Yes, I'm certainly familiar with Biglino's work and recommend it to those (regrettably few) that already express an interest in that area. Otherwise it's like throwing ping-pong balls at a brick wall. And as time goes on, I think more and more that it's not ethically sound even to expose people to knowledge you know they will reject. Still up in the air.
A few notes on Biglino and his work you might find of interest:
First--and not that you should be taking anyone's word on such things--but as strange as his findings are, I came to all the same conclusions (and beyond) before I'd ever heard of him. And it was through an entirely different approach: he from translation and etymology, and myself through Sumerian mythology. Impossible to think that we arrived at the same place simply by happenstance. Far easier to believe that we both just arrived at the truth.
Second, I believe he says less than he knows and thinks. This goes back to what I mentioned in the first paragraph. He's in a deeply Catholic country, and this type of research is... beyond challenging to that context. You'd have more success going around telling every Italian that he was adopted. So he goes more into detail and less into sweeping implications (which is what I'm interested in).
Third, I think They are in the process of "turning" him, which is a big disappointment. I saw he was interviewed by the highest-profile disinformation agent in this area, Graham Hancock. I haven't yet had the heart to actually watch it because I fear the worst. Another researcher from over twenty years ago, Alan Alford, was turned in such a way. I could name many others that exist just to send you off into the weeds, so always keep your wits about you even with Mauro.
Final note on "Westworld": what I said only applies to Season 1 of the recent reboot and none of the rest of the franchise. I scraped Season 2, being well aware of what I was looking for and found virtually nothing. The, uh, "message senders" had apparently moved on.
Yes, I'm certainly familiar with Biglino's work and recommend it to those (regrettably few) that already express an interest in that area. Otherwise it's like throwing ping-pong balls at a brick wall. And as time goes on, I think more and more that it's not ethically sound even to expose people to knowledge you know they will reject. Still up in the air.
A few notes on Biglino and his work you might find of interest:
First--and not that you should be taking anyone's word on such things--but as strange as his findings are, I came to all the same conclusions (and beyond) before I'd ever heard of him. And it was through an entirely different approach: he from translation and etymology, and myself through Sumerian mythology. Impossible to think that we arrived at the same place simply by happenstance. Far easier to believe that we both just arrived at the truth.
Second, I believe he says less than he knows and thinks. This goes back to what I mentioned in the first paragraph. He's in a deeply Catholic country, and this type of research is... beyond challenging to that context. You'd have more success going around telling every Italian that he was adopted. So he goes more into detail and less into sweeping implications (which is what I'm interested in).
Third, I think They are in the process of "turning" him, which is a big disappointment. I saw he was interviewed by the highest-profile disinformation agent in this area, Graham Hancock. I haven't yet had the heart to actually watch it because I fear the worst. Another researcher from over twenty years ago, Alan Alford, was turned in such a way. I could name many others that exist just to send you off into the weeds, so always keep your wits about you even with Mauro.
Final note on "Westworld": what I said only applies to Season 1 of the recent reboot and none of the rest of the franchise. I scraped Season 2, being well aware of what I was looking for and found virtually nothing. The, uh, "message senders" had apparently moved on.