Nail this fucking thing with more shit where it fucks up.
a) nature implies continuous motion...trying to "nail" artificial distracts everyone consenting to the artificial (AI) from natural.
b) finding flaws within a system designed to exploit the flawed improves it.
The price of...
Ongoing value of nature (inception towards death) generates temporary evaluation within (life)...others suggest "prices" to tempt one to ignore that evaluation implies ones "free" will of choice.
scientist created
a) -ist implies consent to -ism; hence an order follower.
b) science (Latin scio; to know) implies perceivable...not suggested scientism by others.
c) one cannot create within perceivable; only transmute out of; within and in response to perceivable...others suggest creationism (implies out of nothing) to tempt one to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies within everything).
interchanging
Internal (life) implies within change (inception towards death). Any inside implies within a moving outside.
the first
Suggested THE-ism implies that the one suggesting came first and the one consenting second.
modular body
MOD'ULATE, verb (Latin modulor, modus, limit, measure.] - "to form sound to a proportion"...being a person (Latin per sonos) implies formed by flowing sound aka measure (choice) within limit (balance).
PROPORTION, noun [Latin proportio; pro and portio, part or share.] aka being partial (life) within whole (inception towards death)...sharing existence among all other partials.
tl;dr...Neil deGrasse Tyson: "This is Gravity...micdrop".
https://genius.com/Dion-the-wanderer-lyrics (dionysus)
it is not...The jews,™ or the US doing this; it is a global obsession with equality...
- tikkun olam - "healing the world by bringing together"
- e pluribus unum - "out of many; one"
Aka U(jew)S equality foundation.
good at controlling
Being moved from inception towards death represents a controlled environment for life...if control represents "good"; then why does life need to resist control to sustain self?
controlling everything
What if everything (whole) controls everyone (partial) within; which in return offers each one free will of choice to pretend to control other ones?
the jews
a) what if ones consent to suggested THE-ism puts oneself under authority of others?
b) what if "the jews" (suggested pluralism) tempts each chosen one (perceivable singularity) to ignore self?
true master race
RACE, noun [Latin radix; radius; ray radiate etc.] implies growth...what if ones consent to suggested conflicts of reason (true vs false + master vs slave) tempts one to ignore growing resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death)?
maybe
MAY, verb - "to have physical power; to be able".
Being implies may...others suggest "maybe" to tempt one to consider being something else, while ignore being.
a bot
What would make me human in your eyes? Conformity to social norms? Behaving like everyone else? Not standing out? Waggle my tail on social cues like one is suppose to?
It's
If "alltheleavesarebrown" could define what is, then I couldn't sit in the shadow of a tree; full of green leaves right now...
Anyway...everything was perceivable; before anyone can suggest what it is.
are you on shrooms?
a) MUSHROOM; verb - "expand or increase rapidly"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/mushroom#etymonline_v_45168
What does rapid growth imply? Being alive!
b) Psilocybin represents a chemical compound; while what I'm writing about implies alchemical apartheid. The former tempts one into a lucid state of mind; while the latter represents ones struggle with an ambiguous state of mind, hence both lacking discernment and having the opportunity to grow discernment.
LUCID (Latin lux; light)...being within light implies separated in-between black/white boundaries; while experiencing spectrum of color. A lucid state of mind tempts one to ignore that perceivable spectrum and others tempts one into black vs white conflicts, while utilizing color-revolutions (right now rainbow) to keep one ignorant.
be honest
a) HON'EST, adjective - "according to justice or moral principles"...perceivable inspiration represents that which "just is" (justice); while others tempt one with suggested information to ignore it.
b) suggested moralism tempts one to follow rules of behavior by others; while ignoring to be free will of choice; hence being able to freely adapt to perceivable origin.
c) MORAL (Latin mos) implies ones disposition in plural; hence mores; manners; morals etc. The deception...being "one" implies singularity. Others suggest pluralism to tempt one to ignore self.
From a different perspective...choice can only exist within balance, hence each ones free will of choice representing center (reacting choice) of surrounding (enacting balance)...the suggested choices by others tempt one to imbalance self when consenting to ignore perceivable balance for suggested choices.
tl; dr...I'm neither into substance abuse; nor can I change the perspective of those who choose to view reality through the lens of a honest vs dishonest conflict.
reasonable logic
a) reasoning implies logic (logos; word) aka contention of words (debate)
b) logic vs illogic represents wanting vs not wanting the suggested information (words) by others.
c) nature uses implication (if/then); while those within represent the free will of choice to ignore it for reason. In other words...PATHOS implies; LOGOS tempts reasoning.
- DEBATE, noun - "contention in words"
Contention about suggested words tempts one to ignore affection within perceivable sound.
English actors
a) being directed by Hollywood implies "reacting"...not acting.
c) english aka anglo aka angle...notice that the english language is based on angles.
all of society is (flooded with glowies)
Nature sets itself apart (life) through flow (inception towards death)...society represents suggested collectivism, hence tempts consenting partials to feel flooded. Furthermore...those who suggest -isms collect those who consent, hence few being able to shine a light upon the ignorance of the collected many.
some random asking leading questions
Social media implies ones consent to suggested collectivism (social) and the ones suggesting as the middle (medius; media) men in-between perceivable whole and each perceiving partial.
Random (motion without direction) represents the state of mind by those ignoring perceivable origin for suggested questions (implies quest towards outcome aka progressivism), hence following leaders.
live to group
Living isn't a group effort; it represents each ones struggle to sustain self.
INSTANT (now, of the moment, within current; pressing) -GRAM (that which is written or marked)...latter (suggested) tempts one to ignore former (perceivable).
- SEX (Latin seco; to divide) + CARD (Latin cartha; carta; map; to draw or delineate).
a) lineal (inception towards death) delineates by division (life) of whole into partial.
b) PLAN (representation of anything drawn on a plane) + PARENT (pere; to produce, bring forth) + HOOD (to cover)
c) minor attracted person (MAP)
become the center...
a) center can only exist within surrounding
b) if suggested information can only exist within center of surrounding inspiration, then "INTEL INSIDE"...
c) INTEL aka INTEL'LIGENCE, noun [Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand) refers to each one choosing to "stand under" what chosen ones are suggesting.
d) if "intel" represents the many, then the few utilize the ignorance of the many about self, by wearing "intel" as a mask aka "wolf in sheep's clothing"...same trick as jew (phonectic YOU).
Edit...suggested "become the center" tempts one to ignore perceivable "coming to be center"...
Consider news during covid...endless suggested warnings for how much perceivable danger?
"Hello, my name is Jimmy Pop and I'm a dumb white guy"
Jimmy Pop; born Richard Lee Franks is of German and Native American heritage, with jewish ancestry...
a) regurgitation diminishes aka CONSUMPTION (destruction by burning, eating, devouring, scattering, dissipation, slow decay; waste).
b) resisting improves resistance...
a) what can one hold in possession (tenure) while being (life) moved (inception towards death)?
b) what if life itself needs to be let go, while being tempted to want to hold onto?
c) how could one resist temptations when burdening self by holding onto? Does holding onto make resistance easier or harder? Notice that living implies getting older, hence requiring more resistance to sustain self...
a) what about the few who suggest labels such as "CEO" to the consenting many? Who could sack those?
b) look at this shit: https://img.gvid.tv/i/LTy2kL91.png Imagine the mental management required to handle all those abbreviations...
c) why is it called "alphabet agencies"? Alphabet aka ABC aka abecedary aka "ABraCaDabra"...spell-craft.
why people believe in... spiritual
a) SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe)...does breathing require one to believe? Why and believe what?
b) could ones belief (want) vs disbelief (not want) towards suggested outcomes distract one from breathing aka adaptation (need) to perceivable origin?
Remember "I can't breathe" leading to death...followed by "put a mask over your mouth and nose"? Spiritual warfare?
There is no any problem with free will definition
a) consider being PHONETICIAN (from phonics; sound) or DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one who adapts to perceivable sound or ignores it?
b) can you give me a definition for "no"? What defines nothing?
c) DEFINITE (having certain limits) -TION (action)...explain the limitation of action?
Can you interact with any of the above without utilizing free will "of choice"?
ability to create completely new
a) CREATION (the act of causing to exist) aka something out of nothing. How could one create without reacting to surrounding to create within?
What if being within (center) implies in response to (surrounding)? Wouldn't that imply perceivable transmutation (out of everything) instead of suggested creationism (out of nothing)?
b) can you show me something complete that isn't in the process of falling apart? How could a partial aka "one among other ones" with free will, create anything complete? If it's complete; then there couldn't exist anything besides it...
c) "new, néwos, now"...what if others suggest "new" to tempt one to ignore perceivable "now"? Can one shape anything "new" without shaping it out of everything existing "now"?
cause-effect chains
Motion represents the cause (ongoing action) which chains every effect within (temporary reaction) aka CHAIN (fitted into one another; that which binds).
Choice is bound to balance (momentum) through motion...
infinite number
a) NUM'BER (designation of a unit) + UNIT (Latin unus; one)...aka finite ones (partials) within infinite oneness (whole).
b) others suggest counting to distract one from that; which when consented to, shapes other ones into the counting ones accountants.
take the problem of free will...
a) PROB'LEM, noun (Latin problema; pello) - "to throw forward"...discerning self as being (life) thrown forwards (inception towards death) implies being problem (temporary growth) within solution (ongoing loss). Suggested "problem" tempts one to ignore perceivable solution.
b) suggested "free will" tempts one to ignore perceivable "free will of choice"...hence tricking one by choice of consent to towards choice of suggestion to ignore "of choice".
c) FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies within need) OF (implies out of; hence within) CHOICE (implies within balance).
d) being problem (living) within solution (process of dying) implies want to hold onto (temptation) within need to let go (adaptation), which in return implies ones response-ability aka free will of choice.
e) choice can only exist at the center of surrounding balance, while balance can only exist within motion. Therefore...balance represents momentum of motion; while simultaneously representing perceivable moment (um) for ones choice within.
"free" will of choice within "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom aka free (life) within dom (inception towards death).
From "bottom bitch" to "top dog" with a suggested label (CEO)...that's how a few tempt many to ignore KNOWLEDGE (perception of that which exists).
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
- CHIEF (highest in Office)
- EXECUTE (Latin exequor; to follow)
- OFFICER (authorized to perform)
a) who; what and why does the highest follow?
b) if lowest authorizes highest to lead; then why the executive (following) position?
a) SCIENCE (Latin scio; to know) + METHOD (Latin methodus; Gr. with, and way)...aka able to perceive (scio) while alive within (meta) way of being moved from inception towards death (hodos).
b) base of being able (reaction) implies enabling (action).
c) different repetitions (life) within same result (inception towards death).
d) the trick...using the scientific method to suggest what "is" tempts one (meta) to ignore what (hodos) "was" perceivable (scio) before any suggestion could be shaped.
a) difference (life) within sameness (inception towards death) can only grow comprehension of sameness; not actually perceive it aka while being alive; one cannot perceive ones inception or death.
b) others suggest sameness (equality) to tempt one to ignore or even attack differences (diversity)...hence being domesticated to behave "alike".
c) only within ongoing -TION (action) can one temporary OPERA (reactionary effort)...
d) consider the following contradiction: RESULT; verb - "to spring forward" + RESULT; noun - "to leap back... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=result
What's the difference between being the reacting "verb" choosing to spring forwards or choosing to consent to a suggested "noun", while leaping backwards? Can one discern that?
Being implies unfolding (temporary growth of life) within conclusion (ongoing loss through process of dying)...others suggest SAFE (free from danger) as the inversion of being free within danger aka free will of choice within the balance (momentum) of motion.
Being implies variable (choice) within static (balance) of motion.
a) trust represents ones consent to the suggestions by others...scientism (science); nihilism (can not) and pluralism (we).
b) science (scio; knowledge; perceivable) isn't trust based; one (singular) cannot be plural (we) and everything perceivable implies that one can perceive.
a) try responding (re) by thinking as partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)...instead of reasoning over the suggestions by others, like "old-time"
b) MAGIC (art of influencing) from root MAGH (to be able)...is one able to discern between artificial (suggested information) and natural (perceivable inspiration)...if so; then utilizing former to tempt others to ignore latter represents magic.
Sleight of hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouLXZuh5O6Q ("the moment I gazed into your eyes...you made me believe in magic")