1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +2 / -1

RealWildRantee was doing his best to attack me, and the only way he can is by lying.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +2 / -1

You know full well he was lying, I would expect you not to attack me for someone else lying.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +3 / -2

There is no "argument," just the overused notion that calling someone a jew is an insult.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

In other words, leftards change the meanings of words so quickly even they can't keep their bs straight, lol

Carry on :)

-1
SicSemperTyrannis2 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Why do you have to be a lying faggot?

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

You shouldn't be using "natalist" as though it were somehow a derogatory term. Leave that for the retard here.

0
SicSemperTyrannis2 0 points ago +2 / -2

That's an outdated definition. Now it means something completely different. What you're referring to changed to MPD (Multiple Personality Disorder) and then DID. (Dissociative Identity Disorder)

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +2 / -1

Fair, but that's not even close to "upstate NY." It's basically a NJ suburb.

0
SicSemperTyrannis2 0 points ago +2 / -2

Not really countering his basic premise

3
SicSemperTyrannis2 3 points ago +3 / -0

disprove my points

No, fool, we just bounce your head off the floor and then stuff you in a locker.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

there is nothing we could realistically do

You've had enough soy for 3 lifetimes, apparently ...

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +2 / -1

But if they had failed in the elections, they wouldn't have been in the conversation to be given authority.

Huge difference between failing and won. Hitler never won.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +2 / -1

Never won nearly enough to do what he did, that's the furthest thing from a technicality imaginable. He begged for that authority, and was granted it. The very next day he began implementing his plans for war which he had made a decade prior, yet wehraboos here falsely claim "he never wanted war."

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +2 / -1

He never did. This is pretty easy history to research. Please do.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +2 / -1

What do you claim he "won?"

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nice list! A small but significant correction: Japan attacked the Philippines on the same day they attacked Pearl Harbor, Japan time. It was a mere 10 hours later. Japan was an absolutely horrible military in terms of their treatment of anyone they came in contact with, including their own people. In this way the comparison with present day Hamas is uncanny.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

You don't realize it's even possible to stop assuming, so anything you write is a waste of time.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

can't provide any kind of explanations.

Just your assumption.

You don't have ears to hear.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're incapable of being sincere.

That's a fixable problem, btw.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've already given you not only as much as you can handle, but more.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

You won't be able to hold a conversation until you learn to read.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

You refuse to read what's written, and prefer to just make shit up.

Good luck with that.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

You'll have to take inventory, and double check whether that's a good decision. For your New Year's resolution you might muster up the gumption to change that.

view more: Next ›