a) "vs" implies reasoning (logic) against others over suggested (words); while ignoring perceivable (sound).
b) ágios (saint; divinely inspired) implies division (being able to perceive) within inspiration (perceivable), hence status quo for being.
Suggested "divine" tempts one to ignore perceivable "divide"; hence being one aka internal division of whole (inception toward death) into partials (life).
Consenting to the suggested "words" tempts one into a conflict of reason about the suggested meaning thereof; hence into a divide against one another, which tempts one to ignore the perceivable divide of oneness (whole) into ones (partials). Partials aren't in conflict with whole...only with other partials if ignoring whole.
sound doctrine
Suggested doctrine aka dogma (settled opinion) tempts one to ignore perceivable "flow" of ongoing sound. Being alive while being moved from inception towards death implies a changing existence...choosing to ignore this represents settlement aka a mind settled on suggested information; while ignoring perceivable inspiration.
Scripture only has authority because it comes from God
a) those who consent to "in nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti" are ignoring "patris et filii et spiritus sancti" for those who suggest scriptures in the name of (in nomine).
This represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew)...bound by spell-craft.
b) nature doesn't offer words; it communicates perceivable sound...those within shape suggestible words to distract each other from perceivable sound.
c) those who adapt to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound); while those who ignore it for word based definitions represents DEAF PHONETICIANS.
d) suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable implications of being "in sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound). That's how spell-craft works...
Understanding...will help to know
a) if free "will" of choice consents to "stand under" (understand) suggested; then it willingly ignores growing comprehension within KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "
perception of that which exists".
b) HELP, verb - "to aid; assist"...choice (reaction) can only exist within balance (action); hence action (surrounding) aiding/assisting reactions (center) aka being center (life) of surrounding (inception towards death) aka perceiving center within perceivable surrounding etc.
c) FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies within need) OF (implies out of) CHOICE (implies within balance).
Others suggest "free will" to tempt one to ignore "free will of choice"...Why? Because consent by choice to suggestions by choice of others tempts one to submit choice to others.
"free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom aka free (life) within dom (inception towards death).
the energy....can be interacted with
a) ENERGY (Greek work; internal/inherent power)
b) INTER (being within) ACT (action) implies as the internal reaction within external action of energy aka power of temporary growth within power of ongoing loss.
c) all represents one in energy aka "all for one and one for all" aka "there can be only one" aka "alone...all(in)one" etc.
...is not of the same essence
a) same essence (inception towards death) generates different substances (life).
b) only within perceivable "everything" can one shape suggestible "nothing". Everything "was" perceivable before one can suggest what "is not" to others.
a collection
Nature sets apart (inception) before collecting (death)...others suggest apartheid (life) within wholeness (inception towards death) to come together (collectivism); hence ignoring to sustain apartheid by struggling within wholeness.
E pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka united states; united nations; european union; uniformity; university; unicode; unicef; universal basic income aka mass migration; miscegenation; melting pot aka compound interest aka merge and acquisition aka wholesale over retail etc.
Suggested "together" aka "towards getting" tempts one to ignore being growth (life) within loss (inception towards death)...each one (perceiving) already got access to everything (perceivable).
a) "vs" implies reasoning (logic) against others over suggested (words); while ignoring perceivable (sound).
b) ágios (saint; divinely inspired) implies division (being able to perceive) within inspiration (perceivable), hence status quo for being.
Suggested "divine" tempts one to ignore perceivable "divide"; hence being one aka internal division of whole (inception toward death) into partials (life).
Consenting to the suggested "words" tempts one into a conflict of reason about the suggested meaning thereof; hence into a divide against one another, which tempts one to ignore the perceivable divide of oneness (whole) into ones (partials). Partials aren't in conflict with whole...only with other partials if ignoring whole.
Suggested doctrine aka dogma (settled opinion) tempts one to ignore perceivable "flow" of ongoing sound. Being alive while being moved from inception towards death implies a changing existence...choosing to ignore this represents settlement aka a mind settled on suggested information; while ignoring perceivable inspiration.
a) those who consent to "in nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti" are ignoring "patris et filii et spiritus sancti" for those who suggest scriptures in the name of (in nomine).
This represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew)...bound by spell-craft.
b) nature doesn't offer words; it communicates perceivable sound...those within shape suggestible words to distract each other from perceivable sound.
c) those who adapt to perceivable sound represent PHONETICIANS (from phonics; sound); while those who ignore it for word based definitions represents DEAF PHONETICIANS.
d) suggested "insane person" tempts one to ignore perceivable implications of being "in sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound). That's how spell-craft works...
a) if free "will" of choice consents to "stand under" (understand) suggested; then it willingly ignores growing comprehension within KNOWL'EDGE, noun - " perception of that which exists".
b) HELP, verb - "to aid; assist"...choice (reaction) can only exist within balance (action); hence action (surrounding) aiding/assisting reactions (center) aka being center (life) of surrounding (inception towards death) aka perceiving center within perceivable surrounding etc.
c) FREE (implies within dominance) WILL (aka want implies within need) OF (implies out of) CHOICE (implies within balance).
Others suggest "free will" to tempt one to ignore "free will of choice"...Why? Because consent by choice to suggestions by choice of others tempts one to submit choice to others.
"free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom aka free (life) within dom (inception towards death).
a) ENERGY (Greek work; internal/inherent power)
b) INTER (being within) ACT (action) implies as the internal reaction within external action of energy aka power of temporary growth within power of ongoing loss.
c) all represents one in energy aka "all for one and one for all" aka "there can be only one" aka "alone...all(in)one" etc.
a) same essence (inception towards death) generates different substances (life).
b) only within perceivable "everything" can one shape suggestible "nothing". Everything "was" perceivable before one can suggest what "is not" to others.
Nature sets apart (inception) before collecting (death)...others suggest apartheid (life) within wholeness (inception towards death) to come together (collectivism); hence ignoring to sustain apartheid by struggling within wholeness.
E pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka united states; united nations; european union; uniformity; university; unicode; unicef; universal basic income aka mass migration; miscegenation; melting pot aka compound interest aka merge and acquisition aka wholesale over retail etc.
Suggested "together" aka "towards getting" tempts one to ignore being growth (life) within loss (inception towards death)...each one (perceiving) already got access to everything (perceivable).