Funny that line caught your eye. I ripped it off by inverting a quote from Winston Churchill:
In wartime, truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies.
Since Churchill was the murderous scumbag servant of the Cabal, it's only fitting we invert what he says, right?
It's always gratifying to know I have been of service to someone. Have a good one!
But of course! The entire Establishment and innumerable dupes like yourself campaign against him for no reason whatsoever.
(BTW, I don't know how many times I've cautioned retards and shills against coming out the gate with "lol" or "hahaha" or "lmao", etc. Gives away the game too easy! HAHAHAHA!)
I just scrolled back about three weeks on his tweets, and I'll give you the impression I got from that, if it's of any use. I would judge him to be a disinfo agent. But don't stop reading because there's more to be said....
There are so many disinfo agents floating around, spotting one should surprise no one. In fact, I would advise anyone to act accordingly. That's not to say you should assume every public figure like this is a liar, but that you should always make sure when you're listening to or reading their material that you're asking yourself the fundamental critical thinking question, "I wonder if this person is in error or deceiving me?" With that "one simple trick", you'll start spotting them more often, just like I do.
With O'Connell and Webb, we're at a level of disinfo one level up from mainstream. Ever notice how the mainstream is full of lies and nonsense, but they never call each other out on it? Even with the staged "Left vs Right" conflict, it's reduced to "us vs them". They steer clear of actually examining the lies and having people think about them, or concluding that giant corporations can be simply propaganda machines.
So at this higher level, you will see these outlets exposing each other. That's an acceptable cost, because what they're doing is shielding their most important lies with a bodyguard of truth. The cost is not even as high as you think, because most or all of the truths could be found scrolling around r/conspiracy long enough.
So all O'Connell's material looked pretty good to me until I got to the Trump Derangement stuff. That was what gave away James Corbett (a colleague of Whitney's). I listened studiously to all his material from the start of his career. Then around 2020 he went off on an anti-Trump rant, which I let go at the time. Later, after the Ukraine War started, he went off on Putin like he got his info from the NYT. So They saved that asset for that long just to go after the big threats when needed. Instructive.
With all disinfo, there has to be truth so it's like walking through a minefield. Profitable, but you must be careful. Which leads me into a final comment on O'Connell's technique. Notice how the tone is: "I'm super hip, deeply in-the-know, I'm a savage cutting through these liars with my machete, just follow me and I'll show you!" That's the trick: "just follow me". It's how they lead you astray when they need to.
So my best advice is, don't "follow" these people for that reason, resist becoming a "fan". That's what they're counting on you to do. When they drop a "truth", pick it up and examine it for yourself. Even at best, an honest person can be mistaken. You must always know when to disagree with any "authority".
Hope any of this helps!
I keep waiting for the counterarguments but never get it. All I get is lame, low-effort insults.
Really, it just makes everyone reading this more certain of what to think, like watching a defendant in court with no case just fling their poo like an angry and frightened chimpanzee.
If that's all they have, they clearly have nothing else. Of course, they can't use their words to say that, nor do they have the intelligence to simply remain silent.
Reading these comments, I really sometimes feel like I'm taking notes while watching vicious monkeys in a zoo cage. I wonder if people are entertained by my taunts? I'm entertained by writing them.
Everyone has the right to be taken in by lame disinfo. I think it all has to do with supporting a weak ego. If you never examine your own reasoning, you'll never have to acknowledge what a dumbfuck you are.
Aggressive and childish insults are far more comforting. Less comforting when you're ridiculed by someone pointing it out publicly, though, isn't it? Some people really can never learn.
But fuck thinking about things, amirite?
FWIW, I concluded a while back that Whitney Webb and James Corbett are moles that were activated to go after Musk and Trump because of the seriousness of the threat they pose.
I had already reached that conclusion about Corbett when this group convened apparently specifically to bash Elon. I dare anyone to listen to it and still believe all of them aren't compromised:
I found it beyond cringe, but obviously most people just lap it up and ask for seconds.
If you haven't been keeping up, NATO is getting it's ass handed to it. But if you think they would formally invite Russia to destroy their assets anywhere in Europe instead of just in Ukraine, well, I guess that's a theory too.
I have this sort of half-assed theory that no one really "sells their soul" to the Devil. Rather, the Devil just convinces you that you no longer have possession of it.
Like, I wouldn't need to shove a gun in your face and carjack you if I just came to your door wearing a plastic badge and shoved a bunch of paperwork in your face along with a lot of fast talk about fees and levies, failure to file, impoundment, registration, federal and state, vehicular forfeiture, .... Maybe you just hand over your keys and I drive off in your ride.
Point is, just don't let anyone talk you out of your soul and try to spread the word to any who will listen. Actually, I think Jesus pretty much said the same thing.
The importance of this point cannot be underestimated. To state it another way, the split between people is not between those who obey the law and those who break the law, it's between the moral and the immoral.
As we see with the immoral, they use the law as a bludgeon against their enemies. More subtly, if the moral obey immoral laws, they have compromised their own morality.
The immoral do not consider the law to be a limit on their own behavior. They will find exceptions, excuses, loopholes, justifications and any other subterfuge to avoid or exempt themselves from it. Interestingly, Jesus made exactly the same criticism of the Jews and their laws.
Most people believe that the goal is crafting the perfect set of laws and then enforcing them without exception or favor. That is, "bringing the guilty to justice." As admirable as that idea may seem, it is ultimately flawed and pointless, a beautiful house whose foundation rests on sand. People must put it completely out of their minds
Where does the solution lie? In natural law and understanding the true nature of morality. While I have hope, I often fear that this is completely out of the grasp of humanity into the foreseeable suture.
A mainstream story showed up just a few weeks ago and was posted on r/conspiracy saying something like, "Did you know that a little factory in Jersey still processes coca leaves for Coca-Cola, and does it through legal loophole?" I suppose that if I had to guess, it was viral marketing for this investment opportunity.
Technical note: They keep talking about "coca extract" versus "cocaine". I thought cocaine was coca extract.
Yes, I believe you're right about them being dud Patriots. I just came across this story with the same photo:
Kiev Lies – US Suffers Losses with Patriot System Destroyed and More (The Intel Drop 5/16/2023)
The video above also confirmed that several Patriot missiles failed to be launched properly and fell on the city streets. During the night strikes, numerous missiles of the Patriot and Iris air defense systems failed and fell in Kiev; they were found by the locals:
Well, it confirms for me that at least some of those square tubes had missiles in them. I always thought they might have just been filled with hundred dollar bills and cocaine.
I think it's an air-defense missile but IDK what kind. Definitely not an "Iron Dome", because those fly up into the air and blow themselves up like a firework. Oh, I mean like a "spectacular midair interception".
Ukraine has got to be absolutely littered with these things by now. Which is good because I'm sure the economy is going to be so depressed for decades there's going to be a lot of people picking these up and turning them in at the recycling center for a few hryvnia.
This will do wonders to stimulate sales of my new MIC product: the MIM-105 SuperPatriot, also known as the "CommieBuster".
The first of it's kind, it's an air-defense system to protect air-defense systems from air-defense hypersonic interdiction, or ADADADHILGBTQIAAP+.
Retail prices not finalized, so just keep those development checks coming. Bulk discounts available.
So how much of our labor do we actually get to keep?
Frederick Douglass is probably the 2nd most famous slave behind Harriet Tubman (since he was just an Establishment propagandist and she both had a vagina and was an Intelligence agent). In his writings, one of his big complaints from the time he was a slave--whoa! an "enslaved person"--whoa! a "person identifying as temporarily experiencing slavery"--had to do with his side hustles. Yes, slaves were allowed to have side hustles, but that's not the plot twist.
Fred did something like play the violin, so he gigged at local weddings and dances or whatever. But when he came back, Massa raked off some of his earnings. A sort of a "tax", if you will. He found this practice outrageous.
If only old Freddie have lived to see our beautiful Neo-Liberal Paradise with freedom for all!
My point was addressed to everyone who happened to read it, but thanks for demonstrating that many people don't actually get past the first few words.
And you're bugging me, aren't you? Seems like standards are pretty low around here. Isn't it embarrassing that this all gets recorded so everyone can see what you did and how I pointed it out?
Off-topic: I've always wondered why no one builds an app where, if you enter a certain PIN, it puts up a phony "false bottom" screen with a goatse background while it vaporizes the contents and activates your dead hand switch.
"Yes officer, I know I should be more careful but the passcode is 1234."
I would disagree with Blockchain Robber Baron and others who hold the view that They are radicalizing people. That's an idiotic notion. People are so un-radicalized they have to invent Patriot Front, as lame and laughable a psyop as I've ever seen. Nor do they need a reason to move on anyone. They do what they feel they can get away with without taking losses, creating what reasons they find convenient as they go along.
And I guess Dissident Soaps was attempting some sort of sarcastic witticism? I can't really tell, but for those unfamiliar with his work, Solzhenitsyn said something far more valuable than Dissident Soaps:
And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.
See how these things are related? The Bolsheviki thought they could get away with it, so that's what they did. They were right. Solzhenitsyn is only pointing out that if they had thought they couldn't get away with it, they would not have done it.
BTW, who said anyone was getting out of the gulag?
Well, yes, thank you for the link and it's precisely what I thought, but on the other hand it's also precisely not my point.
That is, BeastMilk posts it without this information, so everyone automatically thinks it's "news" and just happened. That's exactly the same technique the mainstream often uses when they wish to mislead people. Others may feel differently, but I object when anyone does such things. The notion that the ends justify the means underlies the vast majority of what the Elite do. Perhaps some think They are correct about that.
Taken from another angle, this is from 5 years ago. My views on a great many things have evolved over the last 5 years. Personally, I would be deeply suspicious of anyone whose views have not changed over that same period. I see that, as a rule, people can barely deal with a static world, let alone a dynamic one, so I always wish to bring this concept in when appropriate.
It may be news to you, but not everything is announced publicly. I know, it's shocking, isn't it? And to find out in a place called conspiracies.win.
What will we find out next was not on cable news? The mind reels!