They've made amazing progress in the industrial leader of Europe:
German deindustrialization continues unabated due to Berlin’s suicidal energy policies (The Intel Drop 7/25/2023)
I always thought there was problem with the plotline onvolving the diver.
The plane supposedly crashed way out in the ocean. Are we to believe a diver/assassin somehow was near enough the crash site to swim over in a few minutes? If he came off a boat, wasn't the boat close enough for the passengers to wave it over? And if it refused to assist, wouldn't they have said that? Similar issues arise if you suppose he came off the shore, which was a couple of miles away.
The questions continue, but the other odd fact is that there happened to be GoPro video of the entire flight beginning with the takeoff. What a coincidence, right?
The entire affair makes me think that the event was faked, the main purpose being that Fuddy, a loyal retainer, would not be available to tell any tales. Then the rest of it, like the JFK assassination, is where they purposely heap conspiratorial wood on the fire to keep researchers staring at the dancing flames as long as they care to without ever approaching the truth.
I've noticed that as part of the overall reality distortion program, "They" really do not want anyone to know how average Jews think and feel in both the US and Israel.
For example, a few years ago I saw someone get literally booed off the stage for even just beginning to badmouth Trump. The punchline: it was a Jewish director at the Israeli film festival in Los Angeles.
Yeah, so not quite what They would have us imagine, right? You can see how airtight the lid really is.
I interpret this as yet another indication of how weak the Elite's hand really is. A Congressional stooge cannot even read a script without the supervision of a malfunctioning fembot.
Sun Tzu told us that all warfare was based on deception. Overestimating an enemy's strength is just as bad as underestimating. The problem we see is that most people simply cannot handle the task of discernment.
He may have been there, but if he got an envelope I'm sure we'd all have seen it.
Funny you mention him, though, because it wouldn't surprise me that he didn't. I think he's an evil troll and has been a useful tool all his career, but I recently came to think he was never "in the club" himself. You know, not one of these bloodline freaks.
I just found out yesterday that Trump held a short press conference featuring Tim Ballard some time during his presidency. I don't have the original link, but it's rebroadcast here:
Trump Breaks when Tim Ballard Describes Human Trafficking happening at the Border!SOUND OF FREEDOM
(The title is overblown; he's quite calm throughout.)
Just another example of something pointed out long, long ago:
You hypocrites! Well did Isaiah prophesy of you, when he said: ‘This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me; in vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.’”
Yes, I'm certainly familiar with Biglino's work and recommend it to those (regrettably few) that already express an interest in that area. Otherwise it's like throwing ping-pong balls at a brick wall. And as time goes on, I think more and more that it's not ethically sound even to expose people to knowledge you know they will reject. Still up in the air.
A few notes on Biglino and his work you might find of interest:
First--and not that you should be taking anyone's word on such things--but as strange as his findings are, I came to all the same conclusions (and beyond) before I'd ever heard of him. And it was through an entirely different approach: he from translation and etymology, and myself through Sumerian mythology. Impossible to think that we arrived at the same place simply by happenstance. Far easier to believe that we both just arrived at the truth.
Second, I believe he says less than he knows and thinks. This goes back to what I mentioned in the first paragraph. He's in a deeply Catholic country, and this type of research is... beyond challenging to that context. You'd have more success going around telling every Italian that he was adopted. So he goes more into detail and less into sweeping implications (which is what I'm interested in).
Third, I think They are in the process of "turning" him, which is a big disappointment. I saw he was interviewed by the highest-profile disinformation agent in this area, Graham Hancock. I haven't yet had the heart to actually watch it because I fear the worst. Another researcher from over twenty years ago, Alan Alford, was turned in such a way. I could name many others that exist just to send you off into the weeds, so always keep your wits about you even with Mauro.
Final note on "Westworld": what I said only applies to Season 1 of the recent reboot and none of the rest of the franchise. I scraped Season 2, being well aware of what I was looking for and found virtually nothing. The, uh, "message senders" had apparently moved on.
It's all over my head, really. The thrust of my research seems to have turned out to be just giving an account of the available evidence to some level of satisfaction. Just trying to make all the pieces fit together in a sensible way. That's deep enough, as you might imagine.
I just wandered my way in to it all, but the account I ended up with is beyond strange, way past anything the vast majority of people could even imagine to be true, let alone entertain the evidence for. Although it's a satisfying level of knowledge, it's quite lonely.
But as far as fiction, myth and legend, I've found a tremendous amount of truth buried and ignored there, completely passed by. As an example (and a central one), I found that the Bible, particularly the OT, was an account of the interactions of some humans with the powerful aliens that created us. As strange as that sounds, it connects up with and is expanded by what the much more ancient Sumerians wrote about their interactions with their "gods".
And as strange as that all sounds, it was confirmed by subtle but unmistakable clues and references planted in Season 1 of "Westworld". Can you even imagine that? Almost no one can, which is why they can put these signals out so freely.
I couldn't make any of this up if I tried for a century.
As to the last thing you mentioned, free will, I think that's a crucial aspect of what's going on but not in the sense everyone seems to think. Rather than being something to do with some "cosmic" or "karmic" sense of it, I think it's much more concrete. That is, I think a deal was put in place a long time ago and has been playing out since then, and here is the clearest description I've found of it:
Because of his arrogance, Allah banished Iblis from heaven and condemned him to hell. Iblis accepted his fate, but asked that he might be spared until Judgement Day so that he could tempt humans from the path of righteousness and lead them to the same fate that would eventually befall him. Allah granted this, but did not give Iblis power over humans. Instead, if they were to be led from the righteous path, it would have to be because of their own temptations and transgressions.
So do I think it's about supernatural beings from some divine realm? Not at all. I think very real events took place on very real Earth in the very real past, but the evidence of them has been mythologized, fractured, rewritten, misinterpreted, smeared together, hidden, destroyed, etc, etc., but the tiny pieces remain that we have to try to put together.
So we can start to form explanations for things we find. Did Pike, out of nowhere, think serving a non-existent Lucifer was a great idea and that fooling people into it over decades was the best way to go? No, he was just a player in a much bigger game to be played according to certain rules that would be enforced at the end.
And how about demons, or aliens, or breakaway Elites with advanced technology: If they're so powerful, why don't they just put the zap on all of us sheep? Either they're not powerful or it's not allowed, and they're afraid of forfeiting or being punished at the end. Which, of course, entail the existence of an enforcer.
But the big picture, as I see it, is that the best way for your opponent to beat you at a game is prevent you from even knowing you're playing one at all.
The more you pay attention, the more you notice They don't want us paying attention. There's a "blind spot" firmly affixed over Phoenicia.
From a totally different direction, there's another example from what you might consider a suspicious organization: the Freemasons. They have as a central figure "Hiram Abiff" that helped build Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem, but they take great pains to tell us this fictional character has absolutely no relation to the historical King Hiram I of Tyre that helped build Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem.
Don't they want the cred that Abiff was a real historical person, and not just made up like the rest of their nonsense? Very strange indeed! Well, there is some indication of what I think They don't want us looking into.
Hiram's predecessor was Abibaal ("my father is Baal") and his successor was Baal-Eser I ("Baal is foremost"). Seeing a theme here? Is it striking a chord?
So if I was one of Them, I wouldn't want anyone putting this together either.
After coming to learn something of the central importance of Phoenicia in world history and down to current events, I've come to notice what seems to be a deliberate effort to mentally separate Phoenicia from the Israelites and other societies in the region.
In reality, of course, there was little separation One example is from the Hebrew alphabet itself:
An example of related early Semitic inscriptions from the area include the tenth-century Gezer calendar over which scholars are divided as to whether its language is Hebrew or Phoenician and whether the script is Proto-Canaanite or paleo-Hebrew.
But how many people ever mention this? Few to none. My "conspiritorial" point here is that this should draw our attention even more strongly towards Phoenicia.
There's an interesting part of this video that's always cut off from the end.
As the gathering is breaking up, James Mattis is standing near Trump but turned away. He's looking at Lindsay Graham a few rows back. Well actually, he's staring a fucking hole in him and Graham looks like a schoolboy caught by the principal jacking off. A smooth operator made extremely uncomfortable.
So Mattis turns out to be Deep State and I think we all know Lady G was Deep State all along. So what the hell was going on there? IDK, TBH.
My point is that when analyzing the world, there are wheels within wheels and players may change sides from time to time. But then, how foolish do you have to be to think it was any other way?
Trump is what I think of as a "closeted truther", and I'm pretty damn sure everyone here is closeted to a certain extent. (You're not going to ruin another Thanksgiving, are you?)
Here's a tweet from 3/12/2012, long before he was involved in politics:
When I was 18, people called me Donald Trump. When he was 18, @BarackObama was Barry Soweto. Weird.
Frankly, I don't even mention such thing in "polite company".
To answer seriously: basically yes.
I'm of the extreme minority opinion that Hunter has been dead of an accidental overdose since shortly before "Biden" was inaugurated. Since then, as I watch the steady stream of Hunter Biden antics go by grabbing everyone's attention--mainstream and conspiricist alike--I realize this show could go on forever and no real Elite is in any danger.
I say to myself, "If Hunter hadn't died, it looks like it would have been worth killing him." As to "enjoyment", well that's up to the individual.
Well, I can tell you that you've thought about it more than 99.9% of the people that I've ever come across.
There's a fundamental problem in orientation, though, that nearly all historical research suffers from, and I hope you can understand my description of it. That is, researchers almost invariable take the evidence easily available to them in it's current context, put it all together in one way or another, shove it backwards in time and call it history. That's not the way reality works and not a proper way to understand history.
If you read back over what you wrote, try to detect that sense that Babylon was a hazy place, an undefined source of myth and legend, with influence spreading by undescribed means and mechanisms. That's the product of working backwards.
Babylon was, of course, as real as Cleveland is to us, just as concrete and mundane, with real people doing real things for real reasons. And so it was to the people of the time, including, for example, the various people in the Bible who talked about it. Is Cleveland a mystical place to anyone today? Generally speaking, no it is not.
So the correct approach is to try to figure out what went on there--and why--from the tiny pieces of evidence that made it down to us. If we're not ready to cite this evidence specifically and give an account of where it fits in to the picture, why should anyone believe the tale we gin up more than anyone else's?
We can confirm our hypotheses by then examining our present world. That is, we should ask, "Is what we've said about the past consistent with and explanatory of what we see now in our past's future?" With that question, do you see now how the arrow of causality is finally pointed the right way?
All this takes a lot of research, organization, and discipline. That's probably the reason no one does it, it being easier--again--to just shove ideas backwards towards a past that can't argue with you. But then again, I did it and I'm no one special, so it's possible.
Babylon is indeed a Mystery.
But I've noticed a universal and basic misunderstanding of the word "mystery". That is, everyone seems to treat it as if it means "unknown", or even "unknowable". The real meaning is more like "secret", or "that which few know".
Which I suppose explains why no one seems to even try to understand what's so important about Babylon in the first place.
Here are a couple of articles fitting additional puzzle pieces into the picture.
First, although I'm sure they originally hoped for the best, Russia was certainly aware of the smuggling abuses of the grain deal. They suckered Ukraine into recalcitrance on the issue, giving them the pretext to let it expire. Once this political goal was accomplished, they obliterated the physical facilities. A crucial item of intel is that the strikes on Odessa had nothing to do with "revenge" for the Kerch Strait attack:
“Regarding the strikes on Odessa and elsewhere: It bears mentioning that these are not yet the ‘strikes of retribution’. All these—admittedly massive—strikes were planned in advance. Nothing of this magnitude happens as a knee-jerk reaction to a terrorist act. As always, targets must be ascertained, verified, confirmed. The amount of planning that goes into these types of combined strikes is not done in a day.”
“The destruction of the Ukrainian ports is an inevitable consequence of Russia’s decision to leave the ‘grain deal’ behind. Rather than try to police any ships with crews foolish enough to attempt docking in Ukraine, it’s best to simply make it impossible to dock in Ukraine.”
Second, the economic destruction of Europe and in particular Germany was part of an explicit and deliberate plan recommended by RAND and exposed back in January 2022. It's nothing short of an Orwellian miracle that virtually no one is aware of this, Europeans in particular.
This article includes some context and developments, along with a link to the original Substack article that exposed the secret report:
Is the War in Ukraine Part of a U.S. Strategy to Weaken Germany? RAND Says, “YES”! (GP 9/13/2022)
An objection would be that the report is not authentic. It seems clear, though, that the strategy chosen by the Establishment is to ignore it completely rather than claim it to be phony, thus avoiding the Streisand Effect. Also, well, in the year and a half since it was exposed, everything has pretty much gone according to it's plan.
For whatever it may mean, I would remind everyone that Jason Aldean was the performer on stage when the Las Vegas "event" took place. By the end of the week, he was performing in an (unprecedented?) musical cold open on Saturday Night Live, which served to jumpstart his career.
Personally, I think the guy is compromised and this is all some lame kabuki whose purpose I couldn't care enough to try to discern.
Yeah, the Koch's Postulates wiki page is a riot. They can barely stand to even state them before they start shouting how, well, there's all these exceptions, you see, and if you don't agree you're stupid and hate science.
I've thought through examples where, if they were allowed to fail to satisfy one or more of the postulates, things like knife wounds could be considered communicable diseases. Also how the horribly transmissible "cooties" could be reliably diagnosed with a coin flip.
You know where it starts falling apart? It's right at the very beginning, but no one ever seems to mention it. The simple question is: are viruses alive?
Everyone can do their own research on this, although no one ever does or even considers that question. And not to give away the answer but, no, they are not. You will. however, find any number of loose counterarguments involving primarily hand-waving and increasingly aggressive sophistry. (We may get to see some in this thread!)
But if viruses are not alive, huge questions instantly arise. How can viruses be "killed" by disinfectants? What was in traditional vaccinations using "killed" viruses? What precisely is the difference between a "live" virus and a "killed" virus? Should anything worthy of the description "science" be using the adjective "killed" for something that was never alive?
I bring this up because almost everyone, even "conspiracy theorists", are simply looking for "experts" to adhere to rather than thinking matters through for themselves. This is a very not good thing.
I've concluded that, whatever his other faults and crimes, while J. Edgar was certainly compromised on the investigation but he was not "in" on the assassination of JFK.
For example. there's an FBI memo where Hoover has heard that someone is going around New Orleans passing themselves off with the same name as an FBI informant--Lee Oswald--and he wants someone to check into it. This was probably an artifact of "Harvey and Lee" running around. If Hoover wasn't even aware of the situation at that level, how deep could he have been?
As for Joseph Farrell, I've also concluded that he's a disinformation agent. Ever notice that he seems to be a widely knowledgeable person with a tremendous amount to say about many subjects from a deeply informed viewpoint, but that it never actually leads anywhere? That's a pretty good formula for constructing a disinformation agent, isn't it?
Both funny and surreal that you mention nitrogen. We get the ammonia used for nitrogen fertilizer through the "Haber Process". Fritz Haber was a contemporary of Hitler, and a Nobel Prize-winning wealthy Jew who also did the original work that led to Zyklon-B, supposedly used as the gas in the Holohoax.
If all this ludicrous insanity was written up in a novel, people would throw it in the trash by page five. What a world we live in.