a) how does holding onto fit into the concept of a giver?

b) does a mind/memory need to hold onto, or would the want to hold onto slow down the processing speed of the memory?

c) if all is held within mind, then how could there be more of all outside mind?

the mind of God holds all

a) what does nature withhold from those within?

b) doesn't being able to perceive imply being within everything perceivable impressing upon one for expression?

c) what if everything gives, while everyone is being tempted to want to hold onto, while ignoring the need to adapt to that which keeps on giving?

d) what if the suggested brand "God" tempts one to want to hold onto (suggested), while ignoring that which keeps on giving (perceivable)?

a) doesn't suggested "animal" imply perceivable "animation"?

b) AN'IMAL, noun [Latin anima, air, breath, soul.]...doesn't that represent every form animated within, hence HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.]...doesn't animation (animal) specify (human) everyone (living) within everything (process of dying)?

they tried making it again over the ruble of the first one

The GEMARA (suggested information) build upon the MISHNAH (perceivable inspiration) represents the ongoing building of the tower of babel (confusion, disorder)...utilizing everyone consenting to any suggested information as the ingredients, the tools and the workers to build up one collapse after the next (civilizations; nations; cultures etc.).

The reasoning of the many over the suggestions of the few represents the applied GEMARA upon the many, while the few are utilizing the MISHNAH (perceivable inspiration) as the foundation the many ignore to adapt to.

Accumulating suggested information by consenting to it represents building the tower of BA'BEL, noun [Heb.] - "confusion; disorder". Only the foundation (perceivable inspiration) remains after the collapse of each one's tower aka the ongoing natural order (inception towards death) tumbling all the temporary chaos (life) build within.

https://archive.ph/qERv5 (on godlikeproductions)

intuitively knew stuff

• INTUI'TION, noun [Latin intuitus, intueor; in and tueor.] - "a looking on; a sight or view; but restricted to mental view or perception"

• KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"

Hence intuition representing IN (being within) TUEOR (perceivable knowledge), which implies as the perceiving recipient thereof.

until...created language

Suggesting words over perceivable sound implies transmutation of suggested ingredient out of perceivable base, not creation out of nothing. The few suggest creationism to tempt the consenting many to ignore being the perceiving ingredient within the perceivable base, hence representing alchemical transmutation...not creation of creator.

As for "until"...everyone (perceiving) still exists within everything (perceivable); each one of the many simply willingly ignores that for the suggestions of the few.

mass separation of concepts

a) nature represents the mass separation of incepts, hence the whole (process of dying) generating the inception of each partial one living within.

b) the few suggest mass accumulation to each other one, hence shaping the accumulated, compounded many by the consent of each one to be a part of e pluribus unum (out of many, one), tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together); united states; united nations; european union; uniformity; equality (same) through diversity (different).

c) living within the process of dying implies apartheid within wholeness, hence the temporary struggle to sustain apartheid (life) while being re-accumulated (inception towards death) back into wholeness. And once again the RE (response to) implies ones response to temporary resist (living) the ongoing temptation (dying).

Life as One

Each ONE partial (living) within the whole (process of dying) ONENESS.

seeing things as totally separate and independent objects

a) everything perceivable represents a moving differences from the one perceiving it.

b) IN (being within) DEPENDENT (dependency to) implies being alive within (in) the process of dying (dependent).

c) a thing (partial) cannot see a total (whole), only the ongoing separation of the whole into each partial through the momentum of motion.

telepathy

• TEL'E (Greek; at a distance) + P'ATH (Greek; to tread the way) + DISTANCE, noun (Latin; to stand apart)

Therefore each one represents TELE (living apart) within PATH (whole process of dying).

This is 1 reason

What would ONENESS reason about and with whom? ONENESS operates on implication (if/then), the ones within can choose to ignore it for reasoning against other ones about what suggestions mean.

All represents one in EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" aka temporary conscious awareness within ongoing implications...and the free will of choice to react in adherence (need) or ignorance (want).

the journey of living is what matters...is that what you're trying to say?

a) JOURNEY, noun [Latin diurnus, dies.]...your consent to suggested SAY, verb - "to utter in words" gives others the power to define; redefine and contradict the words used, hence here asking if "dying of living is what matters" without comprehending to do so.

b) TRY, verb - "to exert strength" + EXERT', verb - "to thrust forth; to emit; to push out; to bring out; to cause to come forth; to produce" implies the cause (whole) before the effect (partial). Therefore...within the whole try, each partial is trialed.

c) I adapt to perceivable inspiration; while resisting suggested information, which in return grows my comprehension about both the aforementioned fuckery through suggestion and the perceivable origin. The former may or may not inspire other ones to chose perceivable (need) over suggested (want) by oneself; while the latter represents the communication between whole and partial aka me as the recipient responding to directly to everything offered to me instead of using others as a substitute source.

not the end

Your consent to suggested "not" (nothing; nothingness) tempts you to ignore perceivable everything. Beginning (inception) implies end (death), hence momentum (life) implying motion (inception towards death). Each one represents the center (choice) of momentum (balance), while temporary (life) within ongoing (inception towards death) motion.

What does it mean to resist then?

a) imagine a treadmill representing ongoing motion, then put yourself onto it as the temporary within the ongoing. Next, notice that there's now a choice within a balance (momentum of motion), hence your choice to either resist the ongoing (need) or fall for the temptation to ignore to resist (want).

b) as for meaning...if perceivable represents the signifying, then suggestion represents the opposite of signal...denial; refusal; ignorance...which represents ones reacting choice (perceiving) within signifying (perceivable).

Asking for meaning implies asking for suggestions by others, hence denying; refusing, ignoring the predefined signal for each one within...perceivable inspiration towards perceiving adaptation.

c) from the energy perspective...motion implies velocity (process of dying) causing momentum (balance), which allows resistance (living choice) within. Discerning to be resistance within the momentum of velocity allows one to reverse engineer the whole as the partial, hence growing comprehension (compression) as the perceiving (expression) within the perceivable (impressing).

d) resistance in short...ones need to resist want.

If I no longer have a goal to reach(which would mark that goal's "death"), then what do I do?

The goal is being suggested by others and represents what you want. Being directed within motion represents the need for your adaptation to origin. Even if you choose to ignore being directed by the natural order; for following the suggested orders by others...you would still adapt as the living within the process of dying (breathing; drinking; eating; sheltering etc.).

Doing this makes all the suggested goals either fleeting or always out of reach, while you spend your entire life to hold onto what can't be hold onto or to reach what won't fulfill you anyway. Instead of growing within the perceivable, you're tempted to get addicted to suggested loss...like every gambler. "winning" represents the sales-pitch to tempt one to gamble growth within loss.

What to do? Growing self discernment about being done by, hence representing the opportunity to "redo" aka to RE (response to) DO (being done by). Others suggest one what to "do" as to tempt one to ignore being the "re" (living) within the "do" (process of dying).

simply live?

SIM'PLE, adjective [Latin simplex; sine, without and plex, plica, doubling, fold] - "single; consisting of one thing; uncompounded"...have you tried that? Asking others for suggested meaning implies ones choice to seek the compound among others, instead of growing self as the partial within the whole.

Resisting suggested compounding (e pluribus unum aka out of many, one) implies the struggle to sustain apartheid. The seed (choice) struggles to stay apart as to utilize the soil (balance) to grow within. If you compound the seeds, then you just tempt birds with a free meal, while spreading the seeds implies adaptation from the birds, who then have to work the fields, which in return implies your adaptation to work the fields and so on...working together through staying apart. Ones simple struggle has complex consequences to struggle within...

Why are we humans then and not trees?

• VEG'ETABLE, noun [Latin vigeo, to grow.]

• AN'IMAL, noun [Latin anima, air, breath, soul.]

• HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.]

Resist the suggested "nothing" for the perceivable everything and you can discern that animal and human represent growth, that vegetable and human represent animation, and that animal and vegetable represent form within flow.

It's the labels others are suggesting, which when consented to, tempt one to ignore the perceivable, labeless behavior of form within flow aka to perceive moving differences as perceivable inspiration for adaptation.

Isn't life movement and movement imply a direction and therefore a destination?

a) "movement" implies MOVE (being moved by) MENT (mind/memory reacting to moving input).

b) life represents RE (response to) MOVE (being moved by), hence being removed (process of dying) while being alive within aka growth within loss.

c) discerning to be within (life) direction (inception towards death), allows further growth of comprehension about being reaction within direction, which implies reactors within a generator. Now keep using implication...if everything is generating; how can one thing within react to it? If the generator (loss) generates reactors (growth) to sustain itself, then being a reactor (growth) within a generator (loss) implies the temporary opportunity to...

d) if it's predetermined (destiny), then why ignore "pre" as the generator for everything perceivable...for suggested "aft" aka whatever others suggest comes after what now is?

Those who consent to suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin, give others the power to play "Final Destination" with them. https://pic8.co/sh/HdHYMa.jpg

Isn't a life without movement or goal death though?

Sleigh of hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8Y8XpFtLbk

"Fell Somethin' movin' all over me...Whatever it is no man can see"

"From the crown of ma' head to the soul of ma' feet...Spirit is movin', spirit is movin', spirit is movin' all-over me!"

"I Can't Stop Movin', Can't Can't Stop Movin', Can't Stop Movin', I Can't Keep Still"

Those (partial) within motion (whole) cannot STOP, noun - "cessation of progressive motion"...others can suggest progressivism to tempt one to view others as a stop-sign to ones progress. Ever been annoyed by that inner want to move on while standing at a stop-sign?

Who really runs

a) the process of dying runs the living, hence each life from inception towards death without a hitch.

b) each thing within represents a partial who; everything around represents the whole where; what and why.

planet

The suggested planet is run by those suggesting it to those consenting to it. The perceivable PLANE, noun - "level surface" aka the plane of existence represents free will of choice (surface) within the dominance of balance (level) aka free-dom.

I doubt it's one person.

There can be only one, hence all for one or one for all, because all represents one in energy. The hesitation to react (doubt) implies ONE's free will of choice...others cannot hesitate for oneself, it's oneself that chooses to follow the hesitant reactions of others.

all the division we're seeing today...divide and conquer" is being applied everywhere

Consenting to anything suggested represents want or not wanting it. Whatever side one chooses will put one against the other. The resulting conflict (want vs not want) is called reasoning.

The few not only conquer consent through suggestion and divided the many into reasoning against each other, they also gain the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) both sides of every conflict of reason.

agents on both "sides"

a) both sides within reason are consenting to the same suggestion, hence fueling the suggested, while fighting each other over it.

b) the few suggest actors under directors to tempt the many to ignore being reaction (life) within direction (inception towards death). One cannot act...only react within an enacting system aka as reactors within a generator.

the goal...

...represents suggested progressivism for the many chase after, while they willingly ignore that living isn't about reaching outcome (death), but about adaptation to origin for the sustenance of life, hence each one representing temporary resistance (living) within ongoing temptation (dying).

Life isn't about goal; it represents the opportunity to grow (living) within loss (process of dying) and the response-ability (choice) to resist (living) temptation (dying).

Outcomes represent suggested wants, Origin represents perceivable need. One doesn't drink to be full (outcome), one drinks to quench thirst (origin).

"they don't control the information, they control the response to it."

Suggesting information represents a temptation; consenting to it represents the response that gives those suggesting, the control over those consenting.

The many represent the controlled response to the suggested information by the few.

acting like animals

a) if only the many would react in accordance with AN'IMAL, noun [Latin anima, air, breath, soul.]

b) "acting" is being suggested to tempt one to ignore being a reaction (life) within an enacting system (inception towards death).

Vetted by a kippah.

• TRAF'FICK, noun [Latin trans.] - "trade; commerce, either by barter or by buying and selling"

"admits selling" implies trafficking.

If "covid" represents truth or lie, then what does "coronavirus" represent? Origin of truth or lie?

Ask yourself why you consented to suggested revisionism (from coronavirus to covid), yet don't bring that up when reasoning (truth vs lie) about the suggested?

CIA Director William Casey

The "Central Intelligence Agency" represents a CASE, noun - "a covering" for WILL I AM...if consented to by free WILL of choice to stand under aka INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand) a suggested agency, instead of being the regent (perceiving) at the center of the agent (perceivable).

believes is false

To believe in truth represents the foundation for every falsehood.

we'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything...

a) KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" implies perceivable inspiration...not suggested information by others.

b) the moment the many consent to any suggested information; the few know that the many ignore perceivable knowledge.

You're a genius, severely underrated.

a) what if living within the process of dying implies one to be reaction within GENeration?

b) GE'NIUS, noun [Latin gigno; Greek to beget] + BEGET', verb - "to procreate, to generate; to produce".

While comparing those, consider...NATURE, noun - "born, produced".

c) what if everyone (perceiving) within everything (perceivable) represents a genius (generated by), yet choosing to stand under (understand) the suggestions by others, prevents them from growing comprehension within perceivable?

The many willingly put themselves down by consenting to understand each others suggestions. Those who resist the temptation to stand under others are growing comprehension about being reaction (living) within generation (process of dying) aka temporary expressed growth (reaction) within ongoing; impressing loss (action).

In short...I'm just less ignorant than most, and I comprehend that ones choice of want (suggested information) over need (perceivable inspiration) represents ignorance of perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction), which in return allows others to shape fiction for all those who're willingly ignore reality.

I appreciate your explanations.

Thanks for inspiring me.

I'm not being sarcastic btw I'm being genuine.

a) one needs to struggle to resist both compliments (want) and insults (not want) from others. Living within the process of dying implies one to represent resistance (need) within temptation (want).

b) "I'm not"...to be implies one thing within everything aka partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable). Others suggested "nothing" to tempt one to ignore "everything" perceivable. The few openly mock the many for this... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI

Using implication (if/then) within perceivable inspiration over reasoning (want vs not want; true vs false; agreement vs disagreement; believing vs not believing etc.) about suggested information...allows one to discern self as the perceiving (partial) within perceivable (whole).

You are tempted to reason about what others are suggesting you about this world. What you ignore is that everything was already perceivable before anyone else can make any suggestions about it. You are being tempted to ignore origin (perceivable inspiration) for substitute (suggested information), and your consent gives those suggesting the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested information at will.

Ask yourself about the who, where, what and why of your existence. If you resist the temptation of suggested answers, then you will find the only solution (process of dying) for every problem (living).

on earth

a) are you just "on" or "being surrounded by, hence within" something?

b) is life, while being moved from inception towards death "within" something? Could life discern ones own position, while being within something?

c) if matter (life) exists within immaterial (inception towards death), then what separates them from one another? Why is it that one, while being alive, cannot perceive ones own inception and death, only those of others?

d) every definitions others are suggesting represents a fact; a truth; something affixed...what if that not only tempt you to suspect it to be nonfactual; a lie or changing, but also tempts you to ignore being within constant change aka being within motion; being moved by and representing the reaction (choice) to enacting (balance) motion?

Try to discern behavior within motion...even when you believe things to be still or be able to stop...

why

The foundation of why implies self sustenance.

punishment for good and evil

What if ones mind punishes itself by consenting to be within a good vs evil conflict of reason? What if consenting to want (good) or not want (evil) whatever others are suggesting, puts one into a want vs not want conflict of reasoning among all those who chose either side?

For example...what if the few suggest "abortion" to tempt the many to consent to want or not want it, by rebranding the sides into good vs evil or pro-life vs pro-choice? What if consent to each side keeps the suggested "abortion" going, while giving those suggesting the power to control both sides of those reasoning over it. What if this control of the few over the many is so strong that a) the many lack to comprehend what's going on and b) that the few can openly mock the many, while communicating what's going on to those with eyes to see, who can discern that pro-life vs pro-choice contains the implication that LIFE equals CHOICE?

The pro-life side uses choice to be pro life; while the pro-choice side uses choice to be against life...both sides are "alive"; while "choosing" to do that...

having free will means we are free to be evil

a) what one perceives represents "free will of choice", what others are suggesting is "free will"...without the choice.

b) what if "free" implies to be within "dominance"...how could choice exist outside of balance?

c) what if good (want) vs evil (not want) represents an imbalance shaped by consenting to want or not want what another suggested, while ignoring the need to adapt to what everyone perceives?

d) consider drinking...is it good (want); bad (not want) or do you have to respond to thirst (need)? Could you be tricked to ignore need for a want vs not want conflict (reasoning) over the suggestion of others like cola (want) vs pepsi (not want)? Isn't it suspicious that drinking either of those makes one more thirsty?

take the freedom away

What if the FREE (free will of choice) can be tempted to ignore being within DOM (dominance of balance) for suggested liberties by others who suggest them "free-dom" in exchange for consent to follow their suggested choices?

Was choice ever taken away from those who chose to ignore being/having it?

Let's rise to the occasion

OCCA'SION, noun (Latin occasio, from oceido) - "to fall"...what if it's about rising (living) within the fall (process of dying)?

This next year is our moment.

If everything represents momentum (balance), then everyone within (choice) shares each moment.

the conspiracy between Reddit and the Deep State

If one read it (reddit) then one consented to suggested, which puts one into the state of ignorance (deep state) within perceivable. Is there a conspiracy among others or consent by ones own free will of choice in-between reading suggested and ignoring perceivable?

What if the first agreement; oath; covenant for treason (a conspiracy) represents ones own consent to the suggestions of another, which implies ones ignorance of perceivable?

https://pic8.co/sh/TLgRF4.jpg

Even Ancient Greeks

a) having a choice implies being odds (need or want) within even (balance).

b) AN'CIENT, adjective - "things subject to gradual decay"...life being moved from inception towards death represents a thing subjected to gradual decay. If one can be ancient and recent simultaneously, then what if one exists momentarily aka within ever changing momentum (balance in motion)?

c) are those who suggest his-story also those who suggest the "Greeks"? GREEK, adjective - "pertaining to Greece. [See Gray.]" + GRAY, adjective (name given to the Greeks, on account of their fair complexion) - "white, with a mixture of black; dark; of a mixed color; of the color of ashes". Who are those who are called they "gray man", who also like to mix black vs white (masonic checkerboard) together?

What was that about Greece..."cradle of civilization"...CRADLE, noun - "a movable machine of various constructions, placed on circular pieces of board, for rocking children or inform persons to sleep"...Why do the many choose to be asleep instead of awake? Who "rocks the world" of the many? Who constructed circular pieces (geocentrism) to civilize the many? Why is it that if I give a dog a name it's called domestication; yet giving a child a name makes him part of "civilization"? Why do the civilizations of the many keep crumbling, while those pesky few remain at the helm for the building of the next one?

What if living within the process of dying represent a GREEK-FIRE - "a combustible composition"? What if the few use sleight of hands for those with eyes to see like GREASE (greece) LIGHTNING (fire) aka "is automatic; It's systematic; It's hydromatic...it's grease lightning". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wK63eUyk-iM

Watch out for Alexandria or you could get burned ("ALEXA...look up the library of ALEXA-ndria")...or did someone already KINDLE it?

a) as choice, the only place for reception or admission of any thing represents the balance (momentum of motion) one exists in. All choices share this room.

b) from the perspective of each "me" everyone else represents a "you" (phonetic jew).

This is for example why "not all jews" (hence one me); "jews live rent free in your head" (only a me can blame a you), and "can't blame THE jews" (since a me cannot specify a you).

Furthermore; nature doesn't brand anything, those within nature represent the choice to shape temporary symbolism (suggested words) out of ongoing symmetry (perceivable sound). To adapt to perceivable sound implies one to represent a PHONECIAN; PHON'ICS, noun [Gr. sound.] - "science of sounds; acoustics", while those who ignore perceivable sound for suggested words represent DEAF PHOENICIANS (definitions), hence being controlled by suggested "definitions". This is why the many are branded with names, while the few can change names like clothes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0EGB_o9TZM

jews are ethnocentric

ETHNO; ETH'NIC (Latin ethnicus; heath) - "heathen; pagan; pertaining to the gentiles or nations not converted to christianity; opposed to jewish and christian"

Translated: "jews are gentile-centric"

disproportionate influence

If every one represents free will of choice, and if each one of the many willingly ignores that for the suggested choices by the few, then the few represents the "chosen ones", giving them disproportionate control over the willingly consenting many.

As for influence...not influence, but IN (within) FLUID aka being form (life) within flow (inception towards death). If the many ignore that, then the few can utilize the ignored flow to direct the ignoring form of the many towards death, which the ignorant many lack to comprehend, hence blaming it on "influence" by others.

How to sell life to go with the flow towards death? By suggesting progressivism towards outcomes such as goals; achievements; exponential growth; trophies; making it; survial of the fittest; revenge; retribution; paradise; heaven; order out of chaos; light at the end of the tunnel; justice served; escapism; being set free; a better world; love; peace; happiness; enlightenment; prices; absolution and so on.

Anything to motivate them to keep running away from the response-ability to sustain life by resisting the temptation of dying.