Glad you asked. It's actually really key to understanding how the whole picture comes together.
There was a book written in 1897 (IIRC, which was 15 years before the sinking) called, "Futility or, The Wreck of the Titan". The storyline contains dozens of parallels to the supposed real-life sinking of the Titanic. You can easily search this up and the list is beyond startling. Okay, so the existence of the book needs an explanation, right?
There are a number of candidates: "All a big coinkydink!", "The author was a time-traveler or could see into the future!", "Synchromysticism!", or maybe, "Proof we live in a simulation and the alien programmers are fucking with us!" Well okay, but I think anyone will admit those are pretty far-fetched.
The alternative scenario is that "They" had this old Tartarian ship, eventually to be named the Titanic, that they wanted to fake the sinking of. Why? Who the hell can be sure with these occult wingnuts and their lunacy. But in any case they had the script in mind at least 15 years ahead of time.
As They always love to taunt us with their superiority by foreshadowing events, they publish this novel that actually contains the scheme. Then 15 years later, well... they simply execute. No coincidences, no time-travel, no synchromysticism, nothing of the kind necessary.
So as wild as the claims of a Tartarian ship, a hoax sinking, and a hoax tourist sub may seem at first blush, at least there's a big pile of evidence to examine. With the other kooky explanations for the book "Futility", there's no evidence to examine at all.
There's one I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on because the research was really new at the time and I'd personally never heard about it: the Titanic was left over from the Tartarians. Tall claim, but it's based around a very simple examination of photos and welding technology that was unavailable of the time. A treasure trove here:
Our civilization did not build Titanic, Olympic or Britannic. Theirs did. Was it the Tartarian one? (6/25/2018)
The other was right in his wheelhouse: a fake historical person as shown in fake photos. In this case it's John Jacob Astor IV, and it puts a knife in the heart of the Titanic/Federal Reserve conspiracy. That was another diversion anyway because all those three supposedly against it never opposed the Fed, as shown by their public statements.
Anyway, we go into that theory assuming JJA4 was just some extremely rich dude. You can start to get an idea that the family was "in the club" from this article about his ancestor:
John Jacob Astor: Freemason, Intel Operative and Made Man (2/7/2023)
By the time we get to JJA4, one of the richest men in the world, well... just google up pics of him. Only about six different ones, all obviously phony. For Chissakes, two of the faces are copies of each other, and in the Titanic one he looks like a cardboard cutout. You can compare to pics of his contemporary, JP Morgan. There's a jillion legit pics of his ugly mug.
So to what extent did this high-profile historical figure exist? I mean, even "Joe Biden" has made a better showing of himself than JJA4.
Jesus, I thought the post title was a typo or something. The sub is named the "Titan"? Really? Really?These fuckers are bold. "Futility", anyone?
I knew the thing was a total psyop from the first second I heard about it. I had no idea they were being quite so obvious. The really stunning thing is that I'm the only person on r/conspiracy saying that, and the shills are all over me for it. It's yet another sad commentary on the state of conspiracy theory Redditors.
It'll be interesting to see if (disinfo agent) Miles Mathis has a write-up on this. His paper was where I first saw the original sinking exposed as a hoax. (Which it was, although he diverted away from the deeper truths exposed by it.)
The Daily Mail and CNN stories were full of holes and red flags, and I'm sure it just gets worse from there. And if it wasn't clear from context, the purpose of the psyop about this dumb tourist sub is just to convince you the sinking a century ago was real. That idea is unconsciously reinforced from the jump when you accept anything at all about this latest gag.
Let me get this straight: "We have never even tried to make a plain old run-of-the-mill hypersonic missile, but we suddenly made one that can definitely hit other hypersonic missiles."
See, this is why I think basically no one is actually reading news stories any more.
(Yes, I get that technically speaking I could "intercept" a hypersonic missile with a plain old run-of-the-mill rock if I was standing right in front of it, but somehow I don't think anyone has this very special case in mind.)
What I think is actually most disturbing about the video is all those people "multi-level signature reviewing". I'm sure any of them could easily tell us straight out, "Yeah, they just told me to sit there and click 'verified' over and over, so that's what I did."
Maybe I'm wrong, but they just look like ordinary people to me. That is, that's not Schwab sitting next to Gates sitting next to Soros. Nor do I think they were paid millions of dollars, or there's video of them killing children, or there are men with rifles standing just out of frame. All it takes is ordinary people going along with the program and then having the "good sense" to keep their mouths shut.
So if anyone thinks the world is evil because there are evil people at the top running things, well, there's more to it than that. They wouldn't get anywhere if it weren't for ordinary people, like the guy in the next cubicle and the woman in front of you at the drive-thru, that were just going along with the program.
Researchers get caught up in reptilians and the doings of the Merovingians and whether we live in a simulation and other things about which we can do little. But real evil is playing out around us all the time unnoticed, and maybe that's why evil people are getting away with it.
To me, the obvious and baffling contradiction that is somehow never noticed is, "Look how different we are, and we need special treatment because we're different. Also, it's outrageous that people notice we're different and treat us differently."
Here's the very strange truth and, strangely, you'll see "conspiracy theorists" only buy into, well, anything else.
On the one hand, nukes are indeed real and have been used many, many times. I'm not talking about any testing, but in actual hostilities. It's happened many dozens of times, maybe hundreds by this point. Four tactical nukes were used between the end of May and the 9th of June in Ukraine.
How could they possibly disguise it? They just tell people they were some type of conventional weapon, or accident (Beirut Port), or just ignored completely. It's been a real eye-opener for me to see how very little people can figure out for themselves when they're not told.
On the flip side, nukes were faked for the first few years. The Trinity test, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and Operation Crossroads (the Bikini Atoll tests) were all faked. Somewhere along the line, though, they did actually achieve the necessary tech.
I suspect those first episodes were faked because "They" needed nukes as part of Their Grand Narrative of the end of World War II and the start of the Cold War. People needed to be kept in fear for their very lives.
It worked, of course, and here we are 3/4 of a century later and people are still shitting their pants over "WW3 going nuclear". Zero percent have any recognition that it already has. If you're wondering, the answer is yes, the world does seem very surreal to me.
The JCPOA was something "They" desperately wanted. I've never done the research to find out exactly what prize was hidden at the bottom of that cereal box, but all Their dicks got hard enough to indicate it was there.
That being the case, it can be used as something of a litmus test. Trump, of course, withdrew the US completely. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei comments only very infrequently on it, and just sort of talks around it. So here we have RFK Jr. in support of it (or more technically whatever equivalent would reinstitute it).
The Clown World giveaway that we were never supposed to notice, of course, was that the "deal" was meant to control a weapons program which did not and probably never did exist. Indeed, the Supreme Leader has issued a fatwa against nuclear weapons, declaring them un-Islamic, and Iran from time to time reissues it's call for a nuclear weapons ban treaty for the Middle East.
Here's my high-octane speculation: we are never going to see any high-octane UFO theatrics. That is, we're seeing about all of Project Blue Beam that we're ever going to see.
Carefully note: this is not to say that They are not going to declare global martial law or some such thing over an "alien invasion" because we all just saw Them do that by relabeling the flu as the Andromeda Strain.
All we're getting is a steady stream of obvious liars (obvious to me, anyway) with ever more outlandish narratives and (as noted) no actual evidence. It's all, "I'm from the government. Trust me, bro!" It's pathetic, really.
Further, and I think more convincing, is that just given current technology and control over mass media, if one simply opens up their imagination and fires up their creativity, one can think of numerous little "ops" that could be pulled to make even hardened disbelievers pause and say, "Hang on, is there really something going on here?" But have we seen any of that at all? Nope.
They've been unable to move the social engineering needle with this latest UFO initiative. No minds are being changed: Everyone that thought it was bullshit before still thinks so, no matter what they say on TV. Everyone that thought UFOs were real before just has more fuel piled on the fire. And a handful of the suspicious and astute now think the proportion of psyop in the UFO phenomenon is higher than they ever suspected.
I had to look up the definition of "klandma": What is Klandma?
Racist grandma or grandma that is member of the Ku Klux Klan. The word was created by the person who created the subreddit r/forwardsfromklandma, which posts racist memes. Formed with the words "Klan" and "Grandma".
Does anyone have any doubt that r/forwardsfromklandma was set up by a fed? Or that the definition of "klandma" in Definder was written by the same fed, who in fact referenced himself in the definition? A legit question, though, is whether any actual non-fed human being has ever posted there. (I did not bother to check.)
All in all, more evidence of how lame and creatively bankrupt "They" really are.
The Republic of Poland has rapidly been turned into a Fifth-Generation Warfare state, similar to Ukraine but at a much faster pace. As obvious as their actions along these lines are, no one really seems to have caught on.
Without this thesis, events will seem nonsensical and pass by quickly without note of their significance. Take this recent statement by Poland, for example:
Poland ‘concerned’ about Сhina-Russia closeness: Warsaw has demanded that Beijing side with Kiev and condemn Moscow (RT 5/19/2023)
Are we to believe Warsaw now cares so deeply for the scumbag Jew/Nazi junta in Kiev that they will publicly makes demands on their behalf on the other nuclear superpower they haven't already greatly antagonized? I reject this completely as being remotely related to the interests of the people of Poland or their Republic.
So how does it makes sense? Poland in now nothing but a tool of the NWO, and They are beyond caring who realizes it (although, again, scant few do). At the current time, sides are being chosen up for a showdown, Poland enthralled to one side and China aligned with the other. Diplomatic shots such as this are already being fired.
This being Fifth-Generation Warfare, none of this is announced publicly or need be in concert with any laws, norms, or external sense.
People should understand clearly that there's nowhere to run. This guy clearly has his heart in the right place, but it sounds like someone in Philadelphia in 1770 saying, "Flee tyranny! Move way out to the Ohio Valley where tyranny will never come!"
Rage Against the Machine told us decades ago that, "The front line is everywhere." And look, it turns out they were In Favor of the Machine all along.
I personally think tiny houses are cool too, and I think their popularity is something more than just liberals being brainwashed dipshits signalling their virtue by living in human habitrails.
Really, the attraction to tiny homes is a direct and practical refutation to all those same liberals who think humanity will "ruin the entire planet" as long as they remain without boots stamping on their faces forever.
Put simply, the vast majority of people wish only to live quite modestly. Prosperous and even wealthy people very frequently choose to live quite well below their means, just like other "normal" people. You'd never be able to pick them out of a crowd. I believe Warren Buffett still lives in the 3500sf suburban home he bought in the 60s.
This is also why Leftists find people like Mike Lindell so infuriating and intolerable. Here's a billionaire that, instead out being out spraying petroleum all over Yellowstone from his Gulfstream, you might see in line in front of you at a fast-food joint. Worse, you may have considered yourself above going to such a joint in the first place.
Bizarre bonus note for anyone who ever thought Bill Gates might have been replaced with a body double at some point: Way, way back when he was the richest person in the world worth only $50B, he was asked in an interview what it was like to have so much money.
He said, "Well, that's just an arithmetic calculation: a number of shares times a price per share. It doesn't really make much difference. No matter what it was, I would still get the same hot dog."
Strange words from the person we know as a Bond villain today.
There is essentially zero understanding in the popular consciousness what a joke the NATO militaries have become. They would get crushed by a peer adversary. The proof is the UAF, which is (was) for all intents and purposes the largest and most combat-ready NATO force on the continent, and that's exactly what's happening.
UK armed forces would last just ‘five days’ in a war, senior MP warns (FT 2/10/2023)
None of this is to suggest that such forces would therefore not be sent into battle to be crushed
Right, exactly.
See, I thought what made conspiracy theorists different was that they were doing what I was doing (and which is simply what I thought everyone should be doing): using the resources of logic, judgement, and a knowledge base of facts that you had previously built up to validate new facts and feed them back in to your knowledge base. Turns out, that's pretty much not what happens.
We all criticize normies because they get their "truths" from the mainstream. like picking books off a shelf. They are allowed a limited selection, so some choose the book labeled "Fox" over the book labeled "MSNBC", but the Elites control the books on the shelf.
I was surprised and dismayed to determine--really only very recently--that almost all "conspiracy theorists" operate the same way, just with a different set of books. They pick books off the shelf labeled "Joe Rogan" or "Clif High" or "The Greek" or whatever. Some more shadowy versions of Rupert Murdoch control or influence the vast majority of what goes on this shelf. But see how it's just an enhanced version of the other thing?
To me, a real seeker with any hope of finding out what the hell is really going on must to be able to recognize admissions of truth when spoken by a known liar, reject falsehoods and errors from their own most valued sources, and accept truths even when rejected by every other person. IDK exactly what qualities it takes to do this, but it seems clear to me that it's what we should all be shooting for.
"Miles Mathis" is most assuredly a disinformation project, as stated. And as I hope everyone understands but seemingly very few do, all disinformation sources must give you some truth. For the astute, even the lies and omissions are valuable, since one can deduce what They wish everyone to think or to steer everyone away from.
The water is too deep for the vast majority, even of those who fancy themselves "conspiracy theorists". Notwithstanding that, I'll still tell people that a deep end of the pool exists.
Most will never venture there for whatever reasons they care to tell themselves and others. Some will go out, but will metaphorically drown. A handful will learn to swim, just as I learned. In my opinion, we need all the swimmers we can get.
In honor of Uncle Ted's passing, I post this to remind everyone that not everything is as we've been told:
The Unabomber was another Psy-op (25-page PDF)
If this comes as news, I hope that at least at this point it doesn't come as a surprise. The paper is by disinfo agent Miles Mathis, so all the usual caveats apply.
A couple of little factoids to add to the material in the paper are that Judy Clarke (of fake OJ trial fame) served as his lawyer, and Merrick Garland (of corrupt DOJ fame) oversaw the Unabom case as Deputy AG. What a coincidence!
This brings up a question regarding Fifth-Generation Warfare and the average state of human consciousness worldwide, which is: If WW3 was 5GW in nature, and it were to break out (or had already done so) but was not formally announced, how many people would actually notice? I suggest the answer is very, very few.
Here we have the prospect of armed and uniformed forces of one or more nation-states being sent to attack those of another nation-state, yet it is not an act of war. The article doesn't even mention it to be so considered. Further, Ukraine has already said such an act is not welcome. Thus, we also have an invasion that is not an invasion.
So if anyone was wondering what Fifth-Generation Warfare would be like, and would that indeed be the nature of World War III, I suggest you have only to look around and examine events for yourself.
How absurd is this story? "We might have to send troops if there are no security guarantees which might commit us to sending troops." What's it going to be: war or war? Because that's your choice in the free societies we're protecting here.
It's all become so surreal. No one is actually even paying attention any more.
I find it so odd that Gingrich has on occasion been permitted to lift the curtain slightly, yet has still not committed suicide.
GINGRICH: ESTABLISHMENT SCARED OF TRUMP BECAUSE HE “DIDN’T BELONG TO THE SECRET SOCIETY” (Infowars 3/4/2016)
When asked why, Gingrich responded, “Well because he’s an outsider, he’s not them, he’s not part of the club, he’s uncontrollable, he hasn’t been through the initiation rites, he didn’t belong to the secret society.”
Haha, we're talking about Israelis! I have no doubt contracts were written up, shekels changed hands, military and commercial espionage was attempted, etc. You know, the very definition of the "defense industry".
I'm surprised that, at this point, anything exists in the West beyond models and CGI.