Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

9
Richard D. Hall explains the important work he did some years ago (subsequent to his "ball" video) with regards 9/11 camcorder video analysis and radar trajectories of whatever hit the towers. He concludes that none of the videos are faked, contrary to claims of fake "9/11 truth" disinfo merchants. (player.odycdn.com)
posted 3 years ago by clemaneuverers 3 years ago by clemaneuverers +9 / -0
1 comment share
1 comment share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (1)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– Primate98 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I like Richard Hall, but I'll have to disagree about the planes. There were no planes. Rather than rehash any analysis presented elsewhere, I've got something I haven't seen anyone else mention, something you can really only see in hindsight. Everyone is free to ponder this for themselves:

It's seems like it would be a hella difficult feat to pilot a jumbo jet into a building, and not just first time, but two first-timers going 2-for-2. But even if you grant that, there's something even more unlikely.

The buildings were about 210' wide (interestingly, this is not an easy number to come by). The 767's have a wingspan of 156'. So if if the plane was not banked and the nose was more than 27' left or right from the vertical centerline of the building, what would happen?

Well, the wingtip outside the silhouette of the building would shear off and go flying across lower Manhattan. Everyone would be able to watch it sailing through the air. It would have been quite a sight, I imagine.

But then, we didn't get to see that, did we? Nope, both very wide planes hit with such precision and in such a way that their entire silhouettes were completely contained within the profiles of the buildings. Just like Wile-E-Coyote.

A response would be, "Well, they hit at a pretty sharp angle, and that lowered the vertical width." That just makes it worse. A plane banked like that means that upward lift is turned into sideways force, so now you're trying to intersect a building with a huge plane sliding sideways.

But we all saw it happen just like that, I guess. Bush even saw the first one.

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No subversion.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
  • Perun
  • Thisisnotanexit
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy