river pirates in the desert!
Pirate/peira/per (to try; attempt; risk) implies taking chance by given choice aka a gamble. Taking chance by giving up choice makes one a deserter aka one who deserts the river for the banks.
Pirate for good
FOR implies the river given choice in-between banks...good or bad implies the risk (pirate) tempting one to desert choice.
ship out
A ship (life) can only sail in-between coming in (inception) and out (death) the river.
conspiracy against the Most High God
MOST HIGH...that's the conspiracy within all of God by anyone who chooses a side against another (most vs least + high vs low).
the 180 degree switch on the issue
Free will of choice operates within balance aka in-between extremes. Choosing to hold onto either side encircles choice, while establishing measurable degrees.
Few shape issues to tempt many into consensus (360 degree) and reason (180 degree vs 180 degree), which is how few control 360 degree by measuring the offset (counterbalance).
Furthermore...setting an issue/exire - "exit; to go out" at the center of counterbalance establishes a way out for those setting the issue within.
Example: "vaccine skepticism"...while the cattle (vacca) reflect (skeptic) against each other; the farmer (pharma) utilizes the suggested -ism as the way out (issue). The -ism represents a consensus aka enclosure for the cattle being farmed.
Allow me to...
TO implies "towards"...that's creator giving allowance towards being. ME implies being taking possession over self, while being given allowance to be.
Notice that asking for allowance among beings turns into a conflict (allow vs deny). Asking makes answers optional, while distracting from primary origin of choice being given.
on the Creator...to the Creator
OnWARD + toWARD implies ward/wer - "to perceive; watch out for"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/ward
Drawing a circle tempts ones perception to look inwards at suggested information held onto.
turn itself
SELF implies the line moving through being, hence representing the shared value of all moving through each one aka the soul/sole.
IT implies being taking a measurement into possession, which contradicts the line into a circle. Notice also that IT neuters sexual division (he + she) and that she implies S(plit)HE aka an internal split of a line aka he moving through she to generate off-spring.
TURN/tere - "to rub"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*tere-#etymonline_v_52779 hence the conflict when establishing contradictions by shaping circles (reason) within a line (implication) and why rubbing applied to anointment establishes anti-christ.
the free will of the creation
Free will of CHOICE in-between the created balance.
creation
Crea/ker (to grow) + tion (action)...action cannot grow; only each divided reaction in-between growth/loss wields the free will of choice to grow or fail to do so.
Turning from the creator doesn't change the course of the creator...it only spins the created against each other.
Notice also that you used VS (circular) and LINE (linear) in the same sentence...that represents you sustaining the contradiction within self, while perpetuating it outwards towards others.
God's adversaries
God delineates (Creator towards creation)...ad (against) verse (to turn) implies creation vs creation.
Only within a line can a circle be shaped.
What if the names of the world were changed
Names hide change, but don't stop the world/werold aka age (old) of man (wer)...
renaming cities
Names invoke a summoning. Those who consent to names are following a call of duty, which tempts ones free will of choice into obligatory service to a chosen ones summons.
The name "city" tempts the body private into civil servitude...if consented to, which represents an enterprise (undertaking). Few dare many to undertake by tempting choice to take names.
Uniform aka sexual uniformity (unisex) aka "one size fits all" as alternative for "not everyone fits the mold"...
Without intelligent design, the 'particles' 'banging' would have demolished themselves
Christ/christen - "to anoint" implies the lubrication preventing friction in-between "banging particles" within the dividing process of whole.
Few design intelligence (understanding) as an identifying mark for many to tempt them to turn against (anti) one another, which demolishes the lubrication (christ).
The trick of Christianity (or any other group) is about tempting each christ to join one another, hence becoming anti-christ.
Particles joining together implies mutual demolition. The "banging together" aka intercourse for off-spring implies the balance act for ones reacting choice in-between the need to set apart and the want to put together.
IN (inception) and OUT (death)...only in-between can being come to life.
If there's a kabbalistic layer between reality and what we experience
The description of another becomes the layer within self, which confines experience into expiration. The layers of self imposed burdens are choking out a beings access to the source of knowledge passing through.
Whatever ones holds onto prevents one from seeing the kabbalah (cube of allah) aka the law of all cueing each being within. Those asleep ain't getting the cue while slumbering under layers of deception.
there's no way to be certain of anything
To be certain requires each beings self dis-CERN-ment...not layers of understanding by others which obscure ones mind from being within the one and only way of knowledge aka living on the edge.
...are all equally insufficient to describe the whole
A description of one to another cannot ever be all...only within all can each one come into being to shape descriptions to one another. Holding onto shaped descriptions represents the deception which equalizes differences among beings.
Nature doesn't describe (outline)...nature delineates being (life) inline (inception towards death).
likely a combination
To combine implies like vs dislike aka putting two (bi) together (com) against ONE another. Nature implies singularity; artifice implies plurality. Only each singular being wields the free will of choice to artificially combine together what nature divides from one another.
What is your evaluation of what life is about?
Value (all perceivable) moves evaluation (ones perception) into being...it's neither a possession (yours) nor a circumference (about), but a linear process moving bringing forth potential.
Few trick many to set values by holding onto them, which in return corrupts ones evaluation of moving value.
How did existence manifest?
An ex (out) stence (stance) manifests inwardly aka all energy manifesting each power within by linear progression from motion > momentum > matter.
What is life about?
About/ambhi (around)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/about Life isn't about; but centered within.
How do you make sense of your existence?
Sense implies each beings sentience while being send within nature...making represents the deception tempting a being to shape something artificial while ignoring nature for it.
What is your best estimate
Best implies versus worse...aka circular confinement of ones mind within conflict, while ignoring the power of ones mind to estimate linear procession. Only if one lets go of either extreme (best or worse) can one estimate freely.
what we are doing here
Nature does the doing which allows each being within to re-do...that's how singularity works. Few suggest pluralism (we) to tempt many together, while gaining the permission to artificially re-shape those who ignore what nature was doing.
how all of this came to be?
All was before each one within comes into being during delineation...emphasis on TO (towards) BE (being).
Christianity - God created the world and man rebelled?
Few suggest creationism (out of nothing) to invert transformation (within everything). Consenting to the former rebels against the latter, while permitting few to rebel against many. Ignoring transformation for creation shapes being into a "rebel without a cause".
Evolution - Happenstance?
a) Happenstance implies by chance...being implies as choice within balance. Few tempt many to take chance which distracts from given choice.
b) Evolution implies "to unroll"...nature delineates, which few distract from by internally (logic) and externally (reason) rolling many together aka tricking each into circular confinement, which then turns many against each other.
Other alien races exist
Alien/alius - "another" implies the position of each being within nature from one ANOTHER; while race/raddix/radius/ray implies each beings stance within all.
10000 year battle
Taking any measurement tempts ones mind into a battle (give vs take).
Reptilian Soul Recycler
Reptile/rep (to creep; crawl) + soul/sole (one and only) + recycle (circular response)...nature moving through each being implies the soul; beings ignoring natural for artificial implies the recycling, and while recycling the adaptation of being to nature becomes a crawl aka dragging across.
Some type of computer simulation
Nature divides each being from one another...few are typecasting many into a collective (some/sum) to make them SIM-ular to one another, which represents com (together) putare (to reckon).
Computation represents the enumeration together of each natural being into an artificial sum aka hive-mind; collected consciousness; gestalt intelligence; group ego; egregore; consensus.
running for purposes
That implies suggested progressivism by few tempting many to ignore origin for outcome aka an inversion of a beings perspective.
beyond our comprehension
Com (together) prehendere (to take hold of) is what tempts a being yonder aka a distance away from discerning self.
I'm really curious
Real implies a beings response (re) to all (al) natural...curiosity tempts a being to aim at artificial outcomes.
ghetto of Frankfurt
- Ghetto; from yiddish get - "deed of separation"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/ghetto
- Frank/franc - "free; not servile"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/frank
Nature separates being...a jew tempts gentiles together with a deed (transaction). This deed represents a gentiles consent to a jewish suggestion, which shapes a consensus among gentiles into a stronghold (furt;fort) for each jewish free (frank) will of choice.
As for Frankfurt in the Bundesrepublik Deutschland...
- BUNDES (to bind; bondage, from jewish bundism, based on yiddish Völkerbund)
- REPUBLIK (gentile commonwealth under jewish sovereignty)
- DEUTSCHLAND aka land of the deutsch/dutch/dish as in yiddish.
The BRD represents the stronghold (fort) for each free (frank) jew. Also check out France aka Frankreich...
Hindu had a much better framework
- Hindu/sindhu - "river"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Hindu
- Frame/fram - "forward"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/frame
Each thing within the river implies body; the forward motion of the river implies soul. Few establish confusion among many by shaping a circular conflict (much vs less + better vs worse) within the forwarding river.
All these problems
- Problem/proballein aka pro (forwards) ballein (to throw)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/problem
All throws forwards (inception towards death) each one within (life), which implies a solution. Few shape the word "problem" to hide the solution within it from many.
liked to know how they subverted
Sub (under) vert (to turn)...like vs dislike implies a circular conflict within your mind aka TURNING one side against the other, and what you call knowledge represents seeking UNDERstanding. That's how you are being subverted.
It's that simple, yet the one subverted cannot see the subversion within self, while trying to figure out the outside by looking into it.
how they rewrote
By tempting you to REspond to what they WROTE instead of what nature delineates.
melted structures
Only within flow (inception towards death) can form (life) be structured. Melting (to become liquid through heat) implies the opposite of coming to be solid (heat; living) within liquid (cold; dying).
while simultaneously denying
Denial simulates fiction (suggested information) within reality (perceivable inspiration). Where? Within the deniers mind! Similarity implies likeness aka your mind confining itself to a like vs dislike conflict.
How is the truth hidden?
Holding onto any truth a) shapes a lie + b) hides change from one.
how is action stopped against the enemy
Action cannot be stopped...reaction can be tricked into circular confinement (friend vs foe). An enemy can only operate en-e-my (within me).
By flooding it
Only in-between flood (inception) and ebb (death) can one come into being.
flooding it with an infinite number of trivial facts, endless rabbit holes, complete fabrications and false opposition
That implies a burden upon being...if consented to. The flooding aspect implies suggested mimicking perceivable...like for example how suggested currency mimics the flood of perceivable current.
claiming all events are fake
Event implies being within all...claiming tempts one to ignore that event implies a process aka ex (out) venire (to come). Holding onto contradicts coming out.
distracting you with the side effects
Sides imply extremes for ones free will of choice in-between...it's claiming a side by choice which distracts choice from its position at center.
placing you in an echo chamber
Ones mind holding onto suggested information represents the chamber aka circular confinement internally (logic) and externally (reason) representing sound repeated by reflection aka an echo.
jews are over-represented
Represent implies each beings response to all nature presents aka ones presence. A jew tempts gentiles into an artificial over vs under conflict of reason against one another, which leaves the jew as the only representative within nature.
Another example...voting a representative shirks ones free will of choice aka the instrument to REspond to PRESENTed. A chosen one becomes/remains a representative by default of gentile shirking of response-ability.
they have practically taken over
Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) to being (life)...a jew tempts gentiles to TAKE artificial (suggestion) while GIVING up natural (perception). This ain't a practical takeover, but a theoretical device tempting those who take (buy into) to also give (sell self out).
jews do NOT work and get free money
Nature implies work; being implies free employment of choice within a working balance. A jew suggests nihilism (not); pluralism (jews); possessionism (get) and an exchange currency (money) as fiat (authoritative sanction) to trick each gentiles FREE will of choice into willingly ignoring natural for artificial.
continues to hold celebrations
A jew celebrates (frequency) within nature that gentiles continue to hold onto artifice (stagnancy).
Are they all in it?
All implies singularity; each one within implies a unit...a jew suggests pluralism (they) to trick gentiles into an artificial consensus. It's what gentiles hold within which permits each jew to animate it anthropomorphically (golem) from outside.
Free Competition in Currency
Competition implies free will of choice binding itself to a side against another, while ignoring that current moves through while setting free anything within it.
A jew suggests currency to tempt gentiles into competition against each other (poor vs rich)...the entrance into which demands each gentiles FREE will of choice consenting to the jewish suggestion of currency.
It's about tricking that which natural current sets free into an artificial bondage to currency.
air conditioning
Air implies linear procession (in > out)...a suggested condition aka con (together) dit (to speak) ion (action) implies circular confinement if consented to.
The deception of air conditioning is about encircling the linear progression of spirit...the latter represents natural animation; the former represents artificial lethargy.
breath of the floor
Floor implies land (L); breath implies air (A); breathing implies water (W) aka natural law progressing through each being as liquid > spirit > solid.
Yahweh's Salvation Anointed was Yahweh before He was Salvation Anointed
a) Yahweh aka je (i) hovah (was)...all was (hovah) within which each anointed one was given the choice to claim self as I am (je).
It's the word "yahweh" which distracts the one using it from God breathing through ones uttering, and it's putting je+hovah together which contradicts anointment (christ).
b) Salvation aka sal (sole/soul) vat (vati; father) ion (action) implies the action of the sole father (God) for each reacting off-spring within. It's each off-spring which perceives animation as soul passing through body/mind aka motion moving through spirit (momentum) and essence (matter).
Once again...putting sal-vat-ion together contractions anointment aka the division of all into each, and it's each ones mind/ment which needs to resist the wanted temptation of putting together what all divides apart.
Before Moses was, I AM
a) Before implies the inversion of "forwarding being" aka all that was animating each one within.
b) Moses/mosaic implies the setting together of divided parts into a whole aka a game of puzzle suggested by few towards many to mix them together.
God anoints aka christens being by dividing each from one another, hence giving FREE will of choice. Moses implies a jew drawing out (mashah) consent from each gentiles free will of choice to establish a consensus among many aka a mosaic/puzzle. Joining a consensus shapes the mashah suggesting it into the messiah for the ones confined within it, which is how each jew becomes the lawgiver (moses) of consenting gentiles.
c) I AM (je suis; jesus) implies taking possession over self, while both ignoring the division from one another (christ) and giving self up to another (you are; judah)...the latter representing judas; the betrayer of jesus.
If any possession is taken (jesus), then one ignores given (god) potential (christ) while becoming possessed aka burdened by another (judah/judas/jew).
Jesus Christ is God
God WAS before Jesus Christ came into being...IS implies a measure taken and shared within God given.
puppets
Only through willing consent can a string be attached to ones mind.
chabad
Chabad aka CHA (chochmah; wisdom) B (binah; understanding) AD (da'at; knowledge)...knowledge implies nature moving through being; wisdom implies the discernment of each being within nature; understanding implies a beings submission to another, while ignoring knowledge.
It's foolish to seek understanding because doing so corrupts wisdom given aka dom (all perceivable) giving wis (ones perception).
Albert Einstein discovered atom via Brownian motion
"The traditional mathematical formulation of Brownian motion is that of the Wiener process"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brownian_motion
BROWN(ian) motion + WIENER process...that's a sodomy joke just like FAT MAN + LITTLE BOY is a pederast joke.
Seems like Trump is playing the "bad guy" for the future "good guy"
Trump as an influencer is utilized to shape appearances (seem) which lure those under the influence into a conflict (good vs bad; like vs dislike) against one another.
What's the opposite of seem? Being... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/appear.html
Being implies solid within fluid, hence not a seeming state. Few tempt many into conflict to bring them closer together like a seam/seem.
He's just making being pro-Israhell look retarded.
Pro vs contra implies the circular confinement of a beings mind while ignoring linear procession. If one ignores procession for confinement; then one retards (cessation of motion) ones mind.
sponsor of terrorism
Sponsor implies "one who binds himself"; terror implies "fear"; -ism implies "consensus"...joining a consensus about being afraid binds one to another.
(((they))) take over the...market
Buying into what another suggests while selling out ones free will of choice "marks" one. The market represents the deal in-between suggestion and consent, which cannot be taken over, since its a free-trade-market.
God WAS before you can choose what the most high IS.
There can be only one...God. It's choosing to hold onto a side which conspires one and another into a manifold against singular delineation.
Inception implies the invite for life to participate within God...joining one another's invites represents the conspiracy against God.
Join a forum > it splits apart > ad infinitum.
My thoughts aside...I bookmarked it. Thanks.