You know what really gets me about this latest wave of "disclosure"? I don't think they actually disclosed one single iota of real intel. Not one.
"They" so despise the public and are so bent on total control that they can't just release a single classified Blue Book case that they couldn't solve fifty years and say, "Check this shit out. Pretty freaky, amirite?"
A caveat for researchers of this subject: I have regrettably concluded that both LaCroix and Wallis are disinformation agent, albeit of two different sorts.
LaCroix is, let's say, excitable and undisciplined, and that leads him (and you) right off a cliff into some multidimensional speculative nonsense. Billy Carson falls into this same category.
As for Wallis, if his academic background is anything like he says it is, he should have the scholarship to steer clear of all that, if not call it out. Yet he doesn't. There's no way he is just accidentally became so undisciplined.
With that being said, in my opinion the Anunnaki is one of the most important subjects anyone could study, as they lie at the heart of our current troubles. It's one of "Their" biggest secrets.
So why are LaCroix, Wallis, Carson, and a number of others allowed to speak about the Anunnaki and related subjects? Because they are meant to lead you around and around the forest, never arriving anywhere, most certainly not at the truth. "They" know this.
So by all means listen to the evidence presented by these researchers, but--and this cannot be overstated--it is crucial that you know when to break with them. If all you're ever going to do is decide which "expert" to follow, the Elite have an endless supply from which you can choose.
You have to develop and exercise your judgment, and become entirely comfortable with recognizing when any and all "experts" have it wrong.
Researchers of the "nuclear 911" event will also want to study the indispensable presentations of Dimitri Khalezov, which actually long predated Heinz Pommer's work. This should be enough to get people started:
Blockbuster: Dmitri Khalezov with Vital New Information on 9/11 (videos unblocked) (Veterans Today 9/12/2021)
In that article there's a short clip of his original 4-hour interview, which is worth digging up for anyone serious about the subject.
I can't resist linking another key article of his exposing in fine detail that Chernobyl was sabotage with small nuclear device, and no accident whatsoever:
Khalezov: Chernobyl and Manhattan (Veterans Today 5/16/2021)
Turns out THE O. J. SIMPSON TRIAL was Faked [2/12/2016 30-page PDF]
The paper is by Miles Mathis, a disinformation agent, so step carefully, but this is from way back when he was putting out solid info and the evidence itself is pretty straightforward.
A bill was introduced in the Hawaii legislature seven months ago that would have eliminated just such a situation: HI HB869 Relating To Coroners.
The legislature finds that coroners should be separate from law enforcement and free to make independent judgments when investigating deaths. Under current state law, the chief of police for a county serves as the coroner if the county does not have a medical examiner. Making coroners independent from law enforcement will promote transparency, avoid conflicts of interest, and encourage more confidence in coroners' rulings.
It just so happens that it's been stuck in committee since a week after it was introduced. So, you know... lucky.
This fits in along with a video posted on X and linked in this article:
The thing is, probably every single black person in Fulton County has a friend or relative who's been hauled off to the jailhouse on some bullshit charges, or has taken the ride themselves. And now they see exactly the same thing happen to a white billionaire ex-President.
And that is a crucial object lesson that brings about a subtle enlightenment. TPTB have tried to divide the people along every conceivable differentiation: black/white, Democrat/Republican, rich/poor, urban/rural, Elite/peasant, etc, etc. Now they see more plainly than ever that none of that meant anything. It was always Us against Them. These people realize that just as they were never going to be one of Them, Trump was always just one of Us and that's why They hate him too.
So yes, it was a desperate and foolish move by TPTB, a nightmare that's backfiring bigly. But They just do not know what the fuck else to do.
A number of years ago, I listened to a mainstream investigative journalism piece (I said it was a number of years ago) looking into the practice of people in the US who could not afford pharmaceuticals instead buying them off "The Dark Web", mostly from China.
The investigators worked with several people that were doing this and getting their medication for like 1/10th the cost. All the users reported no problems. When the drugs were tested in a lab, it was all top quality product.
So yes, it's imperative that you stay away from these people at all costs (literally).
Exactly, the "person" in question is really the big black hole. It makes me think that whoever orchestrates these things is (1) totally out of touch with normal people, and (2) completely creatively bankrupt.
I mean, how hard would it be to just arrange for (what appears to be) a couple of rando millenials to go on TikTok and say some version of, "I was on the plane and saw that guy. He looked like Post Malone but with less face tats and more faggy. I didn't even take a picture because he was just some dude and I didn't know this was going to be a whole thing."
Almost everybody would accept that at face value. Is it that hard? No, but they didn't do it.
For those that are into what I would call "deep conspiracy", the significance of this whole TMFINR incident should not be underestimated. "Deep conspiracy" is where you're actually trying to figure out just what the hell is going on in the world, rather than (1) reacting to the flow of news, or (2) digging up all the evidence that proves you were right all along.
TPTB are going to excessive lengths to cover up whatever seems to have spilled over in the back of that plane. People who wonder what goes on in the strangest, darkest corners of the world typically just make it up according to their preferences and prejudices rather than looking for and studying the transient anomalies such as this one. Too much work, I suppose.
What did Airplane Lady (is her name even Tiffany?) really see that caused her to flip out? Filling in the context, I'd say it was a person sitting next to her that she--being the outgoing sort--was interacting with until it slowly dawned on her that that person... was something other than a person.
The touchstone here is the "Men in Black" phenomenon. They're said to often have a strange appearance, like plastic-looking skin or an ill-fitting wig, but what really puts people off is their behavior.
We've all interacted with innumerable people over the course of our lives--and seen and read about many others--and we are incredibly attuned to the entire range of normal and even abnormal human behavior. Anything outside of that range is deeply disturbing and literally unnatural.
So best guess? A soulless humanoid, a biological robot, useful for certain kinds of tasks. Maybe TPTB were just field testing and this one failed. Who knows how many did not?
For some, hatred has been set forth to be a virtue, and they are passionate to signal their virtue to others. Definitely a bad combination.
On the flip side (and there is always a flip side, isn't there?), the hatred only rarely spills over into action because their reward comes from signalling, not acting. They do not possess the courage of their convictions because they have no true convictions. Thus, they have no stomach for it any time it's coming the other way.
For those interested in looking a little deeper into the fakery and manipulation of the world, this "Dmitry Utkin" was a phony person, a transparently thin creation of Western Intelligence.
There are only two other photos in him in existence, both poor pics of non-descript bald white guys that bear only that much resemblance to the other photos. No video, of course. They admit he hasn't been seen in public since 2016. No social media, or writings, or comments from friends, relatives, or colleagues.
So if you're examining the facts and circumstances of the plane crash, it looks like Intel just added him to the list of the dead and pumped it out through their Mockingbird channels. Now it's as "true" as any other "fact" in everyone's worldview.
"Utkin" was only of value as a Nazi boogeyman lurking in the darkness, blackwashing Wagner, Putin, and all of Mother Russia. I suspect they feared that with the death of Prigozhin, people might expect Utkin would rise to the fore, or at least tweet something on the incident. As easy as it was to create him, they just closed the book instead.
Well, it's baffling, isn't it?
No airplane has ever crashed before, correct? A genius such as yourself would certainly know if one ever had. Have any other airplanes ever crashed? And if so, were there any causes other than Putin?
lol
As I listened to his very first statement, I felt compelled to make a certain point. As part of that statement, he identifies Nimrod and Apollo as the same entity. This is certainly not true: Apollo was said to be born on the Aegean island of Delos, and Nimrod was said to "out of Kush". This is itself erroneously taken to mean "the son of the person named Kush", but actually refers to the "land of Kush" which is now southern Egypt and northern Sudan.
Now, this it not all some dry academic trivia, but rather highlights a failure of scholarship. I'm certain this gentleman is authentic and greatly desires to fight evil--which is admirable--but a lack of disciplined research is a crippling handicap to anyone.
Are the Elites so undisciplined in their research, so slipshod in organization? I seriously doubt it. And that's why They have gotten so far, and why progress against them is so painfully slow. Scholarship is the least each of us can bring to the table, and you're hearing this from the product of a public education.
As I was reading the first paragraph of the story I wondered, "Given no limits to the absurd levels of Russophobia the West constantly flogs on all of us like a gang of homicidal carnival barkers. how long until they just blame this on Putin?"
I only had to wait two more paragraphs for the answer.
A reminder to anyone who's into Theosophy/New Age/anything of the like. Alice Bailey and Helena Blavatsky were constructed from the same cloth, and they admit as much in Bailey's wiki:
Her writings bore some similarity to those of Madame Blavatsky and are among the teachings often referred to as the "Ageless Wisdom". Though Bailey's writings differ in some respects to the Theosophy of Madame Blavatsky, they have much in common with it.
Did you can notice the attempt at deception with "some similarity" changing to "much in common" by the next sentence? The trick is that you can subconsciously choose either one to key on.
The point is, both were ops. But as with any disinformation campaign, they must include some truth so everyone is free to wade through their respective cesspools looking for half-eaten apples they can rinse off which are still perfectly good.
How could a child even protect himself from such an assault? What do people expect him to do, not sneak into the pool? It only had three signs telling him not to go in there. Only three, people, only three! And not a single one of them showed a little stick figure with a little stick soda getting dumped on him.
This poor child is going to grow up in an insane world where he'll just be shopping one day and--out of nowhere--some racist is going to tell him he has to pay for shit before he walks out with it. Sheer madness.
There are a lot of people that question why Trump did not fight the stolen election even harder in 2020 when he was still President. There's actually quite a lot to say about that particular period of time, but it does seem to appear on the surface that he rolled over at the end.
(As an aside, many conclude from this that he was "controlled opposition" all along. Many of these are shills, of course, but importantly many others are conspiracy theorists that are driven not by a search for the truth through independent research, but a desire for psychological comfort by being "smart" and being "right all along". It's regrettable to see capable people that are prisoners of such a level of consciousness. And no, they cannot see this at work in themselves any more than they can see the back of their heads.)
My whole point here, though, is that Trump leaving the presidency is not quite the mistake some seem certain that it was. If we look back on the last two and a half years, the Deep State/NWO/Establishment/Elites have done far, far more damage to themselves than Trump was ever able to accomplish fighting more directly.
The main strength of the damage is in the consciousness of the people. They may not know have direct awareness of it, but they're getting a good idea that things are fundamentally wrong, and a good idea who is responsible. If we reflect deeply, those changes always were and are where changes really needed to take place.
So for all those who are certain there is no plan and if there is it's not working, well, I do not share that judgement.
Rather that ask for further information, you simply shout about your own conclusions. So stereotypical of the numerous fools around. Yet another illustration, as if we needed one.
How old was this post? What normal person would even care this long after? Are shills that concerned about clouding the issue? Makes me even more sure about my conclusions, as will any astute reader seeing this.
Whatever is shown on your infographic I'm sure falls into the category of "not even wrong". If anyone is so stupid to believe it, they are free to do so as there are no restrictions on gullibility. And on a personal note, I couldn't possibly care less about anything further you have to say on the issue.
But in true shill fashion, you will not be content to leave it at that. Prove me right, will you?
Oh yeah, even beyond that. It's not just that they don't see the illusion, they have no concept that there might be any problem at all with their "reality". If you press them on it, they'll vehemently deny it.
And if you suggest that to any extent things are not as they seem, I always think it sounds to them like you just told them to go research how two and two are not actually four. Hey, I'd have the same reaction if that's what heard.
Big ups to anyone that (1) seeks more information, (2) changes their mind, and (3) says so publicly. A model that few follow.
Side note: Although her work first awakened me to 911 with the photos of "toasted cars", Judy Woods is controlled opposition. It's the classic form where you get some truth (the cars and dustification) but are then steered off in the wrong direction (DEWs--and not that they don't exist but they weren't used on the WTC).
She has flatly denied there was excess heat at the site, which points towards nuclear detonations. I mean, workers' boots were melting, there were puddles of molten metal, and fires would not go out for months. No excess heat? Okay.