Investigative journalists found a new clue
a) an -IST (journalist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ISM (journalism), hence ones willing submission to another. Following a track (to investigate) for suggested clues implies being directed by others, while submitting to follow.
b) suggested journalism (accounting of daily events) tempts one to ignore perceivable journey (life being moved from inception toward death)...a journey one needs to resist the temptation of.
the tracks lead to Ukraine
Suggested UKRAINA (border; frontier) tempts one to ignore being center (perceiving) of surrounding (perceivable).
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see... https://genius.com/Johnny-vancouver-no-guts-no-glory-lyrics
substantive progress in fixing the world
a) essence implies motion (inception towards death); substance implies resistance (life).
b) others suggest progressivism (towards outcomes) to tempt one to ignore resisting being progressed (perceivable origin).
c) natural order (flow-state) doesn't require fixing (establish immovably); each temporary chaos within needs to struggle to sustain self (life) within order (inception towards death).
Others suggest one to seek "order out of chaos" as the inversion of being chaos (temporary growth) within order (ongoing loss).
a helluva lot longer than I ever thought
a) thinking implies within momentum aka within perceivable moment. Being represents a temporary state (choice) within a momentary foundation (balance) of an ongoing system (motion; work; energy).
b) others suggest one to reason short vs long, while ignoring ones moment(um) of existence.
c) one can only exist "now"...others suggest "before" and "after" as the inversion thereof. Now represents center; before/after represents surrounding...one can only exist at the center (choice; life; growth; perceiving) of surrounding (balance; dying; loss; perceivable)...center represents resistance (need) within surrounding temptation (want).
What is drawn child porn?
Suggested temptation "drawing" in.
Porn isn't for children.
a) suggested is (want) vs isn't (not want) tempts one to ignore what was perceivable (need) before suggestions can be made about what it is or isn't.
b) before suggested temptation (porn) exists ones responsibility to resist perceivable temptation (lust).
c) is porn for adults or does it destroy adults; which in return destroys children? How does an adult protect children from temptation by simultaneously subjecting oneself to it?
d) PORN aka pornē (bought; purchased) from -per (to traffic in; to sell)...ones consent to the suggestions of others implies buying/purchasing by consent, that which is trafficked/sold by others...both adults and children represent free will of choice to transact like that.
If one watches porn, then one consents to purchase others, who were trafficked to supply ones lust.
a sexual act
ACTION (inception towards death) to SEX (division of male/female) to REACTION (life)...intercourse among reactions doesn't represent a sexual action; yet others suggest the brand "sexual act" to distract one from reacting.
Ones reaction (choice) implies being sexually enacted (balance) upon within motion.
There's huge differences
Sameness implies huge (perceivable whole); difference implies small (each perceiving partial).
There are artworks
Nature (born; produced) Implies energy (work)...others suggest artificial to tempt one to ignore naturally perceivable. Artificial can only be shaped within; out of and in response to natural, yet oneself represents the free will of choice to ignore either side.
costing multimillions
a) nature sets evaluation (perceivable partials) into value (perceivable whole)...others suggested prices to tempt one to ignore that.
b) nature divides itself from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving)...others suggested CO- (together; with) to tempt one to ignore apartheid.
c) to be implies temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death)...others suggest -STA (to stand, make or be firm), which tempts one to ignore perceivable flow-state.
d) others suggest MULTI- (many) to tempt ONE (singular partial within whole) to ignore self...multiculturalism; multitude; multiplex; multi-millionair etc.
Ask yourself if a multitude of energy can exist or if energy (internal/inherent power) implies all in one?
- Mila Antonova aka MILA (mi-lady) ANTON; ANTHONY; ANTH (flower) NOVA (new)
When pedos write the narratives...Virgina Roberts (virgin robber); James Alefantis (J'aime les enfants aka I love children); Fat Man and Little Boy and now "mi-lady new flower".
to remove...from the MSM.
a) perceivable represents the mainstream for each perceiving one within.
b) the suggestions by others represents ME'DIATE, adjective [Latin medius, middle.] - "being between extremes".
c) if perceiving (center) ignores perceivable (surrounding) for suggested (middle); then one was tempted by another to ignore ones position.
d) as for removing...one represents RE (response) within MOVE (motion).
From the jewish perspective...suggesting fictitious metaphors desiccates reality for those who consent to it. In other words...flow-state of perceivable reality (inspiration) can be dried into suggested fiction (information). Those who hold onto information are tempted to ignore ongoing inspiration.
tl; dr...suggestion represents media; perceivable represent main stream...consent to the former tempts one to ignore latter.
who is more powerful, the King or the kingmaker?
Kings (life) exist within kingmaker (inception toward death) aka monarchs aka MONO (one) ARCH (partial growth within whole loss).
Kings among themselves seeking power over each other are ignoring POW'ER, noun - "exerting force" aka thrusting force aka life being thrust from inception towards death. Ignorance makes pawns out of kings...
be taken away
Way gives (inception) and takes (death) being (life).
first point
Viewed (perceivable) existed before ones view-point (perceiving)...
second point
a) suggested counting tempts perceiving one to ignore being one-self.
b) others suggest SEC'OND, adjective [Latin sequor, to follow; to seek.] to tempt one to ignore that origin (inception towards death) needs to be (life) resisted. One doesn't need to seek reality (perceivable); one needs to resist wanted fiction (suggested), which others tempt one to seek.
fall into one of these categories
Ones consent to the suggestions of others tempts one to think CATEGORY, noun - "in logic, a series or order of all the predicates or attributes contained under a genus; distributed all the objects of our thoughts and ideas into genera"...within reality...whole genus (inception towards death) sets itself apart (life).
The opposite of category (suggested) represents whole (perceivable); which one ignores when categorizing, hence others suggesting endless categories to tempt one to ignore this.
Do we even need more evidence?
That which is evident; open to be seen; manifested for perception implies always more than one within be aware of, hence allowing ones growth of self discernment among perceivable differences (inspiration).
running things
a) can partial (life) run faster than whole (inception towards death)?
b) if outcome of life implies death; then what are things running towards or away from?
from "a" White House...
Which one? The symbolical one; the ancient one; the studio ones or the sacrificial one?
a) ongoing flow (inception towards death) forms temporary units (life)...others invert this by tempting ones to group together with other ones.
b) others suggest "without" to tempt one to ignore being (life) within (inception towards death).
c) one (singular) cannot be group (plural)....others suggest "group" to gain control over suggested "group" through ones consent to submit to it.
d) FED'ERAL, (Heb. to pledge.] + INTEL'LIGENCE, noun [Latin intelligo, to understand] ...standing under pledges ones consent to submit to another.
e) suggested questions tempts one to want suggested answers, which not only tempts one into a conflict of reason (wanting vs not wanting suggested question and answers); but tempts one to ignore the need to resist (life) perceivable solution (inception towards death).
Being alive implies struggling to remain firm (form) while being dissolved (flow)...that represents the solution for every problem.
Comptroller Of Currency
a) current (inception towards death) doesn't count/comptroll; it divides (sex) to distinct (male/female) units (each ones trans-formed life).
b) if one consents to suggested counting, then those suggesting become accountants over units of suggested currency.
c) perceivable current (inception towards death) needs to be resisted (life); while suggested currency tempts everyone to follow.
quantum initiative
a) QUANTUM (amount) INITIATE (to enter) aka ones consent to enter suggested amounts by counting.
b) the amount of perceivable reality implies ONE aka whole oneness (perceivable) and each partial one within (perceiving) for all represents one in energy.
finance
- FINANCE, FINE - "very small diameter"
- DIAMETER, noun [Gr., measure through.] - "line passing through center of a curvilinear figure, terminated by circumference" aka a line (inception towards death) passing through center (life) of a curvelinear (growth within loss) figure (shape; form; person), terminated by circumference (living center terminated by surrounding process of dying).
Ones consent to suggested finance gives others the power to con-fine ones diameter; hence restricting ones growth with artificial loss (currency); within a circle (ouroboros); within an artificial circuit (choice to choice); while ignoring natural current (balance to choice).
If one consents to anything another one suggests; then one puts on the "ring that binds" aka the power of the few, which keeps the many ignorant; which keeps one blind (suggested information) to ones surrounding (perceivable inspiration).
From the energy perspective...resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) can be short-circuited with other resistance aka others can tempt ones resistance to be spend on their resistance instead of within velocity.
Freedom. Liberty. Self rule. Representative Republic.
a) free (choice) can only exist within dominance (balance)
b) suggested liberalism (liberty) tempts one to ignore being "free" will of choice.
c) RULE (straighten)...straight (inception towards death) generates curve (life aka growth within loss).
d) suggested representation tempts one to ignore to RE (respond to) PRESENT (presented by) perceivable.
incompatible with these concepts
a) CONCEPT; noun (Latin concipere) - "to take in and hold"...one exits within and needs to let go, while resisting want to hold onto. Suggesting a concept tempts others to consent to hold onto it.
b) a concept aka general notion implies generated NO'TION, noun [Latin known; to know.] aka perceivable knowledge; not suggested understanding.
incapable of successfully ruling themselves so how can they possibly understand
Understanding implies ones consent to "stand under" others; hence being ruled, while shirking response-ability (free will of choice) onto others.
participate in a government
A partial mind (ment) needs to resist being controlled (govern) by others, hence resisting being collectivized. Consenting to representative government represents suggested collectivism.
Do you think the drug addicts, the fatties, the lazy, the criminal should be able....
Being implies enabled by origin. Judging others tempts one to ignore adapting to origin by oneself. It's that ignorance which shapes others into drug addicts; fatties; lazy and criminals....for those represent the consequences of ignorance and only oneself can ignore. Others cannot ignore for oneself.
slavery it shall be....just like most humans want.
Ignoring perceivable need for suggested want...binds one to those suggesting; hence ones consent to be a slave enables one who suggests to be master. Consent by choice to suggested choices of others represents submission.
Humanity is trash
a) center expressing self cleans up surrounding...viewing surrounding as trash represses expression of center.
b) nature doesn't produce TRASH, noun - "worthless matter"...it uses immaterial value (inception towards death) to generate material evaluation thereof (life).
Being evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable) can only be discerned by oneself...not given by others.
this shit pile for eternity
a) eternity (process of dying) generates perishable (living) by setting itself apart from whole into each partial.
b) partial ones are being tempted to pile up aka to merge together, while ignoring the need to struggle as apartheid within wholeness.
They all belong together.
a) suggested "belong" tempts one to ignore being short (life) within long (inception towards death)
b) suggested "together" tempts one to ignore being alive (growth) within the process of dying (loss), hence not towards getting (together) but within while losing.
if you knew growth in the US (and World) was headed into permanent decline...
Growth (life) can only exist temporarily within ongoing loss (inception towards death)...ones rise (need) and decline (want) is based on resisting ongoing loss, hence growing resistance withing temptation.
fixed income investments...at these current
Current implies ongoing flow-state....others suggest "fix" to tempt one to hold onto instead of resisting.
Ones mind is tempted by others to invest in suggested outcomes; while ignoring to adapt to perceivable origin (ongoing income).
creditworthiness
Ones consent to the suggested values by others represent ones creed (trust; faith; belief), which gives others control over all suggested values.
0.) consenting to chain oneself to a block within a crypt aims at zero life expectancy...
Do governments want to regulate it? RUN
Being alive implies being run from inception towards death; hence in need to resist perceivable temptations...consenting to the suggestions of others tempts ones mind (ment) to be controlled (govern) by others.
group that lives in the ocean
a) OCEAN, noun (Latin oceanus; Gr.; Heb. to encompass, whence a circle)...those within the ocean are encompassed by the ouroboros circle.
b) if one ignores self (perceiving within perceivable) for others (suggested), then one ignores being center (partial) within surrounding (whole) aka COMPASS, noun - "stretch; reach; extent" aka temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
c) as for group...suggested "we" (plural) tempts perceiving one (singular) to ignore self for others.
One cannot be a group...one can ignore being a partial within whole, while pretending to be a part of a group, while others herd these groups like cattle.
a) repeat aka RE (response to) PETO (drive towards)...life represents the response to being driven from inception towards death. Others tempt one to repeat suggested, which ignores resisting perceivable.
Suggestion aims at outcomes; perceivable represents origin...
b) HE-BREW HIS-STORY...jew fell for it.
believe in this fact
Aka ones consent (believe) to the suggestion (fac-ism) of another one...always a choice.
...losing to Universal
E pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka united states; united nations; european union; university; universal basic income; uniformity aka abrahamism (father of multitude) etc.
The trick...one-self gets lost when merging with others, hence MERGE, verb - "to be sunk, swallowed or lost". Why's that an issue? Because nature sets each ONE within apart from ONE another, hence ones struggle to sustain apartheid (life) within wholeness (inception towards death).
In short...the few control the many because each one of the many willingly consents to be merged into suggested collectives.
only stock matter
Matter (life) within immaterial (inception towards death) represents ones life-stock aka the temporary firm part of the ongoing whole. Form within flow implies a STOCK (life) EX (expression) CHANGE (being moved by).
sales
If supply (suggested) meets demand (consent), then buying burdens oneself with a sales-tax, collected by those selling aka the happy merchants of temptation.
a) trusting another ignores self.
b) SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] aka perceivable (inception towards death) requires resistance from those perceiving it (life)...not trust.
Example...eating and drinking represents ones resistance within perceivable hunger and thirst. Any form of trust tempts one to ignore that.
c) ones consent to the suggestions of others gives others the power to utilize ones consent (trust) as the foundation (fund) for their suggestions.
Owen Benjamin hit one out of the park with: "whenever you watch a movie...a jew is taking a dumb on your soul"
a) nature implies constant change (motion)...those within suggest the cessation of motion (stop) to exploit each other.
b) consent of the many to suggested laws and truths gives the few the power of crimes and lies.
c) the few suggest "win" to tempt the many to ignore being growth (life) within loss (inception towards death).
d) as long as perceivable oneness is being ignored, so long will there be a suggesting few (supply) and a consenting many (demand). Nature sustains each temporary imbalance within ongoing balance...it's on each one within to choose needed balance (perceivable) or wanted imbalance (suggested).
a) love (want) vs hate (not want) represents your consent to suggested juda-ism...either side tempts you to ignore need (perceivable) for want (suggested).
b) like vs dislike represents a rebranding (suggested revision-ism) of want vs not want.
c) the conflict between want vs not want is called "reason" and the so called jews control both sides of every conflict of reason, hence utilizing "talmudic reasoning" to contradict both sides.
d) PERMIS'SIVE, adjective - "granting liberty"...nature grands LIBER (free) aka free will of choice to each one within. Suggested allowance vs prohibition tempts one to ignore that.
tl; dr...your hate of what others suggest fuels the suggested, just like your love would. Both sides fight each other, while ignoring who made the suggestion and who consented to it.
Ones consent to a suggested -ISM (antisemitism) gives the one suggesting the power of ones consent to ENTER and TAME ones MENT (mind/memory).
In retrospective
One exists within specere (observable aka perceivable)...others tempt one to hold onto suggested, hence thinking backwards (retrograde). Choosing to let go of "retro" allows one to operate with-"in spective".
in a sense "true"
Does one sense true (want) or false (not want) or does one choose to judge something as true or false? How does perceivable nature communicate if something is true or false? Where does nature suggest what anything "is"?
all-knowing
All (whole) represents knowledge (perceivable)...each one (partial) within represents perceiving choice at the ledge (balance) of knowing.
choose light or darkness
Comprehension (light) or ignorance (dark) of perceivable. Adapting to perceivable grows ones comprehension thereof; while ignoring it for suggested keeps one "in the dark" of perceivable, hence ignorance representing bliss.
100%
a) PER-CENTUM (by the hundred)...putting "100" before "by the hundred" negates itself, hence showcasing ones ignorance to others.
b) nature differentiates itself from whole into each partial UNIT (Latin unitas; unus; one)...others suggest one to count (two; three; four etc.). If one counts other ones, then one ignores self.
Counting represents the foundation of numerology, hence giving the few the power to designate units, to enumerate; to become the accountants; to play others by the numbers etc.
the ability to choose good or evil
Choosing good (wanting suggested) or evil (not wanting suggested) tempts one to ignore perceivable change aka the change (inception towards death) which enables oneself (life).
Choice implies adaptation within the center of balance (momentum of motion). Only within balance can there be choice, and only within motion can there be balance (momentum).
no consequences
If the center (choice) looks at ones surrounding (balance) and sees imbalance, then that represents the consequences of ones response-ability (free will of choice) within a balance based system.
Judging others for their choices tempts one to ignore choosing in response to balance, hence others tempting one to imbalance self, which they deliberately exploit through suggestions.
fate after death
FATE, noun [Latin fatum, fatus, fari, to speak]...the process of dying represents ongoing sound; those living within represent temporary choice to shape suggestible words out of perceivable sound, hence to speak.
- John 8:44: "When he lies, he speaks..."
- Leviticus 19:11: "You shall not steal; you shall not deal falsely; you shall not lie to one another."...suggestion "steals" from perceivable; consenting to suggested represents the deal of religion (Latin religio; to bind anew); consenting to want or not want suggested tempts one to reason (want vs not want) against others, hence being in conflict among one another.
Death is non-being
a) only within the ongoing process of dying (whole) can there exits temporary living (partials).
b) suggesting what "is" tempts one to ignore that everything perceivable "was" before the suggestion could be shaped within it; in response to it; about it.
c) suggested "non" (nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable "everything".
the opposite of
"of" implies out of, hence being within...only within balance (need/want) can choice exits in-between opposites. Ignoring need (perceivable) for want (suggested) tempts one into imbalance (want vs not want)...that's where others injected the suggested "nothing".
change the order
Natural order (inception towards death) implies change for each one within (life).
a different perspective
a) ones perspective implies different from any other one, hence ONEs perspective...
b) whole (perceivable) differentiates itself into each partial (perceiving). Differentiation implies SEX, noun [Latin seco, to divide.]
"Leaders" and followers, both jerks
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...leaders (by suggestion) tempt followers (by consent) to be jerked from ones position as resistance within temptation.
a) being implies core (life) within surface (inception towards death)
b) core (living) cannot survive surface (process of dying)...others suggest survivalism to tempt one to seek means to survive from others like healthcare or insurance.
"Being like water" tempts one to ignore being (choice) within momentum (balance) of motion...Y BRUCE LIE?