1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/zero + https://www.etymonline.com/word/zero + https://www.etymonline.com/word/cipher

b) Meaning implies one taking measurement, while ignoring all given.

c) Nothing implies the inversion of everything; established by ones consent to suggested nihilism (nihilo; nothing) tempting ones de-nial of all perceivable.

Ones consent to a suggestion by another one implies 1+1 aka a binary (twofold) code for ones (1) denial (0), and code/coda/codex refers to statutory law.

That's how a jew forms statutory law out of a gentiles denial of natural law flowing.

And of course the art of computation is called arithmetic; formerly tælcræft (tale-craft)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/arithmetic which combines numerology and spell-craft.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

more words to counter

There cannot be more than sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all". Counting sound starts and ends at one.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

It does, doesn't it. But it isn't one. Did that solve anything?

What does mainstream education teach about a verb? That it denotes "action".

What you are describing (is vs isn't) represents reactions turning against one another, while ignoring that action moves straight into reaction aka from cause into effect aka from flow into form aka from all into one.

Action implies the ongoing solution dissolving any temporary reaction within. Nature dissolves any is vs isn't conflict within by limiting each being (life) in-between boundaries (inception towards death).

You say "it isn't one", but all implies oneness (cause) for each one (effect) within. Sound implies sanus/entire/whole/all aka oneness for each one within. It's the words used to describe this which tempts one to ignore singularity for plurality, which is why each singular word is shaped by many letters.

The word 'imply', implies that there is a deeper connection left unsaid.

If/then implies a separation during motion aka analysis...not a connection aka synthesis. Your consent to the suggested word "imply" implies a synthesis tempting you to ignore analysis.

As free will of choice one needs to analyze im-plica-tion (within fold of action) to discern self as reaction within fold of action. Fold implies "to bend"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/fold as in a straight line (inception towards death) bending (life).

As for leaving unsaid...sound doesn't say anything; it internally separates instruments from one another, thereby giving the opportunity to form speech during flowing sound.

That's the shortcoming of words.

A letter is shorter than any word, and only within sound can a word come into being.

Welcome to dualism as explanation.

TO dualism implies from one towards two. TO implies the origin of one aka from all motion into each unit of matter...only afterwards can units of matter be put together into two.

A chosen one suggests one's choice to give consent to an -ism, which when given, implies a dual-ism, since it synthesizes ONES choice and a chosen ONES suggestion.

If sound; then each instrument within...that's how singularity works. If an instrument ignores sound for another instrument's words, then a dualism was shaped within the singularity of sound.

There were no words before mouths to express

a) Why do you put NO before the "word" of God? If God implies everything; then nothing (no) implies ones denial of everything.

b) Expression implies pressing outwards (ex-press) from within action (ion), hence sound allowing each instrument within to express outwards whatever noise one chooses to shape.

c) If there; then here...both imply from the perspective of one within all.

it is said that in the beginning was The Word. Logos as the spirit...

Motion (sound) > momentum (spirit) > matter (instrument)...words are exchanged by matter to distract from the momentum of motion. Words let (hence letters) others breathe spirit into one...which isn't the animating spirit (living), but the ghostly spirit (dying).

Holding onto words tempts one to ignore that sound moves through one, hence animating (motion) the spirit (momentum) of being (matter).

all words as lesser formulai....sephira...are formulated.

a) Sephira/sepiroth/sefirot aka the ein-sof (endless one) of jewish mysticism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sefirot

The trick...suggesting the sof/soph (knowledge aka all perceivable) tempts ones perception to ignore all perceivable for the suggested. A jew formulates "knowledge" within a gentiles mind, while calling it "understanding", hence tricking one to give consent to a suggestion.

The formula used implies spell-craft (words shaped within sound) and mercantile magic aka selling (to suggest) and buying (to consent). Nature sets each being free (choice)...buying and selling tempts ones free will of chocie to sell itself out by buying into a chosen ones offer.

breaks its truth

And yet truth is being held onto while fighting lies. A synthesis conflicting with analysis, hence a "world of lies".

how to count and spell

a) If God implies one, then two implies...more than God; double God? What about zero aka less or no God? How can one count without denying that there can be only one?

b) Consenting to a spell...spellbinds ones free will of choice.

eliminate the guesswork and error.

Where's the guesswork and error for form (life) within flow (inception towards death)? What if flow amends any error form shapes? What if work continues (flow) to discontinue each employee (form)?

What if that which sets simultaneously eliminates aka what if the setting (inception) of being (life) implies elimination (death)?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

decentralization of power

a) Potential (life) can only grow at the center of procession (inception towards death).

b) Decentralization implies being divided (de) at center (centr) of all (al) action (ion).

c) Being given choice within balance implies "empowerment"...seeking power from outside (chosen one) center (ones choice) diminishes power.

law enforcement

Being implies mind (ment) within (en) force of natural law, which one needs to resist the wanted temptation to follow along.

Suggested law enforcement inverts this by shaping a consensus of followers who are not allowed to resist.

Natural (resistance is fertile) or artificial (resistance is futile)...represents the struggle of each ones free will of choice among one another.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

how the karma system works

a) Karma/kwer - "to make, form"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/karma

Ongoing flow (inception towards death) allows temporary form (life) to shape...any formed shapes are being dissolved within the karmic justice of flow aka solution dissolving problems.

b) Work internally separates (analysis); systems are internally shaped together (synthesis) to distract from that.

Work (nature) generates employee (being)...other beings shape systems to distract employee from real work with fictitious work. Real work sets one free (Arbeit macht frei); fake work binds ones free will of choice to a chosen ones suggestion.

It doesn't decide each act and go

a) Only nature acts; which allows each being within to react aka to decide how to react to being enacted upon.

b) Nature always goes...it's each being (life) within which temporary goes in (inception) and out (death) of it.

bad luck

Good vs bad implies gambling ones choice on chance. Resisting the temptation to gamble on either side sustains ones choice within balance.

Luck implies "what happens to one by chance"...being given a choice implies within (matter) the balance (momentum) of motion.

A jew suggests luck to invert natural choice with artificial chance...yet consenting to it implies a gambling gentile stacking choice on chance.

Neither good, nor bad chances are karmic justice...only all balance represents the karmic justice for each ones choice. Taking a chance tempts one to ignore being given a choice.

Fuck their "system".

The issue...sys (together) implies ones consent to the suggestion of another, and fuck/fuge (masonic joint) also implies ones consent joining with the suggestion of another. What's the suggestion? Pluralism (theirs).

Each of these words (fuck their system) represents a crafted spell to trick the one using it against another into bondage instead.

Sleight of hand: "Fuck the System" by THE EXPLOITED... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuck_the_System

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

He is a person

Aka per sonos...by sound.

Makes no sense.

Sensing implies responding (perception) to something send (perceivable)...only afterwards can one make something within it. Just like words can only be made after sound sends/sense, hence being of a sound mind.

According to

To be able to accord (come into agreement)...one has to be first TOwarded aka being moved. Sound implies the moving instigator for anything shaped within.

Only withing sound can A-CHORD be played...

the Word is Christ

Christ implies "anointed one" aka one set apart from one another...any word is shaped by holding letters together.

Sound anoints by flowing through each solid instrument within.

second person

Being person aka per sonos (by sound) implies by seco (to divide).

There can be no second to God...the one and only. Hence second/seco (to divide) implies the division/divination of each Christ (anointed one) within all of God.

not an attribute or an abstraction

Any one within all implies an attribute thereof, and essence (life) during abstract (inception towards death).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

That black cube box is called Kaaba

a) Kaaba aka Kabbalah aka "cube of allah".

b) Cube/cubus/kybos - "six sided die" aka living within the process of dying, while being in-between left/right + up/down + front/back.

c) Circular thinking (logic) turning into conflict (reason) blackens the cube of ones perception within linear progression.

d) A cube has six SQUARE faces; logic enCOMPASSes ones thinking... freemasonry.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

How about this...verb/verbal/verbum - "word", hence "dealing with words, concerned with words only"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/verbal

Then think about that..."When the agent and object change places, and the agent is considered as the instrument by which the object is affected, the verb is called passive".

If the word/verb implies passive; then sound implies active. Nature activates being (life) by passing (inception towards death).

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Again...singing and speaking imply articulation of natural sound. Only within sound can one utter/utera - "outer, exterior, external", as in...sound impresses; singing and speaking expresses, hence ex-istence.

Being within sound implies instrument aka mind (ment) structured (stru) within (in)...hence INTO EX-istence.

Whole separating into partial aka cause into effect aka all into one implies internal expression.

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

But only within sound can any word be spoken. Words imply the articulation of natural sound. What are words describing if not all sound offers?

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

question God's Word

What if... "In the beginning was sound, and sound was with God, and sound was God."

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

living under Christian rule and persecution

What about living under jewish rule and persecution?

a dominant and often hostile Christian world

What about the dominance and hostility of a jewish world?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you actually think this will change anything?

Tucker vs Piers implies suggested information shaped from both sides; which distracts the consenting viewers from being within perceivable inspiration aka within (life) change (inception towards death).

It's holding onto any shape which distorts ones sight within change.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Forgiveness = Constant peace, good future.

a) Artificially equalizing destroys particular nature.

b) Only nature forgives (inception towards death) being (life) aka giving forward.

c) Peace/piece standing together (con-stance) implies war.

Love = Abundance

Holding onto love (want) binds one to hate (not want) hence restricting ones access to all abundance given (need).

Unity = Power

Power implies potential during procession...a separation from one another; not a unification with one another. Unifying power into a mass...diminishes the potential of each unit within to express self.

Faith = Growth

Faith implies holding onto (repression)...growing implies letting go (expression).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wish we could live free of paper

Paper isn't the issue. Wishing binds ones free will of choice to suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin. Choice originates within balance...wishing implies leaning outwards aka imbalance. A jew suggests paper to tempt consenting gentiles to fulfill their wishes with.

Wish/wen - "to desire; strive for... https://www.etymonline.com/word/wish

Suggestion implies temptation...consent implies ones desire giving into temptation while striving for the suggested.

Utilizing suggestion to tempt consent represents for example the Islamic "jinn/genie" which represents bondage until one sets it free, while binding self to wishes. AL-ADD-IN...being implies one within (in) all (al); wishing implies adding (add) more than all offers by means of suggestion from another one.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

to stop participating

Particles can only exist during a process. Particles responding to process implies reality; particles suggesting each other to stop any process implies fiction.

We can but it requires us to stop participating with the system

WE + US imply system/systēma - "stand together"...the inversion of participation.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) Only nature offers each being movement...how to move implies each beings free will of choice.

b) Satanic implies "contrary, opposing" aka turning from nature against one another, yet only within nature can one turn...so nature continues straight, while many within are encircling each other in contrary opposition.

One cannot be in a contrary position without choosing a side to hold onto. If you chose holy instead of satanic, then you put yourself into contrary position. That's how Satan works (synthesis), while God works (analysis) with your free will of choice at center.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

"The Fabians chose the name to draw a distinction between their slow-going tactics and those of anarchists and communists."... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Fabian

Nature can neither be delayed; nor hastened...all moves steady. It's each being which can be destabilized aka rocked-steady from both (delay vs haste) sides. Holding onto either side binds ones free will of choice to an artificial conflict.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) Debt to whom? If the answer is Rothschild, then how could Macron's government be on the verge of collapse while working for Rothschild?

b) The opposite of debt implies asset aka "sufficient estate"...what's sufficient for the estate of being?

c) Verge/virga - "edge"...doesn't free will of choice position one at the edge of balance? Doesn't ones perception within all perceivable imply knowl-EDGE?

What if ignoring assets for debt implies hEDGEing a bet aka gambling?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

How many hertz is that frequency?

Frequent/farcire - "to cram"...others suggest pluralism (many) to manipulate frequency within ones singular mind. Consenting to a suggestion hertz/hurts...

Within nature there can be only one hertz/herz - "heart"...each ones heart responding occasional (not frequent) to all of nature moving through.

Why do you say...connects to the many psyops

Because PSY (psyche; animating power) separates from one another what OPS (operari; effects of animated power) are connecting together.

Psy (inception towards death) op (life)...the latter can be manipulated to ignore former, so manifold connections will always have a separating origin moving through.

Why is it called "replica" ? What is it a replica OF

Matrix/matris - "mother" implies momentum (mother) of motion (father) for each matter (off-spring) within.

It's matter which can replicate to one another what originates from all motion, by shaping momentum. If one consents to a suggested replica, then one holds onto the shape, while ignoring the momentum of motion going on.

That's why nature doesn't "call" anything...it moves sound. Calling implies the articulation of sound into words, which tempts one another to answer and make a connection aka communication.

By what means?

Mean/men - "to think"...holding onto a thought by consenting to suggested meaning implies TAKING measurements, while ignoring GIVEN. Nature moves through each beings mind and cannot be held onto without ignoring natural (inspiration) for artificial (information).

buddism

Consenting to any suggested -ism prevents one from being buddha/bheudh - "be aware"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Buddha

Awareness implies each ones perception (form) within all perceivable (flow)...holding onto each others suggestion makes one oblivious.

What is the nature of this "matrix"

a) Nature implies to nurture (ure) native (nat) aka each native coming into being (life) during nurture (inception towards death).

b) Being implies matter within momentum of motion, which allows each ones perception to perceive a moment of all perceivable motion. Moment implies mom (mother) + ment (mind) which is why mother nature always has each being within mind.

Other word for matter...material aka mater (mother) i (within) al (all).

Is it made of wood?

Motion generates momentum within which matter comes into being. Making/mag - "to knead, fashion, fit" implies matter shaping one another within momentum of motion, and if one ignores the momentum of motion for what another one shaped out of matter, then one fell for magic... https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/baycityrollers/youmademebelieveinmagic.html

As for wood. Coming into being within nature implies the separation of natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater)...take any piece of wood and analyze it the separation of land, air and water within. Why does wood grow from land; towards air; while transferring water?

A matrix of what

Motion. What else can anything come out of? Of/ab/apo - "off; away"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/of

What does a suggested matrix tempt one to ignore? Being moved! If a prison can confine a prisoner, then how does nature (inception towards death) reach the prisoner (life) during confinement?

What does a prison confine one from? One another! But isn't that what nature does to each being...separating each being from one another? Why is it called confine-MENT (mind) and imprison-MENT (mind)?

Of what? Chicken butt...because it rhymes, and only within sound can words be shaped into rhymes. A mind can be manipulated with words to take offense at this...

No human has observed...

How could "no" be observed?

ETI just means "supernatural entities"

ETI aka Extra-Terrestial-Intelligence...

a) Being implies within outside aka as above/so below...super and extra tempt one to ignore that.

b) Nature implies land; air and water...not just terra.

c) Entity implies "being within"...intelligence implies under one another (understanding), hence within (in) tale (tell) of bondage (ligo). Intelligence tempts entity into submission...if consented to.

Dark eti are DEMONS

Demon aka dai (to divide) mon (to provide)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/demon

Nature provides being by division from one another, hence positioning each being in-between bright and dark. Demonic possession implies taking (consent) into possession (suggested), while ignoring provided (perceivable) division (perception).

How do you demonstrate some far away

DEMON-strate implies showing (strate) the divided (de) provision (mon) to one another, thereby tempting another to consent to the suggested show, while ignoring ones perceiving sight.

If one consents to what another shows, then one synthesizes together artificially, what nature divided from one another for analysis.

The issue with "far away" is that the suggestion thereof tempts ones consenting mind to take artificial measurements...not given by nature.

This suggestion "Saturn is approximately 746 million miles (1.2 billion kilometers) away from Earth at its closest point" tempts one far away from one sight if consented to.

As for saturn/satus - "to sow"...few sow suggestions to grow consensus among many about artificial measurements. The ring around saturn (sown suggestions) implies ones circular thinking (logic) turning into conflict (reason) against others.

By your logic

That logic (circular thinking) tempts one to ignore thinking (life) straight (inception towards death). Nothing is by logic...logic is a by product of everything nature moves straight through each thing.

Kike/kikel - "circle" aka the circle of life...the wheel of fortune...the leap of faith...the band of hope...on the path unwinding.

I agree with the idea

That implies your consent to suggested idealism (idolatry) tempting you from logic (agree or disagree) into reason (agree vs disagree). While holding onto a side...your sight suffers distortion.

to reject ALL

One (life) within all (inception TOwards death) cannot reject TO...reject implies ones response (re) to being thrown (ject) within all, hence as life from inception towards death.

follow

If form (life) follows flow (inception towards death) then...suicide aka killing of self aka "thou shalt not kill".

newage stuff

"The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun." ~Ecclesiastes 1:9

The trick...one needs to resist the wanted temptation to answer ecclesiatic/ekkalein - "to call out". Anything suggested (information) calls one out of everything perceivable (inspiration)...it's the answer which fucks one over.

When is the last time this worked?

All works; each one's employed within. Everlasting work for each temporal employment...the only break one gets is coming into being.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did they change the calendar to keep us out of sync?

a) Change cannot be kept...it changes; moves; separates matter; processes potential etc.

b) A calendar represents a "systematic division" aka a contradiction in terms...systematic (synthesis) division (analysis).

c) Nature divides being...others suggest synchronicity to tempt each divided being to respond alike one another aka lockstep; order following; hivemind; gestalt intelligence; collective consciousness; getting the download etc.

which calendar is the most natural

Calendar/calare/kele - "to announce solemnly, call out", hence a "call" to "end"...that's artificial.

natural to maintain

Maintain (manually hold) implies ones ignorance of nature moving.

natural rhythm

Rhythm/rhein/sreu - "to flow"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rhythm

Flow (inception towards death) generates form (life)...form adapting to being generated by flow implies regeneration.

That's why the rhythm (inception towards death) is gonna get'cha (life)... https://genius.com/Gloria-estefan-rhythm-is-gonna-get-you-lyrics

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Drinking is not wrong

Right vs wrong implies a conflict aka an imbalance for ones choice. Others tempt ones choice into imbalance by suggesting both sides to drink from.

Each being within nature implies want (drink) within need (thirst)...right vs wrong reasoning implies wanting vs not wanting, while ignoring need.

It's hurt

It can't hurt. One can choose "it" to harm self. Others suggest "it" to tempt ones free will of choice to harm self by choosing it.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

The issue with Alcohol is that it disconnects the soul from the body

a) Soul moves through body...only within soul can body separate from one another.

b) Nature doesn't suggest a being to drink anything...it forces thirst through each being. Consenting to a suggested "alcoholic" drink establishes an artificial connection, which distracts one from natural separation.

act aggressive when drunk

a) Being drunk implies ones REACTION to a drink...only nature acts.

b) Passive (inception towards death) aggressive (life)...hence one needing to resist wanted temptation to experience calmness within the eye of the storm.

A living being cannot be passive while being passed...only reactive during agitation. That's why aggression is so tempting and why others suggest alcohol to calm ones temperament..."don't drink too much tho or else".

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›