Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

26
There were giants. No one debates that other mammals were enormous during the ice age. Why wouldn't humans have also been?
posted 2 years ago by KiloRomeo 2 years ago by KiloRomeo +28 / -2

Elephants were giants.
Tigers were giants
Sloths were giants.
Lions were giants.
Rhinos were giants.
Bears were giants.
Great apes were giants.
Even gerbils were giants.
Yet humans were less than 5' tall?
I'm not buying it.

28 comments share
28 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– Primate98 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

I would say we got the entire range, but getting smaller as we progress through history. That would be consistent with the Nephilim genetics getting progressively diluted.

For example, currently the tallest country in the world is the Netherlands at 72.36 inches. Makes you think those Dutch bankers, through the Venetian Black Nobility, brought those genes with them from the Levant.

In between, say two to four centuries ago, you get a lot of art and architecture for what I would guess would be 10-12', about twice as tall as "ordinary" humans. All the Tartarian architecture looks about that size. For example, the Hermitage has statues on the outside with humans and giants of that ratio, and the front doors look about 15' high.

Going back to the original Nephilim, I heard that the translations of the reports and measurement units yield about 36'. I used to discard that out of hand and attribute it to translation errors, thinking that was too tall on principles of physics. Now I'm not so sure. I mean, I think the physical principles still hold, but now I wonder if the force of gravity was the same.

It intrigues me how much "They" want this erased from history and it disturbs me how well They've succeeded.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - ptjlq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy