Perceivable symmetry underneath suggested symbolism...
new meanings for some well-established term
TERM, noun [Latin terminus, a limit or boundary.]...what if ones choice to shape "new meanings" can only exist within the boundary of balance?
What if a sentence (life) can only exist within term (inception towards death)?
It depends on what you mean by...
a) what existed first...suggested meaning or perceivable meaning?
b) if being able to perceive implies by means of perceivable, then perceiving depends on perceivable...not on suggested.
c) can temporary (life) define meaning for ongoing (inception towards death)...while being within?
to some, this is...to others, it's not.
a) what comes first...suggesting others what is; or being able to perceive what was perceivable?
b) "it's not" aka "it is nothing"...what is nothing? where is nothing? why is nothing? when is nothing? who suggested you that nothing is?
c) is or isn't implies a conflict of reason (is vs isn't)...can one get into such a conflict without consenting by choosing a side?
Reason aka logic aka logos aka suggested words...does nature utter sound in the shape of words or do those within perceivable sound shape suggestible words to each other?
As opposed to now
a) are suggested "before" and "after" in opposition to perceivable "now"?
b) can one be outside of "now"?
c) -tion implies action...what represents opposite of action and where does it exist in relation to action?
why...believing ...from the exact same sources?
Those who believe ignore same source (perceivable) for different sources (suggested), hence flip-flopping from one suggestion to another.
Consider this...why go back to liars? Because why bite the hand that feeds truths? Notice that both believers and disbelievers of COVID-19 have consented to COVID-19 as suggested by the same source...this is how those suggesting control both sides of those consenting.
there is no
a) who suggested you that "no" exists; and why did you consent to use it?
b) if "there" (a perceivable location); then does one need to suggest others what it? If location existed before locals within, then why would the locals suggest each other about the location instead of adapting to origin?
Location (inception towards death aka momentum aka balance in motion) exists before locals (life aka being within moment aka choice within balance)...
AI...advanced
Natural advances everything within; artificial tempts those within to ignore natural.
going too far
Death implies going too far; while alive...everything goes.
more advanced than before
INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand)...if one consents to "stand-under" artificial suggestions, then artificial keeps burdening oneself, hence piling upon those willingly standing under others.
I other words...the more one utilizes artificial; the faster natural flushes one down the drain.
- UNI'TED - "joined; made to agree; cemented; mixed; attached by growth"
- U'NION - "joining two or more things into one, and thus forming a compound body or a mixture"
a) being implies divided (life) within loss (inception towards death)...others suggest "attached by growth" as the inversion.
b) being one implies being apart from one another...others suggest "joining together" as the inversion thereof.
c) suggested "two become one" tempts one to ignore coming to be.
d) life being moved from inception towards death represents the opposite of being "cemented in place"...masons utilize ones ignorance as bricks and ones willing consent as mortar to cement ones mind/memory in place, hence building suggested walls within the minds of those who ignore perceivable.
This btw represents the wailing wall; hence the few lamenting the ignorance of the many; while simultaneously fertilizing it with more suggested temptations. Why? Because mass ignorance keeps parasitic few protected...fortified behind the walls of ignorance.
e) both united and union imply (Latin unitas; unio, unus) - "one" aka apartheid, while suggested us (united states) represents togetherness. One doesn't exist "towards getting" but as growth (life) within loss (inception towards death).
- CAPTIVE, noun - "one whose affections are seized by others"
Ones consent to the suggestions of others gives others the power of ones consent to seize ones affections (desires). If one chooses suggested (want or not want); then one ignores perceivable (need)...want over need represents the temptation to ignore need for want.
Free will of choice puts itself into captivity if consenting to the suggested choices by others, because consent binds one to suggested aka RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew)...
abraham licoln
a) ABH RAHAM (father of multitude;) represents e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka united states; united nations; european union; university ,uniformity; unicode etc.
b) LIN (linked together) COL (collected as partials)...COLN (Greek kōlon) - "limb member"...a dig at ones ignored free will of choice.
transformed into an empire
a) "free" will of choice within the "dom" inance of balance implies being a temporary serve (life) within the dominion of ongoing empire (inception towards death)....process of dying dominates living; living serves dying.
b) motion (male) to momentum/balance (female) to trans-form (living choice). It's empire (ongoing) which transforms (temporary) internally/inherently.
The ignorance of the consenting many allows the suggesting few to utilize the ongoing empire of loss to destroy whatever temporary growth is being build, while the many are busy fighting each other over not wanting to lose what they hold onto.
From a different perspective...the few remain sheltered within foundation (natural order); while the many destroy themselves by building the ever collapsing tower of BA'BEL, noun [Heb.] - "confusion; disorder".
"Maybe if we ignore the ongoing natural order harder; then our temporary chaos won't collapse upon us this time?"
bankers divvied
a) a (river) bank contains (current). Those divided (life) by current (inception towards death) can be contained; collectivized; compounded etc. if willingly given TRUST to suggested BANK, hence establishing bank & trust.
b) ones consent to suggested currency tempts one to ignore perceivable current, and thereby ones need to resist current or drown within. Holding onto suggested currency within perceivable current burdens one with exponentially increasing debt. Drowning while holding onto an anchor...
cartel
CARTEL, verb - "to defy"...suggestions by few tempt many to ignore perceivable, hence DEFY; verb - "to renounce one's allegiance; to challenge, provoke, repudiate".
What if suggested words represent a service by others; hence tempting those who consent into servitude?
opt out of everything
OP'TION, noun [Latin optio, from opto, to wish or desire.]...only within everything "needed" can one have the option to "want". Others suggest "opt out" to tempt one to ignore being "option within".
The people didn't sign up for that.
a) suggested THE-ism implies ones consent to submit to the authority of another. Ones consent signs contract with others suggesting.
b) suggested "didn't" (did nothing) represents ones ignorance of being done within everything, which others utilizes as a litmus test to vet ones discernment...a mind believing in nothing discerns "not" much of everything.
blackstone to acquire ancestry for $4.7
a) "Blackstone" in English Gematria equals 612 (9) + 47 (11)...9/11 encoding
b) "Ancestry" in English Gematria equals 630 (three times six)...666 encoding.
ownership of every person
Being PER (by) SONOS (sound) implies owned by; hence ship within...others suggest "ownership" as the inversion thereof, hence tempting one to deny self, which gives others the opportunity to claim everything denied.
Nature doesn't engrave; impress durable (write)...it impresses (inception towards death) temporary (life), while putting each one towards grave.
The written word can't dispel those who consent to the spell-craft of suggested words. The grammar utilized by the many represents the suggested grimoire of the few...animated through the willing incantation of the many as corporations (corpus orations aka voices of the death).
popularized in a game called Call of Duty
a) CALL (ongoing action) generates DUTY (temporary reaction)
b) OF duty implies as suggested reactions to one another aka temptation for oneself to ignore call of perceivable.
c) consenting as person (singular) to suggestions by others; collectivizes self into people (plural) aka a popularizable populace aka pop-culture (cultivating popolo; people).
why would they do such a thing?
The many (populace) consenting to the suggestions (call of duty) by the few; give the few not only the power of the suggested; but also the opportunity to control whoever makes suggestions.
Mass consent to suggested words over perceivable sound was already given, and so now whoever shapes suggestions out of words is operating within a controlled environment.
Yuri Bezmenov can talk about ideological subversion as much as he likes without endangering those subverting. Why? Because LOGIC; LOGOS (words) is being used by both those who subvert and those who try to straighten up subversion. Those willingly under the spell of words can't read words without keep falling for the spell...they lack discernment between perceivable (sound) and suggested (words) which represents each ones free will of choice (need over want or want over need).
completely controlled
Complete (whole process of dying) controls partials (living)....others suggest "complete control" to tempt partial ones to ignore being within perceivable whole.
originally Jewish
Perceivable sound represents origin of suggested words like "jewish". Ones consent to the latter tempts one to ignore former.
people who founded
Foundation of partials implies whole...not each others suggested funding. If a many ignores this, then a chosen few can utilize mass ignorance as the foundation for mass subversion.
Frankfurt School
Aka FORT (fortis; forticfication) of the FRANK (open; ingenuous; free) aka dominance of balance as the fortification for each ones free will of choice...unless ignored.
How can one be distracted from response-ability (free will of choice)? By suggested SCHOOL, noun (Latin schola; Gr. leisure, vacation from business, lucubration at leisure, a place where leisure is enjoyed).
brainwash
WASH (inception towards death aka flow) generates BRAIN (life aka form). Brain needs to resist wash....others suggest brain to ignore resisting; hence getting washed away as flotsam for pirates out to loot.
a) what if words used to describe something represent a dressing tempting one to ignore salad underneath (sound underneath words)?
b) what if oneself represents core (perceiving) within salad (perceivable), while others tempt with dressing (suggested)?
c) SAL' AD (Latin salata; salted)...consider salt (motion) generating oil (momentum) for a temporary core within? What happens if salt + oil are mixed?
off
a) ON (denotes nearness); Off (denotes distance).
b) as center (life) within surrounding (inception towards death)...what denotes nearness and distance from ones perspective?
c) what does nearness and distance imply for energy as a whole?
rotten to the core and it had to have been caused by an overseeing entity.
a) being (entity) able to see (perceiving) implies as the core of everything perceivable.
b) one can only see from in-between over/under (as above; so below)...ignoring this for the suggestions of others shapes one into a follower of overseers.
a) if one consents to suggested "truth" then anyone else becomes an implied "liar" unless also consenting. This represents "blame, reproof, reprehension, reprimand, expression of disapprobation" aka CENSURE aka a judgment that condemns.
b) through this, the few suggesting, gain mass consent to CENSOR - "to register the effects of the citizens, to impose taxes according to the property which each man possessed, and to inspect the manners of the citizens, with power to censure vice and immorality, by inflicting a public mark of ignominy on the offender."
c) ones consent by free will of choice represents an offense; hence willingly ignoring to resist (defense of self) by submitting to others.
d) ongoing temptation (inception towards death) generates temporary resistance (life)...ignoring this tempts others to exploit ones lack of resistance; self defense.
e) OFFEND', verb - "to transgress; to violate; as, to offend (natural) laws; to disturb, annoy, or cause to fall or stumble; to draw to evil, or hinder in obedience; to cause to sin or neglect duty."
Ones consent represents ones hindrance of self in obedience to others...
industrial complex
- IN'DUSTRY, noun [Latin industria.] - "habitual diligence in any employment, steady attention to business"...that implies ones free will of choice for temporary adaptation within an ongoing system.
- COMPLEXED, adjective - "composed of two or more parts or things; composite; not simple; including two or more particulars connected; as a complex being"...being implies partial within whole aka apartheid within wholeness aka ONE-self within ONE-ness.
Ones consent to suggested complexity represents the industrial power others utilize to keep one in ignorance of simplicity aka being ONE.
Suggested counting (complexity) tempts consenting one (simplicity) to perplex self.
actions speak louder than words
a) action generates sound; reaction chooses to speak.
b) those consenting to suggested words ignore hearing perceivable sound...no matter the volume thereof.
jews for...against
Gentiles consenting to suggested sorosism tempts them into conflict of reason (for vs against)...jews thereby gain power of gentile consent to define; redefine and contradict both sides at will; hence....
William A. Jacobson
a) Son of Jacob; a (free) will (of choice) I am.
b) JAC'OBIN - "violent revolutionists; a turbulent demagogue" from DEMAGOGUE [Gr. The populas, and to lead.] - "leader of the people; an orator who pleases the populace and influences them to adhere to him"
radioactive
A suggested distraction from surrounding activity (inception towards death) generating center radius (life) representing perceivable status quo of existence aka growth within loss.
- PEOPLE ...aka suggested collectivism (plural of person).
- OF ...aka "proceeding from", hence being (life) within procession (inception towards death).
- THE ...aka suggested the-ism representing ones submission to authority of others.
- LIE ... aka falsehood, which implies a suggested cover tempting others to ignore covered "truth". Yet; what if cover implies ones ignorance of nature uncovering itself trough motion (communicating perceivable towards each ones perception) ? Labeling motion as truth or lies tempts one to ignore perceivable change.
What happens if one applies change to truth? If being alive represents truth; then applied change (inception towards death) shapes it into a lie, hence eventually not being alive anymore...
Edit: whatever one holds onto as "truth"; others can contradict with "lies" by simply utilizing perceivable change; ignored by those holding onto suggestions.
contradictions of the written and oral Torah
a) suggested words (both written and oral) contradict perceivable sound if consented to.
b) TORAH (instruction; imparting of knowledge; authoritative direction) implies perceivable inspiration...not suggested information.
- flow (inception towards death) represents authoritative direction of form (life).
- whole (ongoing loss) to partial (temporary growth) represents imparting (division of whole into each partial)
- being choice implies within balance (momentum of motion), hence within known (perceivable balance) edge (perceiving choice) aka balancing.
- perceivable whole dividing into perceiving partials implies communicated inspiration (moving differences).
mishnah...gemara
Gemara contains those who fall for suggested information; while mishnah teaches those who adapt to perceivable inspiration how to deal with those within gemara (talmudic reasoning).
Only oneself can grow self discernment about being perceiving partial within perceivable whole, which requires ones free will of choice to resist suggestions by others.
If one consents to suggested words over perceivable sound, then one will be stuck reasoning over suggested, hence giving those suggesting the power of ones consent to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested meaning at will.
If one resists reason (want vs not want; belief vs disbelief; truth vs lies; agree vs disagree etc.) for implication (if/then, hence in accordance with momentum/balance), then mishnah can help one to resist as center, while being surrounded by gemara followers and their temptations.
authoritative or normative parity
a) author (inception towards death) authorizes resistance (life)...others suggest progressivism, hence tempting one to follow orders; norms; rules of behavior etc. instead of being free will of choice resistance within natural order.
b) suggested equality (same) through diversity (difference) represents the inversion of being different (partial temporary growth) within sameness (whole ongoing loss). Parity suggests being equal...being one implies different from every other one, hence partial within whole.
a) HOMO (same) SEX (division) aka sex (life) within homo (inception towards death)
b) DIVORCE aka DIVERT - "turning from direction" aka subversion. Direction (inception towards death) turns into resistance (life)...others suggest one to follow, hence subverting ones position within direction.
c) ongoing (inception towards death) leads to temporary (life).
The many are ignoring this for reasoning against each other over who fucks whom where and why; while the few rebrand narratives (marriage vs divorce; homosexuality vs heterosexuality; culturalism vs multiculturalism; sodomy vs procreation; spouse vs stranger; morality vs degeneracy; make up vs break up; faggots vs bigots etc.
All suggested distractions from being perceiving eye (life) of perceivable storm (inception towards death), hence in need to sustain center by resisting temptation of surrounding.
now exploit
Perceivable now (reality) can be exploited with suggested before and after (fiction); yet only if oneself chooses to ignore perceivable for suggested first.
to get people to catch on to the reality...there seems to be an open checkbook to pay for this
a) the many willingly ignoring perceivable reality for suggested fiction...gives the few the power of mass consent to define reality through fiction.
b) CHECK, verb - "to stop; to restrain; to hinder; to curb"...ignorance keeps the many in check; the suggestions of the few for which the many ignore perceivable, "binds" aka spell-bounds them to the few, who in return become the accountants aka "bookies" (bookkeeper).
we are all being turned into metal saturated antennas
Signal (perceivable) towards antennas (perceiving)...anything suggested jams consenting antennas from comprehending perceivable signal.
It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words"
a) motion generates (inception) and destroys (life) those living within.
b) ongoing sound destroys temporary words held onto...
c) the construction of suggestible words represents ones veil of ignorance over perceivable sound.
4 levels to this particular
a) particular implies each ONE part of whole ONEness. Others suggest counting to tempt ONE from discerning to be.
b) by choosing to count to four one ignores level (balance) aka balancing as choice within the momentum of motion. Each ONE represents the center (choice) of surrounding (balance); hence adaptation representing re-calibration aka finding level. Oneself choosing to count others implies being tempted from center outwards, hence balancing self.
- Who cares?
That represents ones (1) ignorance of everything perceivable (1) for suggested nothing (0). Others exploit ones ignorance by using zero as the foundation for math; for counting, which when consented to, gives others the power of ones consent to shape ones foundation; level; balance. A zero-sum game...
intelligence gathering
Those who consent to stand under (understanding; intelligence) others are willing gathering under whatever is being suggested to them. The many are amassing themselves; while the few are suggesting collectivism and progressivism to keep them distracted from perceivable apartheid (being partial within whole) and need to resist (life) being progressed (inception towards death).
From a different perspective...the world wide web gathers whoever chooses to willingly log (locking oneself) into it. Suggestion ensnares ignorance.
fighting communism
Ones consent to any suggested -ism implies a) a many choosing to commune under a chosen few, and b) fighting each other within the conflict of reason over the meaning of the suggested -ism.
Reason represents the mental state of war the many are willingly choosing sides within with each one of their choices. The few suggest endless labels for both sides to keep distracting from the origin...reason aka logic aka logos aka words (suggested information) over sound (perceivable inspiration).
advanced students
Aka ones consent to stand under (as a student) suggested information by others (teachers), while following along suggested progressivism (advancing)...repression and self destruction.
the Party
Another sleigh of hand for those with eyes to see...a party is being suggested as a collective; a gathering, yet it perceptibly implies partial; apart from one another. Ones consent to the former; while ignoring the latter is based upon suggested THE-ism, hence ones willing submission to the authority of others, who shape suggestions in THE name of THE suggested.
PYR (fire) AMID (in the middle of)..."bound by wild desire; I fell into a ring of fire"