The online false prophets that worship Lucifer have been spreading a psyop about the Trinity being an old concept before Judaism and that it was founded by the Egyptians and Babylonians (Isis/Iris/Osiris as an example).
These People are so sneaky and they use cunning arguments to fool People into thinking religion is all mumbo jumbo.
Luckily, I have done oceans worth of research to figure all this out.
-
The Trinity concept was the oldest concept in human history once People realized that God must exist. This concept was taught by a prophet named Caligastar to very, very, very ancient People. That one concept has stood the test of time because it happens to be true that God is 1 person split into 3 parts.
-
The Catholic Church has altered the Bible many times. They altered the New Testament to make Mary a virgin but she wasn't a virgin at all. They did this to match their own belief that Isis was a virgin in Egyptian mythology.
So all this talk about the Trinity stemming from Egyptians is invalid because it actually stems from one of the first belief systems of God in human history thanks to an ancient prophet.
The reason they are doing this psyop, which also happens in schools, is to spread the idea of atheism which was first pushed by Albert Pike in the 1800s. He saw that People realized the Catholic Church was a criminal organization and fell out of faith so Pike recommended to push on that to strip humanity of all religion and then push Luciferianism on them after.
a) whole (one) into partials (ones) implies internal division (split).
b) person aka per (by) sonos (sound) implies the partials within whole sound, hence being by sound.
c) two, three etc. implies ones (partial) choice to count other ones within whole.
d) whole designates partial units (unus; ones) through division, hence setting ones apart from one another. Counting (collecting partials) represents the inversion of being apart aka a partial within whole.
e) take any so called trinity (father; mother; child) and notice that one can discern each one of them. Therefore...suggested three tempts one to ignore perceivable ones (moving partials, differentiated by whole).
f) if one comprehends the above, then the suggested trinity...past; present; future...implies the perceivable moment (momentum of motion) aka "now".