Oh my! You might ban me....again? Like, you mean like the last time, and the time before that, and the time before that, and the time before that? We must be going on a bakers dozen now. Bans on this site are like the points on Who's Line Is It Anyway....they're tallied but they don't matter.
Swamp said he's from America. Not like anyone could track you down from saying that. The times of the day you're most active, looks like you're from Eastern Europe or Tel Aviv.
What nation are you currently in? I'm really sleepy, are you?
What nation do you live in? You're not from America are you?
Getting ready for lunch soon?
You must be needing to get to sleep soon. What time is it where you're at?
That's a beautiful illogic from the person who can't even tell us his prior account (fake) names. I've said from the start that I volunteer for Scott Lively and am accountable to the SwampRangers.org entity, which is more than most anons.
Are you Scott Lively?
https://communities.win/c/TrueConspiracies/p/1ASFm4cTGD/swamp-searches-for-unmodded-comm/c
This is what happened in a nutshell
Looks like the truth won out since you have no actual rebuttal....
I'm banned from here, yet here I am. If you want to post there, just sign up a new username. It doesn't require email and you don't even have to select the box that you agree to the terms of service. Just a name and password and you can post there.
What's the real names of the owners? Do you know their real names?
What date were you approached with anything to do with moderating c/Conspiracies, who said it, and what was said?
Post pics of your DMs so we can see what was said and when. Paleos been talking to you about how to mod the forum behind the scenes. Even messaged me about getting you to ban me on his behalf.
As far as u/Nep1 goes, post links to where you guys claim he wanted a site moderator and make a mega thread of all the posts on here and other forums in regards to it so we can get a timeline going on.
I believe your cult conspired to gain control of the c/Conspiracies forum because it's a more active forum. Your co-cultist u/Slechta5614 mentioned something about getting all the main forums on the site to work together towards a goal. Sounds like you guys are trying to establish your cult's dominance and take over the bigger forums of the site.
If you decline to be transparent with the timeline of when and how you were selected to be mod here, it'll be safe for everyone to assume you and your cult did conspire to take over the forum. SwampRangers little vote to get community input was an obvious attempt to swarm and target the forum to create a false image of community consensus.
There were maybe five candidates who proposed they could be mod, on several different pages, and it's clear the admins and Paleo based their decision on those several pages, where the vocal among the community expressed their views (and those who opted not to express their views had fair warning). The decision appears to have been made after a week or two of my and others' raising the point, but they didn't implement it for months, presumably to gauge people's reaction to u/Thisisnotanexit indicating direction.
Prove it.
There was sufficient consensus that moderation was preferable
Prove exactly how many people it took to qualify sufficient consensus. Looks like it was just your cult.
so admin stepped in by having TINAE state a direction and waited to see that direction validated by the community.
That means she was pre selected without community approval. Prove where her direction was validated by the community. From the looks of it both those who don't like her and those who do had issue with the way she modded. She even admitted screwing up, and being too harsh. She backtracked on certain rules, and kept altering them. Her original direction sucked and she had to change it cuz everyone threw a fit. She failed. She was a hard ass long enough to ban JG5, RealWildRanter and others that Paleo told her to. Immediately after she changed course and those who were banned wouldn't have been with the direction she went. She was the plant that you and Paleo can control. She's only a figurehead and you and Paleo are running the show behind the scenes.
Tell us your real name if you want to be transparent.
I don't get it.
That much is obvious given your behavior in shitting up the place as well with your treatment of me lol.
Your non answer about whether or not you are a Swamp Ranger is your way of admitting you are.
I've been around since The Donald got banned from Reddit. Saw someone advertise it in a Breitbart comment section and joined on. Over the years, the site has degraded and the energy it once had is gone. My main account got banned years ago because a mod thought my username was antisemitic, but it had nothing to do with Jews. They were too stupid to look it up and ignored my appeal.
Respect him for what?
I bet you were you one of the admin that approved of Anaconda back in the day when everyone couldn't stand him. I wouldn't say I'm mad. More like disgusted about how great a site like this could be, and how poor leadership has caused its downfall. You recently tried to reason with the pedo spammer. That's pathetic. You're never going to talk sense into those types. The way you said being a Nazi was worse than being a pedophile before, that's twisted morality. For being a Nazi, most of the time you'd think JG5 was just one of Jew hating Christians on this site that aren't Nazis. Yet, a legit pedophile isn't more of a problem? You ban the pedo left and right and go hard on him when he appears, yet the actual Nazi you say is worse... he's still here.
What's the deal with u/C? Did he quit or get fired? How many of you are in control of the site now? That one guy went AWOL and dispersing it was a good idea. Unfortunately, it appears you guys have a dying site that fizzled out and will fade into obscurity.
What kind of stuff did the feds talk to you guys about after Jan 6? They had to have cucked you guys so the site would stay up.
This is a blatant admission you decided to install her as mod prior to any community input about whether or not to have a mod and who it would be.
The voting and Meta posts about community input about the mod position was all performative. None of it mattered. You made a decision from the beginning and the alleged community input was about you and the Swamp Cult being able to claim it was community driven.
Way to tell us you're a member of the Swamp Rangers without saying it...
What's your position on this site? Doesn't say you're admin and you're not listed as a mod. Admin that doesnt use the official admin stamp on here? Part owner or developer perhaps? Why are you calling the shots on who the mod is on c/Conspiracies and about who to ban or not?
This comment from u/SwampRangers is admitting to a takeover of the c/Conspiracies forum by the Swamp Cult. Both u/Graphenium and u/Neo1 did not want u/Thisisnotanexit to be mod of the forum. You can see u/Neo1's disdain at https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ASFhYB4Kf/i-regret-to-find-out-this-place-/c and u/Graphenium's comment below
This isn’t a real thread. It’s just people who follow SR around and interact with everything he posts.
The only people who’ve voted in it so far are you, TINAE, then swamp who doesn’t actually ever post here just had 3 people follow him to the thread (aka not community members) and Dresdenfirebomber an obvious shill who also isn’t a community member.
The ones voting for a mod are the Swamp Cult and no others. It's a group effort to target the forum and create an illusion of a community consensus by only considering members of the Swamp Cult as the community. There are more that didn't want moderation and ones who didn't want u/Thisisnotanexit than did. They swooped in, raised the call for moderation through lies, and got one of their own in power.
Therefore we can declare the vote (unless people chime in late) to have rendered a passing total of 4-1-1 in favor of Yes; but to interpret the vote it's clear that it reflects only those willing to be active in supporting a mod board of most any composition. As we proceed to build informal consensus if any, the contingent that consciously deprecates deliberative processes by nonparticipation, and by active redirection via other activity (including squabbling), will need either to draw itself out into making commitments, or to be bypassed by their alternate activity being overcome by community consensus activity.
u/Doggos, u/C, and u/Perun you guys are listed as the mods of this forum and have utterly failed to do so. It was never u/SwampRangers position to rig a passing vote for getting a mod, especially when it's one of his lackeys.
u/Slechta5614 admitted that there's a plan by the Swamp Cult to take over the site. https://communities.win/c/Christianity/p/1ASFhNzhq6/the-dark-tower-chapter-1/c/4eZE8o0aFM9?d=50
Communities.win is a gathering hub for many different types of people..
Jesus gathered disciples that were very different from each other.
Patriot.win
GreatAwakening.win
Christianity.win
Conpro.win
Conspiracy.win
These are the main 5 on .win.
All separate but under the same umbrella. Have unique purposes but same destination in the end .win will act as a functioning body
12 There is one body, but it has many parts. But all its many parts make up one body. It is the same with Christ. 13 We were all baptized by one Holy Spirit. And so we are formed into one body. It didn’t matter whether we were Jews or Gentiles, slaves or free people. We were all given the same Spirit to drink. 14 So the body is not made up of just one part. It has many parts.
15 Suppose the foot says, “I am not a hand. So I don’t belong to the body.” By saying this, it cannot stop being part of the body. 16 And suppose the ear says, “I am not an eye. So I don’t belong to the body.” By saying this, it cannot stop being part of the body. 17 If the whole body were an eye, how could it hear? If the whole body were an ear, how could it smell? 18 God has placed each part in the body just as he wanted it to be. 19 If all the parts were the same, how could there be a body? 20 As it is, there are many parts. But there is only one body.
21 The eye can’t say to the hand, “I don’t need you!” The head can’t say to the feet, “I don’t need you!” 22 In fact, it is just the opposite. The parts of the body that seem to be weaker are the ones we can’t do without. 23 The parts that we think are less important we treat with special honor. The private parts aren’t shown. But they are treated with special care. 24 The parts that can be shown don’t need special care. But God has put together all the parts of the body. And he has given more honor to the parts that didn’t have any. 25 In that way, the parts of the body will not take sides. All of them will take care of one another. 26 If one part suffers, every part suffers with it. If one part is honored, every part shares in its joy.
27 You are the body of Christ. Each one of you is a part of it.
u/JosephGoebbel5, u/DresdenFirebomber, u/RealWildRanter, u/Neo1, u/Third-Eye-Vision, u/dukey, u/newfunturistic, u/user20461, u/Eccentrik, u/LightBringerFlex, u/guywholikesDjtof2024, u/Zyxl, u/defenderOfMontrosity, u/TurnToGodNow, u/deletedandredacted, u/muhqtardtho, u/Mrexreturns, u/free-will-of-choice, u/SicSemperTyrannis2
I think you would be for digital ID. You've done the same things here that you're complaining about. You forced your will on others here, denying them expression of their free will, by removing access to a site unless they consent with your rules. You did that to control behavior, trying to force us to make what you thought as better choices in the name of protecting us (men you see view as children).
All the while, you still haven't seen yourself as controlling, and you believe your good intentions to help others gives you the right to impose on their exercise of free will as they see fit. You're the demonic adversary. You're the other side of the same coin as those implementing digital ID.
u/JosephGoebbe5 check out the irony lol.
What's your brain issue then? You posted a Pepe meme with a blue hat earlier saying to be patient with you because you're autistic. You believe you are. With the paranoia and delusions you're probably schizophrenic. Do you hallucinate or hear voices? Do you believe people are actively watching you on the internet or at home?
So you were diagnosed with autism, but don't trust it?
All your faith in God isn't enough to see you through with a yes answer. That'd be honest of you. Instead, you deflect. That's what people do when they know the answer is yes, but they don't want to openly admit it. It doesn't fool anyone. It's ok. You trust God enough to admit that yes you have autism?
Of what? Perhaps you are schizophrenic or have schizo-affective disorder (the one with the bipolar attached).
You got enough faith your God will see you through if you admit whatever you have? It's not like mental disorders are in short supply on the site.
That's a yes you are! Are you mature enough to actually admit it? Why hide it?
Yeah. If you were perhaps people wouldn't treat you so bad. It'd bring some understanding to your thinking and actions. Are you autistic?