Free will of choice operates within balance aka in-between extremes. Choosing to hold onto either side encircles choice, while establishing measurable degrees.
Few shape issues to tempt many into consensus (360 degree) and reason (180 degree vs 180 degree), which is how few control 360 degree by measuring the offset (counterbalance).
Furthermore...setting an issue/exire - "exit; to go out" at the center of counterbalance establishes a way out for those setting the issue within.
Example: "vaccine skepticism"...while the cattle (vacca) reflect (skeptic) against each other; the farmer (pharma) utilizes the suggested -ism as the way out (issue). The -ism represents a consensus aka enclosure for the cattle being farmed.
Free will of choice operates within balance aka in-between extremes. Choosing to hold onto either side encircles choice, while establishing measurable degrees.
Few shape issues to tempt many into consensus (360 degree) and reason (180 degree vs 180 degree), which is how few control 360 degree by measuring the offset (counterbalance).
Furthermore...setting an issue/exire - "exit; to go out" at the center of counterbalance establishes a way out for those setting the issue within.
Example: "vaccine skepticism"...while the cattle (vacca) reflect (skeptic) against each other; the farmer (pharma) utilizes the suggested -ism as the way out (issue). The -ism represents a consensus aka enclosure for the cattle being farmed.