A book represents words bound, which implies those consenting to read to be "spell-bound". Furthermore, ones consent to the suggestions of another represents a) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law and b) costs credit (creed; faith, submission, consent), hence c) RELIGION (Latin religio, to bind anew).
Ones struggle implies as living (growth) within the process of dying (loss)...binding oneself to what others are suggesting makes that struggle considerably worse.
it's been manipulated
a) MANIPULATION (Latin manipulus) - "to manage by mental influence"...ones consent to the suggestions by others gives others the consent to manipulate one.
b) the "it" represents what others are suggesting, ones consent isn't towards "it", but towards those suggesting...the "it" distracts one from the suggesting source, just like suggestion (fiction) distracts one from perception (reality), hence layers upon layers of distraction.
the message distorted
MES'SAGE, noun [Latin missus, mitto, to send.] - "dispatch"...it's perceivable (inception towards death) which dispatches perceiving (life). Each perceiving ONE represents the message within ALL perceivable...not what one suggests to one another as messages.
how it seemingly pacifies
Consent to suggested implies submission of consenting choice to suggesting choice, hence willingly pacifying oneself by ignoring to be free will of choice.
evil prevails
a) consenting (want or not want) to suggested moralism lures one into a good (want) vs evil (not want) conflict of reason over suggested moralism. The trick...both wanting or not wanting suggested tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable.
b) PRE (before) VAIL (cover)...suggested information represents the cover over ones consenting mind, while ignoring what comes before suggested...perceivable inspiration.
inaction
Living within the process of dying implies one to be reaction (growth) within enacting (loss). Suggested inaction tempts one to ignore perceivable IN (within) ACTION (hence reacting to being enacted upon).
jews being our chosen
a) if one chooses to consent to the suggested choice of another, then the other becomes the "chosen one".
b) if a ME ignores self, then only for a YOU (phonetic jew).
Sleight of hand from DE (of) LA (the) SOUL (spirit)..."What I do ain't make-believe...People say I sit and try...But when it comes to being De La...It's just me myself and I"
to escape yourself
a) "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka perceiving within perceivable is available at every moment of existence to everyone within.
b) consenting to suggested information implies willingly confining oneself to mentally upheld information, shaped by the suggestions of others. That's the "open" cell one ignores to step out of aka Plato's allegory of the cave.
c) the few suggest escapism to tempt the many to seek suggested liberty from being chained as the inversion of perceivable FREE (life) within DOM (inception towards death).
Recent example...consent to suggested BLOCK (burden) CHAIN (confinement) CRYPTO (death) to set yourself free.
form of brotherhood
Flow (inception towards death) represents the revealing of form (life)...others suggest one to come under the hood (concealment) of collectivism (brothers and sisters united).
The hood always represents ignorance over comprehension, and consenting to it allows others to ROB (to plunder) IN (within) HOOD (ignorance).
infighting
Reasoning (want vs not want) over suggested represents the foundation for every conflict within perceivable. Choice implies being within balance (need/want), hence not within conflict. Choosing to ignore perceivable balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want) is what's being exploited by others with suggestions to reason over.
Consider each one to represent "CHRIST-I-AN" aka AN, adjective [Latin unus, una, unum] - "One" ( https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/an )
A book represents words bound, which implies those consenting to read to be "spell-bound". Furthermore, ones consent to the suggestions of another represents a) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law and b) costs credit (creed; faith, submission, consent), hence c) RELIGION (Latin religio, to bind anew).
Ones struggle implies as living (growth) within the process of dying (loss)...binding oneself to what others are suggesting makes that struggle considerably worse.
a) MANIPULATION (Latin manipulus) - "to manage by mental influence"...ones consent to the suggestions by others gives others the consent to manipulate one.
b) the "it" represents what others are suggesting, ones consent isn't towards "it", but towards those suggesting...the "it" distracts one from the suggesting source, just like suggestion (fiction) distracts one from perception (reality), hence layers upon layers of distraction.
MES'SAGE, noun [Latin missus, mitto, to send.] - "dispatch"...it's perceivable (inception towards death) which dispatches perceiving (life). Each perceiving ONE represents the message within ALL perceivable...not what one suggests to one another as messages.
Consent to suggested implies submission of consenting choice to suggesting choice, hence willingly pacifying oneself by ignoring to be free will of choice.
a) consenting (want or not want) to suggested moralism lures one into a good (want) vs evil (not want) conflict of reason over suggested moralism. The trick...both wanting or not wanting suggested tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable.
b) PRE (before) VAIL (cover)...suggested information represents the cover over ones consenting mind, while ignoring what comes before suggested...perceivable inspiration.
Living within the process of dying implies one to be reaction (growth) within enacting (loss). Suggested inaction tempts one to ignore perceivable IN (within) ACTION (hence reacting to being enacted upon).
a) if one chooses to consent to the suggested choice of another, then the other becomes the "chosen one".
b) if a ME ignores self, then only for a YOU (phonetic jew).
Sleight of hand from DE (of) LA (the) SOUL (spirit)..."What I do ain't make-believe...People say I sit and try...But when it comes to being De La...It's just me myself and I"
a) "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka perceiving within perceivable is available at every moment of existence to everyone within.
b) consenting to suggested information implies willingly confining oneself to mentally upheld information, shaped by the suggestions of others. That's the "open" cell one ignores to step out of aka Plato's allegory of the cave.
c) the few suggest escapism to tempt the many to seek suggested liberty from being chained as the inversion of perceivable FREE (life) within DOM (inception towards death).
Recent example...consent to suggested BLOCK (burden) CHAIN (confinement) CRYPTO (death) to set yourself free.
Flow (inception towards death) represents the revealing of form (life)...others suggest one to come under the hood (concealment) of collectivism (brothers and sisters united).
The hood always represents ignorance over comprehension, and consenting to it allows others to ROB (to plunder) IN (within) HOOD (ignorance).
Reasoning (want vs not want) over suggested represents the foundation for every conflict within perceivable. Choice implies being within balance (need/want), hence not within conflict. Choosing to ignore perceivable balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want) is what's being exploited by others with suggestions to reason over.