The more I learn about history, the worse the picture gets. And beyond all the crimes and outrages, what's becoming more problematic is trying to get a feeling for what people at the time knew about what was happening around them and why.
Bringing it forward, every time I see someone begin their reasoning with something like, "People have always..." or "People have never...,", I think to myself, "There is just no way you or anyone else can be so sure of that."
When I saw "Wag the Dog", of course I thought it was material some Hollywood screenwriter had dreamed up. I disliked the movie because I thought it was ridiculously over the top and had no instructive value.
Fast-forward to the present and we find out "They" do it in "real life". And not only that, I found out they've been deceiving on this scale for a very long time when I stumbled on this quote from George Orwell on the Spanish Civil War:
Early in life I have noticed that no event is ever correctly reported in a newspaper, but in Spain, for the first time, I saw newspaper reports which did not bear any relation to the facts, not even the relationship which is implied in an ordinary lie. I saw great battles reported where there had been no fighting, and complete silence where hundreds of men had been killed. I saw troops who had fought bravely denounced as cowards and traitors, and others who had never seen a shot fired hailed as heroes of imaginary victories; and I saw newspapers in London retailing these lies and eager intellectuals building emotional superstructures over events that never happened. I saw, in fact, history being written not in terms of what happened but of what ought to have happened according to various “party lines.”
I thought this was a pretty bad look: Mountain Meadows Massacre
The Mountain Meadows Massacre (September 7–11, 1857) was a series of attacks during the Utah War that resulted in the mass murder of at least 120 members of the Baker–Fancher emigrant wagon train.
Even there, they try to throw you off because it had nothing to do with the Utah War. This was just a wagon train of emigrants passing through. It's pretty gross when you read the full story, including lowlights like: false flag trying to pin it on Indians, theft, execution under a white flag of truce, and kidnapping.
It's almost unbelievable now, but many years ago I just stumbled into a docu-drama they made about it on Netflix. In probably 10-12 years since, I have never seen this incident mentioned a single other time.
As far as acromegaly and many other disorders from which humans suffer, I believe they may ultimately be related to our genetics. Specifically, I'm of the view that we are the product of genetic engineering, and those engineers like human ones are less than perfect. I fear many of these problems may never be sorted out unless seen in the correct context.
Because really, some of us may naturally be intended to be much larger, and the environment disrupts our optimum development (think about a magnificent Great White shark being raised in a 10-gallon fish tank full of dirty bathwater). In addition to the factors you mentioned, I think the environment in ancient times may have been extremely different.
For example, dinosaurs may have been so large partly because gravity was weaker, and gravity was weaker because the Earth was smaller! Which sounds kooky until you begin to examine the evidence:
I used to reject out of hand the idea that the largest giants recorded in ancient texts were up to 36'. Well I can tell you, I don't reject the idea any more.
I stopped watching all financial news years ago when I figured out that the vast majority of what they were doing was "retrodiction". The thing that just happened? They tell you why it happened. Who cares at that point?
I'm pretty sure any of us could come up with a line of similar bullshit: "That bad quarterly report? See, what you need to understand about climate change is that...."
A few weeks ago, a friend on Facebook posted a picture of herself standing next to one of the doormen at a hotel somewhere in the Middle East. The dude has got to be near 8' tall. He's otherwise totally normal looking, so it's not acromegaly or something.
So how tall is he exactly? Well, she asked him and he didn't know, just that he was the "tallest of them". That's how common it is around there, evidently--the guy didn't even bother measuring.
And still, people think it was impossible there were giants. How much taller do they need to be?!?
I like Richard Hall, but I'll have to disagree about the planes. There were no planes. Rather than rehash any analysis presented elsewhere, I've got something I haven't seen anyone else mention, something you can really only see in hindsight. Everyone is free to ponder this for themselves:
It's seems like it would be a hella difficult feat to pilot a jumbo jet into a building, and not just first time, but two first-timers going 2-for-2. But even if you grant that, there's something even more unlikely.
The buildings were about 210' wide (interestingly, this is not an easy number to come by). The 767's have a wingspan of 156'. So if if the plane was not banked and the nose was more than 27' left or right from the vertical centerline of the building, what would happen?
Well, the wingtip outside the silhouette of the building would shear off and go flying across lower Manhattan. Everyone would be able to watch it sailing through the air. It would have been quite a sight, I imagine.
But then, we didn't get to see that, did we? Nope, both very wide planes hit with such precision and in such a way that their entire silhouettes were completely contained within the profiles of the buildings. Just like Wile-E-Coyote.
A response would be, "Well, they hit at a pretty sharp angle, and that lowered the vertical width." That just makes it worse. A plane banked like that means that upward lift is turned into sideways force, so now you're trying to intersect a building with a huge plane sliding sideways.
But we all saw it happen just like that, I guess. Bush even saw the first one.
Haha, I'll bring this full circle!
I always thought the tallest country was Norway. I had no idea whatsoever that it was the Netherlands. I've listened to Adam Curry--who was raised in the Netherlands and is quite tall himself at 5'17"--for 15 years on the No Agenda show and I don't recall he's ever mentioned it. Frankly, I would have 100% guessed they were short due to cold climate, diet, and population density.
That is, I had no idea until I looked it up the day before yesterday to post a comment in this thread: There were giants. No one debates that other mammals were enormous during the ice age. Why wouldn't humans have also been?
I had to look up and down that thread before I wrote this because I thought it might have been you that said something to cause me to look it up.
Capper: I can't put my finger on it but I know I saw someone in the last couple of days mention the "tallest country", but it was an odd usage because they were referring to north-south... lol
Weird!
Do you know that feeling you get as an adult when you watch cartoons that you watched as a child? You knew things were being referred to, but you didn't have the necessary background and maturity to catch them. They just flew right by.
When I see something like this, I flip that same feeling around a think, "Okay, something is going on here but I don't have the necessary background and maturity to catch it.
(Strangest time in my life concerned synchronicities: A few years back, I went through a period of about a year and a half of one synchronicity per day every day. I finally mentioned it to someone that one of the oddest parts was that it was only one per day. The next day there were two, of course.)
I certainly could not say, but the single most provocative piece of information I've come across that something very deeply "occult" is going on there (aside from the human sacrifice!) is this:
Within walking distance of the front doors, just over the border in France, is the village of Saint-Genis-Pouilly. The name ultimately derives from "Apollo", as there was a temple to that deity located there in Roman times.
But who cares? Lots of such temples around, right? Well, this one was located on an incredibly intriguing construct known today as the St. Michael and Apollo Axis (scroll down a ways to get to that section).
You will have noted that just with the name, we have connected to the Old Testament, New Testament, Roman pantheon and Greek pantheon, and you'll find at that link that we connect also to the Druids and the Hyperboreans!
I feel it's like a lock and I'm still searching for the key to throw the door wide open.
Good gravy! I found it shocking that Mitt Romney's forebears had been driven out of Utah by other Mormons. They said it was because they insisted on practicing polygamy, but now I'm thinking that may have been the limited hangout narrative.
I completely agree with your sentiment that all the "twelves" we see around us are echoes of long forgotten times. One of the earliest occurrences of such of which I am aware is that the Sumerians gave their deities specific numerical rank (12 ranks for 12 deities):
How did the ranking system for the Sumerian pantheon work?
(Of course, one should use exquisite care in the wording. Perhaps these entities used a numerical ranking system among their "royalty", and the Sumerians simply recorded what they were told about it.)
For some reason, I expected to get blasted with both barrels, so I was delighted to see what you wrote. Thanks for the OP!
It was mentioned in this thread that the sexagesimal system was derived from the duodecimal system. I think the order of that is reversed, and this is not a minor point.
That is, the Sumerians used the sexagesimal system in the 3rd Millennium BC, and by my read on the duodecimal system, practical use of that as a numbering system is almost unknown.
This may seem like a pretty pedantic point, but I believe it contains the seed that leads to crucial knowledge.
You see, no one in their right mind with 10 fingers would invent a base-12 numbering system. Let alone a base-60 numbering system. Let alone a base-60 system with no antecedents that just springs up out of nowhere. And then we have the question of why they would dream up gods with extra fingers and give no reason whatsoever.
As alien (<-- haha) as the concept may seen, it seems to me much more straightforward to believe that the "gods" of the Sumerians had--or at least appeared to have--12 fingers, and that they handed the Sumerians their own sexagesimal numbering system, advanced even beyond a base-12 system they might have begun with.
A small point, but really paints a different picture I'd say.
Without getting too deep into it, here's a quick tip for persons interested in research on these female "deities": a great many of them trace back to and are identical with the "goddess" known to the Sumerians as Inanna.
Well, okay, one point: The name "Inanna" is just a corruption of the Sumerian NIN.AN.NA, where "NIN" = "lady or queen", "AN" = "heaven", and "NA" indicates a verb, so here meaning "from". Thus, "Inanna" is not really a name, but a description or title meaning something like "Queen of Heaven".
The Queen of Heaven is specifically mentioned in the Old Testament in opposition to Yahweh, and I suggest we can take that as evidence she is distinct from Mary, either Virgin or Magdalene.
Thanks for the anecdote. I knew all the Masonic/Jewish associations, and the scumbaggery of the founders, but I never knew the darkness carried over so close to the surface in the modern day.
I've never read any Sherlock Holmes, or even watched any adaptations other than the recent Benedict Cucumberpatch version. But I'll take up "Scarlet" as my first foray into it, on the lookout for it being something more than an entertaining detective story.
Thanks for the tips!
I'd never heard it suggested that SLC was some sort of den of iniquity. All the Mormons I've ever met in person were The Nicest People Ever (seriously). But after just a few seconds research, I come across this:
'The Real Housewives of Salt Lake City' Is Getting Too Evil (Gawker 1/28/2022)
The Housewives world is already full of colorful, bored, evil, rich people. But RHOSLC takes this to a different level, featuring women who are unwell in a way that should not be on camera.
Good Lord, Gawker calls out in all earnestness that the show needs to be shut down? The only words that came to mind were these:
Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.
I think many of us agree Stew is controlled op. If that's so, what should be noted is just how extreme a limited hangout this is with this level of truth.
The authentic information exposing the nonsense behind virology is pretty simple and quite damning. It obliterates COVID-19, all viral vaccinations, "the flu", and many other things. "They" have been pushed very far to give any oxygen to it.
That being said, maybe the idea behind it is that a substantial fraction of the population is never going back to the mainstream Establishment, so they've got to begin building up an "alternative" Establishment.
I would liken it to all these bullshit patriotic organizations like the Proud Boys and TPUSA. If you ask me, they've all laid a giant fart. Maybe we should take heart that we're seeing the best these creatively bankrupt Leftists have got, and it all sucks.
Although it's hard to put a finger on the exact time without more information, I theorize that Russia--well, certain people in Russia--have foreseen what has finally spilled over in Ukraine, and have long worked both to avoid and prepare for this day.
I haven't spent much time effort on it, but for anyone interested in the backstory I suggest you begin with a man I believe was a key figure: Anatoly Sobchak
... a co-author of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the first democratically elected mayor of Saint Petersburg, and a mentor and teacher of future presidents Vladimir Putin and Dmitry Medvedev.
Think you would have heard of this guy, right? Well, the mere fact that the Western mainstream doesn't ever mention him is a clue in and of itself.
I would say we got the entire range, but getting smaller as we progress through history. That would be consistent with the Nephilim genetics getting progressively diluted.
For example, currently the tallest country in the world is the Netherlands at 72.36 inches. Makes you think those Dutch bankers, through the Venetian Black Nobility, brought those genes with them from the Levant.
In between, say two to four centuries ago, you get a lot of art and architecture for what I would guess would be 10-12', about twice as tall as "ordinary" humans. All the Tartarian architecture looks about that size. For example, the Hermitage has statues on the outside with humans and giants of that ratio, and the front doors look about 15' high.
Going back to the original Nephilim, I heard that the translations of the reports and measurement units yield about 36'. I used to discard that out of hand and attribute it to translation errors, thinking that was too tall on principles of physics. Now I'm not so sure. I mean, I think the physical principles still hold, but now I wonder if the force of gravity was the same.
It intrigues me how much "They" want this erased from history and it disturbs me how well They've succeeded.
Was it one of the upside-down crosses hanging from the ceiling?
That would go along with the fasces on the wall, the star-and-wreaths on the woodwork, and the swastikas on the upholstery in the visitors' gallery (not pictured).
As I understand the algorithm of ChatGPT, it is simply searching for and stitching together what it finds to be the most pertinent and predominant writing relevant to a question.
If that is so, then we have good news! Clearly, the "controlled demolition" theory of WTC 7 is the most pertinent and predominant view on the Internet.
The Aribiters of Truth should be along any time to correct this obvious error before the good of the People and State is endangered.
Giants are frequently portrayed in ancient and historical artwork. The deniers explain it away by saying, "Those were just more important people, kings and warriors, and their greatness was reflected by the artist drawing them larger than others."
I've always wanted to personally ask a person holding this view, as I did for the vast majority of my life, "Suppose there actually were giants. As an artist, how would you have portrayed them? Would it have been just like in the existing artworks, but with an arrow pointing towards them with a note saying, 'no really guise, these are yuuuge people!!!'?"
There's no way to prove it, but I think many or all of the Apollo astronauts came to "believe" it, or whatever you might call the psychosis that removes conscious awareness of being part of a great deception.
Similarly, Thomas Jefferson carefully avoided taking credit for the Declaration of Independence for about 25 years. After that, we could surmise that it was much easier all around if he just "believed" he wrote it.
The movie was released just before the scandal broke. So the "predictive programming" was successful, eh?