Jesus Christ, not some bureaucrat.
Those who suggest in nomine (in the name of) patri et fili et spiritus sancti represent the BUREAU (office for business transaction) CRATS (kratia; power of) and the consent by the many to the suggestions by the few represents a) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka the business transaction and b) the consent of the many as the source of power for the suggestions of the few, who gain the power to shape the suggested.
orthodoxy
ORTHO (straight) DOXA (to praise; bestow upon, dispose onto) from DEK (to take; accept).
Inception towards death represents the straight, and those living within represent the resistance to straight, hence the QUEER - "odd, singular". ODDS (living) within EVEN (process of dying).
It's the process of dying which bestows (inception) and disposes (death) those living within, and the living choice to accept (want) or denial (not want) dying doesn't change the need to adapt to the temptation of dying by resisting.
AIDS red ribbon
AID, verb (Latin adjuto) - "to help; to assist; to support, either by furnishing strength or means to effect a purpose" + ornamental symbolism for crossing bloodlines.
It's about race mixing (mass migration). Pause the clip at 33 seconds and look at the line-up...asian, jew, freemason, black, white.
Edit: Cosmo (politan) Krammer aka COSMOS (orderly arrangement) + POLIS (city aka collective body of inhabitants) + KRAM (to hug)
In other words...out of many, one aka e pluribus unum aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka united nations, united states, european union, equality (same) through diversity (different), uniformity etc.
Casting doubt within the court of public opinion may inspire others to miss suggested information...private spell-craft doesn't share much public space for other casters.
So something is spilling on the "Jizz Lane" and the Big Guy will be implicated...huge announcement or juvenile writing?
I can literally make...take...and post...
Suggestion
you would just eat it up
Consent
if it confirmed your bias
Implication (if/then) applied to reason (agreement vs disagreement)
a) what if suggested (want) tempts one to ignore perceivable (need)?
b) what if consenting to suggested (fiction) tempts one to ignore adapting to perceivable (reality)?
c) what if consenting to want or not want suggested, while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable, results in a conflict of reason (want versus not want)?
Could the few utilize suggestion to divide the many into reasoning against themselves over the suggested, which would allow the few not only control over both sides of ever conflict, but also the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested at will?
screenshots from other sites
a) how could one send anything from screen to screen without it representing a "screenshot"?
b) ever noticed that whatever is on a screen represents either a tranquilizer or adrenaline shot for those consenting to look at it? Are viewers looking for screenshots while getting shot by the screen?
Still not AI
For those who consent to artificial understanding (suggested information) over natural knowledge (perceivable inspiration) it is what others suggested it was.
jonny tickle
- Jonny; noun (Hebrew yohanan; hanana) - "he was gracious" + TICK'LE, verb (Latin titillo, corrupted).
Who could've seen that coming...news by a graciously corrupted source?
vigilance paid towards such lies is the only way to keep them from spreading
a) is there any truth preserved by humanity that isn't being debated; reasoned or contradicted as by now?
b) does the way (inception towards death) preserve or spread those living within?
tracking around drag...
If one tracks around those who drag behind, then one preys upon.
Dr. Malone
Doctor aka DOCKED ORE (a formed vessel within flow, ignoring to steer) + MAL (male) ONE
- Fátima; noun - "to wean; abstain"
To abstain (keep from) implies ones choice to hold onto want (temptation), while ignoring need (adaptation), which in return affects all others, one is holding the wanted from.
To wean implies others suggesting one to consent to abstain from want (while ignoring need) for what the suggesting others not want.
The dynamic between mother and child, when it comes to weaning from the tit, isn't about want (take) vs not want (give), but about growing within need (hunger) by resisting want (taking) and not want (giving). The more mother and child resist want vs not want conflicts, the more in balance they both will be within need.
prophecy of Fatima
a) the consequence of consenting to suggested (want or not want) will always be wanting vs not wanting more...conflict of reason.
b) the partial (living) cannot abstain from the whole (process of dying)...no matter what other partials prophesize.
Round-earther: "alone I'm a mere stick; but together we form a mighty faggot"
Flat-earther: ...rolling on the flat floor laughing...
Meanwhile...
-
EARTH, noun - "indefinite mass"
-
INDEF'INITE, adjective [Latin indefinitus; in and definitus, definio, to define; de and finio, to end, finis, end.] - "not limited or defined; not determinate; not precise or certain".
IN (within) DE (of) FINIO (end) implies one to be (living) within and out of that which ends (process of dying), hence still going on aka substance matter (life) within immaterial essence (inception towards death).
tl; dr...the perceiving ones can shape within everything perceivable, other ones tempt one to ignore this for reasoning about suggested shapes. Why? So that the few can shape the many with suggestions.
- SYNAGOGUE; noun - "to put together" from SYN- (together) + AGEIN (to put in motion, move).
a) nature sets itself apart from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living), hence the need for each one to struggle for the sustenance of apartheid (living) within wholeness (dying).
b) the few suggest the many to ignore perceivable apartheid for suggested togetherness...hence, e pluribus unum (out of many; one), tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together), united states; united nations; european union; uniformity; synagogue (to put together); migration; equality (sameness) through diversity (difference), a many within a chain of command under the few etc.
c) suggested togetherness represents the inversion of perceivable apartheid...the many are being tempted to destroy themselves by seeking togetherness, while the few sustain themselves through apartheid.
d) suggested "we" (plural) tempts "one" (singular) to ignore perceiving oneself (partial) within perceivable oneness (whole).
PTSD aka Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
a) POST, adjective "suborned; hired to do what is wrong"...the suggestion to consent to a chain of command represents one being hired to do what is wrong (ignoring self for others).
b) POST, noun [Latin postis, positus, pono, to place.] - "a fixed place or station"...both suggested "united states" and "soldier" represent an affixed place or station for those consenting to be part of.
c) -POST; preposition -"after"...trauma, stress and disorder continue as long as one consents to be posted by others.
d) ignoring to resist (living) the perceivable natural order (process of dying) for following suggested orders represents TRAUMA; noun - "a wound, a hurt; a defeat", from TERE - "to turn".
e) resisting (living) temptation (dying) alleviates STRESS, noun - "force; urgency; pressure", while ignoring it for spending resistance on the suggested orders by others represents the accumulation of stress. Holding onto that which was (suggested) stresses one within that which is (perceivable).
d) if temporary chaos (life) willingly ignores the ongoing natural order (inception towards death), for following the suggested orders by others, then that represents DISORDER, noun - "want of order or regular disposition; irregularity; immethodical distribution; confusion" within oneself.
never saw any....action.
Reaction (living) within the momentum (balance) of enacting (process of dying) cannot perceive action...only reactions within an enacting system. Life cannot perceive its own inception and death, only itself being alive and the inception and death among others.
Consenting to belief in suggested "action" a) ignores one to react and b) gives others the power to direct ones ignorant reactions by suggesting one how to "act".
This is why the few suggest "actors" under "directors" to tempt the many to ignore being reactors (life) within direction (inception towards death), and how do the many react to suggested actors? Monkey see; monkey do!
a) can this (living) deny that (process of dying)?
b) if this (living) ignores that (process of dying) for whatever others are suggesting, then can the suggested be confirmed (want) vs denied (not want), while the perceivable (need) is being ignored?
to deny use of
Only works upon already consented to, in this case the suggested TERM, noun [Latin terminus, a limit or boundary.] which tempts free will of choice to ignore the perceivable limit/boundary...being choice at the center of balance.
Ones consent to suggested terms binds one to others, who can only then utilize denial to contradict ones behavior.
illness
The process of dying represents health; those struggling to stay healthy within represent the living illness. It's the suggested terminology that is being inverted.
disorder
The ongoing natural order (inception towards death) generates temporary disorder (life). Once again a suggested inversion (seeking order out of chaos) for being chaos within order, hence struggling to sustain self.
insanity
IN (being within) SANUS (sound) + PER (being by) SONOS (sound). The instru-mental mind of each one represents the temporary free will of choice within the balance (resonance or dissonance) of ongoing sound.
The suggestion "insane person" tempts one to ignore that...
actress...against
To be against implies "reacting" to...not acting. The few suggest "actors" under "directors" to tempt the many to ignore being "reactors" (life) within "direction" (inception towards death).
natalie portman
NATALIE; from natus (to be born) + PORT (female resort of vessels for the purpose of loading and unloading) MAN (male lead and load)
why all of the young girls looked exactly the same.
a) nature sets itself apart from whole (process of dying) into partial (living), living (growth) within the process of dying (loss) represents ones struggle to sustain apartheid within wholeness, before becoming whole again.
c) the few suggest the many to ignore apartheid for coming together, hence e pluribus unum (out of many; one), tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together), united states; united nations; european union; equality (same) through diversity (different); uniformity.
In short...tempting the perceiving one (single) to consent to the suggested we (plural) aka "we the people" destroys apartheid, hence the partial (living differences) within the whole (same process of dying).
Notice that the willing slaves of capitalism want more of the "same", while demanding it to be "different"...
Hardly anyone knows anything.
a) KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"
b) the few suggest information to tempt the many to ignore perceivable inspiration.
c) the world isn't defined by what others are suggesting it means; the world is perceivable before each perceiving one comes to be in it. If one consents to suggested, then those suggesting it can define the world one believes in.
d) understanding suggested represents the inversion of growing comprehension within perceivable knowledge...only oneself can discern this.
work
a) EN'ERGY, noun [Greek; work.] - "internal or inherent power" aka the working foundation of everything .
b) the internal/inherent power within energy represents velocity (process of dying) generating resistance (living) aka loss generating growth as the internal/inherent sustenance (generation/regeneration) of energy aka a whole sustaining itself through the partials within.
c) the difference between perceivable work and suggested work...the former inspires one to grow resistance within perceivable, while the latter tempts one to spend resistance upon suggested. Working for others implies resisting energy being harvested by others, hence being tricked into a work"weak", while looking forward to the "weak"end.
incompetent
COMPETENT, adjective - "suitable; fit; sufficient; a competent force; having legal capacity or power"...therefore...the process of dying represents competence, while those living within represent IN (being within) COMPETENCE (a suitable environment).
The lack of self discernment among the many is being exploited by the few suggesting them to be competent vs incompetent within suggested rules of behavior aka good goy vs bad goy domestication.
Everything (perceivable) fits everyone (perceiving)...one needs to discern that for oneself.
hire
Why is one in a "lower" position when one consents to get "higher-ed" by others?
major outlet
a) major (whole process of dying) generates minor (living partials)
b) outlet (perceivable) generates inlet (perceiving).
c) the few suggest major outlets to tempt the many to each consent to make minor inputs, which for the receiving few, shapes into compounded interest.
the stores themselves feel less inclined to bother even trying to support the old business model despite having its doors open.
a) the support for subsidiary living represents the process of dying, within which the subsidiary struggles to support self, hence adapting to origin.
b) the few suggest the convenience of storing goods to tempt the many to ignore the inconvenience of ignoring to store goods...to grow goods; to maintain goods, and to sustain self by doing so aka to ignore the fruits of ones labors.
STORE, noun - "a large number; a stock provided"...aka ones growth (living) within oneness (process of dying) represents the perceivable store, while ones consent to a suggested store tempts one to become the accumulated "live-stock" of others, which can then be traded at the stock-market.
c) the few suggest convenience to breed inconvenience among the many. The stores aren't supported by income, but by the outcome of those consenting to the stores. A strong costumer is being tempted by convenience so that he becomes a weak costumer that can be harvested while being inconvenienced aka the few breeding the lack of resistance among the many.
The more you feed the cattle, the less they will resist the slaughter...
the cheapest quality possible
a) evaluation (living) can only exist at the center of value (process of dying).
b) consenting to suggested value (prices) devaluates ones choice of evaluation. The few are selling narratives to tempt the many to keep ignoring their self devaluation, hence prepping everything (perceivable reality) up with fake fronts (suggested fiction).
Reality implies constant loss (process of dying) while each one within represents the momentary opportunity of temporary growth (living), the few suggest progressivism (towards loss) as growth (expansionism) while utilizing any trick in the book aka any suggested fiction to trick the many to consent to ignore reality until they're too weak to resist the consequences of their own willing ignorance to sustain self as growth (living) within loss (process of dying) aka as resistance (living) within temptation (dying).
Words/language re-members things long forgotten
What if re-member aka 'response to memory' tempts one to ignore what one's getting...perceivable inspiration?
What if a memory can be filled with suggested information, hence constantly tempting one to reason and a remember suggested (fiction) instead of adapting to perceivable (reality)?
What if the suggested word/language tempts one to ignore perceivable sound?
Can one create a suggestible word without shaping it out of already perceivable sound? Does nature communicate itself as perceivable inspiration (whole) towards perceiving senses (partial) or does it make suggestions by branding anything with words?
force to coin
Does the force of velocity (process of dying) coin the force of resistance (living) or does living represent temporary evaluation within the process of dying as ongoing value?
Could others suggest a price-tag for a perceivable nature, as to tempt those within to ignore being set "free" will of choice?
hook
HOOK (suggested information) LINE (perceivable inspiration) SINKER (consent to suggested over perceivable)....it's always a choice.
Hooked off stage and the Shepherd's crook come to mind...
A notice of liability was offered... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIUAC03YMlA (written by Simon Katz & Stuart Jude Zender)
Entrance suggested revisionism...paganism; heathenism and gentilism...all insults used by believers against non-believers.