2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

This can be construed...

Con (together) struere (to pile up)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/construe

Directly before the example "kill yourself" I wrote: "Which suggestion has free-will-of-choice made without ripping apart the process of suggesting?"

If others pile together (construe) what one rips apart...how isn't that a conspiracy?

Anyway...would you like me to delete c) ?

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

The spread of Christianity

Christ (to anoint) spreads...Christianity contracts.

to make people weak

People (plural) makes person (singular) weak...if joined.

naive

Naive/naif - "natural; just born; innocent; genuine" implies being a native of nature aka the status quo of being.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why did you say that?

Because free-will-of-choice

Why did free-will-of-choice answer?

Because free-will-of-choice chose to be questionable...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Logic is not a storm.

Before you chose IS or IS NOT...that was the calm before the storm. After choosing a side you became the eye of the storm aka in-between IS vs IS NOT.

Logic (inwards) instigates the storm of reason (outwards).

This implies that you are stupid!

a) Stupid implies versus smart aka a conflict of reason, hence if ones chooses to brand another as stupid or smart, then one instigates a stupid vs smart conflict of reason.

b) Stupid/steu - "to push"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/stupid

Nature pushes being hence when push (inception towards death) comes to shove (life).

Bonus thought: Why did Dante describe the inferno of hell as nine circles?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everyone needs to pay

Everyone implies each one (partial) within everything (whole)...hence being set free from one another. Ignoring this for dealing with one another tempts one into having to pay to satisfy a creditor.

Everyone needs to resist the wanted temptation to pay credit (creed; belief; faith; consent) to one another.

uniforms

Uniforms (plural) contradicts uni-form aka "formed singular"...

fooling us

Us (plural) fools one (singular) if joined...

1st responder

One can only respond to what came first aka a response can only ever be secondary.

The suggestion "1st responder" tempts one to ignore being a secondary response (perception) to first cause (perceivable).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) And his power (consensus) shall be mighty, but not by his own power (suggestion)...shaping a destructive suggestion is empowered by those consenting to it.

b) People (collectivism); assumption (possessionism) and meaning (determinism) represent tools of deception to tempt one into adversary (satan) to another.

c) Holy (whole) people (summation of partials)...summation tempts one to ignore that whole separates partials from one another into each "holy person". The suggestion "whole-SOME-ness" summons partials together.

What about the power of secret societies?

a) SEC (to separate) SOC (to unify)...being implies secular power which society drains if one joins.

Few suggest both secularism and socialism to bind secular consent (-ist) to social consensus (-ism).

b) Natural secrecy isn't about withholding anything in secret, but a secernere - "to set apart" aka nature setting apart each being within from one another.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

care center

Being implies at the center (life) of a carrying (inception towards death) nature...a jew suggests artificial care centers to decentralize gentiles by tempting them to unburden themselves of their young and old, while simultaneously burdening care-takers.

It's about shirking and shifting response-ability onto another.

By law they're required to complete compliance

Within natural law...a being cannot be complete or compliant. Being within nature implies as partial within whole, while resisting temptation.

A jew suggests completeness aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) to tempt a consensus among gentiles into compliance aka into following jewish orders.

external audit

Again...audit/audire/au (to perceive). Ones perception within all perceivable implies internal potential within external process.

A jew tempts gentiles to count, which makes gentiles accountable to jewish accountants...that's the trick behind auditing aka holding accountable.

Nature doesn't hold...it sets each being free.

nobody

Each being within nature implies a body aka a living vessel. No aka nothing (Latin nihilo) implies nihil-ism suggested by a jew to tempt consenting gentiles to de-nial perceivable nature for suggested artifice.

In short...nobody implies body in denial.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

departments to launder

To divide (de) parted (part) minds (ments) to launder/leue (to wash) aka brainwashing.

audit fails

Audit/audire/au (to perceive) hence gentiles failing to perceive thanks to suggested brainwashing by a jew.

5
free-will-of-choice 5 points ago +5 / -0

There's no jew with a $38 trillion dollar hole in his portemonnaie...debt only exists in the minds of gentiles.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

will carry out orders

There's only one order aka the natural order carrying will (life) in (inception) and out (death)...others suggest orders to tempt ones will to willingly carry burdens, which represents the origin of sin.

without question

Nature neither asks questions, nor gives answers...beings trick each other with artificial questions and answers to ignore that nature represents a solution aka the transformation of solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death).

It's been happening right before our very eyes and we just didn't realize it.

HAP'PEN, verb - "to come by chance"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/happen

Nature gives choice to being before being can take chance from one another...a happenstance implies a fictitious distraction from reality aka a mind control device.

Taking a chance by given choice implies "gambling"...

modern left

a) Others suggest modern or ancient and left or right to tempt ones choice to choose a side to hold onto, while ignoring that choice can only work within a moving balance in-between.

Choosing a side distracts one sight...others suggest sides as a mind control device to manipulate ones sight.

b) Modern/mode/med - "take appropriate measures"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/mode

Taking measures misappropriates motion given. Why? Because motion moves, while taking measurements tempts ones mind to ignore being moved.

Ignorance represents the main device/devis -"intent, desire" to manipulate self and others. Sleight of hand: "the devil is in the details".

agree or disagree

That's the suggestion which tempts consent into a circular conflict internally (logic) and externally (reason) aka a mind control device.

experiment in action

Only within action can one ex (to express) per (by) ment (mind) aka mentally react to physical enactment.

Project MK Ultra

Ultra implies "holding extreme positions"....tempting ones free will of choice to hold onto agree or disagree implies extreme positioning. Using suggestion to tempt choice to hold onto a side implies projection of ultra.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

be quiet, you have always sounded like

Sound implies silence...instruments make noise when trying to sound alike, which is called harmony (to harm one).

like a shitty LLM

It's suggested languages which tempts diverse tongues to sound alike one another, which is based on tikkun olam aka the establishment of a one world language. English represents the main freemasonic attempt at this, while another failed attempt was Esperanto by a jew named Leyzer Zamengo aka Lazarus Ludwig Zamenhof.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

free-will-of-choice uses implication over reason, which no artificial intelligence can utilize. Then again...users of AI can be effortlessly tricked to ignore that, and so the exploitation of ignorance by artifice continues.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

stormfaggotry

a) A jew tempts gentiles into the cyclonic storm of logic (circular thinking) and reason (turning against one another), which permits each jew to erect self at the eye of the storm, while cutting of gentiles from the circumference aka circumcision.

b) A faggot implies a self imposed burden aka ones consent to the suggestion of another, which instigates the cycle of logic and reason.

upgrade

Any degree of measurement (grade) keeps ones mind down, hence inflicting a burden (faggot) on it. A jew suggests upgrades to tempt consenting gentiles to burden themselves with mental downgrades.

I've noticed

Notice/gno - "to know" implies ones perception within all perceivable, which cannot be claimed (I've) only ignored for the suggestions of one another.

"I have" isn't a natural state, but a fictitious mental burden aka a being possessed by possessions from another, hence being put on notice.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

looking...sounds ironic to me.

Sound moves and cannot be held onto...looking/locking tempts one to ignore that, which establishes irony/eironeia - "dissimulation, assumed ignorance".

audience reach

Audience/audire/au - "to perceive"...ones perception doesn't reach farther then the screen on which others prostitute themselves for one through suggestion.

only fans

a) "A fanatic is someone who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" ~Winston Churchill

Reality implies only change, which allows each subject within to ignore being changed, which if chosen represents fiction.

b) Fan; verb - "to stir up air"...the symbolism of Onlyfans represents circular logic turning into conflicts of reason among gentiles, which each jew stirs up into the air by suggestions from outside.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

United States should "dominate the world"

a) Uniting states inverts dominance (inception towards death) setting estate (life) free.

b) Only within dominance can a world freely be shaped.

c) Natural world implies partials separated within whole...artificial world implies a system of partials put together.

Few show many pictures of the "world" as a whole to trick them to ignore that a partial within whole cannot show other partials what whole looks like.

Example...a fish cannot show other fish what the "whole" ocean looks like.

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nick Fuentes claims

Claims are designed to trick followers to hold onto what a leader said, while ignoring the natural change of leading.

the same statement

It's followers who are being tricked into a same state of mind by holding onto and reasoning against one another over more and more claims.

should not be labeled...because it did not involve...

It's labeling which involves a being...not what's being labelled. Labels represents physical idols and mental ideals...not a natural designation.

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

a) If one buys weed; then one was conditioned to follow the program of another...smoking adds insult to injury.

b) Growing weed exposes one to the temptations of selling; buying or smoking it.

c) Instead of smoking volatile substances...try discerning self to be an essence within a volatile spirit passing through. That's how one gets high without smoke.

Smoke indicates the burning out of something...spirit implies the animation of heat within.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

People suggest things

A person (singular) suggests people (plural) to make things look alike...nature separates each thing within from one another by (per) sound (sonos).

Words do not suggest things

Nature does before anyone within can come into being...the word "nothing" can only be suggested to one another after nature brought one into being.

Nothing tempts one thing to deny everything.

You are suggesting things.

a) YOU originates from ME...only if one claims self as ME does everyone else become YOU.

b) How could free-will-of-choice suggest if consenting to any suggestion implies the bondage of ones free will of choice to another ones suggestion?

Which suggestion has free-will-of-choice made without ripping apart the process of suggesting?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

the word "suggest"

Suggest; verb - "to seduce; to draw to ill by insinuation; to inform secretly"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/suggest

Nature doesn't do that...a being does to distract one another from nature.

Woven into your tapestry

Free-will-of-choice uses analysis to rip apart what others weave together by synthesis. Questionable views analysis as a woven tapestry because of a view distorted by synthesis.

half truths

Hence a synthesis of half truth vs half lies...

mȳthos...

...implies "speech, thought, word, discourse, conversation". For choice to remain free; one has to break free from those...not hold onto.

Typically

Aka typecasting...casting a symbol; emblem; mark; sign; figure; image; form; kind etc. into a mold.

following

Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) needs to resist the wanted temptation to follow.

any variant of said word

Variance/variare - "to change"...sound changes; words tempt one to hold onto meaning; definition; significance; interpretation; consensus etc.

When you describe words as half-truths or lies, then you choose to affix that description within yourself while ignoring the change of sound.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

he's jewish

Shayne/shane/shaun/john from Hebrew y'hohanan (gracious) + Coplan from Yiddish koplon (leader)...

There's absolutely no basis for claiming

Only within absolute (cause) can there be essential (effect)...claiming implies affection to one another, while ignoring the absolute base of being.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

saturn

a) Saturn/satus - "to sow" aka sowing the seeds of suggestion to plant within the soil of consent.

b) Saturn as the most remote planet refers to ones plane of existence as a mote (particle within whole); which becomes remotely controlled when consenting to any suggestion.

Only within a plane (linear perception) can a planet (circular logic) be shaped...

Architect

  • Arc; noun - "shape of a curve that stands (life) when supported only by the extremities (inception/death)".
  • Teks, verb - "to weave together"

Nature separates each being from one another...weaving it back together makes one an architect aka an arch-angel drawing angles of attack (masonic square) within circular confinement (masonic compass).

an infinite circle in a square

Line implies infinite; circle implies beginning and end of line put together (ouroboros eating its own tail), and square implies ones finite perception from in-between left/right + up/down + front/back aka from within a cube.

infinite powerful soul

The infinite line implies the soul/sole empowering each rise (life) within a fall (inception towards death).

beam of saturn

Aka the ray of light (beam) sown (saturn) within the visible spectrum of light.

merkaba

Mer (to rub away; harm) + kaba (cube) implies ones cubical perception being rubbed away within a circular conflict of reason against one another.

mind and emotion

Motion generates mind internally...emotion tempts mind externally.

Example...having a mind allows one to become envy of another; drawing enviousness from another into self implies emotion.

Emotion tempts one to ignore being (life) within motion (inception towards death).

things spin around us

All moves through each one within...that's how singularity works. Choosing to hold onto plurality (us) tempts oneself to spin inwardly (logic) and outwardly (reason), while singularity continues to move linearly.

If one lets go of "us", then one can think straight again.

The reason the deep state

Reason implies a deepening state of mind. There's no winning a conflict of reason; only mutual destruction, hence eating ones own tail.

a change of consciousness

Change moves sciou (perception) apart from one another...suggested con (together) sciou (perception) tempts one to ignore change by holding onto a collective consciousness aka a hive mind. Only letting go of it allows one to perceive natural change.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

We can only hope both are found guilty

What if hope makes one guilty of ignoring origin for outcome?

banking start-up

Current ends at a bank. Starting a bank confines current.

alleges the defendants orchestrated a "blitzkrieg" campaign

Aka a jewish allegation...

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Will you shut the fuck up

a) Consenting to any suggested -ism confines one free will of choice.

b) Fuck/fuge - "masonic joint"...freemasonry utilizes a masonic joint to bind free will of choice into a consensus.

c) Choosing either up or down confines free will of choice within imbalance (up vs down)...only in-between balance can there be free will of choice.

A child learns this during the transfer of crawling > walking...

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

we can agree that technocracy is not what we want

  • Techno/tekhnē (art) + cracy/kratos (strength)
  • We (pluralism) + agree (solidarism) + not (nihilism) imply suggested artifice, which when consented to, gives another strength over consensus.

That's how a technocracy works...by few simply tempting many to want to come together; into agreement with one another, and thereby into a state of denial.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›