a) the process of dying runs the living, hence each life from inception towards death without a hitch.
b) each thing within represents a partial who; everything around represents the whole where; what and why.
planet
The suggested planet is run by those suggesting it to those consenting to it. The perceivable PLANE, noun - "level surface" aka the plane of existence represents free will of choice (surface) within the dominance of balance (level) aka free-dom.
I doubt it's one person.
There can be only one, hence all for one or one for all, because all represents one in energy. The hesitation to react (doubt) implies ONE's free will of choice...others cannot hesitate for oneself, it's oneself that chooses to follow the hesitant reactions of others.
all the division we're seeing today...divide and conquer" is being applied everywhere
Consenting to anything suggested represents want or not wanting it. Whatever side one chooses will put one against the other. The resulting conflict (want vs not want) is called reasoning.
The few not only conquer consent through suggestion and divided the many into reasoning against each other, they also gain the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) both sides of every conflict of reason.
agents on both "sides"
a) both sides within reason are consenting to the same suggestion, hence fueling the suggested, while fighting each other over it.
b) the few suggest actors under directors to tempt the many to ignore being reaction (life) within direction (inception towards death). One cannot act...only react within an enacting system aka as reactors within a generator.
the goal...
...represents suggested progressivism for the many chase after, while they willingly ignore that living isn't about reaching outcome (death), but about adaptation to origin for the sustenance of life, hence each one representing temporary resistance (living) within ongoing temptation (dying).
Life isn't about goal; it represents the opportunity to grow (living) within loss (process of dying) and the response-ability (choice) to resist (living) temptation (dying).
Outcomes represent suggested wants, Origin represents perceivable need. One doesn't drink to be full (outcome), one drinks to quench thirst (origin).
the journey of living is what matters...is that what you're trying to say?
a) JOURNEY, noun [Latin diurnus, dies.]...your consent to suggested SAY, verb - "to utter in words" gives others the power to define; redefine and contradict the words used, hence here asking if "dying of living is what matters" without comprehending to do so.
b) TRY, verb - "to exert strength" + EXERT', verb - "to thrust forth; to emit; to push out; to bring out; to cause to come forth; to produce" implies the cause (whole) before the effect (partial). Therefore...within the whole try, each partial is trialed.
c) I adapt to perceivable inspiration; while resisting suggested information, which in return grows my comprehension about both the aforementioned fuckery through suggestion and the perceivable origin. The former may or may not inspire other ones to chose perceivable (need) over suggested (want) by oneself; while the latter represents the communication between whole and partial aka me as the recipient responding to directly to everything offered to me instead of using others as a substitute source.
not the end
Your consent to suggested "not" (nothing; nothingness) tempts you to ignore perceivable everything. Beginning (inception) implies end (death), hence momentum (life) implying motion (inception towards death). Each one represents the center (choice) of momentum (balance), while temporary (life) within ongoing (inception towards death) motion.
What does it mean to resist then?
a) imagine a treadmill representing ongoing motion, then put yourself onto it as the temporary within the ongoing. Next, notice that there's now a choice within a balance (momentum of motion), hence your choice to either resist the ongoing (need) or fall for the temptation to ignore to resist (want).
b) as for meaning...if perceivable represents the signifying, then suggestion represents the opposite of signal...denial; refusal; ignorance...which represents ones reacting choice (perceiving) within signifying (perceivable).
Asking for meaning implies asking for suggestions by others, hence denying; refusing, ignoring the predefined signal for each one within...perceivable inspiration towards perceiving adaptation.
c) from the energy perspective...motion implies velocity (process of dying) causing momentum (balance), which allows resistance (living choice) within. Discerning to be resistance within the momentum of velocity allows one to reverse engineer the whole as the partial, hence growing comprehension (compression) as the perceiving (expression) within the perceivable (impressing).
d) resistance in short...ones need to resist want.
If I no longer have a goal to reach(which would mark that goal's "death"), then what do I do?
The goal is being suggested by others and represents what you want. Being directed within motion represents the need for your adaptation to origin. Even if you choose to ignore being directed by the natural order; for following the suggested orders by others...you would still adapt as the living within the process of dying (breathing; drinking; eating; sheltering etc.).
Doing this makes all the suggested goals either fleeting or always out of reach, while you spend your entire life to hold onto what can't be hold onto or to reach what won't fulfill you anyway. Instead of growing within the perceivable, you're tempted to get addicted to suggested loss...like every gambler. "winning" represents the sales-pitch to tempt one to gamble growth within loss.
What to do? Growing self discernment about being done by, hence representing the opportunity to "redo" aka to RE (response to) DO (being done by). Others suggest one what to "do" as to tempt one to ignore being the "re" (living) within the "do" (process of dying).
simply live?
SIM'PLE, adjective [Latin simplex; sine, without and plex, plica, doubling, fold] - "single; consisting of one thing; uncompounded"...have you tried that? Asking others for suggested meaning implies ones choice to seek the compound among others, instead of growing self as the partial within the whole.
Resisting suggested compounding (e pluribus unum aka out of many, one) implies the struggle to sustain apartheid. The seed (choice) struggles to stay apart as to utilize the soil (balance) to grow within. If you compound the seeds, then you just tempt birds with a free meal, while spreading the seeds implies adaptation from the birds, who then have to work the fields, which in return implies your adaptation to work the fields and so on...working together through staying apart. Ones simple struggle has complex consequences to struggle within...
Resist the suggested "nothing" for the perceivable everything and you can discern that animal and human represent growth, that vegetable and human represent animation, and that animal and vegetable represent form within flow.
It's the labels others are suggesting, which when consented to, tempt one to ignore the perceivable, labeless behavior of form within flow aka to perceive moving differences as perceivable inspiration for adaptation.
Isn't life movement and movement imply a direction and therefore a destination?
a) "movement" implies MOVE (being moved by) MENT (mind/memory reacting to moving input).
b) life represents RE (response to) MOVE (being moved by), hence being removed (process of dying) while being alive within aka growth within loss.
c) discerning to be within (life) direction (inception towards death), allows further growth of comprehension about being reaction within direction, which implies reactors within a generator. Now keep using implication...if everything is generating; how can one thing within react to it? If the generator (loss) generates reactors (growth) to sustain itself, then being a reactor (growth) within a generator (loss) implies the temporary opportunity to...
d) if it's predetermined (destiny), then why ignore "pre" as the generator for everything perceivable...for suggested "aft" aka whatever others suggest comes after what now is?
Those who consent to suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin, give others the power to play "Final Destination" with them. https://pic8.co/sh/HdHYMa.jpg
Isn't a life without movement or goal death though?
"Fell Somethin' movin' all over me...Whatever it is no man can see"
"From the crown of ma' head to the soul of ma' feet...Spirit is movin', spirit is movin', spirit is movin' all-over me!"
"I Can't Stop Movin', Can't Can't Stop Movin', Can't Stop Movin', I Can't Keep Still"
Those (partial) within motion (whole) cannot STOP, noun - "cessation of progressive motion"...others can suggest progressivism to tempt one to view others as a stop-sign to ones progress. Ever been annoyed by that inner want to move on while standing at a stop-sign?
a) the process of dying runs the living, hence each life from inception towards death without a hitch.
b) each thing within represents a partial who; everything around represents the whole where; what and why.
The suggested planet is run by those suggesting it to those consenting to it. The perceivable PLANE, noun - "level surface" aka the plane of existence represents free will of choice (surface) within the dominance of balance (level) aka free-dom.
There can be only one, hence all for one or one for all, because all represents one in energy. The hesitation to react (doubt) implies ONE's free will of choice...others cannot hesitate for oneself, it's oneself that chooses to follow the hesitant reactions of others.
Consenting to anything suggested represents want or not wanting it. Whatever side one chooses will put one against the other. The resulting conflict (want vs not want) is called reasoning.
The few not only conquer consent through suggestion and divided the many into reasoning against each other, they also gain the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) both sides of every conflict of reason.
a) both sides within reason are consenting to the same suggestion, hence fueling the suggested, while fighting each other over it.
b) the few suggest actors under directors to tempt the many to ignore being reaction (life) within direction (inception towards death). One cannot act...only react within an enacting system aka as reactors within a generator.
...represents suggested progressivism for the many chase after, while they willingly ignore that living isn't about reaching outcome (death), but about adaptation to origin for the sustenance of life, hence each one representing temporary resistance (living) within ongoing temptation (dying).
Life isn't about goal; it represents the opportunity to grow (living) within loss (process of dying) and the response-ability (choice) to resist (living) temptation (dying).
Outcomes represent suggested wants, Origin represents perceivable need. One doesn't drink to be full (outcome), one drinks to quench thirst (origin).
don't feed the troll
a) JOURNEY, noun [Latin diurnus, dies.]...your consent to suggested SAY, verb - "to utter in words" gives others the power to define; redefine and contradict the words used, hence here asking if "dying of living is what matters" without comprehending to do so.
b) TRY, verb - "to exert strength" + EXERT', verb - "to thrust forth; to emit; to push out; to bring out; to cause to come forth; to produce" implies the cause (whole) before the effect (partial). Therefore...within the whole try, each partial is trialed.
c) I adapt to perceivable inspiration; while resisting suggested information, which in return grows my comprehension about both the aforementioned fuckery through suggestion and the perceivable origin. The former may or may not inspire other ones to chose perceivable (need) over suggested (want) by oneself; while the latter represents the communication between whole and partial aka me as the recipient responding to directly to everything offered to me instead of using others as a substitute source.
Your consent to suggested "not" (nothing; nothingness) tempts you to ignore perceivable everything. Beginning (inception) implies end (death), hence momentum (life) implying motion (inception towards death). Each one represents the center (choice) of momentum (balance), while temporary (life) within ongoing (inception towards death) motion.
a) imagine a treadmill representing ongoing motion, then put yourself onto it as the temporary within the ongoing. Next, notice that there's now a choice within a balance (momentum of motion), hence your choice to either resist the ongoing (need) or fall for the temptation to ignore to resist (want).
b) as for meaning...if perceivable represents the signifying, then suggestion represents the opposite of signal...denial; refusal; ignorance...which represents ones reacting choice (perceiving) within signifying (perceivable).
Asking for meaning implies asking for suggestions by others, hence denying; refusing, ignoring the predefined signal for each one within...perceivable inspiration towards perceiving adaptation.
c) from the energy perspective...motion implies velocity (process of dying) causing momentum (balance), which allows resistance (living choice) within. Discerning to be resistance within the momentum of velocity allows one to reverse engineer the whole as the partial, hence growing comprehension (compression) as the perceiving (expression) within the perceivable (impressing).
d) resistance in short...ones need to resist want.
The goal is being suggested by others and represents what you want. Being directed within motion represents the need for your adaptation to origin. Even if you choose to ignore being directed by the natural order; for following the suggested orders by others...you would still adapt as the living within the process of dying (breathing; drinking; eating; sheltering etc.).
Doing this makes all the suggested goals either fleeting or always out of reach, while you spend your entire life to hold onto what can't be hold onto or to reach what won't fulfill you anyway. Instead of growing within the perceivable, you're tempted to get addicted to suggested loss...like every gambler. "winning" represents the sales-pitch to tempt one to gamble growth within loss.
What to do? Growing self discernment about being done by, hence representing the opportunity to "redo" aka to RE (response to) DO (being done by). Others suggest one what to "do" as to tempt one to ignore being the "re" (living) within the "do" (process of dying).
SIM'PLE, adjective [Latin simplex; sine, without and plex, plica, doubling, fold] - "single; consisting of one thing; uncompounded"...have you tried that? Asking others for suggested meaning implies ones choice to seek the compound among others, instead of growing self as the partial within the whole.
Resisting suggested compounding (e pluribus unum aka out of many, one) implies the struggle to sustain apartheid. The seed (choice) struggles to stay apart as to utilize the soil (balance) to grow within. If you compound the seeds, then you just tempt birds with a free meal, while spreading the seeds implies adaptation from the birds, who then have to work the fields, which in return implies your adaptation to work the fields and so on...working together through staying apart. Ones simple struggle has complex consequences to struggle within...
VEG'ETABLE, noun [Latin vigeo, to grow.]
AN'IMAL, noun [Latin anima, air, breath, soul.]
HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.]
Resist the suggested "nothing" for the perceivable everything and you can discern that animal and human represent growth, that vegetable and human represent animation, and that animal and vegetable represent form within flow.
It's the labels others are suggesting, which when consented to, tempt one to ignore the perceivable, labeless behavior of form within flow aka to perceive moving differences as perceivable inspiration for adaptation.
a) "movement" implies MOVE (being moved by) MENT (mind/memory reacting to moving input).
b) life represents RE (response to) MOVE (being moved by), hence being removed (process of dying) while being alive within aka growth within loss.
c) discerning to be within (life) direction (inception towards death), allows further growth of comprehension about being reaction within direction, which implies reactors within a generator. Now keep using implication...if everything is generating; how can one thing within react to it? If the generator (loss) generates reactors (growth) to sustain itself, then being a reactor (growth) within a generator (loss) implies the temporary opportunity to...
d) if it's predetermined (destiny), then why ignore "pre" as the generator for everything perceivable...for suggested "aft" aka whatever others suggest comes after what now is?
Those who consent to suggested outcomes, while ignoring perceivable origin, give others the power to play "Final Destination" with them. https://pic8.co/sh/HdHYMa.jpg
Sleigh of hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8Y8XpFtLbk
"Fell Somethin' movin' all over me...Whatever it is no man can see"
"From the crown of ma' head to the soul of ma' feet...Spirit is movin', spirit is movin', spirit is movin' all-over me!"
"I Can't Stop Movin', Can't Can't Stop Movin', Can't Stop Movin', I Can't Keep Still"
Those (partial) within motion (whole) cannot STOP, noun - "cessation of progressive motion"...others can suggest progressivism to tempt one to view others as a stop-sign to ones progress. Ever been annoyed by that inner want to move on while standing at a stop-sign?