consider myself Christian
Consider each one to represent "CHRIST-I-AN" aka AN, adjective [Latin unus, una, unum] - "One" ( https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/an )
struggling with the bible, how it's put together
A book represents words bound, which implies those consenting to read to be "spell-bound". Furthermore, ones consent to the suggestions of another represents a) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law and b) costs credit (creed; faith, submission, consent), hence c) RELIGION (Latin religio, to bind anew).
Ones struggle implies as living (growth) within the process of dying (loss)...binding oneself to what others are suggesting makes that struggle considerably worse.
it's been manipulated
a) MANIPULATION (Latin manipulus) - "to manage by mental influence"...ones consent to the suggestions by others gives others the consent to manipulate one.
b) the "it" represents what others are suggesting, ones consent isn't towards "it", but towards those suggesting...the "it" distracts one from the suggesting source, just like suggestion (fiction) distracts one from perception (reality), hence layers upon layers of distraction.
the message distorted
MES'SAGE, noun [Latin missus, mitto, to send.] - "dispatch"...it's perceivable (inception towards death) which dispatches perceiving (life). Each perceiving ONE represents the message within ALL perceivable...not what one suggests to one another as messages.
how it seemingly pacifies
Consent to suggested implies submission of consenting choice to suggesting choice, hence willingly pacifying oneself by ignoring to be free will of choice.
evil prevails
a) consenting (want or not want) to suggested moralism lures one into a good (want) vs evil (not want) conflict of reason over suggested moralism. The trick...both wanting or not wanting suggested tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable.
b) PRE (before) VAIL (cover)...suggested information represents the cover over ones consenting mind, while ignoring what comes before suggested...perceivable inspiration.
inaction
Living within the process of dying implies one to be reaction (growth) within enacting (loss). Suggested inaction tempts one to ignore perceivable IN (within) ACTION (hence reacting to being enacted upon).
jews being our chosen
a) if one chooses to consent to the suggested choice of another, then the other becomes the "chosen one".
b) if a ME ignores self, then only for a YOU (phonetic jew).
Sleight of hand from DE (of) LA (the) SOUL (spirit)..."What I do ain't make-believe...People say I sit and try...But when it comes to being De La...It's just me myself and I"
to escape yourself
a) "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka perceiving within perceivable is available at every moment of existence to everyone within.
b) consenting to suggested information implies willingly confining oneself to mentally upheld information, shaped by the suggestions of others. That's the "open" cell one ignores to step out of aka Plato's allegory of the cave.
c) the few suggest escapism to tempt the many to seek suggested liberty from being chained as the inversion of perceivable FREE (life) within DOM (inception towards death).
Recent example...consent to suggested BLOCK (burden) CHAIN (confinement) CRYPTO (death) to set yourself free.
form of brotherhood
Flow (inception towards death) represents the revealing of form (life)...others suggest one to come under the hood (concealment) of collectivism (brothers and sisters united).
The hood always represents ignorance over comprehension, and consenting to it allows others to ROB (to plunder) IN (within) HOOD (ignorance).
infighting
Reasoning (want vs not want) over suggested represents the foundation for every conflict within perceivable. Choice implies being within balance (need/want), hence not within conflict. Choosing to ignore perceivable balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want) is what's being exploited by others with suggestions to reason over.
inscrutably (unsearchable) ubiquitous (everywhere)
The few suggest searching (for information) to tempt the many to ignore perceivable (within inspiration) everywhere. One needs to resist wanted information to be able to see needed inspiration.
joining...free-masonry
It implies "free" will of chocie to join the suggested choices of others, which represents ones ignorance of being "free" will of choice within perceivable.
Consider if the "chosen ones" chose to join or were chosen to be?
light’s path is affected by the matter it travels through
The path you talk about represents the visible path by matter. The light itself goes on, no matter the temporary matter in-between. Ongoing (cause) generates momentum for temporary (effect). Only within momentum can temporary perceive the consequences of ongoing...light.
to speak in code
- CODE, noun - "a collection or digest (put in order) of laws"
a) nature doesn't collect, it divides whole (action) into each partial (reaction).
b) nature doesn't put rules (laws) into order, it represents the ruling order (ongoing) for the free will of choice chaos (temporary) within.
c) perceivable sound represents the natural order, suggested words represents the inversion thereof aka "spoken code" aka spell-craft.
Not sure what a Rollercoaster is.
a) everything "is" perceivable, while the assuring suggestions of others tempt one to ignore what is for what others suggest it to be.
b) ROLLER (that which rolls, turns on its own axis) + COASTER (vessel sailing near the shore)...if resistance (life) turns on axis (inception towards death) it ignores resisting. Resistance implies balancing (need/want) as choice within momentum, which if ignored, tempts one into want vs not want imbalance, hence a conflict about suggested information (current) stuck within a conflict of reason (bank)...a vessel within a controlled current, stuck in-between river-banks, hence always near the shore.
vaccine-driven
Flow (inception towards death) drives form (life)...cattle (vacca) chooses to follow instead of resisting.
number
NUMBER (designation of a unit) implies UNUS (one)
finite...infinite
Aka temporary living (growth) within the ongoing process of dying (loss).
Consciousness which animates
Consciousness implies awareness of animated input, hence perceiving (reaction) within perceivable (action).
eternal
Internal (growth) at the center of External (loss) implies EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" aka Eternal.
soul
Aka SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe) aka adaptation of internal (living) to external (process of dying).
figment
FIG'MENT, noun [Latin figmentum, from fingo, to feign.] - "an invention; a fiction"...ones choice to ignore perceivable (inspiration) for suggested (information) represents a) suggested fiction over perceivable reality and b) an invention upheld within ones MENT (mind/memory).
agent
a) if one puts on the uniform others are suggesting one to wear, then one represents a "regent".
b) ignoring to be regent (living) within agent (process of dying) breeds regret...
a) Protection aka PRO (forward) TEGO (cover)...the only cover within forward velocity (inception towards death) represents resistance (life). Fighting against others tempts one to ignore being resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying).
b) those who ignore to resist for the sustenance of self within perceivable will be exploited as TRAF'FICK, noun [Latin trans.] - "trade; commerce" through the suggestions of others.
c) a child represents a decedent of oneself aka DESCEND, verb - "to move or pass from a higher to a lower place", hence from ones heightened resistance comes an offspring of lower resistance. The more resistance one grows, the more resilient ones offspring becomes.
child protection agencies
One represents the regent (living) within the agent (process of dying), hence the need to protect self by resisting wanted temptations as free will of choice. Others suggest "protection agencies" as the inversion of being "reactive protection" within perceivable.
love everyone
Every one implies each different one...suggested "love" tempts consenting differences into a conflict of reason (love vs hate) against each other.
the hispanics...coming over the southern border
HISPANIC; adjective - "pertaining to Spain"....are you in France?
Don't listen to the dividers. Use discernment.
a) DIVIDE, verb - "to part or separate an entire thing; to cause to be separate"...whole nature (perceivable) divides itself into each partial (perceiving). Adaptation between partial and whole grows ones self discernment, while consenting to other partials suggestions tempts one to ignore self discernment, hence being labeled by others.
b) SEX, noun [Latin seco, to divide.] - "the distinction between male and female"...to be implies divided within whole...divided one grows (living) within united loss (process of dying).
c) the chosen "ones" (singular) tempt the consenting many (plural) to mix together aka "e pluribus unum" (one out of many) or "tikkun olam" (healing the world by bringing together) or equality (sameness) through diversity (differences) or united states; united nations; european union; uniformity etc.
Within nature each one needs to struggle to sustain apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying).
TikTok banned this vid
And now it's being propagated on "Twitter"...
divide and conquer
The perceivable source of division implies being partial within whole.
The suggested source of division represents ones consent (want or not want) to suggestions by others, which a) divides one against one another within the conflict of reason (want versus not want), which b) represents conquering the many with suggestions by the few.
don't
Aka "doing nothing"...the suggested inversion of being (perceiving) within everything (perceivable).
colors
a) the few suggest achromatic colors (white; black) to tempt the many to consent to a label representing "without hue"....a phonetic trick to tempt each one of the many to willingly deny being a "HUE-MAN".
b) the white vs black conflict of reason (freemasonic checkerboard) represents light vs dark aka comprehension (of perceivable inspiration) or ignorance (for suggested information).
What is the Gospel?
a) consented to (want or not want) mission (progressivism) as suggested by others.
b) suggested THE-ism (denial of self for the being above self) tempting with GO (good) SPEL (spelling) aka spell-craft (suggested word over perceivable sound).
c) WHAT (which part) implies ones lack of self discernment as partial (living) within whole (process of dying), hence questioning others parts, while wanting suggested answers.
d) whole generates partial reactions through motion aka EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - " internal or inherent power".
a) mortal (life) within immortal (inception towards death) aka temporary growth (partial) within ongoing loss (whole).
b) mortal (growth) can draw from immortal (loss) to sustain self by resisting being drawn into immortal.
How could one be deeper than willingly standing under others? How could one be higher than choosing to grow self?
a constant state of lack and desire
The process of dying represents a constant state of loss and temptation for those temporarily living within...
liberation from
Or being LIBER aka free will of choice within -ATION (momentum of motion aka balance)?
repeat, having suffering as the baseline feeling'
a) frequent (repeat) adaptation of living (growth) within the process of dying (loss) implies SUFFER aka SUB (under) FERO (to bear) aka one struggle to sustain self (life) while drowning (inception towards death).
b) baseline (inception towards death) implies EMOTION (to move from) for ingredient (life) being tempted by base. Resisting (living) temptation (dying) grows resistance...
respect for all life
RE (response to) SPECIO (view) aka adaptation to perceivable (need), while resisting suggested (want).
sexual abstinence
SEX (seco; to divide) ABSTAIN (to hold)...whole (process of dying) into partial (living) represents the division, and the partial need to resist the want to hold onto.
leaving behind
Suggested BE (being) HIND (the part which follows) tempts one to ignore being the resistance within being pushed from inception towards death, while being tempted by it to ignore resisting.
The few utilize suggestion to tempt the many to consent to suggested aka following orders, which tempts one to ignore resisting (life) the natural order (inception towards death).
The process of dying doesn't leave anyone living behind...
linearly to improve
If "inception towards death" represents linearly, then does "life" improve when following it along?
seeks...to achieve liberation
Having the free will of choice to seek (want), while ignoring all provided (need) implies being LIBER (free reaction) within -ATION (dominating action).
giving it substance
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents substance (growth) within essence (loss).
kharma and dharma
Kharma (suggested outcome) Dharma (perceivable origin)...oneself exists in-between. The more one wants vs not wants suggested Kharma (information), the more one ignores the need to adapt to perceivable Dharma (inspiration).
reality framework
a) EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" represents the foundation of essence (flow) and substance (form).
b) reality (perceivable inspiration) or fiction (suggested information) implies ones free will of choice at the center.
c) velocity (process of dying) generates momentum (frame) for resistance (living) within. In other words...the perceivable, ever changing moment (um) represents the frame within work (energy) for those working (adaptation) within.
Hirnadel
What if it's not the minds (hirn) elevation of the nobel (adel) few, but the willing consent of the many to understand aka to "stand under" what the few are suggesting them?
iq
INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand) aka ones consent to "stand under" the suggestions by others, like....
aristocracy
...suggested ARISTOTE'LIANISM, noun - "the philosophy or doctrines of Aristotle".
the way
Inception towards death represents the only way for the life within, and living within the process of dying implies the need to express resistance....not repress self by consenting to understand (stand under) the suggested ways by others.
book bringing
Bringing denotes action; a suggested book "binds" those consenting to it. Choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) represents a contract, based on credit; creed; faith aka submission of choice to choice of others.
Prisoners are being "booked"...
peace
a) peace implies versus war...always a conflict (reason).
b) consider suggested peace to represent tranquility of ones state of mind, while suggested "war" represents the perplexed state of ones mind...if consenting (want or not want aka peace or war) to suggested.
send/share to all world leaders
Nature leads from inception towards death; nature sends life from inception towards death, and nature shares whole (process of dying) by dividing into partials (living), which allows the partials to consciously experience the whole.
DID (past tense of verbs)...if action (inception towards death) represents the foundation for every reaction (living) within, then there's no past tense of action.
In other words...one has to ignore that perceivable reality "does" before one can shape suggestions about what it "did" or "didn't".
1 person split into 3 parts
a) whole (one) into partials (ones) implies internal division (split).
b) person aka per (by) sonos (sound) implies the partials within whole sound, hence being by sound.
c) two, three etc. implies ones (partial) choice to count other ones within whole.
d) whole designates partial units (unus; ones) through division, hence setting ones apart from one another. Counting (collecting partials) represents the inversion of being apart aka a partial within whole.
e) take any so called trinity (father; mother; child) and notice that one can discern each one of them. Therefore...suggested three tempts one to ignore perceivable ones (moving partials, differentiated by whole).
f) if one comprehends the above, then the suggested trinity...past; present; future...implies the perceivable moment (momentum of motion) aka "now".
The crypto jews underneath India were called Beni Israel and Cohin...
https://christiansfortruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/The-Jewish-Fifth-Column-in-India-.pdf
I don't know why this orthodox sect is so powerful
a) ORTHO (straight) DOX; from DEK (accept) + SECT; from SECO (to divide)
Meanwhile....STRAIGHT (inception towards death) generates DIVIDED (living).
b) the power of the chosen ones (singular) represents the ignorance of the many (plural), who keep wanting to come together, while ignoring the need to struggle for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying).
c) everyone knows aka KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...most willingly ignore perceivable (inspiration) for suggested (information).
everything we are doing is reactive. That's a recipe for failure
a) to be implies reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying). One cannot act; only react.
b) ignoring to react to perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction) is where the few utilize suggestions as a recipe to brew ignorance among the consenting many.
c) failing (decline) represents the status quo for temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death), hence the struggle to resist (living) temptation (dying). Others suggest temptations to tempt one to ignore struggling.
a) DIS (lack of) EASE (to help, assist)
b) "lack of" represents ones want for suggested, while ignoring ones need to adapt to everything perceivable. Nature offers everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving)...anything lacking represents a suggestion.
c) the process of dying (whole) generates each one of the living (partials), hence establishing free will of choice to help/assist sustaining oneself.
d) growing self discernment implies one to be AT (near) EASE (to help, assist), hence only ever one choice apart.
So by definition, a definition is a deaf phoenician
a) Notice your use of "by" and "is"...if you are "by" your mother, then you cannot define what your mother "is", because she "was" before you can shape any suggestions about what she "is".
b) Suggestion cannot define what "is", because perceivable "was" before any suggestion about it can be shaped out of it.
c) Notice that I use "represents" over "is", which implies RE (response to) PRESENT (presented by) aka each perceiving ones response to perceivable origin...not to the suggestions by one another.
d) Try humming, next continue humming, while shaping words out of the humming sound. This represents incantation aka adaptation to ongoing, while shaping temporary out of it. Next notice how others respond to this...the sound will distract them from the words, because they're domesticated to respond to suggested words, while ignoring perceivable sound. Doing this will agitate them, will make it harder for them to ignore the sound underneath the words, will weaken their ignorance of ongoing for temporary.
The ongoing (process of dying) unnerves the temporary (living); which in return inspires adaptation for growth of temporary within ongoing loss.
c) deaf phonetician (definition) represents the use of phonetics as both a sleight of hand for those who have ears to hear and mockery of those who willingly choose to ignore sound for words. Same shit is done with symbolism above symmetry, numerology above the designation of different units (ones), words upon sound (spell-craft) and even rhetoric; revisionism and contradiction upon words upon sound etc. Layers of deception; propagated by suggestion towards consent.
or is it the other way around?
a) One way (inception towards death) for everyone within (living). Others imply one living among other ones, while being moved from inception toward death. The way represents velocity (process of dying), which generates momentum, within which resistance (living) can exist.
In short...one perceivable way, endless suggested ways by other ones...your choice to discern reality (perceivable) from fiction (suggested). The allegory of signing a contract with the devil at the crossroads represents one falling for the temptation to consent to the suggested ways by others.
b) Choice can only exist within balance (need/want), hence "living on the edge"...choosing want over need, tempts one into a want vs not want conflict (reasoning).
c) OR, a termination of Latin nouns - "It denotes an agent, as in actor, creditor"...aka ones consent (credit; creed; belief) to the suggested options (optio; wishes; desires) by others. Nature doesn't suggest nouns (names)...it terminates any suggested noun, while tempting those holding onto them down the drain.
It's AGENT (process of dying) generating REGENT (living)...any suggested OR tempts one to ignore that. It's on each ones free will of choice to control self by steering the vessel aka form (life) within flow (inception towards death) through using the OR (phonetic; oar). The few suggest DOCTORS (phonetic; docked oars) to tempt the many to shirk response-ability onto others.
If words can't define, you would counter your own attempts?
a) Ones temptation (attempt) represents reasoning (counter) over the suggested information by others.
b) I take the idolatry; revisionism and contradictions of suggested words apart, while expressing my comprehension of perceivable sound. For me this represents adaptation to perceivable inspiration and reverse engineering of suggested information. The more I reverse engineer information, the more I free my mind/memory for use of inspiration.
Inspiration implies adaptation to ongoing; information implies holding onto temporary.
c) nature sets itself apart aka from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living)...it designates units (Latin; unity; unitas; unus, one). Others tempt one to ignore this by suggesting to count aka to collect units together.
Take anything counted as "two" and notice that you being able to discern between each "one" of them implies differentiation of ones, not sameness of two. It's the suggested label "two" which tricks "one" to ignore oneness (perceivable) and oneself (perceiving).
Like words, all literal/exoteric transliterations of esoteric subjects have their limits.
a) Perceivable sound limits suggestible words. Perceivable balance limits the perceiving choice to shape suggestions. Exoteric (process of dying) represents the limit for esoteric (living) expressions within.
b) Words are suggested to tempt "one" to think "like" other ones, hence mass consensus to suggested definitions. Meanwhile, each "one" implies a different partial (perceiving) within the same whole (perceivable).
Life represents one struggle for apartheid within wholeness, while others tempt one with suggested togetherness to behave "alike" aka e pluribus unum (one out of many) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or united states; united nations; european union, uniformity or equality (same) through diversity (difference).
c) Only within limit (balance) can one be free will of choice.
gnosticism
- GNOS'TIC, noun [Latin gnosticus; Gr. to know.] + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"
The suggested -ism tempts one to consent to those suggesting it, while ignoring to adapt to perceivable. Therefore...Gnosticism represents the inversion of Gnostic. One doesn't need to define perceivable...one needs to adapt to perceivable aka to inspiration (moving differences) aka to a predefined reality which communicates itself as whole (perceivable) to each partial (perceiving)...even when ignored for suggestions by one another.
The linked explanation
The (the-ism) linked (suggested) explanation (definition)...tempts one to ignore being EX (expression of living) within PLAIN (impressing process of dying). In other words...life being moved from inception towards death represents ones "PLAIN of EXistence".
Furthermore...-ATION (action) requires ones self discernment about being reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying). Others can only shape their explanations by reacting to -ATION (action). One cannot suggest a word without shaping it out of perceivable sound...but others can tempt one to ignore perceivable for suggested.
earlier concept
Thinking represents the subject to objectifying input. One is being subjected to thinking, because ones mind was objectified for the subjective role of thinking. Both coexist within the same origin, hence subjection (living) within objection (process of dying), both in balance (momentum of motion) with each other.
The process of dying represents the "earlier" state, while living within represents the "recent" state. Perceivable (reality) will always represent earlier than suggested (fiction)...
a) suggested RE (response to) FUGIO (to flee) tempts one to flee from perceivable origin, hence the setup for hopium aka suggested outcomes, which is being directed with fear of perceivable outcome (death).
b) difference (living) within sameness (process of dying) aka partials within whole.