That's a good point. I saw an interview maybe a year ago with an English mercenary who went back home after just a few months. He estimated that he had lost about 40% of his hearing from the continuous shelling.
The addendum to that was his answer when the interviewer asked if any of the shelling had been close. He said that (IIRC) one had hit as close as 100m.
As far as being life-threatening from fragmentation, as long as you're in a trench or on the deck it doesn't sound that close. But having these enormous rounds rain down around everyone and blow up anywhere in the vicinity has got to be ear-shattering. Literally.
You know, now I'm really wondering if this indeed was an AI psyop and I'll tell you why. First, I've noticed that when people interact with AI, they read meaning "in" to whatever is there. It's sort of like a crazy person having a conversation with a Magic 8 Ball.
I listened to an hour-long interview with "Ashton Forbes" on "The Unexplained" yesterday, and what I noticed is that his narrative is not a narrative at all. That is, you might say that a narrative is a description of a set of logically connected events, but that's not what he presented. That idea gets lost in a rapid-fire delivery of details.
For example, he talks about lithium-ion batteries and people seeing a plane on fire in the sky. Minutes later, he's talking about military satellites recording orbs teleporting the plane away. The thing is, he never even attempts to connect these two outlandish events.
Did the orbs set fire to the batteries in the cargo hold? Were they just waiting around for the next plane to catch on fire? Is the fire mere unrelated happenstance? If teleporting the plane was to rescue it, where are the passengers? Why isn't the plane on fire in the teleportation video, when these battery fires are notoriously hard to extinguish?
The point is, it seems as if something meaningless--as it is with AI-produced content--has been put forward for people to read whatever meaning they desire "in" to it.
One thing I noticed about those grenade-dropping videos is that, almost always, the targets never even looked up. A few times I could even see that the drone was only at an altitude of 50m, plenty close to hear. WTH were they thinking?
Finally, I heard it mentioned a couple of times that--for the Ukrainians, anyway--there are always drones flying and the noise is constant. They did hear them, they just ignored it.
Even if you survive all that, can you even imagine the PTSD from anything whirring and buzzing? Unimaginable.
The changes brought by modern drone warfare are absolutely shocking, and in a way no one from the Establishment wants to admit. In the West, for two decades "drone warfare" has meant total impunity incinerating brown people all over the world with skyborne murderbots.
Those days are over. As some indication, we can take two data points from vastly different conflict zones:
In the Red Sea, one of the types of anti-ship drones used by the Houthis costs about $2,000 a piece. The air defense missiles used to shoot them down cost about $2,000,000 each. I suppose no one in the US military is much concerned about that--there being an infinite supply of dollars--but those complex units are manufactured painfully slowly.
Over in Ukraine, a Spetnaz operator from a drone battalion was interview by "Texas" Bentley last fall:
Russian Spetsnaz Operator Explains How Drones Are Changing Modern Warfare (TID 10/7/2023)
In the embeddeb video interview, he more or less casually mentions:
And also you can drop grenades and bombs. Two weeks ago, one of my comrades killed and wounded 87 Nazis. Two weeks, could drop.
Those are Rambo++ numbers. And if you've seen video of toy quadcopters dropping grenades into trenches full of guys that never saw it coming, it's all too believable.
If only these toys had cost $25M each, the US military would have been far more interested.
At least they're putting some kind of limit on the damage this swamp creature is doing:
Ohio Senate overrides DeWine vetoes on trans youth gender-affirming care and local tobacco bans (1/24/2024)
The Senate voted 24-8 to override DeWine’s veto of House Bill 68, which blocks gender-affirming care for trans youth and prevents transgender athletes from playing women’s sports. The bill prohibits transgender youth from starting hormone therapy and puberty blockers.
Keep it up, Great State of Ohio!
Oh no, it wasn't TallestSkil. That type I've learned to just ignore. It's like trying to converse with a dog to get it to stop barking. No point to it anyway because there's no meaning behind it. They just have to get it out of their system.
There's a finer philosophical point to be made about that other guy. A lot of people are trying to "do the right thing" and make the world a better place, in whatever special snowflake way they have. I do too, in my way, The thing is, if I'm doing God's work, I guess I'll find that out when He tells me. These other people don't need anyone to tell them they're they're doing God's work, including God. The disturbing part is when a malevolent force comes along and simply informs them of what God's work is. See how that makes all the difference in the world?
No, this other one I found disturbing. You read about all this crazy, outrageous shit that has gone on throughout history and it's like your mom telling you the stove is hot. You know it's factual, but you don't really know it's true until you make contact with it.
I've only ever had to block a single person in years and years on social media. You know what set him off? In the course of some other argument I was making, I said, "most people around the world are good". Who knew that would be so controversial? He was some kind of Christian religious zealot.
The point is, I learned that the kind of implacable fanaticism that we usually associate with scimitars and stakes and carpet bombing is alive and well in this world, and it does not take any sort of unreasonable point of view to get crossways with such a mindset.
The meta-point is that when you look around at other people and think that they're basically like you, that's probably basically correct most of the time. But some people are so very alien to what you might considered a normal human experience that it nearly defies imagination.
Everybody's also free to wear sunscreen.
But then again, do you own research because we all need that Vitamin D.
I thought this was weird when it took place:
I remember there were so many predictions that this was evidence The Event was upon us. In the years since, I can't recall a single post saying, "Member what I said about predicting The Event? I was totally wrong just like every fucking other prediction!"
No conspiracy theorists (since virtually all the theory has been diluted out of conspiracy theory these days) ever discuss the next logical question, so I'll bring it up: why did he assassinate her?
And yes, an assassination it was. As pointed out, he lay in wait, there were no exigent circumstances, there was no previous connection between the two, etc. He also seemed to have no fear of legal repercussions for this very public act, Note that the sponsors barely covered their asses with lame and staged legal repercussions.
There's another tell-tale sign in the incident which I will also bring up. In this high stress and chaotic situation, when the gunshot--which must have been deafening in the tight space--rings out... no one reacts. No one hits the deck, or ducks, or runs off, or even looks around.
Do I think this means the gunshot and the murder were fake? Absolutely not. A real event took place in the context of a larger scene. If you see Torvald knock out Nora's teeth during "A Doll's House", that doesn't prove it's fake even though it's up on a stage in a theater.
Much more to be said, of course, but there's not much point since the discussion has been totally derailed long before this point.
Elon Musk said he wanted to "authenticate all real humans" on Twitter. That sounds like a lot of work, so maybe we should all get behind him just authenticating "Enterprising Desert Raven".
After all, the exposure of a million bots and psyops begins with a single truth bomb.
In wondering whether Ghislaine was a Jewess to begin with, I looked up her mother, Elisabeth Maxwell, and found this regarding Ghislaine's maternal grandparents::
Paul Meynard was a descendant of Protestant Huguenot aristocracy whose distant lineage included kings of France, while Colombe Meynard was a Roman Catholic whose marriage to a Protestant resulted in her excommunication. Her father Paul owned a silk-weaving factory and was the mayor of the village.
I found this passage notable for a couple of reasons, but both are consistent with Ghislaine being another Simulant. That being the case, nothing about her life should be taken at face value or as "something they wouldn't lie about".
First, for centuries, Jews have been extremely heavily tied up in the textile and related industries like clothing. I think Paul may have been a Jew and not a Protestant as they tell us.
Second, excommunication is as serious a punishment as the Church can deal out in the modern world, and there's nothing whatsoever about "marrying a Protestant" in the very long list of excommunicable offences in the Catholic Church.
Even as it stands today, the big restriction is that to be married by a priest in a Catholic church, both bride and groom must be Catholic. I suppose we have to add that one must be male and the other female. By birth. Thus, I don't believe this "excommunication" nonsense.
So what does this latest "news" mean? Fuck if I know.
Personally, hearing that the Hebrew year is 5784 makes me wonder exactly what the hell was so special about the year 2024 - 5784 = -3760.
It seems to me that there may be more to be learned from figuring that out than from any of the multitudinous forms and results of "divination". I guess anyone with even the slightest interest senses that would be a lot of work and suddenly loses that slightest interest.
For anyone wishing to be conversant on the specific topic of documentation for this "well-documented historical event", you should be ready to discuss the Wannsee Protocol.
That document is put forward by non-revisionists as the primary documentary proof of the "Final Solution", of which all other documentation would be considered supplementary or secondary.
Do your own research but (spoiler alert), it's quite an obvious forgery.
I think anyone that really claims to understand money in any form should be conversant with rai stones and their properties.
What that understanding has shown me is the single fundamental problem with money of any sort, that which enables all the various frauds and shenanigans of all types, is that people do not understand the money they have, and they may thusly be controlled with it.
One of my favorites was this one:
The guy just evaporates and two months later they say, "Looks like he's not coming back so I guess we'll get someone else." That's more lax than if he was a clerk at a GameStop.
As to the interpretation of the purge, Xi is cleaning house on the Chinese Deep State. If he was really Ming the Merciless--as we are all instructed to believe--we should be hearing all about this and so much more that they just make up. We are not.
Rule #1 of Deep State Fight Club is that you do not talk about your losses. Rule #2 of Deep State Fight Club is that you do not talk about your losses.
Ah, sorry, I never saved the link. It was just a throwaway comment on a throwaway Reddit post long after I had been personally convinced.
If I had to show someone just one clip, I'd show them Bill Hicks doing "Goat Boy". For Chrissakes, it's Alex Jones' very characteristic voice! Make sure you have that in your collection.
The other one to try to look up is a clip from JRE, and I think it was just after the time Rogan moved to Austin. Right at the top, Rogan says something like, "Hey Alex, all these people are saying you're Bill Hicks. Look in that camera right there and tell them you're not Bill Hicks."
So AJ lol's and blabs and lol's for five minutes about the whole controversy, but he never says he's not Bill Hicks.
What you're seeing, though, is this: there is a certain subset of "conspiracy theorists" (actually the biggest part these days) that aren't really seekers after the truth. Rather, they choose alternate "authorities" the same way normies just accept the default "authorities".
So if one of these people has accepted AJ in that way, they just don't want to hear about it. It's precisely like telling normies that Rachel Maddow and the witches on "The View" are not their friends, they're just a bunch of lying corporate stooges. It makes that person feel extremely uncomfortable.
That's what you're up against and it's not a matter of evidence.
The finer point I would put on it is that what we are presented with as "the occult" is like believing the idea that pirates and conquistadors with swords are floating around the seas on sailing ships. No, those don't exist.
Real pirates and conquistadors wear suits and go around the world with banks and media organizations doing far, far more damage than the other kind ever did. Everyone recognized the old kind but few recognize the new kind. As long as people keep talking about dudes with eye patches and parrots, they have an effective cloak of invisibility.
And there, to my way of thinking, is about the only kind of magic we need to be worried about at this time.
Yeah, Crowley is definitely another one. You have to sort of mentally step back from what's shoved in your face about him and evaluate, "Behind all the smoke and mirrors, exactly what 'powers' did he ever exhibit? Did this guy ever even pull a rabbit out of a hat?" You start to conclude he was just a dissolute, drug-addicted, serial abuser of women that Intelligence rolled out and told us was Voldemort. Then everyone tries to read meaning in to what he wrote, instead of recognizing the nonsense that was written.
But I do believe the bit about Barbara Bush. When you realize it's a very small club and They like to keep it all in the family, the world starts to make a lot more sense.
You can add the warmongering jerks of Estonia to the list:
And it looks like they're gunning for the pole position, because they'll even stomp on what were very recently the Golden People:
But with the war winding down to the final destruction of Ukraine, I guess we all knew that chorus was on it's way from the West: "The only reason we--ehem--Ukraine didn't win any bigger was because the Ukrainians are weak-ass faggots."
For those who suspect there is something deeper at work here than is ever suggested even by conspiracy theorists, well, I think so too. Just as food for your own thought and in greatly simplified form, here's the theory I've been working on....
Normies are normies because of the way they think. That is, they have a different way of processing the world than you suppose. Whether you agree with them on any particular point is not relevant, it's how you got there.
Primarily, they believe what they are told to believe by those they consider in authority. Did you ever notice that many normies are just out of touch with straightforward elements of reality? This is the reason.
This disconnection from reality is the main feature of what is called "psychosis":
Psychosis is a condition of the mind that results in difficulties determining what is real and what is not real.
They go on to say it's something wrong with your brain or whatever, but this is a misunderstanding (which may be intentional at the highest levels). But how do we get from there to what we see in the OP? It's another aspect which is misunderstood by the mainstream, but they do know it exists and we find the strong link described under "homicidal ideation":
Homicidal ideation is not a disease itself, but may result from other illnesses such as delirium and psychosis. Psychosis, which accounts for 89% of admissions with homicidal ideation in one US study....
So to recap, these people have a totally different mode of thinking leading to what appears as psychosis, which then easily spills over to homicidal thoughts about those they have been told to hate and who are the cause of their troubles.
I don't even know why I'm writing this because everyone seems a lot more content with, "These people are dumb assholes." Hey, but who knows who might stumble on this?
I would hang in there, stay in the fight. I think we're getting closer and there's more water pushing against the dam than there's ever been.
Just taking the MH370 example, I've noticed two quite distinct kinds of posts on r/conspiracy, or more specifically posts with distinct sets of comments. The posts themselves are innocent enough, along the lines of, "Whatever happened to MH370?"
One kind is absolutely, completely overrun with shills pushing any and every kind of nonsense, including this "Ashton Forbes" line. Sometimes I'll post the Diego Garcia info and I've even been attacked by the OP himself! That leads me to believe the post is either targeted for cognitive warfare or completely set up by them (and why wouldn't it be?).
But there are others that are "unmolested", and they are full of solid info: Diego Garcia, Philip Wood, MH17, all the good stuff. That tells me there are plenty of awake people out there that "They" are working hard to drown out.
Who wins in this battle? Well, one indication is that They have had to step up Their game, so clearly They are feeling more pressure. I say we keep turning up that pressure.