I consider it as evidence giving insight into the true history of our planet. Exactly what it is evidence of, I don't yet know.
It seem to be consistent with certain aspects of the general narrative of the Bible, especially the OT: a segregated population, forbidden from freely interbreeding with neighbors, a firm distinction between themselves and "goyim" and not necessarily as the result of a social construct, and the idea that it is their consciousness that's different.
I can't help but think of Jerry Marzinski's work, and his conclusion that schizophrenia is, in most cases, demonic possession. I should further hasten to say that I don't think that the concept of "demonic possession" should be left at "evil spirits".
You want to think (well, at least I want to think) that people are all the same and we should understand that and act accordingly. That seems like the right way to be. In the case of Jews, if someone is born into it, they pretty much just go along with the program just as the vast majority of Christians, Muslims, and whoever else do.
Regrettably, that does not seem to be quite the case. Further, I do not think we advance the cause of Truth and the alleviation of human suffering by ignoring truth wherever and however we find it.
Thus, there really does seem to be a "problem":
Haaretz report suggests up to 40% of Ashkenazi Jews may suffer from mental disorders like schizophrenia (Newstarget 10/21/2024)
Another forgotten episode from his past is when he and MTG went to visit the J6 prisoners pretty early on. Neither on ever talked about it, nothing ever came of it, and it has vanished from the public consciousness. So what happened?
Well, to get it out of the way, if Gaetz was some real reptilian in the grass, then why the hell would he do it in the first place? Those were the only two, AFAIK, that tried to get in to see the prisoners.
I believe what they found out that day was that the "J6-ers" were almost or entirely phony, another gigantic psyop. Further, I believe he was smart enough to realize that the Swamp was far deeper than he had ever guessed, and that just yelling and wading in was going to be pointless. (BTW, exactly the same thing happened when Tucker went to try to see the already long-dead Julian Assange.)
If that was, in fact, the lesson Matt learned back then, then he's had over three years to think and plan and coordinate. No wonder "They" are shitting a brick over his nomination.
Ha, join the club! The insanity goes on forever. I just spent like 3 hours writing up a post with a hilarious premise: tying famous UFO incidents back to participants in the Salem Witch Trials. It came out too long.
I thought I'd just let it fly, but then I went to check one last incident, the "Hopkinville Goblins". Yep, that one too! I was just now staring off into space and contemplating how to break it up in two.
Since you're working on the Pratts, here's a preview so you can make sure to get this jackhole in there:
Not done yet! Ralphie Boy was educated at the Pratt Institute, founded by Charles Pratt. Our second “7”! He made it big managing the transition from whale oil to petroleum for Standard Oil. (Historical aside: We’ve been talking about Salem, but the other nest of vipers was in Nantucket, where they had become fabulously wealthy getting whale oil out of unalived whales. See how they run the whole show?) If you read carefully between the lines, it seems like the Pratts were running Standard Oil and John D. was a front-man. That’s on brand for these spooks, isn’t it?
Oh, our third “7” for the jackpot? The Pratt Institute has an extension campus in Utica at the Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute. Cha-ching!
Frankly, it's surreal. It's like this was AI-generated, created from prompts given by an awake and aware person for what they would like to see happen.
Personal confession: a video similar to this one was posted on r//conspiracy_commons, and several of the Redditors "debunked" it as from years ago or some such claim, and I believed it.
On a serious note, I think Trump did not have a very good idea of what he was up against in 2015. He severely underestimated Them and ultimately he--and all the rest of us--came out on the losing end. This time around, any sort of "middle-grounding" or negotiation or artful wording or saying without saying is out the window.
Fat lot of fucking good it did any of us last time.
I've had my suspicions about RFKjr in the past and--quite frankly--those may still apply. But what we seem to be seeing, or at least what I see, is a man who may have compromised himself in the past in this or that way for this or that reason, but now feels empowered to pretty much say what he thinks, and has been thinking for a long time.
This may be the whiskey sours talking, but it strikes me as a revival of the true American spirit of the First Amendment. You speak your mind and if other people don't like it, you are under no obligation to give a fuck.
I haven't written it up yet, but I stumbled into the time just before the turn of the 20th Century where the same old Spook Families invented and thus took control of both psychology and (surprisingly or maybe not) parapsychology. I think of them as the "Boston Psy Crew":
Morton Henry Prince
G. Stanley Hall
Society for Psychical Research
William James
Charles Sanders Peirce
Benjamin Peirce
Frederick O. Prince
Frederick H. Prince
Rev. Dr. Walter Franklin Prince
Joseph Banks Rhine
Dr. James Jackson Putnam
That's just what I have in my notes. So if anyone is wondering why both psychology and parapsychology are dumb and wrong and never went anywhere, now you have your answer as to why. "They" saw the advantage long, long ago and took appropriate action.
Trump was fighting into January of 2021, then something very very very strange happened on the 12th of which no one seems to have taken note. What that was precisely I do not know, but just wildly speculating I believe it could have been the credible threat of something along the lines of a mass casualty attack--nuclear or a "natural" disaster--on the United States. After that day, he never conceded nor said the election was not rigged, but he stopped resisting.
Just a few days ago, I think when he finally believed victory was assured, he made an offhand comment along the lines of, "I should have never left." I consider that consistent with the idea that he underestimated the damage that would be done to the world during Biden's term, and that perhaps he should have just let America take the hit, or gambled that the extortionists would not follow through.
You have to evaluate people on their actions, and in this case there's a particular action (or lack thereof) to notice. Whenever talk of secession comes up, leftists never say anything like, "Good! I hope the good people can get the hell away from those (blanks)!" Never. Why is that?
They realize subconsciously--which is where all the meaningful action happens--that they require what they perceive as an underclass of dumb MAGA-hatted asshats to do all the work they consider beneath them, which increasingly means all work. It's not hard for their subconscious to work out that a practical slave class will be required to pay the taxes that fund the UBI for the "good" people.
Their subconscious also knows you can't say these thing out loud. If pressed, their conscious will reverse-engineer the kookiest of reasons to justify their position. I had one guy assure me that the Republic of Texas would repatriate gays just to execute them. We "good" people certainly can't let that happen, can we?
For anyone interested in the technical aspects and evidence concerning the sabotage using mini-nukes of what was then sold as an "accident", this is an extremely detailed analysis:
VT Nuclear Education: Khalezov, Chernobyl and Manhattan (VT 9/7/2020)
Spoiler: 9/11 was also nukes, if anyone did not already know.
A few months ago, I saw a comment come through on Nextdoor titled something like, "What are we going to do about the fluoride in the water?" I thought, "Thank God, normies are finally getting hip to this.
I open it up to find out that the water company was temporarily switching to another reservoir, and that for about six months they were NOT going to be fluoridating the water. That's what this guy was flipping out about.
I really thought I'd seen some brainwashing before that.
It's only been a little over a year, but already many questions about this incident have been forgotten. That's how it works and They know it. To refresh, here's an article from just afterwards, and a quote to entice reading:
An Exercise in Conspiracy Factualism: The Curious Downing of the Aborted F-35B Stealth Fighter-Bomber Jet (VT Foreign Policy 9/26/2023)
Armed with this information, what can we speculatively adduce? Simple: the downed F-35B Stealth fighter-bomber was likely carrying at least a tactical nuclear weapon and its mission was to drop that weapon somewhere along its flight path (hence, the military is not providing the public with the flight path that would enable skeptics to surmise what the actual nuclear target in fact was).
The possible motive behind this mission was to orchestrate a False Flag attack on the U.S. itself (and for anyone who doesn’t believe that an American administration would be so Machiavellian and unspeakably evil as to actually do this, I refer you to Operation Northwoods; please look this up).
Now that you know the backstory, it's disturbing, right? This spooky effect of hiding in plain sight. Discussing Crowley jerking off in Loch Ness seems ridiculous compared to personally seeing things all around that you somehow never really saw before.
I have a weird feeling I can't get rid of every time I think about applesauce. (Yes, it's Them.)
I feel confident I know basically what took place, but I have no idea how much of that is in "the files". My point, though, is that if I'm correct and the key points are therein contained, the vast majority of people simply could not believe it.
It would be a case of mass cognitive dissonance. Many would claim the documents themselves were fake, and most would simply subconsciously deflect it all away as if it did exist.
The point is, it's difficult to see what would be productive out of the whole exercise. If I were Trump (and I'm not), I would just release what part of them I thought the populace could actually handle and say it was everything.
I mean, in the real world, parents withhold information from their children all the time for various reasons. No one describes them as Zionist puppets or the anti-Christ or whatever. People need to grow the fuck up.
Haha, trust me, I've got an extremely different idea about who Cain married:
Interbreeding between archaic and modern humans
In fact, I flip the issue around and find it amazing that the story has been preserved anywhere in any form.
You hate to think that this kind of thing exists and literally makes people crazy, but here you have it:
INBREEDING: Ashkenazi Jews descended from just 350 people, study finds: “everyone is a 30th cousin” (NewsTarget 10/24/2024)
You bring up an important point, along the lines of "the dog that didn't bark". So this was supposed to be a civilian geostationary satellite operating at up to (admitted) 60Gbps. That's a gold-star prime piece of equipment.
The plug gets pulled and what do we hear along the lines of disruption? Nothing at all, not a blip, at least as far as I've heard. Jim must be correct that this rig was 100% military. "They" could have pulled a few Ethernet cables and faked some outages, but they know that no one is paying attention.
And I agree that this has gone next-level. What I had thought what we would see from the RF would be use of a combat laser to blind a surveillance sat, something like this:
Nuclear-Powered Anti-Missile System? What Russia’s Combat Laser May Be Used For (Veterans Today 3/19/2018)
I think the message here was, "You're not going to have all your high-tech shit, and if we're going to dance we're gonna do it with rifles and artillery and toy drones just like Ukraine."
The RF could have done this any time, but we have to ask, "Why now?" There's no way of proving it, but I think this was the response to the nuking of Toropets a month ago.
I thought about this possibility, but there's just no way they can let Trump retake the presidency. He's got a much better idea what he's up against and he's going to go to work right away with a chainsaw and a sledgehammer. He's had four years to make plans and shape the battlespace.
You can see that this is understood implicitly by many, underlying certain statements they make, as if he will take power on Election Day instead of in January. That's when the Rubicon will be either be crossed or it will not, with this exception....
So Kamala is going to lose bigly even though there's going to be rigging in her favor bigly. Given all the foregoing, the only way to play that is to expose the rigging but leave out who it was in favor of. Then they just wave their hands around about having to redo the whole thing next year because "the American people deserve a fair and honest election and will settle for no less".
That will buy them time for something to break their way, like a nuclear war or some such. You can't lose as long as the game continues, can you?
I think They must look back and realize this is the gambit They should have run back in 2016. Given the controversy, a lot of people would have went along with it. It's way more obviously lopsided now than it was then. Few will be inclined towards accepting it or even putting up with anyone else that does.
EDIT: I came across this variant gambit right after posting:
Martin Armstrong: Can Biden Declare Martial Law To Suspend the Election? (10/23/2024)
Lots of detailed legal history with the conclusion:
Therefore, reviewing these decisions, I would have to say that while it would be controversial, the government could call this a necessity if they can get Russia, China, North Korea, or Iran to declare war or attack before the election or certainly before January 20th, and they could declare Martial Law. Hence, the Democrats, in the hands of the Neocons, could carry out their coup, suspend the election, and seize the country as Zelensky has done in Ukraine under the same theory. They would need to close all courts, including the Supreme Court, out of NECESSITY, real or manufactured.
Yes, absolutely, 100%. What rounds up to everything They do to us "ordinary" people is through us "ordinary" people, and if we stopped going along with them--directly or indirectly--it would all be over very quickly.
The thing is, when you actually start to follow up on all the tiny splinters that have been carefully sanded away over the centuries, it's like a gigantic snarl of fishing line (to mix metaphors). Just a quick example from your first paragraph from material I've yet to write up:
Know how this post mentioned Essex as the origina of the Spook Families? They tried to overthrow Elizabeth I back in something called "Essex's Rebellion". Liz looks like the JFK of the 16th Century. IOW, one of their own that got out of control.
Her real father, I would suggest, was Henry Percy, the sixth Earl of Northumberland and previous "accepted suitor" of Anne Boleyn. Liz is born not even 9 months after the marriage of Anne and Henry VIII, so they retcon a "secret wedding" a little before.
Fast-forward to Barbara, and while the Crowley thing I think is true, more interesting is that she was born Barbara Pierce, and those Pierces trace back to the Percys with a metric shit ton of historical manipulation along the way.
Seriously, you cannot even make this up.