Back in the heyday of /r/conspiracy about a decade ago, it was really obvious which topics were worthy of investigation, because you would be aggressively attacked for even mentioning them.
The hot button topics were usually Israel/Mossad, Federal Reserve/$, Monsanto/glyphosate and vaccines. Discussing these issues would get you swarmed by the same sockpuppet accounts.
A similar phenomenon happens on .win, albeit on a smaller scale. Whenever I mention reddit's collusion with the US gov inevitably the same contingent shows up and tells me to "move on" and how "nobody cares."
Well, you clearly care, otherwise why are you so insistent I stop talking about it? I still get PMs on .win from reddit miscreants telling me they're gonna get me in "two more weeks." lol ok.
This is literally a conspiracy forum for wide-eyed, high octane speculation. If you don't like a thread, downvote it and move on. Why are you harassing OP with transparent attempts at intimidation?
For the non-shills who don't care either...you don't have to, but if you were paying attention you'd realize that what happened on reddit is at the heart of the coup of the internet by bad actors that has unfolded over the last few years. Reddit may be only one piece of the puzzle, but it's a significant one, and one that's so blatant that it's among the easiest to unravel, and doing so may ultimately prove to be a catalyst that started with Twitter and eventually will take down the other Big Tech juggernauts too.
The censorship on reddit regarding COVID, elections, etc played a major rule in the brainwashing of an entire generation, and this clearly was by design. It's why I spent 10 years sounding the alarm of vaccine and pandemic propaganda on reddit, and why they had to take me out.
To the shills: you'd do the same in my position. You'd laugh at the absurdity of it, make occasional posts so it remains fresh, and continue the fight elsewhere.
I'm never going to stop talking about it. Stay mad, I guess? I welcome the abuse, it always means I'm right.
Happy New Year, all!
This next year is our moment. Let's rise to the occasion.
OCCA'SION, noun (Latin occasio, from oceido) - "to fall"...what if it's about rising (living) within the fall (process of dying)?
If everything represents momentum (balance), then everyone within (choice) shares each moment.
If one read it (reddit) then one consented to suggested, which puts one into the state of ignorance (deep state) within perceivable. Is there a conspiracy among others or consent by ones own free will of choice in-between reading suggested and ignoring perceivable?
What if the first agreement; oath; covenant for treason (a conspiracy) represents ones own consent to the suggestions of another, which implies ones ignorance of perceivable?
a) what if living within the process of dying implies one to be reaction within GENeration?
b) GE'NIUS, noun [Latin gigno; Greek to beget] + BEGET', verb - "to procreate, to generate; to produce".
While comparing those, consider...NATURE, noun - "born, produced".
c) what if everyone (perceiving) within everything (perceivable) represents a genius (generated by), yet choosing to stand under (understand) the suggestions by others, prevents them from growing comprehension within perceivable?
The many willingly put themselves down by consenting to understand each others suggestions. Those who resist the temptation to stand under others are growing comprehension about being reaction (living) within generation (process of dying) aka temporary expressed growth (reaction) within ongoing; impressing loss (action).
In short...I'm just less ignorant than most, and I comprehend that ones choice of want (suggested information) over need (perceivable inspiration) represents ignorance of perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction), which in return allows others to shape fiction for all those who're willingly ignore reality.
Thanks for inspiring me.
a) one needs to struggle to resist both compliments (want) and insults (not want) from others. Living within the process of dying implies one to represent resistance (need) within temptation (want).
b) "I'm not"...to be implies one thing within everything aka partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable). Others suggested "nothing" to tempt one to ignore "everything" perceivable. The few openly mock the many for this... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI