Very good video. Always interesting to hear someone competent talk about their area of expertise and experience.
To back up another step before we even get to the issue of steering, we should ask why any steering was necessary, even if the power went out? That is, the ship was running straight ahead directly between the pylons with the rudder presumably amidships when the power went out. I further suspect the rudder is basically "locked" into place when the hydraulic pumps are not actually running.
Given their incredible momentum, turning, slowing, and stopping huge ships like that are big tasks. I wouldn't be surprised if the stopping distance for such a ship would be half a mile or more and several minutes before you'd ever have to think about it drifting around in the current, which--given that it was in a river--would just be further towards the sea.
You're right, they're definitely all over the world, and just as a preview of a future post....
I knew these people came originally from England, but I have so little familiarity with that history. Then recently, someone mentioned the current Queen and I suddenly realized her name is Camilla Parker Bowles. "Oh FFS", I thought, "that's gotta just be a coincidence, right?"
So I did the research and you can guess the result.
What we're seeing are Christian Zionists, and it's becoming clear that the existence and influence of this group was one of the Big Secrets all along. It's not that you get censored for mentioning them, it's just that somehow, some way, no one ever does. That's how the Big Secrets are actually handled.
You know who apparently has turned out to be one, of all people? The American Badass himself, Kid Rock:
Joe Rogan and Kid Rock clash over how Israel should win war against Gaza: ‘That’s actually a war crime’ (NY Post 2/26/2024)
Kid Rock and Joe Rogan clashed over the Israel-Hamas war, with the rock star declaring on Rogan’s podcast that Israel should begin killing civilians in Gaza up to “40,000 a f–king time” if it wants to win the war. “Only wars we won were f–king ones where we were the most brutal motherf–kers on the planet,” Kid Rock said on Thursday’s episode of “The Joe Rogan Experience.”
I mean, where in the hell else would someone you presume to be an America Firster get such outrageous ideas about a foreign war between Heebs and Muzzies? Plus, who the fuck is "we" exactly, Mr. Rock?
Christian Zionists is your answer.
On a "meta" level, keeping the popularity of conspiracy theory out of the general consciousness is actually an important--even vital--part of the conspiracies themselves.
The idea concerns something called "common knowledge of the fraud". That is, when confronted by some fraud (or here, conspiracy theory), your thoughts and actions will differ greatly based simply on whether you estimate that understanding to be common knowledge, or that you stand alone or with few others.
I see "conspiracy theorists" constantly congratulating themselves on their knowledge of conspiracies, which always indicates to me they completely fail to understand this aspect. Personal knowledge is necessary, but hardly sufficient.
I think the big secret surrounding Israel's nuclear arsenal is that it pretty much doesn't exist.
There used to be a trope in old 70's TV shows where a guy would threaten a dude with a bulge in his jacket pocket that concealed a revolver. Of course, you don't actually need a revolver if the other guy assumes you have one.
I believe that's what we have here. If you look around, there are a handful of analysts that suspect the same thing. When you carefully search for the specific concrete evidence of the arsenal, you find it's a mirage.
That being said, it's a long and untold story but they stole about 50 devices of 5kT each (from the US, of course) at the beginning of 2019. One of them was used on Port Said. They also appear to have discreetly used a few of them in the current war.
But the thing is, why would you need to steal a few very small nukes if you supposedly had a bunch of big ones at your disposal, and the capability of manufacturing any more that you need? It strongly implies the opposite.
Right, I think that's an excellent point.
Also, I think when the NSDAP founded the Ahnenerbe and that group started looking all around the world asking questions like, "Wait--who were the Aryans exactly? And where did they come from? And what what do we find in history when we start tracing back along their path?", and then they started finding answers to those questions, well, somebody somewhere said, "Okay, we gotta shut that shit down!"
Now the whole narrative boils down to "racial supremacists eugenically breeding a race of occult supermen". And people now "know" that for a fact.
Wow, I'm going to have to study your Einstein post.
Actually, my first "love" was science, but a few years ago I realized that I was lucky never to have ended up with a career in mainstream science. I see how polluted and suppressed and inverted it has all become, and I'm sure I would have gotten deranged right along with it.
As to the muzzling of Einstein, you're not going to believe it (but maybe at this point it's somehow not surprising) but it connects to the Parkers one more time. I'm dead serious.
The Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation paid for an assistant (i.e. handler) for Einstein. That Macy family was connected to Nantucket and tied up with the Parker family all the way back in the late 1700's. Details and links are in a post I wrote just two days ago (freaky, right?):
I already linked that post, but the occurrence of Einstein was (I thought) pretty trivial and purely incidental. If you noticed it there and that's.what put you in mind of Einstein, then it's not so freaky. Really, I kind of hope that's the case... lol. Hard to keep track of who said what to who and when.
Such strange and enigmatic doings are revealed when you start kicking over rocks, eh? It makes you think that all the blank spots of history that we all assumed were only boring people doing nothing of note is totally wrong.
I think the Hunter S. Thompson lead is a red herring. He's my favorite author and I have read a ton of his work. "They" have very subtly tried to blackwash him since his extremely suspicious "suicide". IMHO, he was smart, observant, and a gifted writer with a huge, dedicated audience.
I have come to understand that he moved to Woody Creek to be a sort of renunciate from the dark world he found he could do little to repair. Eventually, I believe he began waking up to the fact that the world was far darker than he had ever suspected. He began his career as a reporter, and I believe he felt himself to be a reporter all his life. His "gonzo journalism" was the best way he knew to convey the truth he found. The last stories he was working on were 911 and the White House Call Boy scandal.
Well, you can see how things are adding up here. Thompson eviscerated people he didn't care for, like Nixon, but we come to find Nixon was an errant clerk. What would Thompson have done with his talents against the real monsters? He had to go, and be left with a little stink around him so people looked no further.
As to good old Hunter, I would point you in another direction regarding his name, and it involves (you're not going to believe this) the Parkers yet again. I'm still trying to get around to writing up a post on the Parkers, but I'll hip you to this one connecting node.
The Parkers have been tied up since at least the late 1600's with a family called the Motts. For example, one of the nexus points is in the theft of the Kingdom of Hawaii. Study the page for the Overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom all you like and you won't see them mentioned, but you can separately study the pages for Samuel Parker (Hawaii politician) and John Mott-Smith and you see two key players in the event floating around. They erase history by breaking the easy connections. (BTW, Mott's page mentions guy named Elisha Hunt Allen. Can't make this up!)
Anyway, the Mott family are the same Mott's of applesauce fame. If you look in the sidebar of that page, you'll see one of the founders was "Jamotia Hunter". This Hunter is mentioned nowhere else on the page, and the sidebar mention is not a hotlink. Strange, right? Another broken connection.
Mott's was founded in Bouckville, NY. About an hour due west lies Skaneateles, NY. Turns out that's the birthplace of (drum roll)... Neilia Biden, Joe's first wife, born as (drum roll)... Neilia Hunter.
So Hunter's middle name is his mother's maiden name, which these Elites do all the time. These towns are both on the eastern side of the Finger Lakes area of New York, and we've all had the displeasure of seeing the Ugliest Tattoo in the World on Hunter's back. So whatever is going on in the Finger Lakes area, it already makes me never want to go there.
You'll have to take my word for it, but there's tons more connections with a family named the Coffins, the Finger Lakes, Nantucket, etc. So the little bit I just wrote up may strike as tenuous, but for me it all drops in like the perfect Tetris piece.
I'd actually never heard of that movie before but I'll have to watch it.
I glanced at the wiki for it and saw that Armie Hammer was in it. I asked myself, "Was that the guy that wanted to eat some lady's toes?" So I searched "armie hammer toes" and yes, he was that guy, but even before that result there was this:
Son Sucks Armie Hammer's Toes In Video And Critics Call Actor A Heel (HuffPo 7/29/2019)
FFS, every f-ing time with these freaks.
"Might get some bread"... I love it! I'm going to use it in the future.
Actually, I write it this stuff up mostly to just instantiate it into the innerwebz, with the hope that someone somewhere sometime might stumble into it at just the right moment during a search.
Funnily enough, I actually confirmed the validity of that theory a while ago. I was searching for something--don't remember what--a reference I vaguely recalled and wanted to cite in a post. After a few searches, voila!, I found someone had written it up in a post on r/conspiracy.
It was just the writeup I was looking for. I was like four paragraphs in before I glanced up at the username and saw it was me... lol
Thanks for the tip!
As I was taking a look at the link, I noticed they give the architect as R.H. Hunt. Clicking over to his page, the three sample photos they give of his work are all obviously Tartarian.
It reminded me of a video I saw a while ago about the old Crystal Palace in London (now destroyed, of course). They give credit for the magnificent design to Sir Joseph Paxton, but it turns out the guy was barely qualified to do lawn maintenance.
It turns out all the other work they credit to Paxton was also Tartarian, so he was just a sock puppet. I suspect we have the same thing with Hunt and, thus, that the Lookout Mountain Hotel was Tartarian. Whatever they tell us about the origin and history of the hotel, we can virtually guarantee it was something other than that, right?
I also happened to notice that Hunt was born in Elbert County. We all know what monument stood there until it was recently blown up by parties unknown. I always thought the location of it had no significance, but maybe that's not the case. It's a tiny place, and the population of the whole county even today is only 20k. The college I went to was almost twice the size (not the town, just the students).
But what seals the case for me is this: a "Notable person" of the county was Danial Parker. He was the son of Captain John Parker. I just yesterday mentioned that man in a post:
That post got 7 upvotes and 4 downvotes. Okay, i get the 7 because not many people are interested in such long-winded talk. Don't upvote and don't read, right? But it also looks like parties unknown don't like when this type of material is brought into the light.
Anyway, thanks again!
There's a disturbing shift taking place, along the lines of the old maxim, "If you can't cover it up, turn it up". We see an example of that here.
I think it's possible within a couple of years we'll see something like, "Of course the vaxx killed millions, and thank the AI God it did so and saved us from overpopulation!"
I say this is disturbing because we're dealing with vicious, cornered animals, and Their corner is getting smaller.
To put a finer historical point on it, the very concept that "the Nazis burned books" is flatly untrue. I say this to emphasize how deeply this false "fact" has seeped into history. Some may have an immediate reaction to this if they just watched the video and saw Nazi officials and members of the SA standing around as books burned, but we need to take a closer look.
The Nazis, recognizing along with many others the corrosive and subversive nature of certain "literature", approved of the voluntary destruction of it. But beyond that, there is no documentation that the NSDAP:
- published a list of books to ban
- confiscated books
- personally destroyed books or commanded their destruction
- organized, directed, supported, or even encouraged any groups--such as the GSA--to do so
I never uncovered a single official document or publication from the NSDAP--let alone legislation--regarding the burning of books. All in all, the idea that "Nazis burned books" is about as erroneous and "Trump made everyone wear red hats".
In fact, I turned up the original prewar article about book burning from "The Guardian", and it seems obvious black propaganda by Western warmongers. You can get that link and others along with more discussion in this old post:
I appreciate you saying so, thanks.
There's a second-order point to this kind of content, which is that you can see how little engagement it gets. You don't even get people saying anything like, "I'm surprised to find out how long They have been around, how deep They are dug in, and how Their fingers are in everything."
So it informs my view of a topic like Trump's first term. People bitch and moan about he didn't "drain the swamp". I find it reasonable to think he waded in a bit and said, "I'm surprised to find out how long They have been around, how deep They are dug in, and how Their fingers are in everything." See how that changes the interpretation of events?
A third-order point explains why he says very little about any of this. Would he get a better reception airing this type of information among the general public than we see here, among supposedly knowledgeable, awake, hardcore conspiracy theorists? Not a chance in Hell.
Then again, can we discount the site shadow-banning when they really feel they need to?
The trolls seem to be taking some effort, though, don't you think? So readers get to see not just the content, but the odd reaction of supposed "conspiracy theorists". That will indicate something to the aware.
Sometimes I wonder if such fools ever regret being so obvious. Probably not, as it requires a degree of reflective thinking.
This story is floating around out there, from a site most discount as fictional, and even the article itself admits the rumor has not been confirmed:
White Hats Suggest Dali Unmanned at Time of Collision (RRN 3/27/2024)
The remote piloting of a "ghost ship" to a fairly small target is probably not that easy, so that would explain the steering corrections. The power loss would then just be someone flicking the switch on and off to create the cover story. Then they had to erase part of the black box to destroy record of all the things the crew would never do and lack of actions they would certainly take.
And supposedly a harbor pilot was in control, so shouldn't we have heard all about him? You know, the standard rumors about how he was secretly gay and suicidal an a religious zealot? Nope, no discussion of him.
Maybe that's because there was no pilot on board, or anyone else.