alphabet agency
a) suggested ALPHABET (Greek alphabetos) aka ALPHA (beginning) + BETA (second of) tempts "one" to ignore being in-between ALPHA (beginning) + OMEGA (end).
b) "alphabet" (row of letters) as suggested progressivism represents "row, row, row your boat (life) gently down the stream (inception towards death)...life is but a dream".
c) "alphabet" aka ABECEDARIUM (primer, alphabet table) aka ABRACADARBRA
a system of power
Suggested Information.
fueled by you
Ones willing consent to the suggested information by others.
I don't think buddhists are pedos in mass.
a) an -IST (buddhist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ISM (buddhism)...that represents each one of the many willingly submitting to the suggesting few. Submission implies ones choice to ignore resisting, which in return tempts others to exploit lack of resistance.
b) mass submission gives power of consent to rebellious behavior of the few, who in return rebel against the submissive many.
c) submissiveness; lack of resistance and shirking of response-ability (free will of choice) represents adulthood guilt, which in return tempts others to abuse childhood innocence. The few are being pushed by guilt and hence drawn to innocence...
d) you thinking through the lens of reason (do vs don't) represents that guilt of conflicting thoughts about suggested information, while ignoring to think in response to perceivable inspiration. Others tempts one into these conflicts of reason, and the more one consents to mental conflicts leading towards physical consequences...the less protected children are.
What will be used next
Your want for suggested outcomes (progressivism), while ignoring perceivable origin, will keep tempting you to want more, while diminishing your resistance (living) within origin (process of dying).
In short...suggested "next" (outcome of motion) tempts one to ignore perceivable "now" (momentum of motion).
Is there any religion or government that has not been completely compromised?
a) RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew)...those who consent to what others are suggesting are willingly binding themselves to the choices of others, which implies compromise of ones free will of choice.
Being bound anew implies COMPROMISE, noun - "to give bond; to promise; a mutual contract of two parties in controversy, to refer their differences to the decision of arbitrators"
b) same shit with consenting to suggested information; hence giving those who suggest the power to GOVERN (control) ones MENT (mind/memory) through the suggested information.
c) suggested "complete" (whole) tempts perceiving partial to ignore perceivable whole.
the Buddhists are...
...bound to those suggesting Buddhism.
Anheuser-Busch (AB) operates under the umbrella of InBev aka IN (Interbrew Belgium) + BEV (AmBev aka American Beverage Brazil)...both Rothschild/Lazard operations.
What happens when we have our elders explain their concept of reality to us
In short...each one of the young has to discern for self between perceivable reality and the suggested explanations by others about reality.
Fundamentally...EX (expressed growth aka living) PLAIN (open loss aka process of dying). Expressed growth by others doesn't represent ones own expressed growth within impressing loss. Agreeing/disagreeing with others or following them ignores expressed growth.
Etymological...CONCEPT (Latin concipere) - "to take and hold onto" tempts one to ignore that being (life) within motion (inception towards death) simultaneously tempts one to hold onto (want); while teaching one to let go (need)...a discernible choice within a balance (need/want).
Example...try holding onto an apple and notice that the natural order dissolves its form. If others suggest you an apple; then they are tempting you to want to take and hold onto it, yet resisting that temptation will allow you to comprehend the perceivable need underneath the suggested want...hunger. Just as the apple rots away within motion, so does your resistance within hunger rots away.
process of keeping faith within integrity
Integer (inception towards death) sets fraction (life) apart...other fractions tempt one to consent (faith) to hold together (keep).
magnetism
a) suggested magnetism tempts one to ignore flow (electric) to momentum (magnetic) to form (electromagnetic).
b) perceivable inspiration represents electric flow; suggested information represents magnetic form...the former requires adaptation by resisting (need), while the latter tempts (want) accumulation. The more one accumulates magnetic information within ones mind/memory, the more one will be burdened by it (repression); hence curtailing adaptation (expression).
NonCompliance. Don't feed them
a) ones consent to suggested "non" and "don't" feeds those suggesting it.
b) COMPLY , verb - "to carry into effect"...cause (inception towards death) carries effect (life). One represents COMPLIANT, adjective - "yielding to request or desire", hence being tempted by it.
DEBATE, noun - "contention in words" aka reasoning over suggested information, while ignoring perceivable inspiration.
The age of reason ( https://img.gvid.tv/i/4Z7mrPe7.jpg ) isn't over; only crumbling...
Frequency of incantation... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FX6rml2Yjs
private code
PRIVATE (separate) CODE (collection)...a contradiction. Nature (perceivable whole) sets itself apart (perceiving partials)...
Others tempts one to collect the separate parts back together aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka equality (same) through diversity (difference) aka united states; united nations; european union; uniformity; universal basic income; mass migration; the melting pot etc.
argot
ARGOT (French; group of beggars)...sleight of hand: BEGGARS (wanting suggested words) can't be CHOOSERS (need to adapt by free will of choice to perceivable sound).
really understood
To understand represents ones consent to "stand under" suggested (fiction), while ignoring to grow comprehension within perceivable (reality).
In short...one cannot "really understand", because understanding tempts one to ignore reality.
a) CENSOR, noun - "an officer whose business was to register the effects of the citizens"...ones consent to the suggestions of others represents registering ones effects, hence willingly giving others the mandate of censor and to CENSURE, noun - "blaming or finding fault and condemning as wrong; applicable to the moral conduct".
b) a SHIP, noun (Latin scapha; from the root of shape.) represents the effect (life) of motion (inception towards death). Effect can be tempted to ignore cause when consenting to register effects to censure.
c) life cannot evade the process of dying, only grow resistance by resisting temptations...others can suggest one to spend resistance while trying to evade suggestions.
d) the few suggest words (language; speech; lingo) to tempt the many to SUB'TERFUGE, noun (Latin subter and fugio, to flee.) response-ability (free will of choice) within perceivable sound.
e) suggested AL'GORITHM, noun - "numerical computation" tempts one to ignore perceivable NUM'BER, noun - "designation of a unit (Latin unus; one)" + COMPUTE, verb - "to think; count".
One (perceiving) thinks within oneness (perceivable)...other ones suggest one to count (collecting units). Nature sets units (ones) apart from one another...others suggest one to put them back together.
Example..suggested "two" tempts perceiving "one" to ignore each perceivable "one" of the suggested "two"...without discernible differentiation; one couldn't count other ones. Labeling ones as "two" is where the magic happens...
harry dent
HARRY; from Old English hergian "make war, lay waste, ravage, plunder" + DENT - "indentation; stroke; strike; blow"
expects
"Don‘t be surprised by what you hear...Things aren't always as they appear"
"The unexpected is nothing to fear...The truth is always clear"
"When you least expect it, expect the unexpected"
- AN'IMAL, noun [Latin anima, air, breath, soul.] + HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.]
a) form (life) within flow (inception towards death)
b) animated SPECIES (beings derived from one common parentage by natural generation).
Look at that link
My consent would chain me to that suggestion, while tempting me to ignore that everything within nature is apart from one another.
They're completely Nato inclusive.
Inclusive implies being within, so how could anything within be "complete"?
special forces
- SPECIAL, noun - "a particular"
- FORCE, noun - "momentum; the quantity of power produced by motion"
How does partial (special) get into momentum (force)?
It's the worldview of the master, not the slave
Aka viewing (perceiving) the world (perceivable) or viewing it through distortion (suggestions).
It's not "a 200 year era", it's "a 200 year period between minor resets, or mud floods"
a) each one represents RE (response to) SET (being set into aka put into order) and one can only exist in-between, hence as center (reaction) within surrounding (action).
b) life represents the circuit (period) in-between inception/death.
c) it is vs it is not tempts one to ignore that everything "was" (perceivable) before one can suggest another what it "is" or "isn't". For one being tempted...nothing (suggested) can exist within everything (perceivable).
Does way (inception towards death) need to be measured (Latin metricus: metrical) by ones (life) within? If so; then why would "one" way need to be measured by "ones" within?
It's called being retarded.
- RET'ARD, verb [Latin retardo; re and tardo, to delay, tardus, slow, late.] - "to diminish the velocity of motion"
a) how could one (life) diminish the velocity of motion (inception towards death)?
b) what if whole (inception towards death) calls each partial (life) into duty (resistance aka ones natural obligation)?
Consider this...being (life) implies within FLAT (inception towards death), while reasoning (yes vs no) tempts one into circular ROUND arguing.
misinformation for a narrative
- NARRATE, verb - "to relate the particulars of any event or transaction" or "to write, as the particulars of a story or history"
What if nature relates (produces) each partial (life) by dividing whole (inception towards death)? What if this internal division of whole (loss) into partials (growth) represents an ongoing transaction aka the transmutation of action into reaction?
What if the suggested narratives (information) of others tempt one to ignore perceivable narration (inspiration)?
What if one represents IN (within) FORM (formed by) -ATION (through action), which implies IN (within) SPIRIT (spiro; to breathe) -ATION (through action).
What if form (life) has to adapt (spirit) to flow (inception towards death) to sustain self...and what if other form can tempt one to ignore that?
to cause a reaction
Does the suggested information by others "cause" ones reaction? If one chooses to ignore the suggested information by others, then did one ignore "cause"?
If ones free will of choice represents effect (reaction); then what represents cause?
Maybe it makes for gamers
GAME, noun - "in antiquity, games were public diversions or contests exhibited as spectacles for the gratification of the people"...what if privately suggested information represents the public diversion and reasoning among the public about it represents the contest?
an effort to win an argument
a) what if arguing (reasoning against others) represents wasted effort (resistance vs resistance) for ones resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death)?
b) winning vs losing...the conflict remains no matter which side one chooses.
c) look at the majority of humanity and tell me what they ever "won" through reasoning?
shared on closed
a) what if ones consent to a closed environment (internet) shapes it wide open for those suggesting it?
b) consenting to suggested online tempts one to behave inline aka consenting to suggested progressivism tempts one to follow directions of others.
Meanwhile in reality...being (life) inline (inception towards death) implies resistance within direction.
leaked documents
DOCU (direction) MENT (mind; memory)...what if ones consent allows the suggestions of others to leak into ones mind/memory for misdirection?
a) 21,000 + 2.4 (9) 38 (11) - 9/11 encoding.
b) PM aka PRIME (first) MINISTER (servant under authority of another)...a contradiction for those with eyes to see.
a) asymmetry (life) can only exist within symmetry (inception towards death).
b) suggested information (asymmetrical) can only exist within perceivable inspiration (symmetrical).
if you want to understand my cynicism
a) want implies reasoning against not want, while ignoring need.
b) standing under (understanding) suggested implies ignoring to grow ones comprehension within perceivable (knowledge).
c) suggested cynicism (distrust) tempts one to ignore perceivable CYNIC (Greek; canine, a dog); which implies trustworthy.
d) using implication (if/then) upon reason (want vs not want) represents the inversion of reason (imbalance) existing within implication (balance).
a) Trump and Biden are the ones representing suggested Trumpism and Bidenism aka playing the idols for the narrative charade upon the wall.
b) the wall represents those who consent to Trumpism and Bidenism ignoring those who play Trump and Biden.
c) the powers that be (tptb) represent those suggesting the cave; while gaining ownership over it as long as others consent to remain within it.
d) tptb suggest those who watch the wall that those who choose to not watch the wall represent traitors to the message.
Only perceivable nature represents TRA'ITOR, noun [Latin traditor; trado, to deliver.] hence delivering every scenario playing within; no matter which role those within choose to play.
e) consider the allegory from the perspective of oneself...suggested fiction (trump + biden by the powers that be) tempting one to remain within the cave of ignorance, while ignoring perceivable reality outside the self imposed cave of ignorance.
What if choosing want (suggested) over need (perceivable) tempts one to view need as traitorous to want, hence the need to let go feeling like self betrayal to the want to hold onto?
f) suggested Platoism tempts one to ignore perceivable PLATONIC (unmixed with carnal desires) aka being different (living) tempted by sameness (process of dying)...spirit implies resisting being moved; carnal implies wanting to hold onto the flesh while being moved.
Finally an opportunity to get rid of all the unused toilet-paper...