a) an -IST (buddhist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ISM (buddhism)...that represents each one of the many willingly submitting to the suggesting few. Submission implies ones choice to ignore resisting, which in return tempts others to exploit lack of resistance.
b) mass submission gives power of consent to rebellious behavior of the few, who in return rebel against the submissive many.
c) submissiveness; lack of resistance and shirking of response-ability (free will of choice) represents adulthood guilt, which in return tempts others to abuse childhood innocence. The few are being pushed by guilt and hence drawn to innocence...
d) you thinking through the lens of reason (do vs don't) represents that guilt of conflicting thoughts about suggested information, while ignoring to think in response to perceivable inspiration. Others tempts one into these conflicts of reason, and the more one consents to mental conflicts leading towards physical consequences...the less protected children are.
What will be used next
Your want for suggested outcomes (progressivism), while ignoring perceivable origin, will keep tempting you to want more, while diminishing your resistance (living) within origin (process of dying).
In short...suggested "next" (outcome of motion) tempts one to ignore perceivable "now" (momentum of motion).
a) an -IST (buddhist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ISM (buddhism)...that represents each one of the many willingly submitting to the suggesting few. Submission implies ones choice to ignore resisting, which in return tempts others to exploit lack of resistance.
b) mass submission gives power of consent to rebellious behavior of the few, who in return rebel against the submissive many.
c) submissiveness; lack of resistance and shirking of response-ability (free will of choice) represents adulthood guilt, which in return tempts others to abuse childhood innocence. The few are being pushed by guilt and hence drawn to innocence...
d) you thinking through the lens of reason (do vs don't) represents that guilt of conflicting thoughts about suggested information, while ignoring to think in response to perceivable inspiration. Others tempts one into these conflicts of reason, and the more one consents to mental conflicts leading towards physical consequences...the less protected children are.
Your want for suggested outcomes (progressivism), while ignoring perceivable origin, will keep tempting you to want more, while diminishing your resistance (living) within origin (process of dying).
In short...suggested "next" (outcome of motion) tempts one to ignore perceivable "now" (momentum of motion).