Pretty much nobody gives a shit about Ukraine anymore except redditors who use it as a scam ‘guys please I’m a brave volunteer hero please buy me this gaming pc for ummmm…. Using on the front line to control missiles. Here’s my address, yeah it’s in America but that’s so the Russians don’t intercept it’.
Covid was exposed as a scam and Covid had died anyway before Ukraine.
Israel/Gaza divide the NPCs too much to get them United behind it.
Are the houthis the new current thing?
I would say no, and I'll explain why.
I, personally, am shocked at the astounding support from leftists for Palestine. It came seemingly out of nowhere (although surely the origins could be traced). They don't appear to give a rat's ass how many times they're called anti-Semitic.
All the other "current things" came after intense, relentless, and unified media campaigns. As with all Big Lies, they're kept simple and repeated over and over (and over).
With this latest Yemen flare-up, there was no such program at all, aside from the lingering, "Houthis are terrorists", for which we are never given any reason or examples or threats. The Neo-Imperialsts are apparently under so much pressure to "do something" that... well, they just did something.
In practical terms, it was ineffective and any sort of "coalition" is falling to bits. Russia and China call it "outrageous", and domestically it's denounced as "unconstitutional". There's even a rumor that Blinken briefed all the Arab leadership, word of which would obviously get to Yemen. so the US could "do something" without having done much of anything.
All in all, I think They are at the point of wishing it would all just go away.
anitifa was originally a pro-Palestine group. before BLMsummeroflove, rank'n'file antifa was almost 100% about supporting Palestine.
the overwhelming majority of the left has always supported Palestine over israel. go to the archives of any of the major non-MSM/non-legacy media left-wing websites and voices, and you'll find fucktons of pro-Palestinian articles and comments. Amy Goodman, dailykos, the nation, Mother Jones, commondreams, Naked Capitalism, Code Pink, ad infinitum, all very much supported Palestine over israel. i spent years on dkos, and there wasn't any pro-israel sentiment at all.
besides Palestine, from the left's POV, israel was disliked b/c of their arms industry, AIPAC, how the US subsidizes irael's arms purchases, israel's nukes, israel's involvement w/US "law enforcement" & CIA, israel's destabilization of the ME, and how AIPAC/israel pushed us into Iraq. even though talking about it would get you banned by dkos admins and admins on a bunch of the other major leftist sites, a large portion of the activist left is aware of israel/mossad involvement with 9/11.
prior to the 2016 election cycle, most of the left was 1 or 2 cognitive steps away from acknowledging the jq. however, the entirety of the left buys into the holohoax narrative and no one wanted to be associated with Hitler/Nazis.
if we can ever get jews and jewish influence out of the way, left and right (in the US, anyway) have alot more in common than each side currently realizes.
I figured there was a backstory like that.
The way I have it penciled in, They had to have a counterbalance to Christian Zionism. They can't have Antifa saying, "Well, at least we agree with the fascists on this set of points." On the other hand, They had to keep it all at a low simmer, because They also simply cannot have people saying, "Death to Israel!" where polite company can hear.
I become more convinced over time that Christian Zionism was the crucial psyop all along, particularly given that you can criticize Christians all you want, and now as we see you can openly criticize Zionists, but the subject of Christian Zionism simply does not come up.
I mean, the Scofield predates the existence of Israel itself by 40 years, and I think there are orders of magnitude more Christian Zionists than Masons. It also goes a long way towards explaining ZOG.
Everyone assumes ZOG is all about campaign donations, but I think it goes way beyond that. If that's all it was, you can just cut it off or someone can give them more money. The hard problem is that I think these people are not just True Believers, but actual Crusaders. You can't just snap your fingers and tell them their Crusade is dumb bullshit leading to great violence and suffering.
Really, I think CZ is the thorny problem Trump has been and is still dealing with. They aren't bad people, they've just been grievously misled into heresy, many tens of millions of them.
What's playing out now in the Palestine War is, in my view, not primarily military. Rather, people have got to see for themselves that these Likudists, Talmudists, and the IDF are very bad actors, brutal and pitiless mass murderers, and they should not be supported in their evil acts. If the IDF was, say, put down by Hezbollah and Iran, then they would still be the Jew victims, right?
And I would agree that that's a big part of the solution to the JQ: that people just see for themselves things as they are. A lot of the problems will take care of themselves after that.
Over what? Affixed truth? Where is that truth affixed upon? Why is it so simple to change truth with repetition of lies?
What if the interweaving of truth vs lies implies complex; while "change" implies simple? How simple could it be for few to distract many from perceivable change, by suggesting them truths and lies until they weave a complex fabric of definitions; revisions, and contradictions upon their eyes?
As in current (all perceivable) things (each ones perception)? Why do many accept "current things" suggested by few over and over again?
a) What if consenting to suggested (houthis) establishes conflicts of reason (want vs not want; true vs false; belief vs disbelief; good vs bad; us vs them; rich vs poor; current thing vs ancient thing etc.)?
b) What if many react by reasoning to whatever few give them by suggestion?
c) What if wanting reasons from others implies ones ignorance of implication (if/then), which would allow one to discern the "why" of everything?
...yet, when using "WE are never given any reason"; one (singular) positions self into a coalition (pluralism)...why are "we the people" always falling apart or being ripped to pieces after being amalgamated?
Meanwhile... https://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/the-jews-of-germany-a-people-apart/2021/10/10/
Could it be that the natural order of CHANGE sets each one within apart, hence also taking apart any coalition of partials?