had WAY more
Can there be another way for life than "inception towards death"? What more than the way of life could there be and where would one be then?
AI won't kill us
a) consenting to artificial (opposition of natural) will kill those within natural. Why? Because it implies ones choice to ignore natural for artificial.
b) intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) implies ones consent to "stand under" the artificial suggestions by others, while ignoring naturally perceivable.
c) suggested "us" (plural) tempts consenting "one" (singular) to ignore self (perceiving within perceivable).
d) if there's an "us", then why are the many struggling to come together? Why do the few represent an "us" while staying apart from the many? Why are the few suggesting the many to consent to US (united states) aka the state of being united?
e) won't aka "will nothing" implies ones free "will" of choice choosing to ignore everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested). If one will, then "won't" becomes impotent.
retard
Suggested retard (to diminish the velocity of motion) tempts one to ignore being resistance (life) within velocity of motion (inception towards death)...living cannot diminish dying, it can only resist it for the growth of resistance, hence prolonging life momentarily.
given ONE answer.
a) there's only ONE solution (inception towards death) for each ONE problem (life) within...wanting suggested answers to suggested questions tempts ONEself to ignore that.
b) what if everything (perceivable) is already given to everyone (perceiving), while each one has the free will of choice to ignore it for the suggestions of other ones?
constant kicking will create a durable callus
a) durable implies able (life) to endure (inception towards death)
b) only temporary within ongoing can be able to endure, hence DURE (able to endure) -ATION (action)
c) one cannot create ENDURANCE (continuance), one can only temporary endure ongoing continuance a moment longer by resisting it, hence building "callus" resistance.
d) "getting a kick out of it" implies continuance kick-starting resistance, hence inspiring adaptation...or else get your shit kicked in.
walking the path to enlightenment
a) path (inception towards death) generates the ability to walk within (life).
b) light coming into mind (inspiration) gives one the choice to express (comprehension) or repress (ignorance) it.
c) continuance moving forward represents the light behind the resistance within aka those who cast shadows. The incoming light represents the whole "burned offering" for each "light bearer"...
d) "let it be light" implies light (process of dying) letting it be (living). Also; IT (substitute or pronoun of the neuter gender, sometimes called demonstrative)...each partial represents a substitute demonstration within the whole, generated by the whole, "trans" formed out of the momentum (female) of motion (male).
There's nothing can be done about this.
How could nothing be? How could being be done?
Either way
Like "inception towards death" and...?
Consciousness is often the result of life experience
a) exper- implies expression (growth) by impressing (loss)...temporary growth (life) requires conscious awareness of ongoing loss (inception towards death).
b) living represents the result of the process of dying; choice (reaction) represents the result of balance (action); growth represents the result of loss; inside represents the result of outside; partial represents the result of whole; perceiving represents the result of perceivable; potential represents the result of potentiality; resistance represents the result of velocity; magnetic represents the result of electric; female represents the result of male; each one represents the result of oneness.
c) suggested OFTEN (frequent) tempts one to ignore that ones free will of choice within the dominance of balance represents frequent adaptation of FREE (living) within DOM (process of dying) aka ones struggle to sustain self.
Sleight of hand: Frequency HURTS (hz)..."no guts, no glory...no pain; no gain...one for all; all for one...riders on the range" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmDckVV5vxQ
raw intelligence...i honestly don't fucking know
a) raw represents perceivable whole; cut represents each perceiving partial. The raw natural order represents the alteration for everyone within.
b) knowledge represents perceivable (inspiration); intelligence represents ones consent to stand under aka understanding suggested (information).
c) if one stands under the suggestions by others (intelligence), then one restricts grow of comprehension within perceivable (knowledge).
d) the few brand their suggestions as "knowledge" and the consent of the many as "intelligence".
e) the "ledge of knowing" represents ones perceiving choice in-between perceivable balance (need/want).
Why shouldn't consciousness at a minimum have a random element that possibly moves one outside the box?
a) motion represents the outside; momentum represents the box, and the formed consciousness within the momentum of motion is consciously aware of being moved...unless ignored for the suggested movements by others.
b) maximum (whole) divides itself into minimum (partials) through box (momentum)...
c) potential (each partial choice) exists within potentiality (whole momentum aka balance)..
d) suggested RAN'DOM, noun - "course without direction aka want of direction", tempts one to ignore being (life) directed (inception towards death), hence "free" will of choice within the "dom"-inance of balance aka free-dom aka FREE (living) within DOM (process of dying).
e) motion outside the box (inception towards death); motion inside the box (up/down; left/right; forwards/backwards aka choice within balance).
Is consciousness genetic?
a) consciousness represents awareness of being generated aka the reaction within an enacting system.
b) whole "was" perceivable before partial within can make a conscious choice to suggest what it "is".
For the sake of argument
a) if ones MENT (mind/memory) ARGUES (to reason); then that implies SAKE (to oppress) oneself.
b) being moved forwards (living) implies coming out of (process of dying)...reason tempts one to ignore implication.
can a parent that is "fully conscious" and a parent that is an NPC have a child that is full conscious or will the child be an NPC?
a) the "non-player-character" (NPC) represents one who ignores perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction), hence being tempted to follow orders instead of being the resistance (life) within the natural order.
b) your want to understand about what others suggest "will" happen, tempts you to ignore each ones free "will" of choice within perceivable.
c) perceivable happens (inception towards death aka momentum aka balance); perceiving shapes self within what happens (life aka choice)...unless ignored for the suggestions by others.
d) the child will be what the child chooses to be...all the suggestions of the parents tempts the child to ignore self discernment as free will of choice.
How could one grow free will of choice by consenting to the suggested choices of others?
a) on itself; any suggested -ism (feminism) represents a temptation, but once consent is added, it becomes suicidal consent to genocidal suggestion...it's not a conflict: but the consequence of mutual choices within a contract (consent to suggested).
b) those who suggest the temptation (-ism) utilize consent given to justify exploiting the consequences.
c) those who consent (want or not want) to suggested temptation are stuck within a conflict of reason (want vs not want) among themselves.
d) reason cannot be won; because both sides are reasoning over a suggestion made by a 3rd party that isn't within the conflict, and that outside party holds the consent of everyone within as the means to define; redefine and contradict what the suggested means. Why? To instigate division; to control both sides of every conflict and to sustain the conflict by constantly changing the rules.
e) consenting to suggested (fiction) implies ignorance of perceivable (reality)...those who ignore reality ignore the sustenance of self, hence the lack of resistance and the escape into fiction for shelter.
f) those who consent to a male vs female conflict of reason are willingly ignoring that the sustenance of self requires intercourse between male/female for offspring.
The few inverted intercourse between male (upwards triangle) and female (downward triangle) for offspring (G aka generative)... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2Aa2jvjS.jpg into a "versus" conflict between male and female.
They are laying the BRICS...
...a yellow (CHINA) brick (BRICS) road to us (OZ).
Are you suggesting
What if it's on oneself to discern between perceivable (need) and suggested (want), before utilizing free will of choice?
a sex change
SEX (Latin seco; to divide) implies through change (motion), hence division of motion (male) into momentum (female) for trans-formation (life) within change (inception towards death).
What am I missing?
If everything (perceivable) is offered to everyone (perceiving), then one can be tempted to miss it when consenting to the suggestions by others...one cannot miss perceivable, only choose to ignore it for suggested, while feeling that something is "amiss".
Baphomet is an invented pagan or gnostic idol
a) what if ones consent to the suggestions of another "idolizes" the suggested (fiction) within perceivable (reality)? What if the few suggest words as idols for perceivable sound, and what if ones consent to suggested words tempts one to ignore perceivable sound?
b) GNOS'TIC, noun [Latin gnosticus; Gr. to know.] - "perceiving perceivable"...could the suggestion of Gnosticism represent the idol for those perceiving perceivable?
Satanist or occultist symbol
Who suggests satanism; occultism and symbolism and who consents to those suggested -isms?
a) if one (singular) consents to suggested groups (plural), then one ignores self.
b) if one ignores to be free will of choice within perceivable, by consenting to the suggested choices of others, then those others become the "chosen ones" aka the ELITE (French élite) -"selection; choice".
a) what if one can only compete (wanting vs not wanting suggested) within everything already available (perceivable need)?
b) what if competition for outcomes tempts one to ignore sustenance of self by adapting to origin?
c) if wars can be won, then where's the PEACE (freedom from disturbance or agitation)?
d) what if being FREE (living) within DOM (process of dying) implies disturbance and agitation, hence ones struggle to sustain self?
the world should take him serious
a) SERIOUS (really intending what is said)...does the real world say anything, or do those within suggest fiction (words) about perceivable reality (sound)?
b) what if only the whole can give (inception) and take (death), while each partial (life) is busy growing within loss by resisting (need) the temptation (want) to hold onto? Could others exploit this by tempting with suggestions?
a) WO (mb) MAN + FE (minine) MALE + S (split) HE = transmutation of ingredient (female) out of base (male). Alchemy.
b) GENDER aka SEX (Latin seco; to divide; the distinction between male and female) aka generation (male) to regeneration (female) aka motion (male) to momentum (female).
c) HUMAN (heb. form) + ANIMAL (Latin anima; air; breathe; soul; animation) aka form (life) within momentum of flow (inception towards death) aka form (trans) within momentum (female) of flow (male), hence having the free will of choice to "trans-form" self.
a) everything implies perceivable inspiration; "nothing" represents suggested information...ones consent to the latter tempts one to ignore the former.
b) wanting (true) vs not wanting (false) suggested information, tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration (moving differences). In short...both true (want) and false (not want) tempt one to ignore change (need). Want tempts one to hold onto; need demands one to adapt to change.
Example: suggested "Cola tastes better than Fanta" tempts one into a conflict of reason (true vs false, want vs not want; agreement vs disagreement; belief vs disbelief etc.), while also tempting one to ignore perceivable need...thirst. One needs to adapt to thirst, no matter what one drinks, no matter how it tastes and no matter who is suggesting one to drink.
c) everything (perceivable) represents need; nothing (suggested) represents want in ignorance of need...oneself represents the free will of choice within a balance (need/want) based system, while choosing want over need tempts one into imbalance (want vs not want).
"not" want represents the foundation for suggested "nothing".
Sleight of hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
Let me start with a basic example to set the ground work...
a) your suggestion (a basic example) towards consent by others (to set the groundwork) instigates the consensual sequence of suggested cues which allows you to direct their reactions.
Their consent represents their faith; belief; agreement; trust etc. in your suggested cues, and they will continue to follow your lead until you choose to break the sequence.
b) one represents the seed (growth) within the ground (loss) aka the ingredient (living) within base (process of dying) aka that (life) which exists in-between start (inception) and finish (death) aka RE (response to) SET (being set by).
Sleight of hand: "we didn't start the fire, it was always burning...we didn't light it, but we tried to fight it"
c) suggestion represents ingredient within perceivable base aka reaction within enacting.
The Italian man has remote controlled you, by exploiting some basic knowledge about you.
a) REMO'TE, adjective [Latin remotus, removeo; re and moveo, to move.] aka RE (response to) MOVE (being moved by) aka living responding to being moved by the process of dying.
b) REMOTE (free will of choice) within CONTROL (balance) of CHANNEL (a passage; a place of passing or flowing)...aka form within the momentum of flow.
The few invert this by suggesting remotes for control to switch channels if one consents to their tell-a-vision.
c) if knowledge represents perceivable, then suggestion represents the exploit to tempt one to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction).
d) suggested information represents the temptation to gain access to ones consent, which when given, allows others to utilize the suggested to direct ones consenting reactions.
Taking it to the Next Level
a) taking it (life) towards (from inception towards death) implies life losing resistance, which allows others to exploit life's lack of resistance.
b) now (living) next (process of dying).
c) choice can only exist within balance aka the momentum of motion aka the level within the natural order...living implies leveling (balancing by choice) or being leveled (back to base).
Secondly...
One (partial) within oneness (whole)...if all represents ONE in energy, then that's "the first; the last; eternity..." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe_0zKVVGQw for "there can be only one", hence "all for one and one for all"...
SEC'OND, adjective [Latin secundus; sequor, to follow; to seek.]...why do you want to follow when you need to resist being moved? Why do you seek within suggested when everything (perceivable) is offered to everyone (perceiving) at every moment (um)?
things gleaned from audio spying via your mobile phone, social media, etc.
Suggested information you consent to hold onto mentally, while physically perpetuating it by suggesting others "your" information. Meanwhile in reality...one represents form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka temporary information within ongoing inspiration, hence tempted to want to hold onto, while ignoring the need to let go.
If you're married...
...then you consented to be bound by contract to another, while being licensed by a third party. Meanwhile in reality...intercourse is required for offspring...the child doesn't spring off to be bound, but to be set free (will of choice), hence springing out of internal course...
imagine how you'd feel, if you received a message like this...
a) receive aka RE (respond to) CAPIO (to take)...can one take perceivable (thirst) or is one tempted to take suggested (drinks)? What if one perceives Inspiration before one can consent to receive suggested information?
b) feelings aka emotions (to move from) tempt one to ignore being (life) moved by (inception towards death), hence in need to resist.
c) IM'AGE, noun [Latin imago.] - "a representation of", hence IMAGINE (reaction to representation of) -ATION (enacting origin). One needs to discern the origin (whole) by reacting to the representations (partials) thereof, which implies ones self discernment about being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable).
One cannot grow self discernment by consenting; agreeing; believing; having faith in; trusting etc. the suggested information by others.
is extraordinarily simplistic
a) what if the perceivable natural order represents simplicity, while each extraordinarily suggestion tempts one to dump complexity upon simplicity?
b) if nature offers everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving), then what does EXTRA (beyond; excess) imply? Could it be ones ignorance of need (perceivable) for want (suggested), hence always being tempted to want more?
c) what if you can only suggest what "is"; because you willingly ignore that everything perceivable "was" available for you to shape your suggestions about it?
the secret details are actually pretty basic
a) does a base conceal (secret) or reveal ingredients? Why is it called CONCEAL (to withhold from sight) MENT (mind/memory)? What within everything perceivable is withheld from ones perceiving mind/memory?
b) DETAIL, verb - "to relate, report or narrate in particulars"...what if the whole (process of dying) narrates itself in particulars (living)? Why are you looking for particular details instead of adapting as the particular to the whole narration?
cause that person to take each specific action
Cause implies enacting, effect implies reacting...hence having free will of choice to react while being enacted upon.
Where Things Get Truly Scary
Getting implies coming out of; scare aka terror aka fear implies towards outcome, hence others tempting one to fear suggested outcomes, while ignoring to resist perceivable origin.
envies you hold
What if your hold represents the greed that tempts the envy within others?
something, with hyper intelligence, using that kind of knowledge
a) if knowledge represents perceivable inspiration; then intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) represents ones consent to stand under suggested information.
b) HYPER (over, denotes excess, or something over or beyond)...there's the aforementioned "extra" again, hence want (extra) tempting to want more (hyper)...
happening to everyone...all at once.
Perceivable inspiration represents all (whole) communicating itself to each one (partials)...suggested information can only ever attempt to mimic this, but it can only reach the ones who consent to let it in (knock, knock...it's Dracula...may I come in for a drink?)
at some point
Consider what your consent to a suggested point does to your point of view (perceiving partial within perceivable whole)? Does your "cone of vision" represent a pyramid, hence the all (perceivable) seeing I (perceiving), unless "capped off" by your consent to suggested points of view?
unthinkable chaos
The few suggest one to want order out of chaos, which represents the inversion of being temporary chaos (life) within the ongoing natural order (inception towards death)....order represents the flow of inspiration coming in; chaos represents suggested information within those who willingly ignore perceivable order.
tl; dr...suggested words represent the interruption (disarray) of perceivable sound (sequence) and others shape ongoing symmetry into temporary symbols (letters), which they bind by your consent into words to mimic sequence (language)...spell-craft.
machiavellian logic...leading two sides into conflict.
a) logic/reason represents both sides of every conflict, shaped by ones consent to want or not want the suggested "leads" by others.
b) suggested machiavellianism tempts with outcome as justification for choice, which represents the inversion of choice as reaction within enacting balance. It's the momentum of motion (balance) which represents that which "just is" (justice) for those being moved by it.
Suggested outcomes tempt one to ignore perceivable origin, hence inverting justice (that which just is) with justific -ation aka just + fiction -through action.
What if ones consent to another ones suggestion represents a conspiracy to ignore perceivable oneness?
CONSPIRE, verb - "to agree, by oath, covenant or otherwise, to commit a crime; to plot; to hatch treason". What if following suggested orders represents the crime of ignoring perceivable natural order?
extends...included
a) can there be extension (growth) without being within (loss)?
b) notice that being within implies that everything one hasn't extended to yet represents the outside for oneself. In other words...surrounding (outside) center (inside).
c) what if choice represents the center of a balance based system?
Life in the Spirit
Implies living within while adapting to origin.
Heirs with Christ
Implies decent through motion from origin.
Future Glory
Tempts one to ignore perceivable origin for suggested outcomes.
everlasting
Consider if ever-first (inception) and ever-last (death) shape life within, hence ongoing process of dying generating temporary living reactions?
Counting suggested fiction within ones memory, while within perceivable reality. For example...while being within left/right, up/down, and forwards/backwards-balance one can imbalance self with suggested "till infinity and beyond".
Doesn't change where you are (perceivable reality), but how you view your surroundings (suggested fiction).
dimension
1d - the few suggest a line has one dimension, while the perceivable line (inception towards death) contains each ones (life) perceiving point of perspective.
3d - the few suggest that a solid has three dimensions, while each perceiving solid (life) within perceivable liquid (inception towards death) represents the choice within left/right, up/down, and forwards/backwards-balance aka the center of ones surrounding.
2d - the few suggest that a superficies (surface) has two dimensions, while the perceiving point of view upon a surface implies from the cone of ones vision aka the top of a pyramid (the top the few like to cut off).
article by will stewart
Aka choice employed to handle domestic (balance) concerns...a steward of will.
Ones free "will" of choice represents the reaction within everything (perceivable)...each one can take all has to offer. Growth (life) can handle loss (inception towards death)...momentarily.
when the people in Palestine are losing their lives, being raped and murdered...
...yet not a peep about jews; israelis.
same thing happens in Syria: Libya; Iraq...
...yet not a peep about zionism.
when Ukrainians are violating the rights of other Ukrainians...
...yet not a peep about khazarians or ashke-nazis.
who is the root cause of this problem...it's clearly the west and the USA.
As clear as permission to reveal/conceal allows it...
KNACK, noun - "readiness; habitual facility of performance; dexterity" aka frequent adaptation by free will of choice as resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying).
The more temporary growth resits ongoing loss, the more resistance grows.
Suggested work tempts one to ignore EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" aka everyone (perceiving) within everything (perceivable) represents work (energy). Ones consensual employment to the suggested work by others tempts one to ignore being temporarily employed (living) within constant work (process of dying).
There cannot be people who don't work, but others can suggest one that their are unemployed people without work.