The final frontier to which "They" will bring us cognitively is "solipsism". They disguise the meaning but, in short, it's the idea that there is no objective reality. (Satanists discourage this among their adherents, but sell it to everyone else.) To the extent this is accomplished in our minds, all things become possible. For in such a state, how would anyone begin to show something was impossible?
To counter it, one need only posit that there is indeed an objective reality. We then use our imperfect senses and imperfect reasoning, and realize that our understanding will simply fall short of perfect. Big deal.
Final note: everyone should clearly understand that no one can "prove" anything to you, and thus can never have a duty to do so. Rather, it is the duty of each of us to understand the world as well as is practical. Without such understanding, moral action becomes uncertain and even--in principle--impossible.
There's a compounding problem that I neglected to mention. Yes, it's a huge task that few accept as their duty, but the reason most people don't do it is not because of laziness of neglect. Rather, it's because it is simply not the way their minds work.
Many people assume that other people's minds work like theirs, maybe better or worse or in a slightly different style or with different biases. Upon careful study, you will find this is not true. Most people's thought processes generally work in reverse, beginning with conclusions and ending with "facts".
I mention this because it's a crucial factor to integrate into any coherent worldview. Otherwise, you'll spend a lot of time banging your head against a wall trying to incorporate "what a lot of other people think". To really prepare to find the truth, you have to be ready to break with what everyone else "knows".
The final frontier to which "They" will bring us cognitively is "solipsism". They disguise the meaning but, in short, it's the idea that there is no objective reality.
They call it "building new reality". However, seems it is they who fall to their crap and build their "new reality" in their small things between ears.
I already wrote about that in other topics here - we wondering about their actions sanity supposing that they percieve same reality as we do, but that's seems to be wrong. They percieve their own reality they build pushing their narratives to us, but eventually fall to it themselves.
And things could be worse - may be it is already next generation, who, unlike the first, never percieved reality at all. It is a generation that was idoctrinated to percieve their "new reality" instead of reality since early childhood.
This leads us to one important conclusion - there is no way to somehow argue or dispute with them at all. As we percieve our reality via experience with real objects around us, they percieve their "new reality" via "expert opinions" and "influencer feelings" as they teached. So, "climate change" or "coronahoax" is as "real" for them, as a cup of coffee in our hands is real for us. They just not able to use normal way of reality perception because they was not even teached to do that as our parents and we by ourselves teach us in childhood interacting with real objects and phenomenons.
Look at the insane level of fake "care" they push to us to apply to our children - that is "dangerous", this is "painful", hide all scissors and cover all sharp edges with that silicon covers for $10 per dozen. "Do not eat" on bags with silica gel and list of warnings longer than user manual for some woodworking tool. And if you are not comply with that insanity, here they have that "juvenile justice" to take a child from you.
Safety trolling is also a part of their "new reality creation". Even on some housekeeping forum you will get dozens of safety trolls comments with arguments why you should not do that per normal one in the thread about replacing broken wall socket.
Then, they buy Teslas along with protesting against electric power plants. And that is perfectly logical in their "new reality".
I thought that there should be permanent huge cognitive dissonsnce in their heads, but such things could not last through whole life, either they have to resolve it, either become a patient in a enforced mental facility. But seems they don't have any cognitive dissonance at all. They just live their lives in a fictional "new reality" where electricity arise in a wall socket and food is produced by supermarkets. The problem is that they completely seize the political power. And no representation is possible for anybody who do not live in their "new reality". They will never understand you, and no arguments or proofs from reality could change that. They are unable to understand them at all.
Practical consequences are a great educator. When money is free everything can be fake and gay. When circumstances are scarce, everything needs to be practical and productive.
I'm afraid that its for normal people who live in real world. Some could be lazy, but they will adapt as you say.
Those I talk about will just extinct and that's all. They will not be able to do something practical and productive, they are not only unaware that food could be grown cooked by themselves and not only bought in McDonalds, but they also unaware that it is possible to learn how to grow and cook food. There is no such thing as learning something by test and trial in their "new reality". And that could be unsafe and dirty.
Really the worst thing with that modern progressive education is that it completely exterminated learning to learn, not even talking about thinking, research and all that things. It produces people with fixed perception of their "new reality" and that's all.
The final frontier to which "They" will bring us cognitively is "solipsism". They disguise the meaning but, in short, it's the idea that there is no objective reality. (Satanists discourage this among their adherents, but sell it to everyone else.) To the extent this is accomplished in our minds, all things become possible. For in such a state, how would anyone begin to show something was impossible?
To counter it, one need only posit that there is indeed an objective reality. We then use our imperfect senses and imperfect reasoning, and realize that our understanding will simply fall short of perfect. Big deal.
Final note: everyone should clearly understand that no one can "prove" anything to you, and thus can never have a duty to do so. Rather, it is the duty of each of us to understand the world as well as is practical. Without such understanding, moral action becomes uncertain and even--in principle--impossible.
There's a compounding problem that I neglected to mention. Yes, it's a huge task that few accept as their duty, but the reason most people don't do it is not because of laziness of neglect. Rather, it's because it is simply not the way their minds work.
Many people assume that other people's minds work like theirs, maybe better or worse or in a slightly different style or with different biases. Upon careful study, you will find this is not true. Most people's thought processes generally work in reverse, beginning with conclusions and ending with "facts".
I mention this because it's a crucial factor to integrate into any coherent worldview. Otherwise, you'll spend a lot of time banging your head against a wall trying to incorporate "what a lot of other people think". To really prepare to find the truth, you have to be ready to break with what everyone else "knows".
They call it "building new reality". However, seems it is they who fall to their crap and build their "new reality" in their small things between ears.
I already wrote about that in other topics here - we wondering about their actions sanity supposing that they percieve same reality as we do, but that's seems to be wrong. They percieve their own reality they build pushing their narratives to us, but eventually fall to it themselves.
And things could be worse - may be it is already next generation, who, unlike the first, never percieved reality at all. It is a generation that was idoctrinated to percieve their "new reality" instead of reality since early childhood.
This leads us to one important conclusion - there is no way to somehow argue or dispute with them at all. As we percieve our reality via experience with real objects around us, they percieve their "new reality" via "expert opinions" and "influencer feelings" as they teached. So, "climate change" or "coronahoax" is as "real" for them, as a cup of coffee in our hands is real for us. They just not able to use normal way of reality perception because they was not even teached to do that as our parents and we by ourselves teach us in childhood interacting with real objects and phenomenons.
Look at the insane level of fake "care" they push to us to apply to our children - that is "dangerous", this is "painful", hide all scissors and cover all sharp edges with that silicon covers for $10 per dozen. "Do not eat" on bags with silica gel and list of warnings longer than user manual for some woodworking tool. And if you are not comply with that insanity, here they have that "juvenile justice" to take a child from you.
Safety trolling is also a part of their "new reality creation". Even on some housekeeping forum you will get dozens of safety trolls comments with arguments why you should not do that per normal one in the thread about replacing broken wall socket.
Then, they buy Teslas along with protesting against electric power plants. And that is perfectly logical in their "new reality".
I thought that there should be permanent huge cognitive dissonsnce in their heads, but such things could not last through whole life, either they have to resolve it, either become a patient in a enforced mental facility. But seems they don't have any cognitive dissonance at all. They just live their lives in a fictional "new reality" where electricity arise in a wall socket and food is produced by supermarkets. The problem is that they completely seize the political power. And no representation is possible for anybody who do not live in their "new reality". They will never understand you, and no arguments or proofs from reality could change that. They are unable to understand them at all.
Practical consequences are a great educator. When money is free everything can be fake and gay. When circumstances are scarce, everything needs to be practical and productive.
I'm afraid that its for normal people who live in real world. Some could be lazy, but they will adapt as you say.
Those I talk about will just extinct and that's all. They will not be able to do something practical and productive, they are not only unaware that food could be grown cooked by themselves and not only bought in McDonalds, but they also unaware that it is possible to learn how to grow and cook food. There is no such thing as learning something by test and trial in their "new reality". And that could be unsafe and dirty.
Really the worst thing with that modern progressive education is that it completely exterminated learning to learn, not even talking about thinking, research and all that things. It produces people with fixed perception of their "new reality" and that's all.