My guess is that they may have agreed with the analysis (only approved candidates win) but may have disagreed with the conclusion (this requires a show of force). Calls to such are reminiscent of the false flag agitprop behind J6 and it glows
Not to go all Q larp in this but ... what if the intel agencies already know this. If Byrne is right, and I think he is, then there's likely people in the know. I'm not talking about accomplices I'm talking about independent analysts who might have stumbled across this. Do you think those folks are just sitting on it? Or are they helping get the info out?
The west coast is the most vulnerable but... it's also the most exploited in terms of their current influence operations. So, they wouldn't do that without extracting their people first which would also serve to telegraph the attack.
Because we're their enemy. They hate us because they have to in order to destroy us