a) consciousness represents awareness of being generated aka the reaction within an enacting system.
b) whole "was" perceivable before partial within can make a conscious choice to suggest what it "is".
For the sake of argument
a) if ones MENT (mind/memory) ARGUES (to reason); then that implies SAKE (to oppress) oneself.
b) being moved forwards (living) implies coming out of (process of dying)...reason tempts one to ignore implication.
can a parent that is "fully conscious" and a parent that is an NPC have a child that is full conscious or will the child be an NPC?
a) the "non-player-character" (NPC) represents one who ignores perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction), hence being tempted to follow orders instead of being the resistance (life) within the natural order.
b) your want to understand about what others suggest "will" happen, tempts you to ignore each ones free "will" of choice within perceivable.
c) perceivable happens (inception towards death aka momentum aka balance); perceiving shapes self within what happens (life aka choice)...unless ignored for the suggestions by others.
d) the child will be what the child chooses to be...all the suggestions of the parents tempts the child to ignore self discernment as free will of choice.
How could one grow free will of choice by consenting to the suggested choices of others?
a) consciousness represents awareness of being generated aka the reaction within an enacting system.
b) whole "was" perceivable before partial within can make a conscious choice to suggest what it "is".
a) if ones MENT (mind/memory) ARGUES (to reason); then that implies SAKE (to oppress) oneself.
b) being moved forwards (living) implies coming out of (process of dying)...reason tempts one to ignore implication.
a) the "non-player-character" (NPC) represents one who ignores perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction), hence being tempted to follow orders instead of being the resistance (life) within the natural order.
b) your want to understand about what others suggest "will" happen, tempts you to ignore each ones free "will" of choice within perceivable.
c) perceivable happens (inception towards death aka momentum aka balance); perceiving shapes self within what happens (life aka choice)...unless ignored for the suggestions by others.
d) the child will be what the child chooses to be...all the suggestions of the parents tempts the child to ignore self discernment as free will of choice.
How could one grow free will of choice by consenting to the suggested choices of others?