Makes counter intuitive argument about the availability of brick making machinery
Have you watched the video? He calls BS on Sears. Also notice the name of the machines (wizard; money-maker; the big six etc.) and question how long it takes for concrete to harden, while adding the extra time frame for it to be usable under pressure. At the 18 minute mark they even have three (3) guys showing of three (3) stages of production...
sears catalogue
Aka to sear - "dry by burning and making insensible" also seer - "one to whom divine revelations are made" + cata (down) logue (logic)
Jon Levi becomes controlled opposition?
A jew suggests the con to roll gentiles together into opposing each other. Jon Levi represents an influencer who informs, which cons viewers to oppose the information among each other aka a jew using fluid (influence) to dry form (information) for bricking gentiles.
planned obsolescence
Planned (to spread) ob (away) sol (whole) escence (essence; being)...planned obsolesce implies flow (inception towards death) producing form (life).
Products that tried to defeat planned obsolescence
Nature bringing forth being implies "product"...a jewish merchant tempts gentiles to buy products during natural planned obsolescence, which implies selling self out, while mutually defeating one another.
The issue isn't about how long can a product endure, while a jew manipulates endurance, but how much resistance a gentile wastes holding onto artificial products during natural production of being.
Any product in any store represents a want or not want option for a gentile who ignores the need to resist want. So the only product in any store represents the gentile entering and exiting it...
add to the list
a) List/leizd - "border; band"...listing anything binds free will of choice. Only in-between balance can choice add/subtract from all onto oneself.
b) List; verb - "to tilt, lean, incline to one side" earlier spelled LUST... https://www.etymonline.com/word/list
when it comes to genetics.
Consider the deliberate use of eugenics and dysgenics upon genetics...
coinclipper (does that even work anymore?)
Public coinbase running on private servers for a cut...
the world continues to repeat itself despite claims to the contrary
If the world continues linearly, then claiming anything within shapes a circular contradiction, which tricks the one claiming to repeat the same loop over and over again.
Few establishing such loops within many represents the artificial circumvention of natural law... https://forward.com/culture/books/695530/elana-stein-hain-circumventing-jewish-law-loophole-eruv-chametz/
the fact that people can be so utterly oblivious to the nature
Fact implies fictitious act, which when held onto...contradicts natural acting > being reacting.
the nature of their own
A being (potential) cannot own (possession) nature (procession) without shaping a contradiction.
Take for example
Taking doesn't amplify expression...it represses. The rhetoric "take for example" represents the propaganda used to distract ones discernment thereof.
Zionism is about the state of Israel....not about jewish supremacy
Israel aka yisra'el "he that striveth with God" implies each beings struggle within all of nature. Zionism represents the propaganda used to trick gentiles to believe that israel represents the jewish homeland instead of the state of each being within nature.
Holding onto any belief permits the one shaping it a supreme position over one.
The truth is...
...the foundation of lies if held onto.
filled with antijew rhetoric
Like the bible warning about those who call themselves jews but are not?
anti american rhetoric
Isn't that based on the pro jew rhetoric used by the alleged representatives of America?
the blatantly lopsided view
Are Muslims using loopholes to corrupt views by tempting infidels to incline towards sides within conflicts of reason?
Sounds jewish...just like blatant/blatire (to babble) aka Babylon.
- By the rivers of Babylon...There we sat down
- Yeah, yeah, we wept...When we remembered Zion
- Let the words of our mouth...Be acceptable in thy sight
the Hebrew text it was built on
Text/teks - "to weave"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/text One can only weave together what nature separated from one another before. No text can ever be a foundation to build upon.
As for hebrew...only within flow can form be brewed (fermentation by mixing and boiling).
An important instruction is to stir up (or fan into flame) the spirit within you
Hence few suggesting texts to artificially ferment natural spirit within a consensus among many, with consensus representing the cauldron aka the kettle to boil the cattle.
energies and breaths
There can be only one energy aka en (within) ergos (work) and only one flow of animation each breathing unit formed within adapts to.
Try to explain plurality of energy without contradiction...
I am sure I am missing many
It's assurance (sure) and multiplicity (many) which tempt one to miss the flow of singularity.
first hand experience
Hand implies manual reaction (secondary) to auto action (primarily). Ex (outwards) per (forwards)...forwards (action) precedes outwards (reaction).
or you have some passing fancy or interest that turns to obsession.
Passage implies linear procession; turning implies circular confinement...that's the obsession. Only within a line can a circle be drawn by holding onto something fancy/fantsy (inclination).
Most people will first
Person aka per (by) son (sound) implies sound first before any by product within. A most vs less conflict among a sum of people can only be shaped afterwards by the use of will.
Psi - Ki - Qi - Chi - Prana
- PSI (psychic force) implies nature animating being.
- KI (kinetic force) implies being set in motion by nature.
- QI (physical life force) implies spiritual nature animating physical being.
- CHI (limiting force) implies the freeing of being within the limit of nature.
- PRANA (permeating force) implies nature passing through each transference of being.
National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE) aka narcose (to benumb, make unconscious)...
dust to make a rib
"for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return" ~Genesis 3:19
Only solid (life) within liquid (inception towards death) can experience dust (vapor) aka the exhalation of moisture. Rib refers to ripping apart solid during fluid aka Adam (motion) > Eve (momentum) > rip/rib (matter) with Christ (anointed one) implying the protective lubrication during the separation process of matter from one another.
He is together with those that choose Him
Together implies "towards getting"...towards implying motion; getting implying matter. Only matter (life) can get everything from motion (inception towards death).
Notice furthermore toget-HER aka him (motion) > her (momentum) > off-spring (matter)...matter GETs what his motion moves TOwards HER momentum.
The word (articulation of sound) TO-GET-HER distracts one from discerning the natural process of sound by using synthesis (putting together) to invert analysis (setting apart).
Guess who meticulously crafts spells out of letters... https://img.gvid.tv/i/4WLy44C5.jpg
I don't see how, God is love and means to love.
How could you see if you hold onto "love" (or anything else)? Sight requires clarity aka the moving animation (perceivable inspiration) from nature...others suggest love and hate to confine ones mental (logic) and physical (reason) sight within circular obscurity by holding together what nature sets apart from one another.
God was love and hate before one was given the will to choose a side...choosing to hold onto either side corrupts sight.
"Hasidic judaism originated in Eastern Europe in the 18th century and centers on a fervent devotion to God through love" aka HASI-DIC (hasse dich; hate you) preaching LOVE/EVOL (evil).
Those choosing hate, choose against love, which is made from God, so they make themselves devils, satans, adversaries...
...and vice versa. Choice only works in-between balance, while choosing to hold onto either side imbalances choice.
Motion delineates (inception towards death) matter (life)...putting life in-between sides that cannot be held onto. Holding onto artificial sides like love or hate shape delineation into ad (against) versary (to turn) aka drawing a circle (reason) inside a line (implication).
Choosing love or hate establishes a circle (versus/verto; to turn) which in return prevents one from thinking straight.
The young toad prefers my limited interaction
Both the young toad and you represent the internal (life) of action (inception towards death)...that's the natural inter-action separating each one from one another.
What you call limitation by preference represents the free will of choice of each to prefer one over the other...which further limits free will of choice by binding self to another.
the 19 yr old turtle
Does a turtle need to measure age? While thinking about that...remember the "slow-moving" tortoise vs the fast-moving hare from Aesop's Fables. (try to mentally take the versus conflict out of it).
Does matter (life) need to measure the speed of motion (inception towards death)? Can it be measured from in-between?
is more generous with her affections.
It's cause which generates effect...effects calling affection to one another "generous" are distracting each other from cause. God implies the one and only generator...each being within a reactor. Reacting to one another's generous affection tempts one to ignore re-generation.
Notice that the financiers represent both the most generous ones by offering everything for a price to anyone who can pay, while also the most stingy ones, since they offer nothing of any value (fiat) to each ones FREE will of choice aka the only God given price.
Finance (an end, settlement, retribution) implies an affect by one another...nature generating being implies cause generating each effect from one another.
Affect (synthesis) contradicts effect (analysis)...if chosen.
when one forces them outside their limits.
Jasper; Kitty and you are forced to be free (life) inside limitation (inception towards death)...others tempt you to set outside boundaries for one another, which distracts from origin. Whatever boundaries you choose to set...your free will of choice can also break.
Nature implies the force that breaks apart each being...holding onto boundaries permits few to exploit the natural break, while setting up more artificial boundaries for many...unbeknownst to the one believing consensus protecting boundaries.
Removed an unnecessary sentence
Can there be unnecessary sentience within nature for any beings life sentence? Can one within God remove anything from God?
Following orders dis-charges one...resisting the temptation to follow orders re-charges one.
a) One (matter) within him (motion) self (momentum)...that's how him (god) moves her (spirit) through each off-spring (essence).
b) One with himself implies together (synthesis); each one within himself implies apart (analysis)...few suggest love and hate to tempt many together into conflict against one another.
c) God generates spirit to animate essence...holding onto love contradicts animation by inverting it into animosity aka hate.
Example...holding onto your lovely cat will soon turn into hateful animosity when the want to hold onto ignores the need to let go of. The lovely cat hates to be held for too long.
Ones choice in-between the need to let go and the want to hold onto implies reality...the measurement taken about how long is too long represents fiction. That's why saying how MUCH we love one another represents fictitious measurements taken, while ignoring reality (need/want balance).
papal loyalty
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew 23:9-11
Any loyalty to a father upon the earth implies treason to the one in heaven...
Deus Lo Vult (God beholds will)
Deus (God) implies need; Vult (will) implies want...one needs to resist want; others suggest to lo and behold want, while ignoring need.
Jerusalem Cross
The five-fold cross deceives one to ignore that there's only one flow A-CROSS (inception towards death) for each form (life) within. The other four imply the crossing out of circumference for the centered one, which represents the rite of circumcision.
Jeru-salem aka yarah (he threw) shalom (peace) implies whole throwing each peace/piece across aka the transference of matter (life) within motion (inception towards death).
One with Himself.
One within himself by parting each one from one another...
We Can Tune Into
Notice that tune/tone has ONE (singularity) in it...WE (plurality) contradicts that. Few orchestrate symphonies to invert natural singularity into artificial plurality as to tempt many together.
Love Is A Frequency
Choosing to hold onto love or hate circumnavigates frequency of choice.
Your job is...
infesting every nook and cranny of power
Material implies matter (mater) within (i) all (al) motion...only motion allows matter to be released. Thinking that the release of material is based on allowances by matter...that's what permits the thought shaped by others to infest every nook and cranny of ones now powerless mind.
intimidation
Consenting to any suggestion permits intimate access to ones private mind. Intimidation isn't based on what others are suggesting, but what one permits to enter into self. The vampire on your doorstep isn't intimidating until being given access...
how many elites
Each chosen one...based on ones choice selecting.
Punkt vor Strich... (??)
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punktrechnung_vor_Strichrechnung aka the order of operations (multiplication and division ) before addition and subtraction...
You failed
Only during fall (inception towards death) can one rise (life)...not a challenge; but a giving of way.
you used inception toward death in all the lines
There can be only one line (inception towards death) for each delineation (life) within...which one cannot use; only re-use.
haven't solved the captcha
The solution to capture implies free will of choice...which cannot be captured by another.
like a bot
Diverse few suggest bots to shape many into like-minded users aka self-abusers.
more RAM
What if ones mind/memory can be used either as ram (adaptation to inspiration) or as hard-drive (holding onto information)? What if the latter corrupts the former into perceiving less?
im blocking you. Sorry if you are a human
Feeling sorry for another while setting a block within self?
Just your replies dont look like human
Because looking/locking implies holding onto...which prevents one from seeing how another describes motion.
See. You are a bot.
How could a bot have sight?
Im blocking you.
Which requires the use of ones free will of choice. Alas...the more one blocks; the less free one becomes.
to drift the discussion
Nature drives being (life) linearly (inception towards death)...beings tempt one another to drift circular (logic; reason) hence from one side to another.
Free will of choice implies in-between sides.
poison the well
Logic (circular thinking) and reason (turning against one another) implies the WELL of WILL. Anything contained within that well contaminates ones will.
1% of the time some human uses your account to appear to be a person.
a) 99% of what free-will-of-choice writes represents handwritten adaptation to perceivable inspiration on the fly. What AI could adapt to perceivable inspiration over suggested information?
b) One cannot be a person...being implies per (by) son (sound) aka an in-stru-ment (mind structured within).
Its nonsense
Which sense can sense nothing?
Clearly low effort sliding.
To slide something requires one to make the foundation for anyone else slippery...that's a whole lot of effort to make others loose their footing.
Low effort is based on ones free will of choice to ignore fundamental (perception) for optional (suggestion)...
You only appear where is convenient almost like 4 chan sliders.
Con (together) venient (to come)...doing that would bind free will of choice to another.
Do Netanyahu
How many Mileikowskys are there?
sponsors you
Sponsor/spondeio - "to libate; bring a fluid sacrifice, pour"...sponsorships tempt free will of choice into bondage.
How much is the payment?
How much? One! There can be only one. As for payment...nothing, that's all value ones mind can hold onto.
Solve this captcha
Capturing distracts from solution. Nature dissolves (inception towards death) being (life)...others utilize suggestion to capture ones interest.
f!v3 x thr33 - s3v3n (5x3-7)
And don't forget Punkt vor Strich...
Why you only appear on sensitive posts and topics?
Appearances can be deceiving...free-will-of-choice adapts to whatever inspires.
Do you get payed to shill and poison the well?
a) What does free-will-of-choice shill for? To shill implies acting as a decoy for a gambler, while gambling implies sacrificing given choice by taking a chance. Shilling would contradict ones free will of choice.
b) Poison/potare (to drink) implies form (life) falling for the temptation of flow (inception towards death). The only antidote to the poison of temptation implies resistance by free will of choice.
Who owns you?
Free can't be owned without binding self to another willingly.
Im asking honest questions
Neither asking others; nor following a quest "hones" ones discernment. To hone implies sharpening ones edge within perceivable knowl-EDGE...
Are you a slider?
Upvote vs downvote aka circular conflict (reason)...that's what makes ones foundation slippery. Describe the momentum (inception towards death) of matter (life) implies a moving foundation within which each ones free will of choice needs to balance.
What is your purpose here in this 7 years?
a) Pur (forth) pose (to put)...only nature puts forth being, which allows each being to adapt (perception) to all nature puts forwards (perceivable) OR ignore if for each other (suggestion).
Natural purpose implies adaptation to origin; artificial purpose implies seeking outcome.
b) As for 7 years...if one counts, then one permits another to hold onto accountable, which binds ones free will of choice. What if seven implies S(plit)EVEN aka being (life) split even (inception towards death)?
that line
Aka that linear progression of life...from inception towards death.
straight
Thinking straight implies natural delineation; circular thinking implies artificial logic.
a) Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.
b) If I ask you to describe the transference of living essence from origin towards outcome, then what labels would you use to include the pass-through of animation?
What about one describing the momentum of life from inception towards death to another is artificial or hallucinatory?
nuns
Nun/nana (mother) aka father (motion) > mother (momentum) > off-spring (matter) aka the perceivable MOMent for the perception of each MATER.
How do you reconcile God saying He will pour out His Spirit and people will prophesy?
a) Pro (forwards) phesy (to speak)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/prophet
The spirit of God forwards will...few utilize the spiritual to animate the material with speech "in the name of" God.
b) God doesn't say anything...God implies the sound naturalizing each instrumental being with the will to articulate speech. The temptation of will (want) needs to be resisted.
c) God alienates (inception separating life) during reconciliation (death uniting life). The reconciliation of many (gentiles) sustains the alienation of few (jew). Alienation implies analysis (setting apart); reconciliation implies synthesis (putting together).
a) Bridging the gap between rendering (suggestion) and reality (perception)...oneself represents the gap; ones consent to another represents the bridge.
b) Notice that "photo-realistic lightning" uses light twice (lightning + photo). Why? Because photo-realism represents the fictitious filter shaped within real light.
c) DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling)...a sample aka "something which confirms a proposition or statement, an instance serving as an illustration" represents a beings consent to the suggested illustrations of another, which in return permits another the deep learning from above (super) each sampled one.
d) What's "visual fidelity"? Ones faithfulness; devotion; trust in suggested visuals by another, which implies a "breakthrough" of perception by suggestion.
e) Requiem aka "mass for repose of the soul of the dead". Soul implies the process of dying animating each life within...few are amassing many by reposing each into consenting to join a consensus with one another.
f) What's a "resident"? An inhabitant. How could one inhabit "evil"? Inversion permits one to LIVE within EVIL...
h) What's "bio"? To live! What's "hazard"? To take a chance in life! Taking a chance inverts being given choice, which is how evil resides within live/life.