You may have missed that those comments were from the author and filmmaker themselves.
I think we can comfortably reason that if they meant to keep the material secret. it might have occurred to them not to write a book and make a documentary in the first place. But did you have other reasoning on that point?
No. You know what's odd? You'd probably agree with 99% of what they have to say on a given day, but they have been super-ultra-100% pro-Israel during the Gaza War.
Here's a sample:
How this all goes together sensibly is beyond me.
Can't believe I'm issuing a trigger warning, but here it is and people may want to step carefully into this material...
I never actually watched the documentary or read the book it was based on, but I read one book review then listened to an interview with the author and the filmmaker.
One thing the filmmaker mentioned was that there were parts of the documentary that he himself would not watch. Even in a screening, he would just find reason to avert his eyes.
The original author mentioned that after writing the book--get this--he no longer believed in God. As far as I could tell he was absolutely serious and it was not a metaphor.
Just a small correction, the work is about the aftermath of WW2 in Germany, a story never told. I never studied it further because I felt I had learned enough about the subject for one lifetime. In summary, maybe just try an interview or book review first.
Let me lay it out in the way that makes sense to me, and perhaps you'll find something of value...
When you sort it all out (or the critical parts, anyway), you find out that the two key personalities are (as the Sumerians knew them) Enlil and Marduk. They were part of a single hierarchy running Anu -> Enlil -> Marduk.
You also find out that these personalities were all known by many different names in different times and different cultures. That further complicates the picture but it can be unwound with meticulous effort. (This may seem like some kind of dodge where you can sub anything for anything else, but just consider how many names you can think of that refer to Hillary Clinton, and that's just in one culture in one short human lifespan.)
To that point, Enlil and Marduk were referred to as Chronos and Zeus by the Greeks, Saturn and Jupiter by the Romans, and Yahweh and Satan by the Israelites. These identifications are crucial.
After that, you find that the "war is Heaven" was a schism between them. A deal was struck and is still ongoing, where Marduk remained on Earth as part of the contest. The "Day of the Lord" is when Enlil will return to conclude the deal. They both remain part of the same hierarchy, as far as I can tell.
So when you're looking at subjects like "Saturnian worship" or the Titanomachy or Satan being the "lord of this world" or many other such things, you can "reverse engineer" them into this very brief summary. You see that they are incomplete, distorted, and corrupted versions of the true situation.
That is, everyone who studies these things has been looking into the wrong end of the telescope, trying to make sense of the tiny images. That's why it's difficult to make all the pieces fit together. People usually just punt, and pick out the parts and pieces they choose to be "true".
Final note: if you're wondering whether those Elites "at the top" know this truth, I doubt more than a handful do. It looks like everyone is just handed down a different mix of lies and truth. But the scant traces I've come across were enough to confirm to me that this was the correct framework.
Another golden example of how the Jews are a powerless, persecuted minority on the verge of Pogrom America 2024. Here's the explosive, violent, Hitlerian/Trumpian rhetoric that got her in crossways, right from NPR's own original coverage:
Lawmakers grill the presidents of Harvard, MIT and Penn over antisemitism on campus (NPR 12/5/2023)
"Today's hearing is focused on antisemitism and its direct impact on the Jewish community," Magill said in her opening remarks. "But history teaches us that where antisemitism goes unchecked, other forms of hate spread and ultimately can threaten democracy."
Magill noted that Tuesday's hearing came two days after a viral pro-Palestinian demonstration outside an Israeli restaurant in Philadelphia, which she called a "troubling and shameful act of antisemitism" that "left many in the community upset and afraid."
Chilling, I know, and I should have issued a Holo-Trigger Warning.
They say the wheels of justice grind slowly, which explains why it took four days for (((them))) to fuck her over. For anyone that thinks attending Harvard is what the Elites do, and that being the President of Harvard is thus a very Elite position, note well how much juice that has when you lack in enthusiasm for the real Elites (who, you will further note, have no names).
Finally, compare this incident with what we would all agree was quite a serious matter, the Penn State child sex abuse scandal. It's a close comparison because it involves the president of the very same institution just a dozen years ago.
The sex abuse occurred beginning in 1994 and allegations first surfaced in 1998, but President Graham Spanier (an admitted white male, no less), did not resign until late 2011.
To summarize, if you're insufficiently servile to (((them))), your position as house nigger will last only days. But you've got a decade and a half when it's merely a matter of insufficient discretion when kids are getting fucked.
You might want to add getting lined up for yet another war to the list:
North Korea: US, Japan, South Korea Military Alliance Could Trigger World War III (TID 11/5/2023)
When the "pariah state" calls you out as a bunch of bloodthirsty warmongers, it's a pretty good sign you're going over the line.
I personally have come to tentatively conclude that the reference may be to something documented in the MUL.APIN, a Babylonian astronomy text likely from 1000 BC.
That would already make it the oldest reference, but I would venture that the Babylonians got it from the Sumerians--who had one and the same pantheon--which could push it back to around 6000 years ago. Who the Sumerians got it from is a story for another day.
Anyway, the MUL.APIN specifies the following:
-- All the major stars and constellations are listed and organised into three broad divisions according to celestial latitude allocating each star to three paths:
- the northern path of Enlil containing 33 stars or constellations
- the presumably equatorial path of Anu containing 23 stars or constellations, and
- the southern path of Ea containing 15 stars or constellations,
And in another story for another day, it turns out Enlil is associated with the planet Saturn (and this has nothing to do with "Satan", which is a very common mistake), so when we see all the Saturn symbology everywhere, they're referring to the same guy.
I feel like somehow we're reaching the end of the line with the anti-Semitism trick:
Netanyahu accuses the entire world of anti-semitism (NewsTarget 12/6/2023)
I mean, how do you amp up from there? Maybe like life itself, Zionists will find a way.
Which ones did you look on yourself before asking me? And why are you under the impression anyone is under any duty to provide you with evidence of anything? What is it that I get in return?
Pretty simple <-- your shilling skils hahahahahahaha
It's funny, because I grew up knowing without doubt that nazis = bad. Now even with all the reeducation I've gotten over the last two years, I still can't figure out which one it is now:
- only certain nazis = bad
- russia = nazis
- trump = nazis
- give moar money
- it's all above my head and none of it's my business in the first place
Maybe the answer is all of the above?
When it comes to war and good guys and bad guys, my own journey of discovery has informed me that:
- All sides in a war fight for purposes other than those publicly stated, even by the good guys.
- They involve almost all good people with no argument with one another, but who come to deadly combat because large groups have been greatly deceived.
- The top levels are often rife with bad guys.
- The real bad guys are hidden, not wearing uniforms of holding public office.
- The really bad guys who orchestrated the wars in the first place are safe because most people simply cannot believe they exist.
All of the above being a quick sketch of the situation, it's no wonder most can't see through it, understand the threat of all warmongers, and just decline to participate.
Side observation: if you look through that gaping hole, does anyone see a gigantic nuclear furnace in there powering the Sun? Me neither, because it isn't there and that's not what powers the Sun. See the Electric Universe for more.
Second order observation: Everyone should note that they can show such a photo in mainstream media and yet no one notices for themselves what I just pointed out. If you've ever wondered how the deceptions of the world possibly get by people, it's just that easy,
Third order observation: If anyone here is brave enough to admit to themselves that I got by you too, you should be wondering what other screamingly obvious things have gotten by you all this time. The best will take their ego down a notch to see if that helps.
I understood there was a problem with archive.org a couple of years ago, when I went to get something from jameshfetzer.org from it. I got some message that all that site's content was banned.
That is, they only resorted to subterfuge in this case because they needed to act quickly. In normal circumstances, they can apparently vaporize an archive totally above board (well, for what phrase may mean any more). I never found any mention anywhere of what legal mechanism was used, not that they really care about proving legitimacy.
I actually remember the time when the FBI wanted lists of the books that "persons of interest" had checked out, and librarians told them to fuck right off. Those days are gone but not forgotten.
"Science" seems to be cautiously stepping clear of a phenomenon I realized existed a while back. Such things as "motivated reasoning" and "cognitive dissonance" are not only subsumed by it, they are examples of the phenomenon itself.
That is, we all believe (without evidence) that everyone reasons by gathering facts, analyzing them, then reaching conclusions. It turns out that in many circumstances, what we refer to as "normies" reason in the opposite direction: they begin with the conclusion.
Since they know what the "right answer" is, they just have to backfill the reasoning to support it. Even facts will give way to this, being ignored, distorted, or even invented. It's quite fascinating to study it in detail.
So imagine struggling on an algebra test, peeking at the smart kids paper, and seeing that the answer is pi/2. Since you have to show your work, you write down as much as you know, add in some BS, and then write down the answer, pi/2.
Get it? There's no way you're not ending up at pi/2. That is the answer, after all. All the of your "work"--true or not true, meaningful or meaningless--is irrelevant and need only superficially appear to be reasoning to the grader.
But at least you're aware you're cheating. In the phenomenon I observe, it's all done subconsciously, very quickly, invisibly and basically unknowably. But it's as real to that person as anything else in their reality.
The effect is extraordinarily powerful. I heard an interview with a hypnotist once, where he said he would implant a post-hypnotic suggestion in people in his office that there was a red-hot stove in the middle of the floor. When he brought them back, he would casually ask them to hand him a book on the far side of the office. They would all walk far around the perimeter, both coming and going.
Now here's the informative part: when he asked them why they took the long way, they each made up a "good reason": "I always do that," or "It was the best way," or even "That's what you asked me to do". They had absolutely no awareness any of this was happening.
This mode of "reasoning" is, in fact, what makes normies normies in the first place. It's also what makes normies programmable and controllable. "They" use it all the time, and that's why we aren't supposed to know about it.
Even here I think something interesting is going on. I think Netanyahu & Co. would love for the hostages to be kept indefinitely as an excuse for the war/extermination. Even as it is, they dragged their feet absolutely as long as possible.
And the blowback from the hostage situation has done and will do, in my opinion, tremendous damage to the Zionists. How long is it going to take Israel to live down the images of otherwise very intimidating masked and strapped Hamas gunmen taking old ladies by the hand and walking them to the Red Cross, where they warmly wave bye-bye to each other?
Wishful thinking, but it may be that "The Jewish State" will not survive to see that day.
I'm reminded of the original Star Trek episode A Taste of Armageddon, back from when such things were purely science fiction:
During a supposed attack by Vendikar, Anan 7 explains that the war is conducted as a computer simulation, and that the Enterprise has been "destroyed" in the attack. The two planets have a treaty, according to which they have to kill the "victims" of every simulated attack. The crew are thereby expected to report to Eminiar's disintegration chambers for execution....
After Spock arrives, Kirk destroys the war simulation computers. Anan 7 condemns Kirk's actions, arguing that it is unalterable nature to fight wars, so without the simulation they have no alternative but to fight a real war. Kirk instead believes that the only reason the war with Vendikar has gone on so long is because the simulation insulated both societies from the horrors of war and gave them little reason to end it.
I think we see that currently one side is insulated from the horrors of war and has little reason to end it.
The problem is more fundamental. It was a nonsense test for a bullshit disease assumed to be caused by a fictitious virus. Nothing sensible will come out of that.
The part never discussed (probably because few actually understand anything about any of this) is that when creating a test of any kind, you already have to know what the right answer is to even begin to judge the accuracy of the test.
The "right answers" are loosely called the "gold standard", but in our NewSpeak the term has lost all meaning. They decline to actually define it, but it has come to mean "the best available". Is "the best available" a synonym for "correct"? No, of course not.
So if you don't have the correct answers, it's like handing a stack of college exams on differential equations to a whacked out homeless guy and asking him to grade them without an answer key. Telling him you just need pass/fail.
Will what you get back be meaningful?