Elephants were giants.
Tigers were giants
Sloths were giants.
Lions were giants.
Rhinos were giants.
Bears were giants.
Great apes were giants.
Even gerbils were giants.
Yet humans were less than 5' tall?
I'm not buying it.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Giants are frequently portrayed in ancient and historical artwork. The deniers explain it away by saying, "Those were just more important people, kings and warriors, and their greatness was reflected by the artist drawing them larger than others."
I've always wanted to personally ask a person holding this view, as I did for the vast majority of my life, "Suppose there actually were giants. As an artist, how would you have portrayed them? Would it have been just like in the existing artworks, but with an arrow pointing towards them with a note saying, 'no really guise, these are yuuuge people!!!'?"
I have come across this over the years and am familiar with Entity Art's recent series on the topic. I definitely do not trust Entity Art because he has written extensively about seeing demons appear in his bedroom, but he does post some interesting information that should be evaluated. For those who want to see some artwork of giants see these links:
As you can see the Virgin Mary is portrayed as a giant. There are some people that are twice her height, and then she is portrayed as being twice as tall as smaller people. I remember trying to find an explanation on all of this artwork and I found some graduate level art history students and teachers who all said it's hierachy of scale which is what you explained above.
We have the Shroud of Turin, so we know what Jesus' bodily proportions were. He was a regular sized person. If his mother Mary was a giant then wouldn't Jesus have been taller? Or did the giant Mary just give birth to a regular sized person? Does that make any sense to you that Jesus would be half the height of His mother Mary? How would that work with the Crucifixion and Mary standing at the foot of the cross? Or do you think that in the artwork I linked above that Mary is regular sized (like us) and that the people smaller than her are just midgets? Also if being a giant was so common in the past then how come we haven't found more graves with giant bones? How come there are no historical accounts writing about how many Popes and Kings were giants?
Based on what I have seen most all of the real giant remains were discovered in North America. I think they were brought over here during the time of the Phoenician Atlantic Michigan copper trade. That is why these North American giant remains were all uncovered with copper jewelry, headpieces, trinkets, etc. The Phoenicians likely brought these giants to America. Many think the Phoenicians were Israelites, but the mainstream view is that they descend from Canaanite's who worshipped demons and sacrificed their kids to Moloch. As someone else stated in this thread, I think Ham's wife had the recessive genes for nephilim characteristics and that is where grous such as the Sons of Anak in the Bible came from. If the Phoenicians were Canaanite that means they descended from Ham. That is why some giants were living amongst the Phoenicians. That is why the giants were brought to America by them.
There is actual historical evidence regarding giants in North America and South America. I have not seen any written historical evidence for giants existing in medieval Europe and Popes and Kings being giants. Has literally any Christian theologian of Catholic or Protestant sects even mentioned how Mary was a giant? Did God just not reveal that information to anyone? Catholics have Marian apparitions and pray the Rosary. Many children have seen Mary and did not report her as a giant. I did see something one time on St. Christopher being a giant, but maybe this information is suppressed and that is why I am unable to find it now.
I do agree that history is being suppressed. I view Genghis Khan and the Mongols as White Caucasoid Scythian Tartarians. I think the portrayal of Genghis Khan and the Mongols as Mongoloid's is an extensive disinformation campaign by the Communist Chinese, Soviet Union, and post-WWI propagandist historians in Europe and America. I've read books from the 1400's-1600's about how Genghis Khan turned Eastern Scythia into Tartary and the Mongols were only a small part of the Tartarians. Many of them were also even Nestorian heretics. Here are some links if people are interested
One topic I don't have a thorough explanation for is artistic depictions of the Native Americans as White people. There is a ton of artwork that depicts most all of the South American Natives as White people and the dark skinned people as a smaller minority group. I already know about about the Viracocha and the Chachapoyas, but these seem to be minority groups. I think the blonde haired blue eyed nobility in South America, which I linked to above, were Eastern Scythian's (Israelites in apostasy) who migrated to the New World. That is why there are some Israelite artifacts in the New World which is sometimes pointed out by Steven M. Collins and other Christian Identity historians. It also fulfills the prophecy of Abraham being a father of many nations.
Note: If the entityart.co.uk links above don't load for people try turning off your VPN. I have had problems with this site when my VPN is on. Don't know why.
I'm thinking like 12-14' . What comes to mind for you?
I would say we got the entire range, but getting smaller as we progress through history. That would be consistent with the Nephilim genetics getting progressively diluted.
For example, currently the tallest country in the world is the Netherlands at 72.36 inches. Makes you think those Dutch bankers, through the Venetian Black Nobility, brought those genes with them from the Levant.
In between, say two to four centuries ago, you get a lot of art and architecture for what I would guess would be 10-12', about twice as tall as "ordinary" humans. All the Tartarian architecture looks about that size. For example, the Hermitage has statues on the outside with humans and giants of that ratio, and the front doors look about 15' high.
Going back to the original Nephilim, I heard that the translations of the reports and measurement units yield about 36'. I used to discard that out of hand and attribute it to translation errors, thinking that was too tall on principles of physics. Now I'm not so sure. I mean, I think the physical principles still hold, but now I wonder if the force of gravity was the same.
It intrigues me how much "They" want this erased from history and it disturbs me how well They've succeeded.