I can literally make...take...and post...

Suggestion

you would just eat it up

Consent

if it confirmed your bias

Implication (if/then) applied to reason (agreement vs disagreement)

a) what if suggested (want) tempts one to ignore perceivable (need)?

b) what if consenting to suggested (fiction) tempts one to ignore adapting to perceivable (reality)?

c) what if consenting to want or not want suggested, while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable, results in a conflict of reason (want versus not want)?

Could the few utilize suggestion to divide the many into reasoning against themselves over the suggested, which would allow the few not only control over both sides of ever conflict, but also the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested at will?