no...accurate...lies...crazy
No vs yes; accuracy vs inaccuracy; lies vs truth; crazy vs normal...a mind operating through the lens of conflict (reason).
twisted my words
a) suggested words twist the minds of those consenting away from comprehending perceivable sound.
b) how could another twist what is "mine"? Could it be that all words are suggested by others to domesticate ones means of communication within a controlled environment?
person
Per (by) sonos (sound); hence in (within) sanus (sound)...ain't that crazy?
Yes, you have dementia.
a) consenting to have DE (away from) MENT (mind/memory) tempts one into conflict (yes vs no reasoning)...
b) HAVE, verb - "to possess; to hold in possession or power"...that represents ones choice to want to hold onto suggested, hence being tempted away from perceivable and ones need to adapt to it.
you are in decline
One can only ascent (life) within decline (inception towards death)...
who?
Who aka "which of many" tempts one within all to ignore self for others.
cognitive decline
a) knowledge (gnoscere) aka perceivable inspiration implies ongoing motion; hence loss (inception towards death) for temporary growth (life) within.
b) ones adaptation to perceivable inspiration (knowledge) grows ones comprehension thereof, while suggested CO- (together) tempts one to ignore that.
dementia
DE (away from) MENT (mind/memory)...momentum of motion (perceivable moment) represents mind/memory for each one within. Others lure one with suggested information "away from" ones position.
Mendes/Benveniste
a) MEND (to repair) BEN (peak) VENI (venice; venetian)...
b) VENETIAN (to venerate; regard) PHONETICIAN (phonetic; sound)...
Joseph Nasi
JOSEPH (yoseph; adds, increases) NASI (נָשִׂיא ; prince; sovereign)...inception adds sovereign; life multiplies sovereign; death subtracts sovereign; while being partial within whole implies divided sovereign.
empire
EMPIRIC; verb - "derived from experience" aka EX (expression within impressing) PER (discover by evaluation).
Each one represents expression (life) within impressing (inception towards death); hence being able to discover value (perceivable) through evaluation (perceiving)...unless ignored for the suggestions by others.
Energy represents empire (all represents one in energy); each one within all enacting energy represents one empiric reaction.
we are; we act; we create; our own...
All suggested distractions from being one...
- suggested pluralism (we) to invert perceivable singularity (one).
- suggested action to invert perceiving reaction.
- suggested creationism (out of nothing) as inversion of perceivable transmutation (within everything).
- suggested want to hold onto (own) over perceivable need to let go (adapt).
while you're studying that reality
Ones consent to the suggested information by others shapes others into master (teacher) and self into slave (student). Wanting to understand suggested implies consenting to "stand under" those suggesting, hence willing submission.
Reality (perceivable inspiration for adaptation) or fiction (suggested information tempting one to hold onto)...ones free will of choice.
judiciously, as you will
Passing justice upon suggested tempts one to ignore that which "just is" aka perceivable. The resulting conflict of judging suggested by mind (judgement) represents reason aka logic (from logos aka suggested words over perceivable sound).
how things will sort out
Each one thing implies partial (temporary growth) within whole (ongoing loss); hence representing a division within...suggested SORT (collection of individual persons) represents the inversion of perceiving apartheid within perceivable wholeness.
If one "thing" consents by "will" to suggested "sort" (collectivism); then that which exists "in" (living) goes "out" (process of dying)...
Everything you read/see/hear/get as search results
To search for (forwards) implies towards suggested outcomes; which tempts one to ignore perceivable origin.
media
Oneself represents center (perceiving) of surrounding (perceivable)...suggestions by others become the middle (Latin medius; media) if one consents to ignore ones position as center within surrounding, hence center self going through middle other to experience surrounding.
-PAY, verb - "to discharge a debt; to deliver to a creditor the value of the debt".
a) ask yourself if ones "free" will of choice owes debt to the choices of others?
b) what if life represents charge and being moved from inception towards death represents discharge?
c) now ask yourself what happens if charge consents to discharge to another charge?
Solution of a...problem
Solution (inception towards death) of a problem (life)...that's why the guy selling it is always traveling, because if you ever realize what you're paying for; then you're gonna want to solve his problematic behavior.
a) shortest possible route for life being moved from inception towards death represents ignorance.
b) seeking a suggested solution tempts one to ignore being dissolved within perceivable.
c) suggestion represents the retail (re-tale) of others selling perceivable whole. Tale because it represents a fictitious narrative tempting one to ignore that whole offers everything towards each ones "free" will of choice.
d) CONUNDRUM, noun -"a low jest; a mean conceit"...aka wanting (conceit) to stand-under (low) the suggested problems (mean jests) by others.
What is your take on the Great Haze?
a) others utilize suggested information to HAZE, verb - "to frighten"...if one consents to such a temptation, then one gets frightened about suggested outcomes; while ignoring perceivable origin.
b) ignoring perceivable (inspiration) for suggested (information) represents "great haze" for oneself; because ignoring everything (reality) for nothing (fiction) gives others the power of ones consent to irritate ones perspective with their suggestions.
endgame
a) a game represents "winning a stake for advantage at play"; which implies outcome orientation, so why add "end"?
b) what if ones consent to want to win outcome oriented stakes, while advancing towards suggested ends...tempts one to ignore sustaining self?
c) PLAY, verb - "to use any exercise for pleasure or recreation; to do something not as a task or for profit, but for amusement" + "to mock; to practice illusion".
Aka falling for temptation by mocking natural animation with suggested illusions.
agenda
Agent (natural order) generates regent (disorder within natural order); which sets regent (life) with the free will of choice to struggle within agent (inception towards death). The suggested agendas by others tempt one to ignore that.
a) consenting to suggested -IST tempts one to ignore doing it by FREE will of choice.
b) wielding free will of choice implies being able to suggest labels for self to others; who uphold those labels by consenting to them.
c) tempting others to consent to uphold suggested aka to affix within ones mind/memory...that represents free (will of choice) masonry.
d) one can be whatever one expresses to be and whatever others believe or disbelief one to be. The former can only be shaped within perceivable; while the latter can be shaped with suggestions.
One can only be a Freemason or Scientologist if others consent to suggested Freemasonry or Scientology...if others consent to both; then one can be both within their minds.
individuals are born without
Suggested "without" tempts one to ignore being born within divide (in dividu).
tabula rasa is...a theory; epistemology; psychology; supposed; empirisism; attributed to.
That represents six suggested distractions to tempt one to ignore what exists (perceivable knowledge) before mind/memory can react to it. Whoever reads these two sentences about "tabula rasa" is being tempted to fill ones memory with the suggested distractions by others, while contemplating if there exist knowledge before memory can be filled with it?
external world of objects
Being able to perceive (subject) implies being within perceivable (object)...hence being objectified (life) while being subjected (inception towards death).
Being internal (center) of external (surrounding) implies being internally surrounded by different subjects (partial) of the same objectification (whole).
A partial cannot perceive whole; only other partials being moved by whole. A partial can grow comprehension about perceivable whole by resisting the suggested viewpoints of other partials.
Blind men (fighting over suggestions) and an elephant (perceivable)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_men_and_an_elephant
Tommy Tee
About as Dutch as Max Herre is German... https://img.gvid.tv/i/254q8gyp.jpg
Late 90s dutch hip hop is some of the best
I liked when Sweden increased the volume of rap... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFDks3sMEjY
to be leaders
a) being implies alive while being led from inception towards death; hence needing to resist; while being tempted to want to follow.
c) consenting to suggested leaders implies submitting to follow...that represents the status quo of the many following the suggested leaders by the few.
Different leaders represent distraction from same direction (inception towards death)...
JRE, AJ, JFKjr, Trump, DeSantis, Tucker, are all in their places to feed you...
Remembering those names implies one took the bite suggested, hence holding onto an idol within ones mind/memory aka still burdening self by indigestion of suggested information by others, instead of letting it go (digestion).
A decent summary
Suggested "sum of all things" implies "e pluribus unum" (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) etc. aka collectivism tempting ONE to ignore apartheid.
The opposite of summary represents "elaborate; add; enlarge; expand; increase; lengthen; break down"...that represents ones state of being growth (life) within loss (inception towards death) aka added through inception; life as a temporary expansion of moment/memory in-between inception/death momentum aka break down of whole into each partial.
the swarm
Ones (singular) consent to suggested we (plural) tempts one into the swarm of consenting order followers. "we the people" and "us" (united states) can only be controlled by a chosen few, hence chosen by each one consenting to suggested "we + us".
One implies partial within whole...not part of collective.
break free
Free (will of choice) implies broken (divided into partial choice by whole momentum (balance)...balance generates choice by dividing self from surrounding into center.
control (that which restrains)
Ones consent to suggested choices of others restraints ones "free" will of choice. Momentum (balance) sets free (choice)...holding onto momentum (captured moments aka pictures or moving pictures aka movies) tempts one to ignore that.
Perceivable momentum can be ignored for suggested memento (remember)...if one consents to hold onto memories.
- CALENDAR, noun - "orderly table or enumeration of persons"
a) being one within sound aka enumeration (number; unit; unus; one) implies person (per sonos; by sound)
b) TA'BLE, noun [Latin tabula.] - "in perspective, a plain surface; a synopsis; many particulars brought into one view" aka ones plane of existence.
Bonus: look into "tabula rasa".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIKKvG0_KdM (666k views)
TIME
a) PAST (where he-brews his-story) PRESENT (suggested narratives presented) FUTURE (ones hopes vs fears towards suggested)...all happening simultaneously within ones consenting mind/memory.
b) time perceived implies motion; perceiving it implies from within its momentum (perceivable moment)...suggested time tempts one to ignore that.
c) past/present/future represents suggested trinitarianism; which is build on ones consent to the suggestions of another (dualism)...both tempt one to ignore self (singular aka particular aka apart within whole).
we live in a 3rd world dictatorship
- DENOMINATION, noun - "the act of naming"
- DICTATE, verb [Latin, to speak.] - "to instruct what is to be said or written"
Nature neither denominates; nor dictates...those within do so that they can dictate denominations to each other.
Reasoning about suggested represents the fight; those suggesting represent the prophets of profits for those consenting to suggested.
how many are we?
Still only each one.
how many are those in power?
Still only each chosen one.
we; the masses, have all this power...
a) the power of mass consent is given to the suggestions of the chosen few by each one choosing to consent.
b) suggested "we" (pluralism); tempts perceiving "one" (singularity) to ignore self for others; hence giving others power over self.
theological root
a) THEO represents suggested THE-ism (ones consent to the suggested authority of another). In that regard...divine (proceeding from God) represents a corruption of divide (separating into parts), which is what procession (motion) does.
Therefore...divine to earthly represents flow (inception towards death) to form (life) through division. All within motion, hence PATHOS (path).
b) LOGIC aka reason; from logos (word) represents suggested words (fiction) over perceivable sound (reality). Moving reality operates as implication (if/then); while reasoning about suggested words tempts one to ignore that.
Logos tempts one to ignore pathos, since logos tempts one to want to hold onto; while pathos implies need to let go.
c) is seed (life) within soil (inception towards death); then roots implies intercourse for offspring, hence perpetuation of self within motion through another.
The soil of suggested words represents perceivable sound; which one ignores when shaping words. Ones free will of choice represents the seed and choosing to suggest words represents weed injuring the fruits of ones labors (consequences of ones choices). Any suggestion by words tempts oneself and others to reason against each other about the meaning thereof.
Logos represents conflict (reasoning); Pathos implies balance (balancing as choice).
what words mean
Only the few who suggest words are wielding the power to define; redefine and contradict the meaning of words at will...and that power represents the consent of the many to words.
Perceivable nature communicates itself as sound; those within shape suggestible words to distract each other, while gaining control through spell-craft.
What's more effective for regulating fertility...vaccines (fear) or pornography (lust)? How is ones mind involved in shaping vaccines into fear and pornography into lust?
without a doubt, proven to be true
a) holding onto suggested proof in form of believing truths or disbelieving lies tempts one to doubt perceivable...
b) if perceivable is moving; then holding onto something suggested will be taken from ones hold, which breeds doubt within oneself.
to think
Adapting to perceivable inspiration implies thinking; consenting to suggested information represents ignorance of thinking, hence sinking as vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death).
two; three ninety-five...
Others suggest one to count; which tempts one to ignore perceivable units (Latin unitas; unus; one) aka one-self. Nature designates units (partials) by dividing itself (whole).
import online
a) if consenting to suggested on-line; then one follows in-line with the suggestions of others.
b) how can one import into while being (life) within line (inception towards death)?
other mediums
Latin medius - "middle"...if the center of motion represents momentum (balance) and the center of balance represents choice, then other mediums (suggested choices) tempts ones center (perceiving choice) to ignore surrounding (perceivable balance)...
impact vs trends
- IMPACT', verb (Latin impactus, from impingo; in and pango, to drive.)
- TREND, verb - "to run; to stretch; to have a particular direction"
a) inception towards death implies directing whole; dividing itself into partial lives.
b) being within motion implies being run by it.
c) being temporary within ongoing implies growth stretching within loss.
d) the impact of suggested trends tempts one to follow; while being perceiving trend within perceivable impact implies need to resist impact (process of dying) as to sustain trend (living).
means it's a tangible thing
Is there a difference between being able to touch (tangible) and getting entangled (not easily separated) when choosing to hold onto; posses a tangible object?
Can one be in possession of self (or others) while being within motion?
cannot shadow ban a book
If ones comprehension represents enlightenment and ones ignorance represents darkness/shadow, then ask yourself how many have books they willingly ignore to read?
How does a closed book see the light? The books one holds onto and the books others keep suggesting...which one puts the other into shadow?
Art too.
Artificial (suggested) implies ones ignorance of natural (perceivable)...isn't perceivable TOO, adverb - "over; more than enough; noting excess"?
Being alive while being moved from inception towards death implies everything going on...
If one ignores everything (perceivable) going on for suggested (nothing); then those fictitious narratives gain momentum, while one goes after them.
Perceivable reality does spell words...those within suggest words to distract others from perceivable reality; while gaining control over shaping suggested fiction. This represents spell-craft.
a) RET'ARD, verb - "to diminish the velocity of motion"...resistance (life) cannot diminish the velocity of motion, while being within its momentum (inception towards death). Life goes on....
b) consenting to suggested THE-ism diminishes ones comprehension of being moved within perceivable.
c) suggested HAP'PEN, verb - "to come by chance aka as effect of an unknown cause" implies ones ignorance of known cause (perceivable).
a) on the contrary...many are willingly holding onto suggested; while ignoring need to let go.
b) nature gives (inception) and takes (death) from recipients (life)...suggestions by other recipients tempts one to ignore what gives; while consenting to be taken by the consequences of ones ignorance.