Turning from the creator doesn't change the course of the creator...it only spins the created against each other.
Notice also that you used VS (circular) and LINE (linear) in the same sentence...that represents you sustaining the contradiction within self, while perpetuating it outwards towards others.
Allow me to rephrase, the free will of the creation turns itself on the Creator, if it chooses to, it can also turn itself to the Creator, by free will of choice.
TO implies "towards"...that's creator giving allowance towards being. ME implies being taking possession over self, while being given allowance to be.
Notice that asking for allowance among beings turns into a conflict (allow vs deny). Asking makes answers optional, while distracting from primary origin of choice being given.
Drawing a circle tempts ones perception to look inwards at suggested information held onto.
turn itself
SELF implies the line moving through being, hence representing the shared value of all moving through each one aka the soul/sole.
IT implies being taking a measurement into possession, which contradicts the line into a circle. Notice also that IT neuters sexual division (he + she) and that she implies S(plit)HE aka an internal split of a line aka he moving through she to generate off-spring.
TURN/tere - "to rub"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*tere-#etymonline_v_52779 hence the conflict when establishing contradictions by shaping circles (reason) within a line (implication) and why rubbing applied to anointment establishes anti-christ.
the free will of the creation
Free will of CHOICE in-between the created balance.
creation
Crea/ker (to grow) + tion (action)...action cannot grow; only each divided reaction in-between growth/loss wields the free will of choice to grow or fail to do so.
God delineates (Creator towards creation)...ad (against) verse (to turn) implies creation vs creation.
Only within a line can a circle be shaped.
I think it fell more into a creation vs Creator story line.
Turning from the creator doesn't change the course of the creator...it only spins the created against each other.
Notice also that you used VS (circular) and LINE (linear) in the same sentence...that represents you sustaining the contradiction within self, while perpetuating it outwards towards others.
Allow me to rephrase, the free will of the creation turns itself on the Creator, if it chooses to, it can also turn itself to the Creator, by free will of choice.
TO implies "towards"...that's creator giving allowance towards being. ME implies being taking possession over self, while being given allowance to be.
Notice that asking for allowance among beings turns into a conflict (allow vs deny). Asking makes answers optional, while distracting from primary origin of choice being given.
OnWARD + toWARD implies ward/wer - "to perceive; watch out for"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/ward
Drawing a circle tempts ones perception to look inwards at suggested information held onto.
SELF implies the line moving through being, hence representing the shared value of all moving through each one aka the soul/sole.
IT implies being taking a measurement into possession, which contradicts the line into a circle. Notice also that IT neuters sexual division (he + she) and that she implies S(plit)HE aka an internal split of a line aka he moving through she to generate off-spring.
TURN/tere - "to rub"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*tere-#etymonline_v_52779 hence the conflict when establishing contradictions by shaping circles (reason) within a line (implication) and why rubbing applied to anointment establishes anti-christ.
Free will of CHOICE in-between the created balance.
Crea/ker (to grow) + tion (action)...action cannot grow; only each divided reaction in-between growth/loss wields the free will of choice to grow or fail to do so.