1
Jacobin 1 point ago +2 / -1

I see what you mean.

It follows a very obvious set of formula.

The continuous references to sources is so odd and jarring

0
Jacobin 0 points ago +1 / -1

So you are claiming to have watched the video?

Because your response betrays the fact that you haven't at all - you're just another automatic white knighting Trump cocksucker

0
Jacobin 0 points ago +1 / -1

That's an assumption you make.

Whether you like it or not therte are serious questions over Donald Trump. Watch the Kay Griggs interview. See how everything revolves around Israelis, whom Trump is completely betrothed to.

See how the CIA is actually just a false front for Army intelligence and how all the generals (and bankers and top businessmen) for a homosexual hierarchy having been recruited from Princeton and Yale and the like.

Donald Trump was recruited by the Army and all those Generals to run for President wasn't he? Well, you don't get to BE a General unless you are inducted into the weird Existentialist homosexual secret societies.

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +2 / -1

I've just finished part 2. Completely eye-opening.

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +2 / -1

You obviously didn’t watch the video but just posted your autopilot response. You’re the shill

0
Jacobin 0 points ago +1 / -1

seems like you're the one crying

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +2 / -1

That’s not true and you know it. This is just your own desperate propaganda attempt at using shameful insults to influence people into disassociating from the things which threaten your worldview, much like how ‘conspiracy theorist’ and ‘nazi’ and ‘racist’ are used to deflect from the very real truths of things.

No, not all the people who say that trusting Trump or Q was stupid are people who believed in the Russia thing, nor are they all ‘leftists’ as though only leftists could fail to be convinced by Trump and Q.

The ACTUAL better critical thinkers (not the self-appointed bastions of Critical thought that Qs anons claim to be) allow the facts and logic to influence their view, whereas for the Q/Trump zealot the ground rule is that all facts MUST be twisted and reinterpreted in a manner to uphold Trump as a good guy/verify Q.

The mental gymnastics over at GAW is astounding when it comes to vaccines. But there were plenty more red flags besides just that anyway.

So, I’m afraid you’re half-arsed attempt is pretty juvenile and completely transparent.

0
Jacobin 0 points ago +1 / -1

You homosexuals always think sass is a legitimate method of argument but your all just hollow.

2
Jacobin 2 points ago +3 / -1

Have you coerced your parents into getting it?

by pkvi
2
Jacobin 2 points ago +3 / -1

Trump is such a massive deceiver it’s difficult to wrap your head around just how brazenly someone can lie like that.

When all the leftist lying rags said Trump was a massive liar it was always dismissed because they were liars. But it turns out that they’re on the same team actually and that even their apparent beef was a lie.

There is nothing that is not lies.

That was the goal of Mockingbird anyway wasnt it - when EVERYTHING the public believes is a lie.

It’s still just astounding how many people go to such elaborate efforts to deceive us all.

0
Jacobin 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don’t think you have the first clue how prevalent it all is.

Where do you think the huge and hurried push for trans acceptance comes from?

Why do the school curriculums of the western world all brainwash children from VERY young into being trans?

What’s it all about? Do you think that the trans phenomenon exists in a vacuum in schools and unis?

Do you think it all just happened organically, like this is the natural ‘evolution’ of a society? Or do you not think the cultural controllers introduce this stuff on purpose?

You can’t have failed to notice that there is a gargantuan transgender movement underway. Perhaps you should consider where it’s whole parameters might lie, its history, how widespread it ACTUALLY is and where it’s heading to instead of just casually dismissing people who have more of a clue than you as ‘watching tranny porn’

Is there even any porn that ISN’T tranny porn?

0
Jacobin 0 points ago +2 / -2

That’s such a cliched and transparent tactic they use.

If you’re not for Trump you’re for Clinton.

No, how about they are ALL the swamp and some of us have just graduated from the delusion of genuine opposition amongst the elites.

-3
Jacobin -3 points ago +1 / -4

Epstein procured Giuffre from Mar-a-Lago. One of the Epstein victims accused Trump.

Dershowitz is Trumps friend and lawyer and he received a massage by his own admission “with his underwear on”.

But you’re right in a way, Trumps proclivities are geared more towards Transgenders and Ivanka.

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +2 / -1

I did a wee search, here’s a video discussing and showing it.

Here is the tech by which such a thing might have been accomplished.

Here’s the Pope’s wheezing display of subservience

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +2 / -1

Aah, right, gotcha. Makes eminently more sense now! My misunderstanding.

1
Jacobin 1 point ago +2 / -1

there's none so blind as those who will not see right enough eh.

-1
Jacobin -1 points ago +1 / -2

The rays would all be equal. Here is a photo of what they're talking about. These rays are obviously hitting earth at a triangle shape which, to be fair, ought not to happen if the sun is massively bigger than the earth, regardless of how far away it is. In fact, the further away something is, the broader its light should be. Try it with a torch up close to your desk or wall or something and move it further and further back - see what happens to the light.

They point out how those rays act and it's completely understandable where they're coming from.

If you held a pea up to your lightbulb about the equivalent distance as the earth is alleged to be from the sun you would not see the light behaving in that manner. The way the suns rays penetrate through the clouds simply DOES suggest a much closer and more concentrated light source.

Now, I'm not saying that the earth is flat or that there isn't some legitimate fancy scientific rationale behind the behaviour of these rays which is beyond the ken of the layperson. I'm only saying that, once it's pointed out to you, the official scientific position clearly just doesn't pass the eyeball test.

0
Jacobin 0 points ago +1 / -1

Look, be as optimistic as you like but you have absolutely ZERO grounds for it. No one is stopping them whatsoever and our militaries will be 100% on their side.

A strongly worded letter to parliament won't change anything. Nor will a protest unless you are protesting for something that benefits them.

We are sitting ducks and they are going to drive us out of society if they don't kill us. So it was written in Revelation too. So, don't puff yourself up with false hope that there is anyone who could stop them who is not them.

Russell Brand the freemason can tell the truth all he wants but he lies with the truth. Neil Oliver can deliver all the uplifting messages he likes. Rand Paul and Jim Jordan and whoever else can trot out all the bromides they like. Point is, they are the DEFINITION of controlled opposition.

We know they are lying. They know they are lying. They know that we know they are lying. We know that they know we know they are lying. And still they continue to lie. — Alexander Solzhenitsyn

They don't care though because they're just going to feed the masses into the great big genocide machine again just like they did with the World Wars and other 'pandemics' like the Plague and Spanish Flu.

2
Jacobin 2 points ago +2 / -0

I learned from Q not to get complacent and never to rely on hope or on others to do what must be done.

lol. Umm, no you learned to do EXACTLY all those things. That was Qs whole schtick from the beginning. Don't you remember all the 'popcorn' 'enjoy the show' 'you elected us to do the heavy lifting' 'you are watching a movie' nonsense?

by pkvi
2
Jacobin 2 points ago +3 / -1

ha, putting a Union Jack on his face to hint at patriotism

0
Jacobin 0 points ago +1 / -1

I said look closely. Do this. Just move the playbar thing with your cursor instead of letting the video play through. For example, pause it on 12 seconds and just LOOK at the guy.

It's a good lookalike in action but it is definitely not him. His eyes are too shallow or something.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›