How do you explain the NPC mindset?
a) choosing to not play within reality (perceivable) tempts one to be played through fiction (suggested).
b) each mind/memory implies a setting within motion; hence being able to receive input...choosing to hold onto suggested input (information) tempts one to ignore letting go of perceivable input (inspiration).
The more one holds onto; the less compatible one becomes within a moving system.
c) plain (inception towards death) generates expression (life)...suggesting explanations to others tempts them to repress self under others; while ignoring to express self.
defined by their worldview
a) DEFINE, verb (Latin; to end, to limit, from finis, end.)...does that sound like a world viewed through the eyes of life?
b) adapting to perceivable sound implies PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound); while ignoring it for suggested definitions (words) represents DEAF PHONETICIANS.
In other words...if one consents to be limited by definitions from others; then one willingly limits ones life.
c) one views a world of perceivable sound...others slap suggested words onto it to tempt one to limit self by ignoring sound. These words/brands/labels/idols are being attached within ones mind/memory by ones consent to hold onto them...
understood as a “spirit”
SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe) implies ones adaptation to being moved aka resistance (exhale) within velocity (inhale)...consenting to "stand under" (understand) the suggestions of others tempts one to ignore resisting, hence all the NPC order followers.
In short...understanding implies repression; spirit implies expression.
I am not saying the woke/ NPC people are the “spirit” etc but rather that they are like the vessels by which it images itself into the world
Vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death) implies adaptation (spirit)...motion generates living reactions; hence animating the breath of life.
collective consciousness
Nature sets itself apart; hence from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving)...others suggest collectivism to tempt partials to hold onto each other (commune-ism; social-ism; global-ism; multicultural-ism etc.)
Being conscious implies ones awareness of other ones (moving differences)...this allows one to grow self discernment as partial (different) within momentum of whole (same). It's the momentum of motion which differentiates partials (temporary growth) within whole (ongoing loss).
Momentum divides center (life) from surrounding (inception towards death)...
I’m trying to get at the root of the ideas themselves...
The issue with that....idealism is being suggested by others; hence your struggle to "understand" what others are suggesting. What this behavior tempts you to ignore is being seed (perceiving) within soil (perceivable); able to grow roots of comprehension...which requires you to resist the suggestions by others.
expressed itself against the “Christian” culture
a) consenting to suggested LOGOS (word) tempts one into LOGIC aka a conflict of reason over suggested. That represents the foundation for ones mind set "against" others.
b) perceivable communicates implication (if/then); suggested tempts one into reason (want vs not want; true vs false; belief vs disbelief; good vs evil; us vs them; coke vs pepsi etc.).
Normies around me
- NOR'MAL, adjective [Latin a square, a rule.] - "perpendicular; forming a right angle"
a) oneself represents center (perceiving) of surrounding (perceivable)...others suggest norms to tempt one to hold onto; which establishes a perpendicular intersection.
b) being center (life) of surrounding (inception towards death) implies a balance/level/horizontal foundation (loss) for choice/changing/vertical (growth) existence.
c) suggested norms rule those who consent to them.
d) choice requires balance...others suggest SQUARE, adjective - "parallel; even; leaving no balance" as the inversion thereof.
e) being alive; while being moved from inception towards death; represents parallel to those who ignore resisting.
f) the few suggest parallelism aka PAR'ALLEL, adjective (Gr. against or opposite) to tempt the many to ignore being curvature (temporary growth) within linear (ongoing loss).
Did I miss something?
Consenting to anything suggested tempts one to miss (ignore) everything perceivable...
Wasn't there a medieval-ish warm period where Vikings farmed greenland and grapes grew in England? Wouldn't that have been a hotter global temperature?
Look into "hello" aka HEL (helsinki) O (odenma) aka the former north-pole...
The entire amendment process is a joke.
AMEND (Latin emendo; a fault) + MENT (Latin mentis; mind/memory)...what if that fault exists within ones mind/memory instead of the suggested amendments by others?
Constitutional Conservative
Does constitution (inception towards death) conserve the life within? What does ones need to breathe; drink; eat and shelter imply for conservation?
What is it that constitutes (enacts; establishes) all life? Can the constitution of being be canceled?
Suggested DRUG (to dry) tempts one to ignore being a vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death); hence depending on liquidity.
a) person aka PER SONOS (by sound)
b) being by sound (per sonos) implies being within sound (in sanus)...others suggest "insane person" to tempt one to ignore this.
c) if sound represents whole (oneness) then those within represent partials (ones)...others suggest counting (collectivism) to tempt one to ignore self for others.
d) if one consents to the suggestions of another one; then that represents the foundation for dualism.
e) if one ignores perceivable (need) for suggested (want); then one shapes a conflict of reason (want vs not want) among all those consenting over the suggestion of one outside the conflict....this represents the foundation for trinitarianism.
f) NAME (Latin nombre; number) - "the designation of a unit" aka UNIT (Latin unus) - "one". Nature divides itself from whole (loss) into each partial (growth); hence a designation of same whole into each different unit.
Take any "two" things and allow yourself to notice that being able to discern between these "two" implies each "one" to be different than "one" another.
For one to be implies at a different position than every other one...others suggest two to tempt one to ignore self.
COUNT, verb - "to number; to tell or name one by one"...if one counts what another one suggests; then the other becomes ones ACCOUNT'ANT, noun - "a registry of a debt or credit". Ones consent; belief; faith; creed...represents the credit others gain power over.
graphē ágios” VS “logos ho theos”
a) "vs" implies reasoning (logic) against others over suggested (words); while ignoring perceivable (sound).
b) ágios (saint; divinely inspired) implies division (being able to perceive) within inspiration (perceivable), hence status quo for being.
Suggested "divine" tempts one to ignore perceivable "divide"; hence being one aka internal division of whole (inception toward death) into partials (life).
Consenting to the suggested "words" tempts one into a conflict of reason about the suggested meaning thereof; hence into a divide against one another, which tempts one to ignore the perceivable divide of oneness (whole) into ones (partials). Partials aren't in conflict with whole...only with other partials if ignoring whole.
sound doctrine
Suggested doctrine aka dogma (settled opinion) tempts one to ignore perceivable "flow" of ongoing sound. Being alive while being moved from inception towards death implies a changing existence...choosing to ignore this represents settlement aka a mind settled on suggested information; while ignoring perceivable inspiration.
Scripture only has authority because it comes from God
a) those who consent to "in nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti" are ignoring "patris et filii et spiritus sancti" for those who suggest scriptures in the name of (in nomine).
This represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew)...bound by spell-craft.
b) nature doesn't offer words; it communicates perceivable sound...those within shape suggestible words to distract each other from perceivable sound.
c) those who adapt to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound); while those who ignore it for word based definitions represents DEAF PHONETICIANS.
d) suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable implications of being "in sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound). That's how spell-craft works...
Understanding...will help to know
a) if free "will" of choice consents to "stand under" (understand) suggested; then it willingly ignores growing comprehension within KNOWL'EDGE, noun - " perception of that which exists".
b) HELP, verb - "to aid; assist"...choice (reaction) can only exist within balance (action); hence action (surrounding) aiding/assisting reactions (center) aka being center (life) of surrounding (inception towards death) aka perceiving center within perceivable surrounding etc.
c) FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies within need) OF (implies out of) CHOICE (implies within balance).
Others suggest "free will" to tempt one to ignore "free will of choice"...Why? Because consent by choice to suggestions by choice of others tempts one to submit choice to others.
"free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom aka free (life) within dom (inception towards death).
the energy....can be interacted with
a) ENERGY (Greek work; internal/inherent power)
b) INTER (being within) ACT (action) implies as the internal reaction within external action of energy aka power of temporary growth within power of ongoing loss.
c) all represents one in energy aka "all for one and one for all" aka "there can be only one" aka "alone...all(in)one" etc.
...is not of the same essence
a) same essence (inception towards death) generates different substances (life).
b) only within perceivable "everything" can one shape suggestible "nothing". Everything "was" perceivable before one can suggest what "is not" to others.
a collection
Nature sets apart (inception) before collecting (death)...others suggest apartheid (life) within wholeness (inception towards death) to come together (collectivism); hence ignoring to sustain apartheid by struggling within wholeness.
E pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka united states; united nations; european union; uniformity; university; unicode; unicef; universal basic income aka mass migration; miscegenation; melting pot aka compound interest aka merge and acquisition aka wholesale over retail etc.
Suggested "together" aka "towards getting" tempts one to ignore being growth (life) within loss (inception towards death)...each one (perceiving) already got access to everything (perceivable).
-
GRETCHEN; from GRETA; from MAGARET (pearl); from Iranian MRGA-ARHI-ITA - "born from the shell of a bird"; hence VOGEL (German bird).
-
JENNIFER; from Welsh GWENHWYVAR aka GWEN (fair; white) and GWYF (smooth; yielding) + FRANK - "free, liberal, generous, outspoken".
Inception towards death aka each ones life-line. How to distract from that? By suggesting on-line; in-line; air-line; the-line...
they give us a higher perspective.
a) ones perspective implies as center (being able to perceive) of surrounding (everything perceivable). Ones consent to any suggestions by others tempts one to view perceivable through the lens of suggested; hence giving others the power of ones consent to define; redefine and contradict ones perspective.
b) only center (choice) can experience high/low (balance); others suggest high vs low (imbalance) to tempt one from center towards surrounding side.
drugs
Others suggest DRUG (dry) to tempt one to ignore being form (life) within flow (inception towards death); hence always wet aka in need of liquid (spirit; thirst; hunger) to sustain form within flow.
psychedelic
a) suggested DELIC'ERE (to allure, entice) tempts one to ignore perceivable PSYCHE (spirit).
b) perceiving partial (life) needs to adapt to perceivable whole (inception towards death); while resisting suggested temptations. Foundation for adaptation implies breathing (Latin spiro; spirit; to breathe), hence reacting as partial (expression aka exhale) within an enacting whole (impressing aka inhale).
centralized power
Being partial (life) within whole (inception towards death) implies as center (perceiving) of surrounding (perceivable)...others suggest "centralized power" to tempt one to consent by the power of ones free will of choice to destabilize self through ignorance.
etymological challenge
One is being tempted by others to ignore perceivable sound (etymo) for suggested words (logic)...the challenge represents ones inner struggle to resist outside temptations.
Give me the real origin of...
a) suggesting others to give tempts one to ignore already having access (perceiving) to everything (perceivable) given.
b) GIVE, verb (Heb. to give; to pass; to transfer; to send)...being passed from inception towards death implies given a passage of life; a transfer (transmutation) from whole to partial; a send off (inception of off-spring) to return to sender (death).
c) real vs fake represents reasoning over suggested words; while ignoring to adapt to perceivable sound.
d) only within energy (internal/inherent power) can one (life) experience origin (inception) and outcome (death), hence being internal (life) within external (inception towards death).
will donate to a cause
Cause (balance) donates will (choice)...will is tempted to keep self from cause, hence will representing want in ignorance of need.
FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies within need) OF (implies out of) CHOICE (implies within balance).
Tetragrammaton
a) if perceiving one ignores perceivable oneness suggestions by other ones; then that represents dualism. Ones consent to the suggestions of others tempts one into a conflict of reason against others over the suggestion by a third party...that represents trinitarianism. Choosing want (suggested) over need (perceivable) tempts one to want more...
One wanting from two; while fighting over three to gain four...
b) COUNT, verb - "to number; to tell or name one by one for ascertaining the whole number of units in a collection"
Nature doesn't collect together; it sets (inception towards death) units (life) apart from one another, and whole for each partial one within implies oneness....not two; three; four.
Others suggest one to count, which tempts one to consent to ACCOUNT', noun - "a registry of a debt or credit"; hence putting oneself in debt to others by credit (creed; belief; faith; consent).
The few represent the accountants of the counting many...if each one of the many ignores self by counting others; then those who resist counting become the chosen ONES of the ignorant ones who chose others.
c) TETRA (four) GRAMMA (suggested words) TONE (perceivable sound)...a person (per sonos aka by sound) needs to "atone" to be within accordance to perceivable sound, hence needing to resist the SIN (syn aka synchrony) of consenting to suggested words (grammatica).
d) consider breathing aka inhale belly (1) chest (2) lung (3) to exhale (4)...now do inhale belly (Y) chest (H) lung (W) and exhale (H). Notice that letters represent suggested incantations within perceivable tone...
e) notice that TE-TRA-GRA-MA-TON represents a contradiction (five) in terms (four)...hence keeping ones mind enchanted with continuous increase of suggested numbers.
Simply resist dualism aka wanting vs not wanting what another "one" suggests...and numbers lose power over one-self.
uniform
E pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka united states; united nations; european union; university; unicode; UNIFORMITY; universal basic income etc.
Nature sets apart; those within tempt each other together as to destroy apartheid.
will all wear a uniform
a) "all for one (uni; unus; one) and one for all" aka "there can be only one" aka "all(in)one" (alone) aka all represents one in energy.
b) each uni (one) form wears will (free will of choice) within momentum (balance) of all motion (flow).
their own set of beliefs
Can you write down an example of a belief that one didn't got by consenting to the suggestions of others?
for the poster by the poster
What about this?
- About free-will-of-choice...Post Score (0) Comment Score (10063)
useless input
a) does nature as a whole offer "useless input" to partials within?
b) what if life represents temporary input; used by ongoing motion (inception towards death)?
c) what if suggested "useless" tempts one to ignore being lesser (perceiving) used within whole (perceivable)?
This place has weird Lines
a) ones life represents one line...inception towards death.
b) suggested lines tempt one to confine self when consenting.
c) "this place" represents your consent to the suggestion of it.
I wonder....why these lines in the sand?
a) just like you choose to wonder; so do others choose to draw lines in the sand, hence temporary confining self by consenting (want or not want) to what others are suggesting.
b) want versus not want represents ones mind confined within a conflict of reason about the suggestion of another.
c) reasoning about suggested implies ignoring perceivable, hence drawing suggested lines within the perceivable line. Those lines cannot be held for long.
topics
a) suggesting a TOPic tempts others to submit underneath it, hence giving the one suggesting a position above the TOP.
b) TOP'IC, noun - "principle of persuasion"...if others don't comment upon ones suggested topic; then that implies ones lack of persuasive skills.
never...never...never...
Aka "not-ever" aka "nothing-everything"...a deliberate contradiction in terms.
no...never...never...never...nothing...not.
Why is it so easy for one; especially when talking about others; to utilize "nothing" as the suggested foundation for whatever one is talking about?
Please don't read, and/or, reply to anything that I post.
I adapt to perceivable inspiration; while resisting suggested information (names; pleading; restrictions; favors; gratitude; insults etc.)
You probably GLOW more than anyone I know on this SUBWIN
a) within light one can either shine (need) or dim self (want)...free will of choice.
b) KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...not judging the suggestions by others.
c) what's the implication for ones SUBmission to WIN what others are suggesting?
d) let's assume glownigger...Where do I incite? What do I protect? (gatekeep) Who am I not allowed to question? What orders am I following? How do I keep others down; hence maintaining the high-ground? What am I used to distract from? Which tools am I utilizing to sustain what narratives for whose benefits? Whose paying for my donuts/bagels? Does the one standing out seem to fit in with uniform-behavior?
why so much talk
a) if perceivable sound goes on; then those who suggest words have to mimic ongoing (sound) with an onslaught of temporary (words).
b) being implies resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death)...resisting implies frequency of adaptation by ones free will of choice...this frequency can be diverted with suggested information.
In other words...if the many ignore need (perceivable) for want (suggested); then they keep wanting more from the few suggesting it. That represents ones frequency of choosing to fall for temptation.
submarine
a) ignoring perceivable law (land; air; water) tempts one to SUB-mit to MARI-time Admiralty Law aka piracy.
b) being implies as form (life) within flow (inception towards death); hence enclosed (momentum aka balance) as a vessel (choice) underwater (motion).
that buzz word " implosion"
a) how to distract explosion (life aka growth) from implosion (inception towards death aka loss)? Suggest lots of "boom" to tempt one to be afraid of expressions, and utilize ones (center) fear of surrounding by suggesting that there can be a "hole in one" aka "black hole" aka an implosion sucking one in.
b) transmutation of form within flow implies flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka explosion (life) in (inception) and out (death) of implosion.
c) BUZZ, verb - "to whisper; to spread, as report" aka suggested information tempting one to consent, while ignoring to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
a) asking about danger, while looking at massive explosions; within a video where "fuck" is censored, because words hurt...
b) inception towards death implies implosion; while life in-between represents explosion. Explosion (growth within energy) can only exist within implosion (loss within energy). Ongoing motion generates momentum for everything temporary within.
c) energy (Greek; work) - "Internal/inherent power" utilizes motion to transport surrounding energy (velocity) towards center energy (resistance).
Breathing implies resisting force (exhale) adapting to incoming force (inhale)...this allows compression.
a) suggested AID (to support) & ABET (to push forwards) tempts one to ignore that forwards push (inception towards death) supports being (life)...if not ignored.
b) ones consent to suggestions by others shapes others into assistance to ones suicide.
effect that makes a symbol affect reality
a) reality implies perceivable symmetry; others suggest fictitious symbolism to distract from that.
b) asymmetric (life) within symmetric (inception towards death) aka uneven (choice) within even (balance); hence choice struggling with imbalance (want vs not want) while balancing (need/want).
Others tempt one with want (suggested) to ignore need (perceivable)...falling for such a temptation represents each ones free will of choice.
c) real aka RE (ones response to) AL (all offered) aka being effect within cause. The suggestions by others affect ones effectiveness within cause if consented to.
Hence "all" (whole) and each "one" (partials) within; for all represents one in energy aka "al-one"...all(in)one.
It's suggested Greek; Latin; English etc. (words) which distracts one from perceivable phonetic (sound). Words carry definitions (definire; to limit); while sound carries infinite (perceivable) towards finite (perceiving)...an unlimited offer.
Those adapting to sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound); while those who ignore sound for words represent DEAF PHONETICIANS (definitions).
Pathologic aka PATHOS (path of perceivable sound) or LOGIC/LOGOS (reasoning about suggested words)...ones free will of choice between need (perceivable sound) or want (suggested words).
A sleight of hand for use of perceivable sound to "cut right through" suggested words others "say; no matter if it's true or not"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oydpekP3F8w
alien 124: "are aliens causing...?"
Ask yourself.
causing
Energy (Greek work) - "internal/inherent power" implies cause (action) & effect (reaction) in balance with each other. Being effect (life) implies being enacted upon within a moving system (inception towards death).
In short...cause implies motion; effect represents ones responses to being moved.
alien
ALIEN (Latin alius; another)...being one (partial within whole) implies being surrounded by "other" ones. Unless looking into a mirror...one can only see aliens (others).
ache
ACHE - "to be pressed"...being implies expression (living) within impressing (process of dying). Ignoring perceivable for the suggestions by others tempts one to repress self by consenting to be oppressed by others...such behavior is ache-inducing.
As for headaches...learn/teach oneself about the need to let go of what one wants to hold onto. For example blaming surrounding for pressure felt within center; prevents center from growing resistance within surrounding.
"Express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature"...
suspect about drug legalization
a) DRUG; noun (Dutch droge) - "dry"...being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies liquidity. Others tempt one with suggested dryness (drugs) to ignore that; while also controlling artificial liquidity (money).
b) PHARMAKEIA; noun (Hebrew φαρμακεία, ας, ἡ) - "use of medicine, drugs or spells for magic, sorcery, enchantment; administer drugs for drug-related sorcery".
... tempts one to ignore resisting (inception towards death) to prolong (life).
Being implies within (life) source (inception towards death).
Being implies regent (temporary growth) within agent (ongoing loss) aka reaction (choice) within action (balance aka momentum of motion).
Others suggest "actors" under directors to tempt one to ignore being reactor (life) within direction (inception towards death), which when discerned would imply being reactors (growth) within generator (loss).
How to shut reactors down? By tempting them to mimic actors...