a) consenting to artificial (opposition of natural) will kill those within natural. Why? Because it implies ones choice to ignore natural for artificial.
b) intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) implies ones consent to "stand under" the artificial suggestions by others, while ignoring naturally perceivable.
c) suggested "us" (plural) tempts consenting "one" (singular) to ignore self (perceiving within perceivable).
d) if there's an "us", then why are the many struggling to come together? Why do the few represent an "us" while staying apart from the many? Why are the few suggesting the many to consent to US (united states) aka the state of being united?
e) won't aka "will nothing" implies ones free "will" of choice choosing to ignore everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested). If one will, then "won't" becomes impotent.
retard
Suggested retard (to diminish the velocity of motion) tempts one to ignore being resistance (life) within velocity of motion (inception towards death)...living cannot diminish dying, it can only resist it for the growth of resistance, hence prolonging life momentarily.
given ONE answer.
a) there's only ONE solution (inception towards death) for each ONE problem (life) within...wanting suggested answers to suggested questions tempts ONEself to ignore that.
b) what if everything (perceivable) is already given to everyone (perceiving), while each one has the free will of choice to ignore it for the suggestions of other ones?
a) consenting to artificial (opposition of natural) will kill those within natural. Why? Because it implies ones choice to ignore natural for artificial.
b) intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) implies ones consent to "stand under" the artificial suggestions by others, while ignoring naturally perceivable.
c) suggested "us" (plural) tempts consenting "one" (singular) to ignore self (perceiving within perceivable).
d) if there's an "us", then why are the many struggling to come together? Why do the few represent an "us" while staying apart from the many? Why are the few suggesting the many to consent to US (united states) aka the state of being united?
e) won't aka "will nothing" implies ones free "will" of choice choosing to ignore everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested). If one will, then "won't" becomes impotent.
Suggested retard (to diminish the velocity of motion) tempts one to ignore being resistance (life) within velocity of motion (inception towards death)...living cannot diminish dying, it can only resist it for the growth of resistance, hence prolonging life momentarily.
a) there's only ONE solution (inception towards death) for each ONE problem (life) within...wanting suggested answers to suggested questions tempts ONEself to ignore that.
b) what if everything (perceivable) is already given to everyone (perceiving), while each one has the free will of choice to ignore it for the suggestions of other ones?