their hand and call shenanigans on this.
It's definitely what I'd do.
As far as Sheen, the rumor of his death went around... a week ago? I recall seeing one single post on LOP and thinking, "Well, I guess it had to happen sometime," but didn't click on it because I was sure to see the detail in a zillion other posts. That was it, though.
The phenomenon at work here is that the vast majority of the human race actually has no internal moral compass.
These people get their "morality" by those they accept as "authorities": their parents, the cops, the church, fancy people on TV, whoever. Nor is it actually morality, but rather that they only subconsciously observe and adhere to external systems of reward and punishment.
In the present case, the Leftist "authorities" have recently made a "virtue" of political violence. The NPCs thus merely seek to express their own "virtue". If you think back to former times--still very recent, actually--when these same Leftists leaders did not hold up violence as a virtue, their followers expressed no such sentiments.
Find someone that swims against the flow of those around them, those closest to them, for reasons of their own internal morality, and you have found someone of a higher level of consciousness.
What I would highlight is that this is a textbook example of how most people in the world actually form the reality in which they live. Specifically, they get it from those they accept as "authorities". Those authorities said a plane crashed, so a plane crashed.
From there, the evidence is made to fit the conclusion, like, "it's all underground because planes go really fast" or perhaps, "what, are you some kind of airplane crash expert now?" Reasoning can be tricky and take effort, but rationalization never ever fails.
By far the easiest way to deal with evidence that would tend to contradict their firm conclusion is simply to not think about it at all. They got no time for all that shit anyway. I suspect everyone reading this has heard that before.
I suspect this doofus is just the patsy. I'm using that term loosely because the crime can never be pinned on him and isn't supposed to be. He didn't do it and could never be convicted. We're all just supposed to argue about him until everyone loses interest in the whole incident. Reference the previous Trump assassination attempts.
I would hazard a guess at the following scenario:
This dummy does all the suspicious shit like posting the song and walking around in front of the cameras and whatever else. For all the surveillance video, there's not one second with him carrying a rifle. That's because he never had one.
The real assassin had an accomplice at the venue, probably someone planted earlier on the maintenance staff. He brought in the real murder weapon and stashed it for the assassin. He also had to let the assassin up on the roof, since access is typically alarmed or simply locked.
The assassin retrieves the rifle, shoots Kirk, and hands it back or drops it in a stash location. Then he blends in with the chaotic, alarmed and confused crowd and eventually slips away.
The accomplice can get rid of the rifle any time. No one is looking for it anyway because the cops already found "the murder weapon" in the woods. It was planted there who knows when with all its bullshit iconography, which the scriptwriters somehow think is convincing. More dumb shit to argue about. This is why no one was seen carrying a rifle around that day: no one did.
Maybe the FBI are just stupid, or maybe the plant in the FBI just says, "OoooOOOoooh, we sure gotta find this guy! Let's have a statewide manhunt!" You don't have to lie and cover up when doing dumb things will suffice.
As an addendum, I have never ever seen such incredibly high throughput shill posts about this event on r/conspiracy. There is a 0.0% chance whoever this person is could arrange such a thing, ruling out the "lone gunman" theory absolutely.
These posts are identifiable because only about 3 out of a thousand would have the slightest chance whatsoever to lead someone to the above scenario. The water isn't muddied, "They" filled in the pond.
I would conclude this is misdirection.
If you were planning on dropping your rifle, why not just drop it where you shot it so there's no chance of anyone seeing you carrying a rifle-shaped object? On the flip side, if you made it to the woods, aren't you just about home free? Why drop it there?
The rifle was planted. It was meant to be found and will lead nowhere. Crowder went through that weird humiliation ritual a few years back, so he's an asset who was chosen to promote this story.
They should have went all the way and planted a different imported bolt-action rifle: the 6.5mm Mannlicher-Carcano,
UPDATE: The FBI apparently smelled this particular rat and seems to be wasting no time trying to get to the bottom of it:
BREAKING: Steven Crowder Announces He Has Been Subpoenaed Over Explosive ATF Leak Revealing Transgender and Anti-Fascist Engravings on Charlie Kirk Assassin’s Weapon (The Gateway Pundit 9/11/2025)
I suspect the guy just dropped his weapon, took off or put on a different colored shirt, put on/took off a hat, and blended into the crowd walking towards the venue to see that happened.
Takes some balls to do that, but--like with stage magic tricks--what's amazing is how much people do not notice about the world around them. Some guy dressed in all black sprinting away from the site of a shooting... well, that is the kind of thing that would be noticed.
I would point to that user as a perfect example of the level of consciousness of the vast majority of "conspiracy theorists".
At that level, you keep finding out how "right" you are and feel a compulsion to demonstrate that to others. Of course, there's no end to "evidence" that can be interpreted to prove that correctness, and it is impervious to all counterargument.
While this may strike many as the obvious endpoint of any conspiracy theory or science or reasoning itself, it isn't. As Richard Feynman put it:
In science, we are never right, just not proven wrong.
The search for the truth is finding out what you're wrong about and correcting yourself, hopefully with an idea that is--in some sense--less wrong.
Oh, there were no days off, any more than there are days off for the robots in "Westworld". Wouldn't even make sense as a concept in that context. Not just a useful comparison, either, since (long story) They were using that show to allegorically tell us how it used to be.
There is no clear and universal consensus on when the idea of a "sabbath" day came into human culture, but I found this passage quite intriguing:
The earliest extrabiblical attestation of Sabbath might occur in a 7th-century BCE ostracon discovered at the ancient fortress of Mesad Hashavyahu, which could refer to a servant doing certain kinds of work "before Sabbath" (lpny šbt).
In another incredibly long story, it turns out the whole world changed drastically around 600 BC, the same dating as this origin of the sabbath. It goes back once again to the Anunnaki, and the settlement of what is loosely known and widely misunderstood as the "war in heaven". The "peace treaty" went into effect at that time.
So in that scenario, the sabbath just came into being along with a couple of hundred other things that humans started thinking up, such as the very idea of writing down history. Big changes all around.
Related: When I first began researching the Anunnaki, I came across an item buried incredibly deeply in etymology that did a lot towards convincing me of their reality.
Ingrained so far down in culture that it has become subconscious is the separation between work and worship. There was a time in living memory when Christians called Sunday, "God's day". Chick-fil-A is still closed on that day, and that's an assload of chicken money to give up just to respect something no human is holding you to. Orthodox Jews live in buildings where the elevators run automatically during the Sabbath. The concept is in there deep.
Nor is it only a modern way of getting out of work. Two followers of Jesus were gathering wood on the Sabbath and the Jews wanted to f-ing kill them for it. Sure, we're largely fallen from the purer faith, but people take this concept really seriously.
So how surprised was I to find that the ancient Hebrew word "avodah" means both "work or service" and "worship or prayer". These two diametrically opposed concepts had been one and the same in the mists of the past. How could that be?
Well, to be brief, the Anunnaki created us as a slave species. These powerful aliens were as gods to these new humans. We can't really get in their heads as to how they thought about it, but their writing seems to indicate so. Does your dog think of you as a god? You sure have god-like powers and do things in mysterious ways.
There's the explanation of how work and worship were originally one and the same. They were literally doings gods' work.
Interesting tidbit about the Ukraine anti-corruption office: it was run by Americans.
I guess the justification was, "We're giving you all this free money so we need to see it's properly used." Under the Big Guy, though, I'm sure it was, "We're just making sure we're getting our piece of the action, capisce?"
Then Trump gets in and Zelensky shuts it down. I think they were worried a new set of Americans would come in and, you know, start looking for corruption... lol
"They" figured out long ago that if you control women, you control men. As Adam Weishaupt put it:
There is no way of influencing men so powerfully as by means of the women. These should therefore be our chief study; we should insinuate ourselves into their good opinion, give them hints of emancipation from the tyranny of public opinion, and of standing up for themselves; it will be an immense relief to their enslaved minds to be freed from any one bond of restraint, and it will fire them the more, and cause them to work for us with zeal, without knowing that they do so, for they will only be indulging their own desire of personal admiration.
Long after, George Orwell operationalized the same principle in 1984:
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy.
Thank so much! You don't know how much I appreciate the support. I hope you find these posts both interesting and useful.
You have no idea how much of this material there is. A year ago, I might have said I had written up 20% of what I had notes on. Now, a year later and after much work, I would estimate it at 10%, maybe 5%... lol
I feel my poor browser may just implode one day, but real, not like the Titan.
Ha, hilarious coincidence! My next post is going to be about the Russells and the opium trade, and when I was researching for it today I came across this book:
The New Underworld Order (Christopher Story 749-page PDF)
On what the PDF refers to as page 74, you find:
Figure 14A: The Order of Skull and Bones, of which this is the symbol, was established at Yale in 1832-33 under the pirate (drug-running) flag of William H. Russell, used for his family firm's China operations.... The skull and crossbones is the symbol of death that is used on bottles of poison: and poisoning is classically the Illuminati's preferred method of 'liquidation'. The symbol is used on pirates' flags, and was the centrepiece of the Nazi Tofenkopf ('death's head') insignia of the Schutzstaffel, or SS. It was used in Prussia by elite soldiers as long ago as 1740....
Even that takes off in two different directions. The documentary "Ring of Power" mentioned that the mercenary Hessians of the wrong side of the American Revolution were from Hesse-Kassel, right next door to Prussia, and that it was a Rothschild who set up the enterprise.
Also just today in the course of the same research and tied up right alongside the same people, I ran across Daniel Coit Gilman who was responsible for bringing in the Prussian education system. That's the one that makes sure children become cogs in the Big Machine.
There's just no end to this heinous crap. I never even used any material from that PDF because the post is too long just with Wiki and Geni... lol
As it's shaping up, pretty much everything to do with "witchcraft" for at least a century, 1642-1735 as far as I've documented, was a gigantic psyop. You find these faker families as victims, accused, witnesses, judges, exonerated, executed, everything. I never even keep track.
That holds for both America and England, although I've written up very little about the action there. You can find a guy, Matthew Hopkins who started calling himself the "Witchfinder General" operating in Essex County, England in 1644. Salem is in Essex County, MA. These are all the same fakers. I touched on Matthew Hopkins briefly here:
A “Cabell” runs through the JFK assassination to UFOs to Thomas Jefferson to the Mueller investigation to the Mayflower and beyond (conspiracies.win 11/27/2024)
Almost all these people were embedded in the Puritan Great Migration, particularly 1635-1640. They were also involved in Quakerism, but I haven't sorted that all out yet. I kinda got the sense that they provoked these religious migrations just as cover to set up shop in a new place, kinda like what we saw with Zionism and Israel.
Are there any actual witches with actual magical powers in any of this? All I could say is that there is zero evidence I could point to. But pointing to someone and calling them a witch and wrecking them maybe was the 17th Century's version of pointing to someone and calling them a terrorist. That isn't proof it's real.
I've heard one interview a long time ago with John Lash Lamb. With Tracy, oddly enough I just listened to her last couple of interviews on The Higherside Chats. Her work with the ouija board is very interesting but problematic. She seemed to begin to get the idea that I have had firmly for a while. That is, you are really contacting discarnate entities, but you cannot and should not trust what they say.
I figured out a while ago that was the basis for the Bible's injunctions against "witchcraft". Like hand grenades and test tubes full of colorless liquid, that shit can be extremely dangerous unless you know exactly what you're doing. New rule: do not touch and stay away.
I mean, I feel bad for Tracy and, Jesus, she was a mom. I think she was under tremendous stress and was fucking with shit where she did not know exactly what she was fucking with, and that did not help her situation. RIP.
I watched the movie. Actually, I sought it out specifically after I had gotten a firm grounding in the Anunnaki. Someone mentioned that the movie had some reference to the subject.
As I was watching it, I thought, "Jiminy Christmas! Whoever wrote this sure knows a lot about the Anunnaki!" I really was shocked. Same thing looking back at the movie, "Stargate".
Since then--let's say a decade--I've been hyper alert to anyone making the connection between these two movies and the Anunnaki. Nothing.
From that I realized, "Yeah, They don't care about parading any of this in front of the public because no one has any idea what they're seeing. Probably just inflates the egos of the people that put it there."
Perhaps we simply misunderstand the nature of God and of just what the hell is going on in this Universe. Really, we should be questioning what our role in it should be.
If someone gets a D+ on their math test, it's probably not correct to conclude that mathematics is wrong and does not exist and people should stop talking about it. Maybe, but probably not.
There's a subtle and slow game going on. It's not just that Tulsi says it out loud, it's that the for real DNI says it in such a way and in the same tones as the normies are used to that get them to realize, "Yeah, that is some bullshit. They can't be doing that shit. Shut it down!"
I have come to realize that most people are terrified of discovering that the world is not as they imagine it and as they have become comfortable with. They don't know who they are, and begin to see that they have no significance in that world.
I used to be so ignorant as to think there was meaning behind it. There is not. It's pathetic, but also part of the truth any true seeker of it must come to accept.