Why is it that at every major outlet it seems more and more are staffed with highly inept workers. It must be a training problem since they used to replace bad people or at least shuffle them to off-hours and try to weed them out with scheduling.
I remember when customer service was part of those jobs, but it seems that along with the advent of online ordering, delivery, etc that the stores themselves feel less inclined to bother even trying to support the old business model despite having its doors open.
I feel like the best service I get these days is in small local stores which are owner operated, and that its a surprise when I get anything remotely reminiscent of the old way service was.
I remember you would walk into a book store and people were all excited about books, could suggest a book for the occasion, and typically were well versed in the different authors even if they weren't familiar with the books themselves, and usually you can find a couple cheery staff members still around, but in almost all other stores I seeing little to none.
It seems like they hire to match a checklist (probably diversity) and yet despite all the diversity, it seems they tend to settle for somewhat of a handful of the following:
- Broken English : They can learn on the job
- Visible Minority/Refugee : No neighbourhood kids anymore, gotta outsource
- Don't like the words "Hi", "Hello", "How are you", "How is your day going?" - Silence
- Don't make eye contact - except when asking for money
- Don't package things nicely, not caring about placement.
- Automaton-like behaviour - Kind of like tele-marketers
- Have no sense of self - cannot do anything except the 'way it is'
- Either shutdown over any disagreements or they go into repeat mode without any means to discuss "Sorry, I cannot do that. Sorry I cannot do that. Sorry I cannot do that."
- Hang out in packs - like groupies
- Never greet, acknowledge, build rapport, or anything remotely sales like to attempt the sales. Just raw numbers kind of grunt tactics.
Its what I would imagine when you think of the cheapest quality possible...why are they getting hired? They are constantly abusing the immigration system, hiring predominantly immigrants and its like we are watching a fucking franchise railroad of humans being employed, paid, and then subsidized because of their "low income" by our tax dollars.
I am in favour of social support systems....but for our local families, preferably those who aren't freshly immigrated from other countries to compete with people here and then inflate our economy by taking all the low income jobs, but being housed in packs. Meanwhile wherever refugees seem to immigrate, violence follows....
Makes you wonder if the refugees are fleeing or are being cast out.....
--
As someone who tries to donate to local homeless shelters, SPCA, and food banks, I find it annoying that the government has the gaul to send money oversees to fund a war, import refugees, incentivize and subsidize them and flood our communities with nothing but burdens, let alone all the stupidity like carbon taxes, etc, and then cannot even bother with basic support at home and cannot support our veterans, our own countrymen, and families in this season during the cold.
a) EN'ERGY, noun [Greek; work.] - "internal or inherent power" aka the working foundation of everything .
b) the internal/inherent power within energy represents velocity (process of dying) generating resistance (living) aka loss generating growth as the internal/inherent sustenance (generation/regeneration) of energy aka a whole sustaining itself through the partials within.
c) the difference between perceivable work and suggested work...the former inspires one to grow resistance within perceivable, while the latter tempts one to spend resistance upon suggested. Working for others implies resisting energy being harvested by others, hence being tricked into a work"weak", while looking forward to the "weak"end.
COMPETENT, adjective - "suitable; fit; sufficient; a competent force; having legal capacity or power"...therefore...the process of dying represents competence, while those living within represent IN (being within) COMPETENCE (a suitable environment).
The lack of self discernment among the many is being exploited by the few suggesting them to be competent vs incompetent within suggested rules of behavior aka good goy vs bad goy domestication.
Everything (perceivable) fits everyone (perceiving)...one needs to discern that for oneself.
Why is one in a "lower" position when one consents to get "higher-ed" by others?
a) major (whole process of dying) generates minor (living partials)
b) outlet (perceivable) generates inlet (perceiving).
c) the few suggest major outlets to tempt the many to each consent to make minor inputs, which for the receiving few, shapes into compounded interest.
a) the support for subsidiary living represents the process of dying, within which the subsidiary struggles to support self, hence adapting to origin.
b) the few suggest the convenience of storing goods to tempt the many to ignore the inconvenience of ignoring to store goods...to grow goods; to maintain goods, and to sustain self by doing so aka to ignore the fruits of ones labors.
STORE, noun - "a large number; a stock provided"...aka ones growth (living) within oneness (process of dying) represents the perceivable store, while ones consent to a suggested store tempts one to become the accumulated "live-stock" of others, which can then be traded at the stock-market.
c) the few suggest convenience to breed inconvenience among the many. The stores aren't supported by income, but by the outcome of those consenting to the stores. A strong costumer is being tempted by convenience so that he becomes a weak costumer that can be harvested while being inconvenienced aka the few breeding the lack of resistance among the many.
The more you feed the cattle, the less they will resist the slaughter...
a) evaluation (living) can only exist at the center of value (process of dying).
b) consenting to suggested value (prices) devaluates ones choice of evaluation. The few are selling narratives to tempt the many to keep ignoring their self devaluation, hence prepping everything (perceivable reality) up with fake fronts (suggested fiction).
Reality implies constant loss (process of dying) while each one within represents the momentary opportunity of temporary growth (living), the few suggest progressivism (towards loss) as growth (expansionism) while utilizing any trick in the book aka any suggested fiction to trick the many to consent to ignore reality until they're too weak to resist the consequences of their own willing ignorance to sustain self as growth (living) within loss (process of dying) aka as resistance (living) within temptation (dying).